Advertisement

Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus

, Volume 8, Issue 5–6, pp 445–456 | Cite as

Sources of Alkylphenols and Alkylphenol Ethoxylates in Wastewater—A Substance Flow Analysis in Stockholm, Sweden

  • N. MånssonEmail author
  • L. Sörme
  • C. Wahlberg
  • B. Bergbäck
Article

Abstract

This is a study of the sources of alkylphenol and alkylphenol ethoxylates in wastewater, including the new observation that the main contribution is from textiles. Alkylphenols and alkylphenol ethoxylates are widely used chemicals in various applications that are partly under environmental restrictions within Europe. The study sets out to analyze the most important sources of this large group of organic compounds in an urban wastewater system. A substance flow analysis (SFA) of the technosphere in Stockholm, Sweden in 2004 was conducted, allowing a comparison of 13 groups of goods’ emissions to wastewater. It was found that the groups of textiles and cleaning agents were the major sources to wastewater, while the group’s personal care products and paint and lacquers give smaller contributions. The content of alkylphenol ethoxylates in goods, especially in textiles, is a most significant source and is probably valid for other urban areas as well.

Keywords

Alkylphenol Goods Nonylphenol Octylphenol SFA Textile Wastewater treatment 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This study was founded by Stockholm City, Stockholm Water Co, Statistics Sweden, and by the Faculty of Natural Science and Technology, University of Kalmar. The authors would like to thank Åsa Andersson for the gathering of data and the Swedish Society for Nature Conservation (Frida Hök) for sharing data valuable for this article.

