Abstract
Several processes bury plants, but sediment can also be subsequently removed, often by delayed erosion. Thus, the ability to survive multiple years of burial and to respond when released are important to vegetation changes and population dynamics. We experimentally evaluated the effects of delayed removal of tephra (aerially transported volcanic ejecta) in an old-growth forest understory near Mount St. Helens, using 1-m2 plots assigned to three treatments: tephra removed 4 months after deposition (50 plots), tephra removed 28 months after deposition (the delayed erosion treatment, 50 plots), and undisturbed, natural tephra (100 plots). Prior to tephra removal, species density, cover, shoot density, and shoot size in the delayed erosion treatment were all similar to values in natural plots and significantly less than values in plots cleared initially, indicating that 24 months of additional burial adversely affected understory plants. However, all attributes eventually approached pre-eruption values for shrubs and herbs, indicating that erosion greatly facilitated vegetation recovery. Responses varied substantially among species and growth forms. Overall, our experimental results indicate that some plants of most species can respond effectively after release from burial of at least three growing seasons. In addition, the delay of erosion retards ecosystem recovery relative to early erosion, facilitates recovery relative to no erosion, and modifies the trajectory of post-disturbance vegetation change.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data will be made available at https://osf.io/ upon acceptance.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Allen JRM, Huntley B (2018) Effects of tephra falls on vegetation: a late-quaternary record from southern Italy. J Ecol 106:2456–2472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12998
Antos JA, Zobel DB (1982) Snowpack modification of volcanic tephra effects on forest understory plants near Mount St. Helens. Ecology 63:1969–1972. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940135
Antos JA, Zobel DB (1985a) Plant form, developmental plasticity, and survival following burial by volcanic tephra. Can J Bot 63:2083–2090. https://doi.org/10.1139/b85-293
Antos JA, Zobel DB (1985b) Upward movement of underground plant parts into deposits of tephra from Mount St. Helens. Can J Bot 63:2091–2096. https://doi.org/10.1139/b85-294
Antos JA, Zobel DB (1985c) Recovery of forest understories buried by tephra from Mount St. Helens. Vegetatio 64:103–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00044786
Antos JA, Zobel DB (1986) Seedling establishment in forests affected by tephra from Mount St. Helens. Am J Bot 73:495–499. https://doi.org/10.2307/2444253
Antos JA, Zobel DB (1987) How plants survive burial: A review and initial responses to tephra from Mount St. Helens. In: Bilderback DE (ed) Mount St. Helens 1980: botanical consequences of the explosive eruptions. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 246–261
Antos JA, Zobel DB (2005) Plant responses in forests of the tephra-fall zone. In: Dale VH, Swanson FJ, Crisafulli CM (eds) Ecological responses to the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens. Springer, New York, pp 47–58
Ayris MP, Delmelle P (2012) The immediate environmental effects of tephra emission. Bull Volcanol 74:1905–1936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-012-0654-5
Bach CE (2001) Long-term effects of insect herbivory and sand accretion on plant succession on sand dunes. Ecology 82:1401–1416
Chang CC, Halpern CB, Antos JA, Avolio ML, Biswas A, Cook JE, del Moral R, Fischer DG, Holz A, Pabst RJ, Swanson ME, Zobel DB (2019) Testing conceptual models of early plant succession across a disturbance gradient. J Ecol 107:517–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13120
Cook JE, Halpern CB (2018) Vegetation changes in blown-down and scorched forests 10–26 years after the eruption of Mount St. Helens, Washington, USA. Plant Ecol 209:957–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-018-0849-8
Crisafulli CM, Dale VH (eds) (2018) Ecological responses at Mount St. Helens: revisited 35 years after the 1980 eruption. Springer, New York
Dale VH, Swanson FJ, Crisafulli CM (eds) (2005) Ecological recovery of Mount St. Helens after the 1980 eruption. Springer, New York
Dech JP, Maun MA (2005) Zonation of vegetation along a burial gradient on the leeward slopes of Lake Huron sand dunes. Can J Bot 83:227–236. https://doi.org/10.1139/B04-163
Eddudóttir SD, Erlendsson E, Gísladóttir G (2017) Effects of the Hekla 4 tephra on vegetation in Northwest Iceland. Veget Hist Archaeobot. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-017-0603-5
