Abstract
Vitamin D has a well-established role in regulating the intestinal absorption of minerals but its association with immunity has not been extensively explored in livestock. Although an optimal circulating concentration of 30 ng/ml 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25(OH)D) is proposed for immune function, it is unknown if this vitamin D concentration is sufficient, particularly for cows under a pasture-based, spring-calving dairy production system. The objectives of this retrospective analysis were to assess circulating vitamin D concentrations in a total of 843 bio-banked serum samples from Holstein-Friesian dairy cows enrolled from 12 spring-calving, pasture-based dairy farms in Ireland. Mean 25(OH)D concentrations were 36.3 ng/ml at calving, 30.7 ng/ml at 7 days post-partum (DPP), and 38.3 ng/ml at 21 DPP. However, mean concentrations masked significant inter-farm and inter-individual variation (P < 0.05). In fact, the proportion of cows with vitamin D insufficiency of < 30 ng/ml was found to be 33.8%, 55.5% and 19.5% at each time point, respectively. In addition, 25(OH)D concentrations correlated positively with immune cell populations (monocytes and lymphocytes) and negatively with blood urea and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) at 7 DPP. This is the first report of 25(OH)D concentrations in pasture-based peripartum dairy cows and we show a high degree of variation across farms and between individual animals. Sub-optimal concentrations of vitamin D in some post-partum cows may predispose cattle to multiple metabolic or infectious diseases, and therefore further work is now warranted.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Optimal immune function is critical to peak cow production and reduced susceptibility to disease. Multiple studies have shown dynamic changes in immune cell (Crookenden et al. 2016) and gene and protein expression (Chapwanya et al. 2009) that have important relevance for infectious and metabolic disease susceptibility (Brewer et al. 2020; Alhussien et al. 2021). This and related work has proposed that events occurring early in the post-partum period, around 7 days post-partum (DPP) are key to the early resolution of physiological inflammation and the restoration of reproductive function (LeBlanc 2014). This is a particular challenge within the tight time frame of a seasonal, predominantly grass-based system which aims to maximise the dietary intake from grass as the most cost-effective food source, and to maintain a compact calving system of a calf per cow per year.
Previously appreciated for its role in calcium homeostasis and bone development (Christakos et al. 2011), vitamin D is now emerging as an important regulator of the immune response. Few studies have been carried out in cattle, but vitamin D has been shown to regulate macrophage function in dairy cows (Corripio-Miyar et al. 2017) and also modulates the mammary immune response (Tellez-Perez et al. 2012). While optimal concentrations have not been empirically defined in cattle, metabolism of vitamin D is quite similar between cattle and humans (Nelson et al. 2012). As a result, a minimum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25(OH)D) threshold value of 30 ng/ml in serum has been referenced in dairy research based on previous studies in humans (Holick 2007). It is likely that vitamin D concentrations have important consequences for bone development, metabolism and potentially for immune regulation but circulating concentrations of vitamin D in pasture-based dairy cows are not currently available. Here we determined vitamin D concentrations in pasture-based Holstein-Friesian dairy cows both before and after parturition and assessed their potential association with immune and metabolic traits of relevance.
Materials and methods
Herd information and sample collection
A total of 843 serum samples from mixed-parity Holstein-Friesian cows across 12 farms throughout the province of Leinster in Ireland were used for the analysis described. All farms employed a pasture-based, spring-calving production system (calving dates February-March) after housing the previous winter. One farm was sampled across two consecutive years (denoted farm 2 and farm 8 in the results). Supplemental concentrate (6–8 Kg/head/day) was provided on farm using commercial ration containing 2,400iu vitamin D3/Kg feed. The 305-d milk, fat, and protein yields (kg) for the lactation period before (“previous lactation”, n = 536) and after sampling (“current lactation”, n = 661) were recorded on a monthly basis during lactation and uploaded to the Irish Cattle Breeding Federation database (www.icbf.com). The study included 192 first parity cows that did not have a milk performance in the previous lactation. As a retrospective analysis on bio-banked samples, individual cow intakes were not available. Blood sampling was carried out at calving (± 3 days), 7 DPP (± 2 days) and 21 DPP (± 4 days) and collected using 9 ml lithium heparin or 9 ml serum vacutainer® tubes for metabolite analysis. The heparin tubes were inverted several times after blood was drawn to prevent clotting. In the laboratory, tubes were centrifuged at 2000 x g for 15 min at 4˚C and then the plasma/serum was aspirated and stored in cryotubes at -20˚C.
Haematology, metabolite and 25(OH)D measurement
Within 3 h of collection, whole blood samples were assessed using an automated haematology analyser (ADVIA 2120, Bayer Healthcare, Siemens, UK) to generate total leukocyte, neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, eosinophil and basophil numbers. For metabolite analysis, concentrations of glucose, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) and urea were measured using a Beckman Coulter AU 400 Clinical Analyzer. Glucose was measured using the hexokinase method, urea and BHB were measured using the kinetic method, whilst NEFA and calcium concentrations were measured using the colourimetric method. 25(OH)D concentrations were measured using the Eagle Bioscience 25(OH)D ELISA kit (VID3-K01, Eagle BioScience, Nashua, NH) as previously described (Nelson et al. 2016b). Standards used for the vitamin D assay were prepared using bovine serum and concentrations were independently validated commercially using LC/MS/MS by Heartland Assays (Ames IA, 50,010). Results across the 7 concentration standards from 0 to 200 ng/ml showed > 99% correlation (data not shown). For analysis, concentrations of samples were determined using a 7-point standard curve spanning concentrations as above fitted with a four parameter logistic curve. The lower limit of detection was calculated as 2.17 ng/ml.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analysis and data representation was conducted using Graphpad PRISM 9. A One Way ANOVA with Tukey correction for multiple testing was performed to assess differences in vitamin D concentrations. A Pearson’s correlation (PROC CORR) was used to assess relationships between production and immune variables with vitamin D concentrations in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data was graphed using Graphpad PRISM 9.
Results and discussion
Substantially lower 25(OH)D concentrations in Spring-calving, pasture-based Holstein-Friesian cows compared to more intensively managed dairy cows
The 25(OH)D metabolite in serum is the best indicator of vitamin D status as concentrations are reflective of both UVB mediated synthesis of previtamin D3 and dietary intake; and is relatively stable over time (Hymoller and Jensen 2017). The distribution of circulating concentrations is shown for the cows sampled in this study across three peripartum time points in Fig. 1(a-c). Mean 25(OH)D concentrations across all farms in this study were calculated as 36.3 ng/ml at calving, 30.7 ng/ml at 7 DPP, and 38.3 ng/ml at 21 DPP (Table 1).
B Farm | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | 32 | 46 | 45 | 42 | 134 | 33 | 48 | ||||
Mean | 25.36 | 28.82 | 22.19 | 31.07 | 30.89 | 24.33 | 25.31 | ||||
SD | 6.95 | 6.71 | 3.901 | 9.73 | 8.36 | 5.47 | 5.18 | ||||
Minimum | 12.21 | 17.15 | 11.76 | 12.91 | 11.27 | 13.73 | 14.32 | ||||
Maximum | 39.36 | 42.46 | 30.36 | 58.19 | 52.03 | 35.29 | 36.07 | ||||
Coefficient of variation % | 27.4 | 23.29 | 17.58 | 31.33 | 27.08 | 22.48 | 20.46 | ||||
PPT < 30 ng/ml % | 71.88 | 63.04 | 97.78 | 52.38 | 52.99 | 87.88 | 81.25 | ||||
C All farms | |||||||||||
Time | Calving | 7 DPP | 21 DPP | ||||||||
n | 141 | 549 | 153 | ||||||||
Mean | 36.32 | 30.70 | 38.33 | ||||||||
SD | 7.86 | 7.94 | 7.57 | ||||||||
Minimum | 5.23 | 3.65 | 9.30 | ||||||||
Maximum | 57.83 | 72.46 | 56.73 | ||||||||
PPT < 30 ng/ml % | 33.85 | 55.46 | 19.54 |
These values are considerably lower than what has been previously reported for dairy cows, albeit under more intensive dairy systems where supplementation is significantly higher. In a study of samples collected from cows across various stages of lactation, housing systems, and locations in the United States, average vitamin D concentrations across 12 dairy farms was reported as 68 ng/ml (Nelson et al., 2016a). Another study on almost 200 cows across 5 US dairies found highest 25(OH)D concentrations at dry off (99.7 ng/ml) (Holcombe et al. 2018).
Circulating vitamin D concentrations vary due to multiple contributory factors, including genetics and the environment (Weir et al. 2017). As sunlight is the predominant source of the precursors of active vitamin D, significant effects of both season and geographical location have been reported (Casas et al. 2015; Nelson et al. 2016b). In this study, all cows are emerging from a period of housing during the winter months, and therefore reduced exposure to sunlight is likely to be a critical contributor to the low 25(OH)D concentrations detected. This is supported by our recent findings in spring-born Holstein-Friesian dairy calves (Flores-Villalva et al. 2021).