References

  1. Ahel, M., Giger, W., & Koch, M. (1994). Behaviour of alkylphenol polyethoxylate surfactants in the aquatic environment—I. Occurrence and transformation in sewage treatment. Water Research, 28(5), 1131–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahel, M., McEvoy, J., & Giger, W. (1993). Bioaccumulation of the lipophilic metabolites of nonionic surfactants in freshwater organisms. Environmental Pollution, 79(3), 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahel, M., Schaffner, C., & Giger, W. (1996). Behavior of alkylphenol ethoxylate surfactants in the aquatic environment—III. Occurrence and elimination of their persistent metabolites during infiltration of river water to groundwater. Water Research, 30(1), 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersson, Å. (2006). Alkylfenoler i rengöringsprodukter—provtagning och analys. Rapport i serien Nya gifter—nya verktyg. ISSN: 1653-9168. In Swedish.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, Å., & Sörme, L. (2006). Substansflödesanalys—av alkylfenoler och alkylfenoletoxilater i Stockholm stad 2004. Rapport i serien Nya gifter—nya verktyg. ISSN: 1653-9168. In Swedish.Google Scholar
  6. Berens, A. R. (1997). Predicting the migration of endocrine disrupters from rigid plastics. Polymer Engineering & Science, 37(2), 391–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergbäck, B., Johansson, K., & Mohlander, U. (2001). Urban metal flow—review and conclusions. A case study of Stockholm. Water, Air and Soil Pollution: Focus, 1, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Björklund, K., Malmqvist, P.-A., & Strömvall, A.-M. (2007). Källor till och flöden av ftalater och nonylfenoler i Stockholms dagvatten. Rapport i serien Nya gifter—nya verktyg. ISSN: 1653-9168. In Swedish.Google Scholar
  9. Brooke, D., Johnson, R., Mitchell, R., & Watts, C. (2005). Environmental Risk Evaluation Report: 4-tert-Octylphenol. Environment Agency UK. Bristol. ISBN: 1844324109.Google Scholar
  10. Brunner, P. H., & Rechberger, H. (2004). Practical handbook of material flow analysis—advanced methods in resource and waste management. Boca Raton: Lewis.Google Scholar
  11. Corsi, S., Zitomer, D., Field, J., & Cancilla, D. (2003). Nonylphenol ethoxylates and other additives in aircraft deicers, antiicers, and waters receiving airport runoff. Environmental Science & Technology, 37, 4031–4037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. EU (1993). Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 of 23 March 1993 on the evaluation and control of the risks of existing substances. OJ L, 084, 1–75. Date 05.04.1993.Google Scholar
  13. EU (1994). Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 of 28 June 1994 laying down the principles for the assessment of risks to man and the environment of existing substances in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 (Text with EEA relevance). OJ L, 161, 3–11. Date 29.6.1994.Google Scholar
  14. EU (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. OJ L, 327, 1–72 Date 22.12.2001.Google Scholar
  15. EU (2001). Commission recommendation 2001/838/EC. Commission Recommendation of 7 November 2001 on the results of the risk evaluation and the risk reduction strategies for the substances, acrylaldehyde; dimethyl sulphate; nonylphenol; phenol, 4-nonyl, branched; tert-butyl methyl ether. OJ L, 319/30, 30–44, Date 04.12.2001.Google Scholar
  16. EU (2003). Directive 2003/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2003 amending for the 26th time Council Directive 76/769/EEC relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (nonylphenol, nonylphenol ethoxylate and cement) (Text with EEA relevance). OJ L, 178, 24–27, Date 17.7.2003.Google Scholar
  17. EU (2006). Commission Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy and amending Directive 2000/60/EC. COM(2006) 397 final. Brussels, 17.7.2006.Google Scholar
  18. European Chemicals Bureau (ECB) (2002). European Union Risk Assessment Report, 4-nonylphenol (branched) and nonylphenol, Volume 10. European Chemicals Bureau, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection. European Commission joint research centre. Publication: EUR 20387 EN.Google Scholar
  19. Graedel, T. E., Van Beers, D., Bertram, M., Fuse, K., Gordon, R. B., Gritsinin, A., et al. (2004). Multilevel cycle of anthropogenic copper. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(4), 1242–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Graedel, T. E., van Beers, D., Bertram, M., Fuse, K., Gordon, R. B., Gritsinin, A., et al. (2005). The multilevel cycle of anthropogenic zinc. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(3), 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hök, F. (2007). Towels with a dirty past. Swedish Society for Nature Conservation. Report. Retrieved December 6, 2007, from http://www.snf.se/pdf/pdf-ssnc-report-towels-07.pdf.
  22. Holmer, O. (2006). Personal communication with Olof Holmer, representing trade associations of KTF, IIH, SVEFF and Lim.Google Scholar
  23. Kemi [Swedish Chemicals Agency] (2001). Lägesbeskrivning för avveckling av bly, bromerade flamskyddsmedel, kvicksilver, nonylfenoletoxilater och klorparaffiner. Kemikalieinspektionen, PM 1/01. Solna. In Swedish.Google Scholar
  24. Kemi [Swedish Chemicals Agency] (2007a). Prio—a tool for risk reduction of chemicals. Information on Alkylphenol and Alkylphenolethoxylate available at http://www.kemi.se/templates/PRIOEngframes____4144.aspx
  25. Kemi [Swedish Chemicals Agency] (2007b). Description of the nomenclature in the Products Register of chemical products. Available at http://www.kemi.se/upload/Produktregistret/Docs/branschkoder.pdf
  26. KIFS (2005). KIFS 1998:8 and KIFS 2005:1. Föreskrifter om ändring i Kemikalieinspektionens föreskrifter (KIFS 1998:8) om kemiska produkter och biotekniska organismer. ISSN 0283-1937. In Swedish.Google Scholar
