Skip to main content
Log in

Community development by forest understory plants after prolonged burial by tephra

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several processes bury plants, but sediment can also be subsequently removed, often by delayed erosion. Thus, the ability to survive multiple years of burial and to respond when released are important to vegetation changes and population dynamics. We experimentally evaluated the effects of delayed removal of tephra (aerially transported volcanic ejecta) in an old-growth forest understory near Mount St. Helens, using 1-m2 plots assigned to three treatments: tephra removed 4 months after deposition (50 plots), tephra removed 28 months after deposition (the delayed erosion treatment, 50 plots), and undisturbed, natural tephra (100 plots). Prior to tephra removal, species density, cover, shoot density, and shoot size in the delayed erosion treatment were all similar to values in natural plots and significantly less than values in plots cleared initially, indicating that 24 months of additional burial adversely affected understory plants. However, all attributes eventually approached pre-eruption values for shrubs and herbs, indicating that erosion greatly facilitated vegetation recovery. Responses varied substantially among species and growth forms. Overall, our experimental results indicate that some plants of most species can respond effectively after release from burial of at least three growing seasons. In addition, the delay of erosion retards ecosystem recovery relative to early erosion, facilitates recovery relative to no erosion, and modifies the trajectory of post-disturbance vegetation change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be made available at https://osf.io/ upon acceptance.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

For their hard work in the field, we thank Tom Hill, Matt Blakely-Smith, Susan Seyer, Ray Yurkewycz, Erica Wheeler, Heidi Guest, Joanna Smith, Mike Ryan, Debbie Brinckman, Abir Biswas, K. Stella Waxwing, Molly Bernstein and Kazuki Hibi. For funding we thank the US National Science Foundation (DEB-8020866 and DEB-8109906), USDA Science and Education Administration (59-2411-1-2-009-0), National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Global Forest, USDA Forest Service and Oregon State University.

Funding

This work was supported by the US National Science Foundation (DEB-8020866 and DEB-8109906), USDA Science and Education Administration (59-2411-1-2-009-0), Sabbatical Support to DGF from The Evergreen State College, The Evergreen State College SURF program National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Global Forest, USDA Forest Service and Oregon State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JAA and DBZ designed the original study and led much of the field sampling. DFG conducted the analyses and led some of the field sampling. DBZ wrote the first draft and all authors made major editorial contributions to the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph A. Antos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare in this work.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Communicated by Christopher Carcaillet.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zobel, D.B., Antos, J.A. & Fischer, D.G. Community development by forest understory plants after prolonged burial by tephra. Plant Ecol 223, 381–396 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-021-01216-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-021-01216-3

Keywords

Navigation