Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Discerning Public Participation Requirements Under the US Clean Water Act

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To enhance water quality, environmental groups have challenged regulations that fail to allow them to participate in the development of effluent limitations under US National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. The issue involves shielding applicants’ management plans that show how they plan to minimize pollutant discharges from public scrutiny. The absence of public input may be accompanied by less information about addressing pollution, limited dialogue on alternatives, and fewer enforcement actions. In response to a judicial ruling, the US Environmental Protection Agency issued revised NPDES permitting regulations for concentrated animal feeding operations in 2008. The new regulations clearly delineate an opportunity for public participation in the development of effluent limitations in individual permits and in notices of intent under general permits. Permitting regulations for other categories of point-source discharges under NPDES permits lack similar provisions on public participation. An analysis of public participation in the development of effluent limitations for NPDES permits suggests that the public is not accorded as many rights as Europeans are provided under the Aarhus Convention. Greater access to information and the ability for the public to participate in decision making offer mechanisms that may be important in enhancing water quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beierle TC, Cayford J (2002) Democracy in practice: public participation in environmental decisions. Resources for the Future, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Black ML, Kohler EJ (2004) Diminishing democracy: a review of public participation in Michigan’s environmental decisionmaking. Wayne Law Rev 50(1):219–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Centner TJ (2006) Clarifying NPDES requirements for concentrated animal feeding operations. Penn State Environ Law Rev 14(3):361–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Centner TJ (2008) Courts and the EPA interpret NPDES general permit requirements for CAFOs. Environ Law 38(4):1215–1238

    Google Scholar 

  • CFR—Code of Federal Regulations (2009) Title 40, parts 25, 122–124, 412

  • Colangelo S (2008) Transforming water transfers: the evolution of water transfer case law and the NPDES water transfers proposed rule. Ecol Law Q 35(1):107–142

    Google Scholar 

  • de Muizon P (2005) “Meaningfully distinct” waters, the unitary waters theory, and the Clean Water Act: Miccosukee v. South Florida Water Management District. Ecol Law Q 32(3):417–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Defense Center Inc versus EPA (2003) 344 F3d 832 (9th Circuit Court of Appeals)

  • EPA (2000) Notice of proposed effluent guidelines. Fed Regist 65:37783–37787

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2002) 2000 national water quality inventory, chapters 2 & 3. Office of Water, Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/305b/2000report

  • EPA (2003) National pollutant discharge elimination system permit regulation and effluent limitations guidelines and standards for concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs); final rule. Fed Regist 68:7176–7227

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2008) Revised national pollutant discharge elimination system permit regulation and effluent limitations guidelines and standards for concentrated animal feeding operations in response to the Waterkeeper decision; final rule. Fed Regist 73:70418–70486

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2009a) Authorization status for EPA’s stormwater construction and industrial programs: States, Indian country and territories where EPA’s construction general permit (CGP) and multi-sector general permit (MSGP) apply. http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/authorizationstatus.cfm

  • EPA (2009b) Notice of availability of final NPDES general permits MAG640000 and NHG640000 for discharges from potable water treatment facilities in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (including both Commonwealth and Indian country lands) and the state of New Hampshire: the potable water treatment facility general permit (PWTF GP). Fed Regist 74(190):50964–50965

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaba JM (2007) Generally illegal: NPDES general permits under the Clean Water Act. Harvard Environ Law Rev 31(2):409–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (2009a) LPDES notice of intent (NOI) to discharge stormwater associated with construction activity greater than 5 acres. http://www.deq.louisiana.gov/portal/Portals/0/permits/lpdes/csw-g.pdf

  • Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (2009b) Water discharge permit: stormwater associated with construction (CSW-G). http://wwwprd.doa.louisiana.gov/LaServices/PublicPages/ServiceDetail.cfm?service_id=2358