  27. Kleijn, R., Huele, R., & van der Voet, E. (2000). Dynamic substance flow analysis: the delaying mechanism of stocks, with the case of PVC in Sweden. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kolpin, D. W., Furlong, E. T., Meyer, M. T., Thurman, E. M., Zaugg, S. D., Barber, L. B., et al. (2002). Pharmaceutical, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in US streams 1999–2000: a national reconnaissance. Environmental Science & Technology, 36(6), 1202–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Korpela, R. (2007). Personal communication with The National Board of Trade, Sweden.Google Scholar
  30. Löfvén, M., & Wahlberg, C. (1997). Nonylfenol—genomförda och planerade åtgärder. Stockholm Vatten, Rapport nr 8-1997. Stockholm. In Swedish.Google Scholar
  31. Loyo-Rosales, J. E., Rice, C. P., & Torrents, A. (2007). Fate of octyl- and nonylphenol ethoxylates and some carboxylated derivatives in three American wastewater treatment plants. Environmental Science & Technology, 41(19), 6815–6821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. LVFS (2004). LVFS 2004:18 Föreskrifter om ändring i Läkemedelsverkets föreskrifter (LVFS 1993:2) om förbud och begränsningar för vissa ämnen att ingå i kosmetiska eller hygieniska produkter. ISSN 1101–5225. In Swedish.Google Scholar
  33. Products Register (1996). Total quantity of nonylphenol ethoxylate as components in chemical products distributed on industrial categories. Extract from the database of the Products Register. Swedish Chemicals Agency. Sweden.Google Scholar
  34. Products Register (2006). Data for 2004 covering used amounts and the amounts of nonylphenol, octylphenol, nonylphenol ethoxylate and or octylphenol ethoxylate placed on the Swedish market, presented in industrial categories. Extract from the database of the Products Register. Swedish Chemicals Agency. Sweden.Google Scholar
  35. Ranner, E. (2006). Personal communication with Eva Ranner, at the Trade Association for Textile Import. Environmental trade code available in Swedish at: http://www.textileimporters.se/swe/hem.php
  36. Rapport (2007). Broadcast from Swedish Television 2007-09-23, available in Swedish at: http://svt.se/svt/play/video.jsp?a=918260
  37. Sandahl (2005). Personal communication with Evert Sandahl, Trade association of SFF, Svenska Fabriksbetongföreningen.Google Scholar
  38. SCB [Statistics Sweden] (2007a). Imports and exports of goods by commodity group CN 2,4,6 level, adjusted for non response, confidential data excluded. Year 2000–2006. Extract from Statistics Sweden’s Statistical database, available at: http://www.ssd.scb.se/databaser/makro/MainTable.asp?yp=tansss&xu=C9233001&omradekod=HA&omradetext=Trade+in+goods+and+services&lang=2&langdb=2
  39. SCB [Statistics Sweden] (2007b). Domestic Production. Industrins varuproduktion (IVP); Industrins produktion efter varugrupp enligt KN. År 1996–2006. Extract from Statistics Sweden’s Statistical database, available in Swedish at: http://www.ssd.scb.se/databaser/makro/MainTable.asp?yp=tansss&xu=C9233001&omradekod=NV&omradetext=N%E4ringsverksamhet&lang=1
  40. Sörme, L., Bergbäck, B., & Lohm, U. (2001). Goods in the antroposphere as a metal emission source—a case study of Stockholm. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, Focus, 1, 213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sörme, L., & Lagerkvist, R. (2002). Sources of heavy metals in urban wastewater in Stockholm. Science of the Total Environment, 298, 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sternbeck, J., Brorström-Lundén, E., Remberger, M., Kaj, L., Palm, A., Junedahl, E., et al. (2003b). WFD Priority substances in sediments from Stockholm and the Svealand coastal region. Rapport B1538. IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet AB. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  43. Sternbeck, J., Brorström-Lundén, E., Remberger, M., Kaj, L., Palm, A., & Kvernes, E. (2003a). Screening tertiary butylphenols, methylphenols, and long-chain alkylphenols in the Swedish environment. Rapport B1594. IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet AB. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  44. SVEFF (2006). Personal communication with the trade association (SVEFF) about the compilation of an investigation of AP and APEO and DEHP in goods and products in use at the members’ businesses.Google Scholar
  45. Sweco Viak (2007). Nationwide screening of WFD priority substances. Screening report 2007:1. Client Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved December 6, 2007, available for download at: http://www.naturvardsverket.se/upload/02_tillstandet_i_miljon/Miljoovervakning/rapporter/miljogift/rapport_vattendirektivsamnen.pdf
  46. Tekoindustrierna (2007a). Personal communication with CEO Ola Toftegard, on the description of the Swedish textile industry.Google Scholar
  47. Tekoindustrierna (2007b). Environmental information available at: http://www.teko.se/miljofragor.html
  48. Testfakta (2007). Populära overaller underkända. Test available in Swedish at: http://www.testfakta.se/Article.aspx?a=21459
  49. Van der Voet, E. (2002). Substance flow analysis methodology. In R. U. Ayres, & L. W. Ayres (Eds.), A handbook of industrial ecology (pp. 91–101). UK: Edward Elgar 2001.Google Scholar
  50. White, R., Jobling, S., Hoare, S. A., Sumpter, J. P., & Parker, M. G. (1994). Environmentally persistent alkylphenolic compounds are estrogenic. Endocrinology, 135(1), 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Månsson
    • 1
    Email author
  • L. Sörme
    • 2
  • C. Wahlberg
    • 3
  • B. Bergbäck
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Pure and Applied Natural SciencesUniversity of KalmarKalmarSweden
  2. 2.SCB Statistics SwedenStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Stockholm Water CompanyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations