Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interspecific effects on plant size inequality: evidence from a temperate savanna community

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influences of intraspecific competition on plant size inequality have been well documented, but interspecific effects on this topic remain little understood. Here we examined the effects of canopy shading and fine roots of the trees (Elaeagnus angustifolia) on size inequality of the grasses (Achnatherum splendens) in a temperate savanna community in northwest China. Three study plots of 400 m2 were divided into 4-m2 quadrats, within each of which (1) canopy shading was quantified by modeling cumulative direct solar radiation (CDSR) and (2) the root effect was quantified using an empirical relationship between tree fine root density (TFRD) and relative distance to tree bases. Morphological traits were measured to represent grass size. Redundancy analysis (RDA) was conducted to examine the relative influences of grass density, CDSR and TFRD on the coefficient of variation of grass size. Results showed that no significant correlation occurred between grass density and grass size inequality. Both CDSR and TFRD had significant negative correlations with grass size inequality, suggesting that canopy shading and the presence of fine roots of trees can, respectively, increase and reduce grass size inequality. Canopy shading and TFRD played competitive roles in determining grass size inequality, where the root effect was a stronger factor than canopy shading. The tree effects can substantially alter the intensity of water stress. In response, size inequality of the grasses could be influenced through size-specific growth/mortality and slowed size divergence. These mechanisms could operate together in the savanna community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagchi S (2007) Relationship between size hierarchy and density of trees in a tropical dry deciduous forest of western India. J Veg Sci 18:389–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begon M (1984) Density and individual fitness: asymmetric competition. In: Shorrocks B (ed) Evolutionary ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 175–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsky AJ (1994) Influences of trees on savanna productivity: tests of shade, nutrients, and tree-grass competition. Ecology 75:922–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsky AJ, Canham CD (1994) Forest gaps and isolated savanna trees. Bioscience 44:77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendel RB, Higgins SS, Teberg JE, Pyke DA (1989) Comparison of skewness coefficient, coefficient of variation, and Gini coefficient as inequality measures within populations. Oecologia 78:394–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonan GB (1991) Density effects on the size structure of annual plant populations: an indication of neighbourhood competition. Ann Bot 68:341–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock TD (1981) Calculating solar radiation for ecological studies. Ecol Model 14:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper BB (1996) Demographic consequences of drought in the herbaceous perennial Cryptantha flava: effects of density, associations with shrubs, and plant size. Oecologia 106:144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper BB, Cahill JF (1996) Limited effects of soil nutrient heterogeneity on populations of Abutilon theophrasti (Malvaceae). Am J Bot 83:333–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper BB, Jackson RB (1997) Plant competition underground. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:545–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper BB, Schenk HJ, Jackson RB (2003) Defining a plant’s belowground zone of influence. Ecology 84:2313–2321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu C, Weiner J, Maestre FT, Xiao S, Wang Y, Li Q, Yuan J, Zhao L, Ren Z, Wang G (2009) Positive interactions can increase size inequality in plant populations. J Ecol 97:1401–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickie IA, Schnitzer SA, Reich PB, Hobbie SE (2005) Spatially disjunct effects of co-occurring competition and facilitation. Ecol Lett 8:1191–1200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duffle JA, Beckman WA (1980) Solar engineering of thermal processes. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara T (1986) Effects of density and extinction coefficient on size variability in plant populations. Ann Bot 57:885–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Z, Liu M, Chen B, Uriankhai T, Xu C, Zhang M (2010) Distribution and interspecific correlation of root biomass density in an arid Elaeagnus angustifoliaAchnatherum splendens community. Acta Ecol Sin 30:45–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston M (1986) Size bimodality in plant populations: an alternative hypothesis. Ecology 67:265–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson J, Ash AJ (1998) Tree-grass relationships in open eucalypt woodlands of northeastern Australia: influence of trees on pasture productivity, forage quality and species distribution. Agroforest Syst 40:159–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepš J, Šmilauer P (2003) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig F, Dawson TE, Prins HHT, Berendse F, de Kroon H (2004a) Below-ground competition between trees and grasses may overwhelm the facilitative effects of hydraulic lift. Ecol Lett 7:623–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig F, de Kroon H, Berendse F, Prins HHT (2004b) The influence of savanna trees on nutrient, water and light availability and the understorey vegetation. Plant Ecol 170:93–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald SE, Yin F (1999) Factors influencing size inequality in peatland black spruce and tamarack: evidence from post-drainage release growth. J Ecol 87:404–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens SN, Breshears DD, Meyer CW (2000) Spatial distributions of understory light along the grassland/forest continuum: effects of cover, height, and spatial pattern of tree canopies. Ecol Model 126:79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller TE, Weiner J (1989) Local density variation may mimic effects of asymmetric competition on plant size variability. Ecology 70:1188–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moro MJ, Pugnaire FI, Haase P, Puigdefábregas J (1997) Effect of the canopy of Retama sphaerocarpa on its understorey in a semiarid environment. Funct Ecol 11:425–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls RL, Child TN (1979) Solar radiation charts. Sol Energy 22:91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien EE, Brown JS, Moll JD (2007) Roots in space: a spatially explicit model for below-ground competition in plants. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:929–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prider JN, Facelli JM (2004) Interactive effects of drought and shade on three arid zone chenopod shrubs with contrasting distributions in relation to tree canopies. Funct Ecol 18:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salguero-Gómez R, Casper BB (2010) A hydraulic explanation for size-specific plant shrinkage: developmental hydraulic sectoriality. New Phytol. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03447.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sankaran M, Ratnam J, Hanan NP (2004) Tree-grass coexistence in savannas—revisited insights from an examination of assumptions and mechanisms invoked in existing models. Ecol Lett 7:480–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholes RJ, Archer SR (1997) Tree-grass interactions in savannas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:517–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwinning S, Weiner J (1998) Mechanisms determining the degree of size-asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia 113:447–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons MT, Archer SR, Ansley RJ, Teague WR (2007) Grass effects on tree (Prosopis glandulosa) growth in a temperate savanna. J Arid Environ 69:212–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (1998) CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide to Canoco for Windows: software for canonical community ordination (Version 4). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Treydte AC, Heitkonig IMA, Prins HTT, Ludwig F (2007) Trees improve grass quality for herbivores in African savannas. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 8:197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner J (1990) Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends Ecol Evol 5:360–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner J (1993) Competition, herbivory and plant size variability: Hypochaeris radicata grazed by snails (Helix aspersa). Funct Ecol 7:47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner J, Thomas SC (1986) Size variability and competition in plant monocultures. Oikos 47:211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner J, Whigham D (1988) Size inequality and self-thinning in wild-rice (Zizania aquatica). Am J Bot 75:445–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner J, Stoll P, Muller-Landau H, Jasentuliyana A (2001) The effects of density, spatial pattern, and competitive symmetry on size variation in simulated plant populations. Am Nat 158:438–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand K, Saltz D, Ward D, Levin SA (2008) The role of size inequality in self-thinning: a pattern-oriented simulation model for arid savannas. Ecol Model 210:431–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson C, Gurevitch J (1995) Plant size and spatial pattern in a natural population of Myosotis micrantha. J Veg Sci 6:847–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Zhang C, Liu M, Yu W, Xu C, Wang H (2007) The influences of arboraceous layer on spatial patterns and morphological characteristics of herbaceous layer in an arid plant community. Acta Ecol Sin 27:1265–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Kimberly Brosofske for enlightening discussion and linguistic checking, and an anonymous reviewer for valuable comments on the earlier versions of this paper. We also thank Zheng Huang, Bin Chen, Tselmeg Uriankhai, Wen Yu, Cheng Zhang, Qinmei Zhang, Xiaokai Liu, Jun Wang and Chi Zhang for assistance in the field investigations. This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40675040).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maosong Liu.

Additional information

Chi Xu and Mingjuan Zhang contributed equally to this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, C., Zhang, M., Liu, M. et al. Interspecific effects on plant size inequality: evidence from a temperate savanna community. Plant Ecol 213, 225–235 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-0018-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-0018-9

Keywords

Navigation