Efford JT, Clarkson BD, Bylsma RJ (2014) Persistent effects of a tephra eruption (AD 1655) on treeline composition and structure, Mt Taranaki, New Zealand. New Zealand J Bot 52:245–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.2014.886599
Egan J, Fletcher WJ, Allott TEH, Lane CS, Blackford JJ, Clark DH (2016) The impact and significance of tephra deposition on a Holocene forest environment in the North Cascades, Washington, USA. Quat Sci Rev 137:135–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.02.013
Eggler WA (1948) Plant communities in the vicinity of the volcano El Paricutin, Mexico, after two and a half years of eruption. Ecology 29:415–436
Field JP, Belnap J, Breshears DD, Neff JC, Okin GS, Whicker JJ, Painter TH, Ravi S, Reheis MC, Reynolds RL (2010) The ecology of dust. Front Ecol Environ 8:423–430. https://doi.org/10.1890/090050)
Fischer DG, Antos JA, Grandy WG, Zobel DB (2016) A little disturbance goes a long way: 33-year understory successional responses to a thin tephra deposit. For Ecol Manage 382:236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.10.018
Fischer DG, Antos JA, Biswas A, Zobel DB (2019) Understorey succession after burial by tephra from Mount St. Helens. J Ecol 107:531–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13052
Franklin JF, Dyrness CT (1973) Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-8
Gilbert ME, Ripley BS (2010) Resolving the differences in plant burial responses. Austral Ecol 35:53–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02011.x
Gillman LN, Ogden J (2001) Physical damage by litterfall to canopy tree seedlings in two temperate New Zealand forests. J Veg Sci 12:671–676
Gillman LN, Wright SD, Ogden J (2003) Response of forest tree seedlings to simulated litterfall damage. Plant Ecol 169:53–60
Griggs RF (1918) The recovery of vegetation at Kodiak. Ohio J Sci 19:1–57
Griggs RF (1919) The beginnings of revegetation in Katmai Valley. Ohio J Sci 19:318–342
Harris E, Mack RN, Ku MSB (1987) Death of steppe cryptogams under the ash from Mount St. Helens. Am J Bot 74:1249–1253
Hintz L, Fischer D, Ferrari N, Crisafulli CM (2021) Vegetation dynamics under residual large trees following a volcanic eruption in a Valdivian temperate rainforest. Plant Ecol 222:915–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-021-01151-3
Hitchcock CL, Cronquist A (1973) Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle
Hotes S, Poschlod P, Takahashi SH, Grootjans AP, Adema E (2004) Effects of tephra deposition on mire vegetation: a field experiment in Hokkaido, Japan. J Ecol 92:624–634
Hotes S, Grootjans AP, Takahashi H, Ekschmitt K, Poschlod P (2010) Resilience and alternative equilibria in a mire plant community after experimental disturbance by volcanic ash. Oikos 119:952–963. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.18094.x
Kent M, Owen NW, Dale P, Newnham RM, Giles TM (2001) Studies of vegetation burial: a focus for biogeography and biogeomorphology? Progress Phys Geogr 25:455–482
Kéry M, Gregg KB (2004) Demographic analysis of dormancy and survival in the terrestrial orchid Cypripedium reginae. J Ecol 92:686–695
Maun MA (1998) Adaptations of plants to burial in coastal sand dunes. Can J Bot 76:713–738
Maun MA, Perumal J (1999) Zonation of vegetation on lacustrine coastal dunes: effects of burial by sand. Ecol Lett 2:14–18
Miller MT, Antos JA, Allen GA (2012) Demography of a dormancy-prone geophyte: influence of spatial scale on interpretation of dynamics. Plant Ecol 213:569–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-012-0022-8
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2020) Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package, version 2.2-7
R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/
Reintal M, Tali K, Haldna M, Kull T (2010) Habitat preferences as related to the prolonged dormancy of perennial herbs and ferns. Plant Ecol 210:111–123
Roberts MR (2004) Response of the herbaceous layer to natural disturbance in North American forests. Can J Bot 82:1273–1283. https://doi.org/10.1139/B04-091
Shefferson RP (2009) The evolutionary ecology of vegetative dormancy in mature herbaceous perennial plants. J Ecol 97:1000–1009
Shefferson RP, Kull T, Hutchings MJ et al (2018) Drivers of vegetative dormancy across herbaceous perennial plant species. Ecol Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12940
Swanson FJ, Crisafulli CM (2018) Volcano ecology: state of the field and contributions of Mount St. Helens research. In: Crisafulli CM, Dale VH (eds) Ecological responses at Mount St Helens: revisited 35 years after the 1980 eruption. Springer, New York, pp 305–323
Swanson FJ, Jones J, Crisafulli C, González ME, Lara A (2016) Puyehue-Cordón Caulle eruption of 2011: Tephra fall and initial forest responses in the Chilean Andes. Bosque 37:85–96. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92002016000100009