  • Maryland Department of the Environment (2008) General permit for stormwater associated with construction activity, general NPDES permit number MDR10, state discharge permit number 08GP. http://www.mde.state.md.us/assets/document/permit/2008_InterimGPCA.pdf

  • Maryland Department of the Environment (2009) General permit for stormwater associated with construction activity, NPDES permit number MDR10, state discharge permit number 09-GP. http://www.mde.state.md.us/permits/watermanagementpermits/mdr10.asp

  • Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (2005a) Declaratory ruling number 2005-01. http://www.deq.state.mi.us/documents/deq-oah-Sierra%20Club%20Dec%20Ruling-31-MIG010000-Jun-15-2005.pdf

  • Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (2005b) Large concentrated animal feeding operations general permit, permit number MIG019000. http://www.deq.state.mi.us/documents/deq-water-npdes-generalpermit-MIG019000.pdf

  • Molina JL, Garcia Aróstegui JL, Benavente J et al (2009) Aquifers overexploitation in SE Spain: a proposal for the integrated analysis of water management. Water Resour Manag 23(5):2737–2760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mylopoulos Y, Kolokytha E, Kampragou E et al (2008) A combined methodology for transboundary river basin management in Europe—application in the Nestos–Mesta catchment area. Water Resour Manag 22(8):1101–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protopapas AL (1999) Combined sewer overflow abatement: the east river project. Water Resour Manag 13(2):133–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg JL (2006) Texas Independent Producers and Royalty Owners Association versus EPA: redefining the role of public participation in the Clean Water Act. Ecol Law Q 33(3):699–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierra Club Mackinac Chapter versus Department of Environmental Quality (2008) 747 NW2d 321 (Michigan Court of Appeals)

  • Spyke NP (1999) Public participation in environmental decisionmaking at the new millennium: structuring new spheres of public influence. Boston College Environ Affairs Law Rev 26(2):263–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Steeves M (2002) The EPA’s proposed CAFO regulations fall short of ensuring the integrity of our nation’s waters. J Land Res Environ Law 22(2):367–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai S (2005) Three asymmetries of informed environmental decisionmaking. Temple Law Rev 78(3):659–718

    Google Scholar 

  • Texas Independent Producers and Royalty Owners Association versus EPA (2005) 410 F3d 964 (7th Circuit Court of Appeals)

  • Tyler N (2003) Practical experience of public participation: evidence from methodological experiments. Innovation 16(3):253–270

    Google Scholar 

  • UNECE—United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (1998) Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters. UNECE, Aarhus

  • University of Maryland Environmental Law Clinic (2008) Letter of Jane F Barrett to Maryland Department of the Environment, 31 December

  • US Code (2006) Title 33, sections 1251–1387

  • US Senate Report 92-414 (1971) Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1971, Report of the Committee on Public Works, Title IV—permits and licenses, pp 69–75

  • Vedwan N, Ahmad S, Miralles-Wilhelm F et al (2008) Institutional evolution in Lake Okeechobee management in Florida: characteristics, impacts, and limitations. Water Resour Manag 22(7):699–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington State Department of Ecology (2005) Construction stormwater general permit. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater/construction/constructionfinalpermit.pdf

  • Washington State Department of Ecology (2009) Notice of intent (NOI) application form: construction stormwater general permit. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/ecy02085.pdf

  • Waterkeeper Alliance Inc versus EPA (2005) 399 F3d 486 (2nd Circuit Court of Appeals)

  • Wisconsin Administrative Code (2008) Natural resources, ch 216

  • Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (2006) General permit to discharge under the Wisconsin Pollutant Discharge Elimination System WPDES Permit Number WI-S067831-3. http://dnr.wi.gov/runoff/pdf/stormwater/permits/construction/construction_permit_S067831-3.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

    Terence J. Centner

Authors
  1. Terence J. Centner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terence J. Centner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Centner, T.J. Discerning Public Participation Requirements Under the US Clean Water Act. Water Resour Manage 24, 2113–2127 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9541-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9541-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation