Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 219, Issue 6, pp 665–675 | Cite as

Refoliation of deciduous canopy trees following severe insect defoliation: comparison of Fagus crenata and Quercus crispula

  • Haruki Nakajima
Article

Abstract

Deciduous trees can survive severe defoliation by herbivores and often refoliate in the same season. Refoliation following severe defoliation represents compensatory regrowth to recover foliage biomass. Although the relationship between defoliation intensity and degree of refoliation at the individual level has been quantified following artificial defoliation for saplings and small trees, no study has examined the relationship for canopy trees and interspecific differences in this relationship. In this study, defoliation by gypsy moths in an outbreak year and subsequent refoliation were visually surveyed for canopy trees of Fagus crenata (n = 80) and Quercus crispula (n = 113) in central Japan. Defoliation and refoliation estimates were scored in 10% classes as the ratio to foliage present before defoliation. The degree of refoliation and the proportion of refoliated trees were high in severely defoliated trees. For 60 and 100% defoliated trees, respective refoliations were 2 and 66% for F. crenata, and 37 and 88% for Q. crispula. All of the 90 and 100% defoliated trees refoliated. These results indicate that severely defoliated trees show an increased need for refoliation to maintain metabolism. Beta regression analysis showed that Q. crispula possessed higher refoliation capability than F. crenata. This is likely associated with the relatively large storage reserves and recurrent growth flush pattern of oak species, which are strong characteristics of oaks and adaptive for response to herbivory and catastrophic disturbances. Interspecific differences in refoliation capability may exert differential effects on forest ecosystem processes, such as influencing the growth of understory species.

Keywords

Foliage recovery Compensatory regrowth Insect herbivory Gypsy moth defoliation Stored reserves Beta regression 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to my colleagues at Toyama Prefectural Government for their helpful support. This study was funded by Toyama Prefecture, Japan.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abrams MD (1992) Fire and the development of oak forests. Bioscience 42:346–353.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1311781 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arimoto M, Iwaizumi R (2014) Identification of Japanese Lymantria species (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) based on PCR–RFLP analysis of mitochondrial DNA. Appl Entomol Zool 49:159–169.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-013-0235-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Augspurger CK (2009) Spring 2007 warmth and frost: phenology, damage and refoliation in a temperate deciduous forest. Func Ecol 23:1031–1039.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01587.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Augspurger CK (2011) Frost damage and its cascading negative effects on Aesculus glabra. Plant Ecol 212:1193–1203.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-9897-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell JL, Whitmore RC (1997) Eastern towhee numbers increase following defoliation by gypsy moths. Auk 114:708–716.  https://doi.org/10.2307/4089290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boege K (2005) Influence of plant ontogeny on compensation to leaf damage. Am J Bot 92:1632–1640.  https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.10.1632 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Borchert R (1975) Endogenous shoot growth rhythms and indeterminate shoot growth in oak. Physiol Plant 35:152–157.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1975.tb03885.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buck-Sorlin GH, Bell AD (2000) Models of crown architecture in Quercus petraea and Q. robur: shoot lengths and bud numbers. Forestry 73:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/73.1.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Canham CD, Finzi AC, Pacala SW, Burbank DH (1994) Causes and consequences of resource heterogeneity in forests: interspecific variation in light transmission by canopy trees. Can J For Res 24:337–349.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x94-046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaar H, Colin F, Collet C (1997) Effects of environmental factors on the shoot development of Quercus petraea seedlings: A methodological approach. For Ecol Manage 97:119–131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00093-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapin FS, Schulze ED, Mooney HA (1990) The ecology and economics of storage in plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 21:423–447.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.21.110190.002231 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cho DS, Boerner REJ (1991) Canopy disturbance patterns and regeneration of Quercus species in two Ohio old-growth forests. Vegetatio 93:9–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00044920 Google Scholar
  13. Collins S (1961) Benefits to understory from canopy defoliation by gypsy moth larvae. Ecology 42:836–838.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1933521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cribari-Neto F, Zeileis A (2010) Beta regression in R. J Stat Softw 34(2):1–24.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v034.i02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Beurs KM, Townsend PA (2008) Estimating the effect of gypsy moth defoliation using MODIS. Remote Sens Environ 112:3983–3990.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Debussche M, Debussche G, Lepart J (2001) Changes in the vegetation of Quercus pubescens woodland after cessation of coppicing and grazing. J Veg Sci 12:81–92.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2001.tb02619.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Del Tredici P (2001) Sprouting in temperate trees: a morphological and ecological review. Bot Rev 67:121–140.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dobbertin M, Brang P (2001) Crown defoliation improves tree mortality models. For Ecol Manage 141:271–284.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00335-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Embree DG (1967) Effects of the winter moth on growth and mortality of red oak in Nova Scotia. For Sci 13:295–299Google Scholar
  20. Eschtruth AK, Battles JJ (2014) Ephemeral disturbances have long-lasting impacts on forest invasion dynamics. Ecology 95:1770–1779.  https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1980.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fajvan MA, Rentch J, Gottschalk K (2008) The effects of thinning and gypsy moth defoliation on wood volume growth in oaks. Trees 22:257–268.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-007-0183-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferrari SLP, Cribari-Neto F (2004) Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. J Appl Stat 31:799–815.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0266476042000214501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Furuno T (1964) On the feeding quantity of the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar LINNE) and the camphor silk moth (Dictyoploca japonica BUTLER). J Jpn For Soc 46:14–19 (in Japanese with English summary) Google Scholar
  24. Gottschalk KW (1993) Silvicultural guidelines for forest stands threatened by the gypsy moth. General technical report NE-221. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, RadnorGoogle Scholar
  25. Gottschalk KW, Colbert JJ, Feicht DL (1998) Tree mortality risk of oak due to gypsy moth. Eur J For Path 28:121–132.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.1998.tb01173.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grace JR (1986) The influence of gypsy moth on the composition and nutrient content of litter fall in a Pennsylvania oak forest. For Sci 32:855–870Google Scholar
  27. Gregory RA, Wargo PM (1986) Timing of defoliation and its effect on bud development, starch reserves, and sap sugar concentration in sugar maple. Can J For Res 16:10–17.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x86-003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanson PJ, Dickson RE, Isebrands JG, Crow TR, Dixon RK (1986) A morphological index of Quercus seedling ontogeny for use in studies of physiology and growth. Tree Physiol 2:273–281.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/2.1-2-3.273 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hashizume H (1979) Characteristics of growth of Buna (Fagus crenata) seedlings and nursery practice. Bull Tottori Univ For 11:55–69 (in Japanese with English summary) Google Scholar
  30. Heichel GH, Turner NC (1976) Phenology and leaf growth of defoliated hardwood trees. In: Anderson JF, Kaya HK (eds) Perspectives in forest entomology. Academic Press, New York, pp 31–40Google Scholar
  31. Heichel GH, Turner NC (1983) CO2 assimilation of primary and regrowth foliage of red maple (Acer rubrum L.) and red oak (Quercus rubra L.): response to defoliation. Oecologia 57:14–19.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379555 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hikosaka K, Takashima T, Kabeya D, Hirose T, Kamata N (2005) Biomass allocation and leaf chemical defence in defoliated seedlings of Quercus serrata with respect to carbon–nitrogen balance. Ann Bot 95:1025–1032.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci111 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Hilton GM, Packham JR, Willis AJ (1987) Effects of experimental defoliation on a population of pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.). New Phytol 107:603–612.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb02930.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoogesteger J, Karlsson PS (1992) Effects of defoliation on radial stem growth and photosynthesis in the mountain birch (Betula pubescens ssp. tortuosa). Func Ecol 6:317–323.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2389523 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hunter MD (1987) Opposing effects of spring defoliation on late season oak caterpillars. Ecol Entomol 12:373–382.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1987.tb01018.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hurley A, Watts D, Burke B, Richards C (2004) Identifying gypsy moth defoliation in Ohio using Landsat data. Environ Eng Geosci 10:321–328.  https://doi.org/10.2113/10.4.321 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Iwasa Y, Kubo T (1997) Optimal size of storage for recovery after unpredictable disturbances. Evol Ecol 11:41–65.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018483429029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jedlicka J, Vandermeer J, Aviles-Vazquez K, Barros O, Perfecto I (2004) Gypsy moth defoliation of oak trees and a positive response of red maple and black cherry: an example of indirect interaction. Am Midl Nat 152:231–236.  https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031(2004)152[0231:GMDOOT]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kaitaniemi P, Neuvonen S, Nyyssönen T (1999) Effects of cumulative defoliations on growth, reproduction, and insect resistance in mountain birch. Ecology 80:524–532.  https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0524:EOCDOG]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kamata N (2002) Outbreaks of forest defoliating insects in Japan, 1950–2000. Bull Entomol Res 92:109–117.  https://doi.org/10.1079/BER2002159 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kikuzawa K (1983) Leaf survival of woody plants in deciduous broad-leaved forests. 1. Tall trees. Can J Bot 61:2133–2139.  https://doi.org/10.1139/b83-230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Koike T (1988) Leaf structure and photosynthetic performance as related to the forest succession of deciduous broad-leaved trees. Plant Spec Biol 3:77–87.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.1988.tb00173.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kosola KR, Dickmann DI, Paul EA, Parry D (2001) Repeated insect defoliation effects on growth, nitrogen acquisition, carbohydrates, and root demography of poplars. Oecologia 129:65–74.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100694 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kulman HM (1971) Effects of insect defoliation on growth and mortality of trees. Ann Rev Entomol 16:289–324.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.16.010171.001445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Långström B, Annila E, Hellqvist C, Varama M, Niemelä P (2001) Tree mortality, needle biomass recovery and growth losses in Scots pine following defoliation by Diprion pini (L.) and subsequent attack by Tomicus piniperda (L.). Scand J For Res 16:342–353.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580118325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liebhold AM, Gottschalk KW, Muzika R, Montgomery ME, Young R, O’Day K, Kelley B (1995) Suitability of North American tree species to the gypsy moth: a summary of field and laboratory tests. General technical report NE-221. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, RadnorGoogle Scholar
  47. Logan JA, Régnière J, Powell JA (2003) Assessing the impacts of global warming on forest pest dynamics. Front Ecol Environ 1:130–137.  https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0130:ATIOGW]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Masaki T, Suzuki W, Niiyama K, Iida S, Tanaka H, Nakashizuka T (1992) Community structure of a species-rich temperate forest, Ogawa Forest Reserve, central Japan. Vegetatio 98:97–111.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mikan CJ, Orwig DA, Abrams MD (1994) Age structure and successional dynamics of a presettlement-origin chestnut oak forest in the Pennsylvania Piedmont. Bull Tor Bot Club 121:13–23.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2996880 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miquelle DG (1983) Browse regrowth and consumption following summer defoliation by moose. J Wildl Manage 47:17–24.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3808047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mizumachi E, Osawa N, Akiyama R, Tokuchi N (2004) The effects of herbivory and soil fertility on the growth patterns of Quercus serrata and Q. crispula saplings at the shoot and individual levels. Popul Ecol 46:203–211.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-004-0188-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Muzika RM, Liebhold AM (1999) Changes in radial increment of host and nonhost tree species with gypsy moth defoliation. Can J For Res 29:1365–1373.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x99-098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nakajima H (2015a) Defoliation by gypsy moths negatively affects the production of acorns by two Japanese oak species. Trees 29:1559–1566.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-015-1237-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nakajima H (2015b) Estimating sound seedfall density of Fagus crenata using a visual survey. J For Res 20:94–103.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-014-0440-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nakajima H, Ishida M (2014) Decline of Quercus crispula in abandoned coppice forests caused by secondary succession and Japanese oak wilt disease: stand dynamics over twenty years. For Ecol Manage 334:18–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.08.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nakajima H, Kume A, Ishida M, Ohmiya T, Mizoue N (2011) Evaluation of estimates of crown condition in forest monitoring: comparison between visual estimation and automated crown image analysis. Ann For Sci 68:1333–1340.