Sydes C, Grime JP (1981a) Effects of tree leaf litter on herbaceous vegetation in deciduous woodland. II. An Experimental Investigation. J Ecol 69:249–262
Sydes C, Grime JP (1981b) Effects of tree leaf litter on herbaceous vegetation in deciduous woodland. I. Field Investigations. J Ecol 69:237–248
Sykes MT, Wilson JB (1990a) An experimental investigation into the response of New Zealand sand dune species to different depths of burial by sand. Acta Bot Neerlandica 39:171–181
Sykes MT, Wilson JB (1990b) Dark tolerance in plants of dunes. Funct Ecol 4:799–805
Waitt Jr RB, Dzurisin D (1981) Proximal air-fall deposits from the May 18 eruption-stratigraphy and field sedimentology. In: Lipman PW, Mullineaux DR (eds) The 1980 eruptions of Mount St Helens, Washington. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1250, pp 601–616
Waxwing SR, Fischer DG, Antos JA, Biswas A, Zobel DB (2021) Long-term responses of forest-floor bryophytes buried by tephra in the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens. Botany 99:151–165. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2020-0127
Xiong S, Nilsson C, Johansson ME, Jansson R (2001) Responses of riparian plants to accumulation of silt and plant litter: the importance of plant traits. J Veg Sci 12:481–490
Zobel DB, Antos JA (1986) Survival of prolonged burial by subalpine forest understory plants. Am Midl Nat 115:282–287. https://doi.org/10.2307/2425865
Zobel DB, Antos JA (1991) 1980 tephra from Mount St. Helens: spatial and temporal variation beneath forest canopies. Biol Fertility Soils 12:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369389
Zobel DB, Antos JA (1992) Survival of plants buried for eight growing seasons by volcanic tephra. Ecology 73:698–701. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940777
Zobel DB, Antos JA (1997) A decade of recovery of understory vegetation buried by volcanic tephra from Mount St. Helens. Ecol Monogr 67:317–344. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0317:ADOROU]2.0.CO;2
Zobel DB, Antos JA (2007) Flowering and seedling production of understory herbs in old-growth forests affected by 1980 tephra from Mount St. Helens. Can J Bot 85:607–620. https://doi.org/10.1139/B07-057
Zobel DB, Antos JA (2009) Species properties and recovery from disturbance: forest herbs buried by volcanic tephra. J Veg Sci 20:650–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01057.x
Zobel DB, Antos JA (2016) Flowering patterns of understory herbs thirty years after disturbance of subalpine old-growth forests by tephra from Mount St. Helens. Int J Plant Sci 177:145–156. https://doi.org/10.1086/684181
Zobel DB, Antos JA (2017) Community reorganization in forest understories buried by volcanic tephra. Ecosphere 8(12):e02045. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2045
Zobel DB, Antos JA, Fischer DG (2021) Secondary disturbance following a deposit of volcanic tephra: a 30 year record from old-growth forest understory. Can J for Res 51:1541–1549. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2020-0473
Acknowledgements
For their hard work in the field, we thank Tom Hill, Matt Blakely-Smith, Susan Seyer, Ray Yurkewycz, Erica Wheeler, Heidi Guest, Joanna Smith, Mike Ryan, Debbie Brinckman, Abir Biswas, K. Stella Waxwing, Molly Bernstein and Kazuki Hibi. For funding we thank the US National Science Foundation (DEB-8020866 and DEB-8109906), USDA Science and Education Administration (59-2411-1-2-009-0), National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Global Forest, USDA Forest Service and Oregon State University.
Funding
This work was supported by the US National Science Foundation (DEB-8020866 and DEB-8109906), USDA Science and Education Administration (59-2411-1-2-009-0), Sabbatical Support to DGF from The Evergreen State College, The Evergreen State College SURF program National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Global Forest, USDA Forest Service and Oregon State University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JAA and DBZ designed the original study and led much of the field sampling. DFG conducted the analyses and led some of the field sampling. DBZ wrote the first draft and all authors made major editorial contributions to the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare in this work.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Communicated by Christopher Carcaillet.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zobel, D.B., Antos, J.A. & Fischer, D.G. Community development by forest understory plants after prolonged burial by tephra. Plant Ecol 223, 381–396 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-021-01216-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-021-01216-3