Significant inter-farm variation in circulating 25(OH)D concentrations in Spring-calving holstein-friesian dairy cows
Average 25(OH)D concentrations per farm ranged from 20.0 to 47.7 ng/ml at calving, 21.0 ng/ml − 45.2 ng/ml at 7 DPP and 24.6 ng/ml – 44.7 ng/ml at 21 DPP (Table 1). An analysis of 25(OH) concentrations across the peri-partum time points showed significant changes on three out of the five farms assessed (Fig. 2). On these farms, significant increases were detected in concentrations at 21 DPP relative to earlier time points (P < 0.05). However individual farm data showed a high degree of variation with coefficients of variation ranging from 16.8 to 38.5% (Table 1a). These farm -specific changes likely reflect individual farm management practices including feed supplementation strategies.
Assessment of an additional 380 cows from 7 farms showed high inter-farm variation (Fig. 3). Mean concentrations were considerably lower at the 7 DPP time point and varied between 22.19 ng/ml up to 31.0 ng/ml (Table 1b).
Taking all data into consideration, the lowest overall 25(OH)D concentration of 30.7 ng/ml was observed at 7 DPP (Table 1c). Other studies have also reported a similar trend of lowest values at 7 DPP, although due to the divergence in dairy production systems, the concentrations reported are almost three-fold higher than detected here (82.6 ng/ml) (Holcombe et al. 2018).
Significant effects of parity and milk yield on 25(OH)D concentrations
A significant effect of parity on 25(OH)D concentration was evident at each time point. The average 25(OH)D concentrations of each parity group are presented in Supplementary Table 1. The effect was strongest at calving. In comparison to primiparous cows, 25(OH)D concentrations were significantly higher in cows at lactation 3 and lactation 4. At 7 DPP, fifth lactation cows had a significantly lower circulating 25(OH)D concentration compared to than second, third and fourth lactation cows at 21 DPP (P = 0.03). At calving, multiparous cows showed significantly higher 25(OH)D concentrations than primiparous cows (43.3 ng/ml vs. 34.5 ng/ml respectively). At 7 DPP (primiparous: 31.0 ng/ml, multiparous: 30.9 ng/ml) and 21 DPP (primiparous: 38.2 ng/ml, multiparous: 38.0 ng/ml), no significant differences were apparent between groups.
The correlations between 25(OH)D concentrations and milk parameters from both lactation periods are listed in Supplementary Table 2. Calving 25(OH)D concentrations were only significantly correlated with the previous lactation’s 305-day fat kg (0.31, P = 0.04) and fat % (0.44, P < 0.01). Milk parameters from the previous lactation correlated with 7 DPP 25(OH)D concentrations included 305-day milk yield (0.11, P = 0.03), 305-day fat % (-0.12, P = 0.03) and protein % yield (-0.17, P < 0.001). The 305d milk yield of the previous lactation correlated positively with 21 DPP 25(OH)D concentrations of 0.39 (P < 0.001). Similar correlations were also evident with 305-day milk solids (0.25, P < 0.01), fat % (0.34, P < 0.001), protein kg (-0.37, P < 0.001) and protein % (-0.33, P < 0.001).
Milk solids (0.24, P = 0.05) and fat kg (0.26, P = 0.04) were the only milk production parameters from the current lactation period that were significantly correlated with 25(OH)D concentrations at calving. Significant correlations were detected between 7 DPP 25(OH)D concentrations and 305-day milk yield (0.11, P = 0.03), fat % (-0.2, P < 0.001) and protein % (-0.12, P < 0.01). Finally, 21 DPP 25(OH)D concentrations were significantly positively correlated with 305-day milk yield (0.27, P < 0.001) and significantly negatively correlated with fat kg (-0.17, P = 0.04), fat % (-0.45, P < 0.001) and protein % (-0.38, P < 0.001).
The divergence between primiparous and multiparous groups as well as the associations with production parameters may be explained by differences in intake, particularly at calving before cows are turned out to grass and supplementation levels are highest.
Widespread vitamin D insufficiency, particularly at 7 DPP
Vitamin D insufficiency (VDI) is defined as 25(OH)D concentrations of less than 30 ng/ml (Holick 2007; Gunville et al. 2013), and vitamin D deficiency (VDD) as concentrations less than 12 ng/ml. The average values calculated here across 12 farms here (Table 1c) obscure significant inter-individual variation. VDD was identified in five of the 12 farms sampled. At each time point, the average minimum values are indicative of VDD, with the lowest value apparent of 3.65 ng/ml at 7 DPP.
