Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Low Power Reconfigurable Analog Baseband Block for Software Defined Radio

  • Published:
Journal of Signal Processing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, an inverter based transconductor using double CMOS pair is proposed for implementation of a reconfigurable analog baseband block consisting of a variable gain amplifier (VGA) and a second order lowpass Gm-C filter. The centre frequency of the filter is varied using current steering DAC. Major contributions of this paper are: proposal for operating the transconductance (Gm) stage and current steering DAC in sub-threshold region in order to minimize the power dissipation, design of variable gain amplifier (VGA) using switched Gm cells with dummy stages, proposal for a digital tuning technique for the filter based on phase comparison method for compensation against process, voltage and temperature variations. The proposed analog baseband block is designed and implemented on TSMC-0.18 μm CMOS process with 1.8 V supply using gm/Id design methodology. The post layout simulation results demonstrate the tunability of the centre frequency from 100 KHz to 20 MHz which meets the requirements of zero IF receivers for SDR applications. The third order input intercept point (IIP3) is found to be 15 dBVp for an input signal of 100 mVp. The power dissipated by the baseband block is 1 mW and 5 mW at 100 KHz and 20 MHz respectively and it requires silicon area of 0.173 mm2. The SFDR over the entire bandwidth is 58 dB. The proposed approach guarantees the upper bound on THD to be-40 dB for 300 mVpp signal swing. The use of inverters with double CMOS pair results in 34 dB higher PSRR compared to those using push pull inverter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Giannini, V., Craninckx, J., & Baschirotto, A. (2008). Baseband Analog circuits for Software Defined Radio. New York: Springer. chapter 5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Laugeois, M. (2004). Reconfigurability Approach on Hardware Design for MTS Terminal. Lausanne: MUMOR Project.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Workshop on Multi-Mode Multi-Band Re-Configurable Systems for 3rd Enhanced Generation Mobile Phones, MUMOR Project Leuven, Belgium, 2004.

  4. Amico, S. D.’ et al. (2004). Low-power reconfigurable baseband block for UMTS/WLAN transmitters, Proc. Of NORCHIP, pp. 103–106, November 2004.

  5. Amico, S. D., Giannini, V., & Baschirotto, A. (2006). A 4th-order active-Gm-RC reconfigurable (UMTS/WLAN) filter. IEEE J.Solid- State Circuits, 41, 1630–1637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Giannini, V., Craninckx, J., Compiet, J., Come, B., Amico, S. D.’, & Baschirotto A. (2006). Flexible baseband Low-Pass Filter and Variable Gain Amplifier for Software Defined Radio Front End. Proc. Of ESSCIRC2006, pp. 203–206.

  7. Chamla, D., Kaiser, A., Cathelin, A., & Belot, D. (2005). A Gm-C low-pass filter for zero-IF mobile applications with a very wide tuning range. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 40(7), 1443–1450. doi:10.1109/JSSC.2005.847274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nauta, B. (1992). A CMOS transconductance-C filter technique for very high frequencies. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 27, 142–153. doi:10.1109/4.127337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Munoz, F., Torralba, A., Carvajal, R.G., Ramirez-Angulo, J.: “Two new VHF tunable CMOS low-voltage linear transconductors and their application to HF gm-C filter design”, in Proc. ISCAS, May 2000, pp.V-173–176.

  10. Crombez, P., Craninckx, J., Wambacq, P., & Steyaert, M. (2008). A 100-KHz to 20-MHz reconfigurable power-linearity optimized Gm–C biquad in 0.13 m CMOS. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 55(33), 224–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Park, C. S., & Schaumann, R. (1986). A high-frequency CMOS linear transconductance element. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst, 33, 1132–1137. doi:10.1109/TCS.1986.1085859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramasamy, S., Venkataramani, B., & Anbugeetha, K. (2008). VLSI Implementation of a digitally tunable Gm-C Filter with double CMOS pair 21 st International Conference on VLSI Design, pp. 317–322.

  13. Pavan, S., Tsividis, Y. P., & Nagaraj, K. (2000). Widely programmable high frequency continuous time filters in digital cmos technology. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 35, 503–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, F., & Kinget, P. (2005). “Low power programmable-gain CMOS Distributed LNA for ultra-wide-band applications,” in Dig. Of Tech. Papers. Symp. VLSI Circuits, pp. 78–81.

  15. Tsividis, Y. (1995). Mixed Analog Digital VLSI Devices and Technology, p. 66. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pelgrom, M. J. M., Duinmaijer, A. C. J., & Welbers, A. P. G. (1989). Matching properties of MOS transistors. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 24, 1433–1440. doi:10.1109/JSSC.1989.572629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Croon, J. A., Rosmeulen, M., Decoutere, S., Sansen, W., & Maes, H. E. (2002). An easy-to-use mismatch model for the MOS transistor. IEEE J. Solid- State Circuits, 37, 1056–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gotarredona, T.S., & Barranco, B.L. (2003). CMOS transistor mismatch model valid from weak to strong inversion, IEEE European Solid-State Circuits Conference, pp. 627–30.

  19. Sümesaglam, T., & Karsilayan, A. I. (2004). A digital automatic tuning technique for high-order continuous-time filters. IEEE Trans. On Circ. and Syst.-I, 51(10), 1975–1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liang, C.-K., Yang, R.-J., & Liu, S.-I. (2008). An all-digital fast-locking programmable DLL-based clock generator. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap, 55, 361–369. doi:10.1109/TCSI.2007.913612.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Foty, D., Binkley, D., & Bucher, M. (2002). Starting over:Gm/Id-based MOSFET modeling as a basis for modernized analog design methodologies. Nanotech, 1(13), 682–685.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Silveira, F., Flandre, D., & Jespers, P. G. A. (1996). A Gm/ID Based methodology for the Design of CMOS Analog Circuits and Its Application to the Synthesis of a SOI Micro power OTA. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 31(9).

  23. Cortes, F. P., Fabris, E., & Bampi, S. (2003). Applying the Gm/ID Method in the analysis and design of Miller amplifier, comparator and Gm-C filter, Proceedings of IFIP VLSI- SoC2003.

  24. Andreani, P., Mattisson, S., & Essink, B. (2000). A CMOS gm -C polyphase filter with high image band rejection, in Proc. ESSCIRC, pp. 244–247.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept of electronics and communication engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli, India

    S. Ramasamy & B. Venkataramani

Authors
  1. S. Ramasamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Venkataramani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Ramasamy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramasamy, S., Venkataramani, B. A Low Power Reconfigurable Analog Baseband Block for Software Defined Radio. J Sign Process Syst 62, 131–144 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-009-0357-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-009-0357-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation