Aberbach, J., & Walker, J. (1970). Political trust and racial ideology. American Political Science Review,
Bénit-Gbaffou, C. (2012). Party politics, civil society and local democracy: Reflections from Johannesburg. Geoforum,
Blakeley, G. (2001). Clientelism in the Building of the State and Civil Society in Spain’. In S. Piattoni (Ed.), Clientelism, interests, and democratic representation: The European experience in historical and comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blyth, M. (2002). Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the Twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bollen, K. (1990). Political democracy: Conceptual and measurement traps. Studies in Comparative International Development.,
Boydell, L., Hoggett, P., Rugkåsa, J., & Cummins, A. (2008). Intersectoral partnerships, the knowledge economy and intangible assets. Policy & Politics,
Brady, D. (1988). Critical Elections and Congressional Policymaking. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
British Sociological Association. (2012). Statement of Ethical Practice. Retrieved http://www.britsoc.co.uk/about/equality/statement-of-ethical-practice.aspx from October 30, 2013.
Brooks, H. (2004). The Dominant Party System: Challenges for South Africa’s Second Decade of Democracy. Cape Town Electoral Institute of South Africa, Occasional Paper, 12–43.
Brown, L. (1991). Bridging organisations and sustainable development. Human Relations,
Bullock, H., Mountford, J., & Stanley, R. (2001). Better policy-making. London: Centre for Management and Policy Studies, Cabinet Office.
Bunce, V. (1981). Do Leaders Make a Difference? Executive Succession and Public Policy under Capitalism and Socialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Butler, A. (2009). Considerations on the erosion of one-party dominance. Representation,
Casey, J. (2004). Third sector participation in the policy process: a framework for comparative analysis. Policy & Politics,
Chaney, P. (2012). New legislative settings and the application of the democratic-participative model of mainstreaming equality in public policymaking. Policy Studies, 33(5), 455–476.
Chaney, P. (2014). Multi-level systems and the electoral politics of Welfare Pluralism: Exploring Third Sector Policy in UK Westminster and Regional Elections 1945–2010. Voluntas: International Journal of Third Sector Research, 23(3), 585–611.
Chapman, T., Brown, J., Ford, C., & Baxter, B. (2010). Trouble with champions: local public sector–third sector partnerships and the future prospects for collaborative governance in the UK. Policy Studies,
Chatterjee, P. (2004). The politics of the governed: Popular politics in most of the world. New York: Columbia University Press.
Chazan, N. (1992). Africa’s democratic challenge. World Policy Journal,
Clarke, G. (1998). Non-governmental organizations and politics in the developing world. Political Studies,
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital and the creation of human capital, American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95–S120.
Collier, R., & Collier, D. (1991). Shaping the political arena. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Dahl, R. (1961). Who Governs? Democracy and power in an American City. New Haven, CO: Yale University Press.
De Jager, N. (2005). The ANC government, co-optive power and the perpetuation of party dominance. Challenges to democracy by one-party dominance: A comparative assessment. Johannesburg: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
Dewan, T., & Myatt, D. (2010). The Declining Talent Pool of Government. American Journal of Political Science,
Dunn, K. (2011). Voice and trust in parliamentary representation. Electoral Studies,
Duverger, M. (1954). Political parties: Their organization and activity in the modern state. London: Methuen.
Ennis, J. (1987). Fields of action: Structure in movements’ tactical repertoires. Sociological Forum,
Ertman, T. (1997). Birth of the Leviathan (p. 35). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, P. (1996). Government action, social capital and development: Reviewing the evidence on synergy. World Development,
Faerman, S., McCaffey, D., & Van Slyke, D. (2001). Understanding interorganizational cooperation: Public–private collaboration in regulating financial market innovation. Organization Science,
Finkel, S., Muller, E., & Opp, K. (1989). Personal influence, collective rationality and mass political action. American Political Science Review,
Forestiere, C., & Allen, C. (2011). The formation of cognitive locks in single party dominant regimes. International Political Science Review,
Friedman, S. (2003). The state, civil society and social policy: Setting a research agenda. Politikon,
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
Fukuyama, F. (1999). The great disruption: Human nature and the reconstitution of social order. New York: Free Press.
Fyfe, N. R. (2005). Making space for “Neo-communitarianism”? The third sector, State and Civil Society in the UK. Antipode,
Gamble, A. (2006). The constitutional revolution in the United Kingdom. Publius,
Gamson, W. (1975). The strategy of social protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
Giddens, A. (2000). Runaway world. London: Profile Books.
Giliomee, H., & Simkins, C. (1999). The awkward embrace: One-party domination and democracy. NY: Routledge.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology,
Green, D., & Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of applications in political science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greene, K. (2010a). The Political economy of authoritarian single-party dominance. Comparative Political Studies,
Greene, K. (2010b). A resource theory of single party dominance: PRI the in Mexico. M. Bogaards & F. Boucek (Eds.) Dominant political parties and democracy: Concepts, measures, cases and comparisons, London: Routledge.
Gubrium, J. (2012). SAGE handbook of interview research: the complexity of the craft. SAGE: Los Angeles and London.
Heurlin, C. (2010). Governing Civil Society: The Political Logic of NGO–State Relations Under Dictatorship. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(2), 220–239.
Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hirst, P. (1994). Associative Democracy: New Forms of Economic and Social Governance. London: Polity Press.