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-011-0132-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nakamura M, Kagata H, Ohgushi T (2006) Trunk cutting initiates bottom-up cascades in a tri-trophic system: sprouting increases biodiversity of herbivorous and predaceous arthropods on willows. Oikos 113:259–268.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14251.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Namikawa K, Ishikawa Y, Sano J (1997) Stand dynamics during a 12-year period in a second-growth stand in a cool temperature forest in northern Japan. Ecol Res 12:277–287.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02529457 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Neuvonen S, Hanhimak S, Suomela J, Haukioja E (1988) Early season damage to birch foliage affects the performance of a late season herbivore. J Appl Entomol 105:182–189.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1988.tb00174.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ohno Y, Umeki K, Watanabe I, Takiya M, Terazawa K, Hara H, Matsuki S (2008) Variation in shoot mortality within crowns of severely defoliated Betula maximowicziana trees in Hokkaido, northern Japan. Ecol Res 23:355–362.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-007-0386-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Onodera K, Hara H (2011) Suitability of plant species as food for Asian gypsy moth larvae of the Hokkaido population. Bull Hokkaido For Res Inst 48:47–54 (in Japanese with English summary) Google Scholar
  62. Palacio S, Hernández R, Maestro–Martínez M, Camarero JJ (2012) Fast replenishment of initial carbon stores after defoliation by the pine processionary moth and its relationship to the re-growth ability of trees. Trees 26:1627–1640.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-012-0739-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Piper FI, Fajardo A (2014) Foliar habit, tolerance to defoliation and their link to carbon and nitrogen storage. J Ecol 102:1101–1111.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Piper FI, Gundale MJ, Fajardo A (2015) Extreme defoliation reduces tree growth but not C and N storage in a winter-deciduous species. Ann Bot 115:1093–1103.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcv038 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Price PW (1991) The plant vigor hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos 62:244–251.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3545270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  67. Reich PB, Teskey RO, Johnson PS, Hinckley TM (1980) Periodic root and shoot growth in oak. For Sci 26:590–598Google Scholar
  68. Rooke T, Bergström R (2007) Growth, chemical responses and herbivory after simulated leaf browsing in Combretum apiculatum. Plant Ecol 189:201–212.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9177-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rozenbergar D, Diaci J (2014) Architecture of Fagus sylvatica regeneration improves over time in mixed old-growth and managed forests. For Ecol Manage 318:334–340.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.01.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rozendaal DMA, Kobe RK (2014) Competitive balance among tree species altered by forest tent caterpillar defoliation. For Ecol Manage 327:18–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Saitoh T, Vik JO, Stenseth NC, Takanishi T, Hayakashi S, Ishida N, Ohmori M, Morita T, Uemura S, Kadomatsu M, Osawa J, Maekawa K (2008) Effects of acorns abundance on density dependence in a Japanese wood mice (Apodemus speciosus) population. Popul Ecol 50:159–167.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-008-0076-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sakai A, Sakai S, Akiyama F (1997) Do sprouting tree species on erosion-prone sites carry large reserves of resources? Ann Bot 79:625–630.  https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schowalter TD, Hargrove WW, Crossley DA (1986) Herbivory in forested ecosystems. Ann Rev Entomol 31:177–196.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.31.010186.001141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schultz JC, Baldwin IT (1982) Oak leaf quality declines in response to defoliation by gypsy moth larvae. Science 217:149–151.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.217.4555.149 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Seiwa K, Kikuzawa K (1991) Phenology of tree seedlings in relation to seed size. Can J Bot 69:532–538.  https://doi.org/10.1139/b91-072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shibata R, Shibata M, Tanaka H, Iida S, Masaki T, Hatta F, Kurokawa H, Nakashizuka T (2014) Interspecific variation in the size-dependent resprouting ability of temperate woody species and its adaptive significance. J Ecol 102:209–220.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Smithson M, Verkuilen J (2006) A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psychol Methods 11:54–71.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.54 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Takahashi K, Goto A (2012) Morphological and physiological responses of beech and oak seedlings to canopy conditions: why does beech dominate the understory of unmanaged oak fuelwood stands? Can J For Res 42:1623–1630.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x2012-097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Valladares F, Chico J, Aranda I, Balaguer L, Dizengremel P, Manrique E, Dreyer E (2002) The greater seedling high-light tolerance of Quercus robur over Fagus sylvatica is linked to a greater physiological plasticity. Trees 16:395–403.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-002-0184-4 Google Scholar
  80. van der Heyden F, Stock WD (1996) Regrowth of a semiarid shrub following simulated browsing: the role of reserve carbon. Func Ecol 10:647–653.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2390175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wargo PM, Parker J, Houston DR (1972) Starch content in roots of defoliated sugar maple. For Sci 18:203–204Google Scholar
  82. Welander NT, Ottosson B (1998) The influence of shading on growth and morphology in seedlings of Quercus robur L. and Fagus sylvatica L. For Ecol Manage 107:117–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00326-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. West C (1985) Factors underlying the late seasonal appearance of the lepidopterous leaf-mining guild on oak. Ecol Entomol 10:111–120.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1985.tb00540.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Williams DW, Fuester RW, Metterhouse WW, Balaam RJ, Bullock RH, Chianese RJ (1991) Oak defoliation and population density relationships for the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). J Econ Entomol 84:1508–1514.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/84.5.1508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forest Research InstituteToyama Prefectural Agricultural, Forestry and Fisheries Research CenterToyamaJapan

Personalised recommendations