The proportion of cows below the threshold for vitamin D sufficiency (< 30 ng/ml) is shown in Fig. 3 and in Table 1. Proportions vary from a low of 19.5% of samples at 21 DPP to a high of 55.5% of farms at 7 DPP (Table 1c). Considerable inter-farm variation in VDI is also evident, with 97.8% of cows on one farm below this optimal threshold (Table 1a and b).
25(OH)D concentrations correlate with immune and metabolic traits at 7 DPP - a potential risk factor for inflammation and disease
Significant effects of vitamin D have been reported on diverse cell types – on mammary epithelial cells (Tellez-Perez et al. 2012; Poindexter et al. 2020) and on the activation of host defence peptides in bovine monocytes (Nelson et al. 2010; Corripio-Miyar et al. 2017) showing important immune relevance. Significant positive correlations were identified in this study between total white blood cell number (0.29, P = 0.013), lymphocytes (0.24, P = 0.039) and monocytes (0.40, P = 0.004) at 7 DPP (Table 2a). With evidence to support a potent anti-inflammatory role in other species, vitamin D could hold significant promise for regulation of inflammation in the post-partum cow (Brewer et al. 2020).
Similarly, a significant negative correlation between vitamin D concentrations and commonly measured indicators of metabolic function were detected at 7 DPP including urea (−0.27, P < 0.05) and NEFA (−0.26, P < 0.05). This could be reflective of cows in negative energy balance having lower intake (including vitamin D) and greater mobilisation of tissue reserves. The concentration of circulating calcium was significantly positively correlated with 25(OH)D (P = 0.016) [Table 2b]. A recent study, based in North America, identified that elevated vitamin D concentrations were associated with increased risk of ketosis and lower vitamin D concentrations also significantly associated with uterine disease (Wisnieski et al. 2020). It is therefore likely that VDI represents an important individual risk factors and warrants close attention on farm.
Conclusions
This preliminary study reports the vitamin D concentrations for pasture-based dairy cows and identified significant correlations with farm, parity and lactation. A limitation of this study is the exclusion of other factors which are likely to partially explain some of the differences including vitamin D intakes via ration, temporal differences between cows with different calving dates and potentially unidentified sub-clinical health issues. However, given the concentrations reported in this preliminary study, results suggest that current vitamin D supplementation strategies in pasture-based spring-calving herds may not equip the transition dairy cow for optimal immune and metabolic function and therefore further detailed investigation is now warranted.
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
Literature cited
Alhussien MN, Panda BSK, Kamboj A, Dang AK (2021) Peripartum changes in the activity and expression of neutrophils may predispose to the postpartum occurrence of metritis in dairy cows. Res Vet Sci 135:456–468. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.11.003
Brewer A, Cormican P, Lim JJ, Chapwanya A, O’Farrelly C, Meade KG (2020) Qualitative and quantitative differences in endometrial inflammatory gene expression precede the development of bovine uterine disease. Sci Rep 10(1):18275. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75104-7
Casas E, Lippolis JD, Kuehn LA, Reinhardt TA (2015) Seasonal variation in vitamin D status of beef cattle reared in the central United States. Domest Anim Endocrinol 52:71–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2015.03.003
Chapwanya A, Meade KG, Doherty ML, Callanan JJ, Mee JF, O’Farrelly C (2009) Histopathological and molecular evaluation of Holstein-Friesian cows postpartum: toward an improved understanding of uterine innate immunity. Theriogenology 71(9):1396–1407. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.01.006
Christakos S, Dhawan P, Porta A, Mady LJ, Seth T (2011) Vitamin D and intestinal calcium absorption. Mol Cell Endocrinol 347(1–2):25–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2011.05.038
Corripio-Miyar Y, Mellanby RJ, Morrison K, McNeilly TN (2017) 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 modulates the phenotype and function of Monocyte derived dendritic cells in cattle. BMC Vet Res 13(1):390. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1309-8
Crookenden MA, Heiser A, Murray A, Dukkipati VSR, Kay JK, Loor JJ, Meier S, Mitchell MD, Moyes KM, Walker CG, Roche JR (2016) Parturition in dairy cows temporarily alters the expression of genes in circulating neutrophils. J Dairy Sci 99(8):6470–6483. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10877
Flores-Villalva S, O’Brien MB, Reid C, Lacey S, Gordon SV, Nelson C, Meade KG (2021) Low serum vitamin D concentrations in Spring-born dairy calves are associated with elevated peripheral leukocytes. Sci Rep 11(1):18969. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98343-8