Hogwood, B., & Peters, B. (1985). The Pathology of Public Policy. London: Oxford University Press.
Hopkin, D., Tanner, D., & Williams, C. (2001). The Labour Party in Wales 1900–2000. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Hsu, J., & Hasmath, R. (2014). The Local Corporatist State and NGO Relations in China. Journal of Contemporary China,
Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Inoguchi, T. (2005). Japanese politics: An introduction. Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
Jackson, J. (1994). Stability and Renewal: Incumbency and Parliamentary Composition. In Albert Somit, Rudolf Wildenmann, Bernhard Bell, & Andrea Rommel (Eds.), The Victorious Incumbent: A Threat to Democracy? (pp. 251–277). Aldershot, Hants.: Dartmouth.
Jenkins, J. (1983). Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements. Annual Review of Sociology,
Johnes, M. (2012). Wales Since 1939. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Kendall, J. (2000). The mainstreaming of the third sector into public policy in England in the late 1990s: whys and wherefores. Policy and Politics,
Kendall, J. (2009). Handbook on Third Sector Policy in Europe: Multi-level Processes and Organised Civil Society. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
King, N., & Horrocks, R. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. London and Los Angeles: SAGE.
Kitschelt, S., & Wilkinson, S. (Eds.). (2007). Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kopecky, M., & Mudde, C. (2003). Rethinking Civil Society. Democratization,
Lappé, F., & du Bois, P. (1997). Building social capital without looking backward. National Civic Review,
Lowi, T. (1964). American business, public policy, case studies and political theory. World Politics,
Lühiste, K. (2006). Explaining trust in political institutions: Some illustrations from the Baltic states. Communist and Post-Communist Studies,
MacNeela, P. (2008). The give and take of volunteering: motives, benefits, and personal connections among Irish volunteers. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 19(2), 125–139.
Mainwaring, S., & Scully, T. (1995). Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Mair, P. (2000). Party Organisations: From Civil Society to the State. In S. Katz & P. Mair (Eds.), How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Richard. Western Democracies, London: Sage.
Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent “yes”. Journal of Politics,
Masket, S. (2009). No middle ground: How informal party organizations control nominations and Polarize Legislatures. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
McAllister, I. (1980). The dynamics of one-partyism. Llafur: The Journal of Welsh Labour History,
McClurg, S., & Lazer, D. (2014). forthcoming). Political networks, Social Networks,
Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-Communist societies. Comparative Political Studies,
Moore, L. (2001). Legitimation issues in the state-nonprofit relationship. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,
Morgan, K. (1981). Rebirth of a nation: Wales 1880–1980. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Morris, A. (1993). Birmingham confrontation reconsidered: an analysis of the dynamics and tactics of mobilization. American Sociological Review,
Mosca, G. (1939). The Ruling Class, A. Livingston (Ed.), trans. H. Kahn, New York: McGraw Hill.
Norris, P. (1999). Institutional explanations for political support. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance (pp. 217–235). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pempel, T. (1990). Uncommon democracies: The one-party dominant regimes. London: Cornell University Press.
Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: Some concepts and evidence. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 1102–1118.
Piattoni, S. (2001). Clientelism, interests, and democratic representation: the European experience in historical and comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pick, D., Holmes, K. & Brueckner, M. (2011). Governmentalities of Volunteering: A Study of Regional Western Australia. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(3), 390–408.
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pierson P., & Skocpol, T. (2002). Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science. Working Paper, Harvard University.
Portes, A. (1998). Social Capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology,
Price, V., & Romantan, A. (2004). Confidence in institutions before, during, and after “indecision 2000”. Journal of Politics,
Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work (p. 41). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Rawls, J. (2003). The domain of the political and overlapping consensus. In D. Matravers & J. Pike (Eds.), Debates in contemporary political philosophy. London: Routledge.
Rohrschneider, R., & Schmitt-Beck, R. (2002). Trust in democratic institutions in Germany: Theory and evidence ten years after unification. German Politics,
Sabatier, P. (1987). Knowledge. Policy-oriented learning, and policy change. Anadvocacy coalition framework, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 8(4), 649–692.
Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning. An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science: A realist approach, Routledge, London. In J. Schlesinger (Ed.), Ambition and Politics. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Schlager, E. (1995). Policy making and collective action: defining coalitions -within the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Sciences,
Schlesinger, J. (1966). Ambition and Politics. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Schwartz, R. (2001). Managing government-third sector collaboration: accountability, ambiguity, and politics. International Journal of Public Administration,
Sharma, S., Vredenburg, H., & Westley, F. (1994). Strategic bridging: a role for the multinational cooperation in third world development. Journal of Applied Behavioral,
Sinclair, S. (2011). Partnership or presence? Exploring the complexity of community planning. Local Government Studies,
Sinclair, R., & Bolt, R. (2013). Third sector accounting standard setting: Do third sector stakeholders have voice? Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,
Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, D. (2006). General inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation,
Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Tilly, C. (1995). Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tsebelis, A. (1995). General inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science,
Wales Audit Office. (2012). The Welsh Government’s relationship with the All Wales Ethnic Minority Association. Cardiff: WAO.
Yap, F., & Kim, Y. (2008). Pathologies or Progress? Evaluating the effects of divided government and party volatility. Japanese Journal of Political Science,