Abstract
Computer models can support policy development in environmental management, but often suffer from a lack of practical application. This is part due to a ‘gap’ between the ways in which various participants in the policy process deal with information. The framework described in this paper provides a structured approach to information analysis in policy processes. The awareness of differences in the nature of information helps in dealing with different perceptions and actor backgrounds during this policy process because it allows a better match between the information needs and the tools or procedures that are applied. Construal level theory, originating from consumer psychology, can account for some differences that remained unaddressed so far and forms a key component of this framework. Application of the framework to the Dutch Maas case shows that a gap between the model and its users is unavoidable; model applications are dominated by the fairly technical conceptions which modelers have of the system, and fail to address high level construals brought up by the stakeholders. Application of the framework can support the match between mutual expectations of modelers and users.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Blöschl G, Sivapalan M (1995) Scale issues in hydrological modeling: a review. In: Kalma JD, Sivapalan M (eds) Scale issues in hydrological modeling. Wiley, Chichester, pp 9–48
Borowski I, Hare M (2007) Exploring the gap between water managers and researchers: difficulties of model-based tools to support practical water management. Water Resour Manage 21:1049–1074. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9098-z
Brandon PR (1998) Stakeholder participation for the purpose of helping ensure evaluation validity: bridging the gap between collaborative and non-collaborative evaluation. Am J Eval 19:325–337
Brugnach MA, Pahl-Wostl C (2007) A broadened view on the role for models in natural resource management: implications for model development. In: Pahl-Wostl C, Kabat P, Möltgen J (eds) Adaptive and integrated water management. Coping with complexity and uncertainty. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 184–203
Brugnach M, Tagg A, Keil F, de Lange WJ (2006) Uncertainty matters: computer models at the science–policy interface. Water Resour Manage 21:1075–1090. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9099-y
Busch S (ed) (2004) Karakterisering stroomgebied Maas (Nederland) conceptual report Aug 2004. Regionaal Bestuurlijk Overleg Maas, Rotterdam
Dale VH, Beyeler SC (2001) Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators. Ecol Indic 1:3–10. doi:10.1016/S1470-160X(01)00003-6
De Groot RS (1992) Functions of nature—evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision making, PhD thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen
De Kok J-L, Wind HG (eds) (2003) Design and application of decision support systems for integrated water management; lessons to be learnt. Phys Chem Earth 28:571–578 (incorporating part A, B, and C)
Evans TP, Ostrom E, Gibson C (2003) Scaling issues in the social sciences. In: Rotmans J, Rothman DS (eds) Scaling in integrated assessment. Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse
Gibson CC, Ostrom E, Ahn TK (2000) The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecol Econ 32:217–239. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00092-0
Janssen, JAEB (2004a) Workshop Oss: personal notes of the IVM workshop, Oct. 21
Janssen JAEB (2004b) Workshop Sittard: personal notes of the IVM workshop, Sept. 30
Janssen JAEB (2005) Workshop Venlo: personal notes of the IVM workshop, Dec. 2
Liberman N, Trope Y (1998) The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: a test of temporal construal theory. J Pers Soc Psychol 75:5–18. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5
Lorenz CM, Gilbert AJ, Cofino WP (2001) Environmental auditing—indicators for transboundary river management. Environ Manage 28:115–129. doi:10.1007/s002670010211
Matthies M, Giupponi C, Ostendorf B (2007) Environmental decision support systems: current issues, methods and tools. Environ Model Softw 22:123–127. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.09.005
McLain RJ, Lee RG (1996) Adaptive management: promises and pitfalls. J Environ Manage 20:437–448. doi:10.1007/BF01474647
Ministerie van LNV (1990) Natuurbeleidsplan. Regeringsbeslissing. Tweede Kamer, vergaderjaar 1989–1990, 21149, nr. 2–3,’s-Gravenhage (in Dutch)
Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Rijkswaterstaat Dienst Limburg (2003) Integrale verkenning Maas, Advies, Hoofdrapport en Achtergronddocumenten (cd-rom) sl (in Dutch)
Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Rijkswaterstaat Dienst Limburg (2004/05) Conceptuele verslagen van de eerste serie workshops, Sittard, Venlo, Roermond en Den Bosch’, RWS DLB, Maastricht (in Dutch)
Niemeijer D (2002) Developing indicators for environmental policy: data-driven and theory-driven approaches examined by example. Environ Sci Policy 5:91–103. doi:10.1016/S1462-9011(02)00026-6
Nieuwkamer RLJ (1995) Decision support for river management. PhD thesis, University of Twente, Enschede
Olsson JA, Anderson L (2007) Possibilities and problems with the use of models as a communication tool in water resource management. Water Resour Manage 21:97–110. doi:10.007/s11269-006-9043-1
Otter H, Valkering P, Wolters H (2004) Participation and social learning in the Meuse River—case study reported under work package 5. Harmonicop, Delft
Pahl-Wostl C (2002) Towards sustainability in the water sector—the importance of human actors and processes of social learning. Aquat Sci 64:394–411. doi:10.1007/PL00012594
Pahl-Wostl C (2004) The implications of complexity for integrated resources management. In: Pahl-Wostl, C, Schmidt S, Rizzoli AE, Jakeman AJ (eds) Complexity and integrated resources management—transactions of the 2nd biennial meeting of the international environmental modeling and software society. Osnabrück
RIWA-Maas (2007) River Water Maas, international cooperation of drink water companies, www.RIWA-Maas.org. Cited July 3 2007
Trope Y, Liberman N, Wakslak C (2007) Construal levels and psychological distance: effects on representation, prediction, evaluation and behavior. J Consum Psychol 17:83–95
Trope Y (2004) Theory in social psychology: seeing the forest and the trees. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 8:193–200. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0802_13
Turnhout E, Hisschemöller M, Eijsackers H (2007) Ecological indicators: between the two fires of policy and science. Ecol Indicators 7:215–228
Van Daalen EC, Dresden L, Janssen MA (2002) The role of computer models in the environmental policy life cycle. Environ Sci Policy 5:221–231. doi:10.1016/S1462-9011(02)00040-0
Van der Veen A, Otter H (2003) Scales in economic theory. In: Rotmans J, Rothman DS (eds) Scaling in integrated assessment. Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse
Wakslak CJ, Trope Y, Liberman N, Alony R (2006) Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: probability and the mental representation of events. J Exp Psychol Gen 135:641–653. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.641
Walker DH (2002) Decision support, learning and rural resource management. Agric Syst 73:113–127. doi:10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00103-2
Wesselink A (2006) Verkenningen hoogwaterbeheer Maas; een studie naar besluitvorming als verweving van expertise en belangen (Explorative Study of flood protection along the Maas: merging expertise and interest). Civil Engineering and Management research report 2006R-003/WEM-004. University of Twente, Enschede (in Dutch)
World Bank (1999) Environmental performance indicators. A second edition note. World Bank, Washington DC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Janssen, J.A.E.B., Hoekstra, A.Y., de Kok, JL. et al. Delineating the Model-Stakeholder Gap: Framing Perceptions to Analyse the Information Requirement in River Management. Water Resour Manage 23, 1423–1445 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9334-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9334-9