Gunville CF, Mourani PM, Ginde AA (2013) The role of vitamin D in prevention and treatment of infection. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 12(4):239–245. doi: https://doi.org/10.2174/18715281113129990046
Holcombe SJ, Wisnieski L, Gandy J, Norby B, Sordillo LM (2018) Reduced serum vitamin D concentrations in healthy early-lactation dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 101(2):1488–1494. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13547
Holick MF (2007) Vitamin D deficiency. N. Engl. J Med 357(3):266–281. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra070553
Hymoller L, Jensen SK (2017) Plasma transport of ergocalciferol and cholecalciferol and their 25-hydroxylated metabolites in dairy cows. Domest Anim Endocrinol 59:44–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2016.11.002
LeBlanc SJ (2014) Reproductive tract inflammatory disease in postpartum dairy cows. Anim 8 Suppl 1:54–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000524
Nelson CD, Lippolis JD, Reinhardt TA, Sacco RE, Powell JL, Drewnoski ME, O’Neil M, Beitz DC and W. P. Weiss. 2016a. Vitamin D status of dairy cattle: Outcomes of current practices in the dairy industry.J Dairy Sci99(12):10150–10160. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11727
Nelson CD, Powell JL, Price DM, Hersom MJ, Yelich JV, Drewnoski ME, Bird SL, Bridges GA (2016b) Assessment of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations of beef cows and calves across seasons and geographical locations. J Anim Sci 94(9):3958–3965. doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016-0611
Nelson CD, Reinhardt TA, Lippolis JD, Sacco RE, Nonnecke BJ (2012) Vitamin D signaling in the bovine immune system: a model for understanding human vitamin D requirements. Nutrients 4(3):181–196. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4030181
Nelson CD, Reinhardt TA, Thacker TC, Beitz DC, Lippolis JD (2010) Modulation of the bovine innate immune response by production of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) in bovine monocytes. J Dairy Sci 93(3):1041–1049. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2663
Poindexter MB, Kweh MF, Zimpel R, Zuniga J, Lopera C, Zenobi MG, Jiang Y, Engstrom M, Celi P, Santos JEP, Nelson CD (2020) Feeding supplemental 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 increases serum mineral concentrations and alters mammary immunity of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 103(1):805–822. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-16999
Tellez-Perez AD, Alva-Murillo N, Ochoa-Zarzosa A, Lopez-Meza JE (2012) Cholecalciferol (vitamin D) differentially regulates antimicrobial peptide expression in bovine mammary epithelial cells: implications during Staphylococcus aureus internalization. Vet Microbiol 160(1–2):91–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.05.007
Weir RR, Strain JJ, Johnston M, Lowis C, Fearon AM, Stewart S, Pourshahidi LK (2017) Environmental and genetic factors influence the vitamin D content of cows’ milk. Proc Nutr Soc 76(1):76–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665116000811
Wisnieski L, Brown JL, Holcombe SJ, Gandy JC, Sordillo LM (2020) Serum vitamin D concentrations at dry-off and close-up predict increased postpartum urine ketone concentrations in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 103(2):1795–1806. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-16599
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the participating farmers for the use of their cattle and for providing access to records. The authors would like to show appreciation to Margaret Murray (Teagasc) for the completion of ELISA analyses.
Funding
This project was funded by the Department of Agriculture, Food and Marine (Stimulus grant number 13/S/472).
Open Access funding provided by the IReL Consortium
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceived the study: KGM, NR, MB, EW, COF and AE. Performed experiments and interpreted data: NR, KGM, AB, MB and AC. Wrote the manuscript: NR, KGM and AE. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest statement
All authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical approval
All experimental procedures involving animals were conducted under ethical approval and experimental license (Licence no for 2019 study: AE19132/P090 and AE19132/P038) from the Irish Health Products Regulatory Authority in accordance with the Cruelty to Animals Act 1876 and in agreement with the European Union (Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes) regulations 2012 (S.I. No. 543 of 2012).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ryan, N.J., Brewer, A., Chapwanya, A. et al. A preliminary analysis of the variation in circulating 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentrations in peri-partum spring-calving dairy cows. Vet Res Commun 47, 311–318 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-022-09946-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-022-09946-z