Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patterns from the past: modeling Public Land Survey witness tree distributions with weights-of-evidence

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Public Land Survey (PLS) witness tree data provide one of the few quantitative data sets of pre-and early-European settlement composition and structure of the forests and woodlands in the western United States. However, quantifying the areal extent of individual woody species from PLS records has proven difficult due to the coarse sampling structure of the data. Several attempts have been made to convert the discrete PLS witness tree data into continuous distributions through the use of various interpolation techniques. While these methods may adequately represent the spatial patterns of individual species over large areas, they fail to consider the numerous environmental covariates that can influence the distribution of individual tree species at finer scales. A more statistically rigorous method calls for combining species–environment relationships to estimate the areal extent of individual species from point data. In this study, we utilize weights-of-evidence (WofE), a discrete multivariate method, to estimate the probable historical distribution of six important woody plant taxa of the cross timbers of south-central Oklahoma. We successfully created posterior probability distribution maps for Quercus stellata, Q. marilandica, Q. velutina, Carya texana, C. illinoinensis, and Juniperus spp. Each posterior probability map was classified into four predictive categories, thereby enabling better estimations of the historical distribution of individual taxon from coarse-resolution PLS data. Model validation indicated that the WofE method effectively estimated the posterior probabilities of all taxa under consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams MD (2001) Eastern white pine versatility in the presettlement forest. BioScience 51:967–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agterberg FP, Cheng Q (2002) Conditional independence test for weights-of-evidence modeling. Nat Resour Res 11:249–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agterberg FP, Bonham-Carter GF, Cheng Q, Wright DF (1993) Weights of evidence and weighted logistic regression for mineral potential mapping. In: Davis JC, Herzfeld UC (eds) Computers in geology, 25 years of progress. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 13–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RC, Anderson MR (1975) The presettlement vegetation of Williamson County, Illinois. Castanea 40:345–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur JD, Wood HAR, Baker AE, Cichon JR, Raines GL (2007) Development of a Bayesian-based aquifer vulnerability assessment in Florida. Nat Resour Res 16:93–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bahre CJ (1991) A legacy of change: historic human impact on vegetation in the Arizona borderlands. The University of Arizona Press, Tuscon

    Google Scholar 

  • Batek MJ, Rebertus AJ, Schroeder WA, Haithcoat TL, Compas E, Guyette RP (1999) Reconstruction of early nineteenth-century vegetation and fire regimes in the Missouri Ozarks. J Biogeogr 26:397–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter GF (1994) Geographic information systems for geoscientists: Modelling with GIS. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter GF, Agterberg FP (1999) Arc-WofE: a GIS tool for statistical integration of mineral exploration datasets. Bull Int Stat Inst 52 Session, Helsinki, Finland

  • Bonham-Carter GF, Agterberg FP, Wright DF (1988) Integration of geological datasets for gold exploration in Nova Scotia. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 54:1585–1592

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter GF, Agterberg FP, Wright DF (1989) Weights of evidence modelling: a new approach to mapping mineral potential. In: Agterberg FP, Bonham-Carter GF (eds) Statistical applications in the geoscience. Geological Survey of Canada Paper 89-9. Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, pp 171–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdo EA (1956) A review of the General Land Office Survey and of its use in quantitative studies of former forests. Ecology 37:754–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce MS, Vernier PR, Nielsen SE, Schmiegelow FKA (2002) Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecol Model 157:281–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs JM, Hoch GA, Johnson LC (2002) Assessing the rate, mechanisms, and consequences of the conversion of tallgrass prairie to Juniperus virginiana forest. Ecosyst 5:578–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui HB, Nguyen QP, Nguyen VT (2008) GIS-based weights-of-evidence modeling for landslide susceptibility mapping at Jaechon area, Korea. In: International symposium on geoinformatics for spatial infrastructure development in earth and allied sciences, Hanoi, Vietnam. http://wgrass.media.osaka-cu.ac.jp/gisideas08/viewpaper.php?id=253. Accessed 14 March 2009

  • Carranza EJM (2004) Weights of evidence modeling of mineral potential: a case study using small numbers of prospects, Abra, Philippines. Nat Resour Res 13:173–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carranza EJM, Hale M (2002) Where are porphyry copper deposits spatially localized? A case study in Benguet Province, Philippines. Nat Resour Res 11:45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cederstrand, JR(1996) Digital geologic map of Ardmore and Sherman quadrangles, South-Central Oklahoma. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports 96-370

  • Cowell CM (1995) Presettlement piedmont forests: patterns of composition and disturbance in central Georgia. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 85:65–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale EE (1956) A preliminary survey of the flora of the Arbuckle Mountains, Oklahoma. Tex J Sci 8:41–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Delcourt HR, Delcourt PA (1996) Presettlement landscape heterogeneity: evaluating grain resolution using general land office survey data. Landsc Ecol 11:363–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWeese GG, Grissino-Mayer HD, Lam N (2007) Historical land-use/land-cover change in a bottomland hardwood forest, Bayou Fountain, Louisiana. Phys Geogr 28:345–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diggs, DM, Brunswig, RH (2006) Modeling Native American sacred sites in Rocky Mountain National Park. In: ESRI international conference proceedings, San Diego

  • Dupouey JL, Dambrine E, Laffite JD, Moares C (2002) Irreversible impact of past land use on forest soils and biodiversity. Ecology 83:2978–2984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer JM (2001) Using witness trees to assess forest change in southeastern Ohio. Can J Forest Res 31:1708–1718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dud′k M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann F, Leathwick JR, Lehmann A, Li J, Lohmann LG, Loiselle BA, Manion G, Moritz C, Nakamura M, Nakazawa Y, Overton JM, Peterson AT, Phillips SJ, Richardson K, Scachetti-Pereira R, Schapire RE, Sobero′n J, Williams S, Wisz MS, Zimmermann NE (2006) Novel methods improve predictions of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle DM, Bidwell TG, Moseley ME (1997) Invasion of Oklahoma rangelands and forests by eastern Redcedar and Ashe juniper. Circular E-947. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, Stillwater

  • Engle DM, Bodine TN, Stritzke JF (2006) Woody plant community in the cross timbers over two decades of brush treatments. Range Ecol Manage 59:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2008) ArcGIS: Release 9.3 [software]. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagin TD (2009) In search of the forest primeval: data-driven approaches to mapping historic vegetation. Dissertation, University of Oklahoma

  • Fagin TD, Hoagland BW (2002) In search of the forest primeval: the use of land survey records in reconstructing past landscapes and evaluating human impact. N Am Geogr 4:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Fralish JS, Crooks FB, Chambers JL (1991) Comparison of presettlement, second-growth, and old-growth forest on six site types in the Illinois Shawnee Hills. Am Midl Nat 125:294–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135:147–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ham WE (1969) Regional geology of the Arbuckle Mountains, Oklahoma. In: Oklahoma Geological Survey guide book 17. Oklahoma Geological Survey, Norman

    Google Scholar 

  • He HS, Dey DC, Fan X, Hooten MB, Kabrick JM, Wikle CK, Fan Z (2007) Mapping pre-European settlement vegetation at fine resolutions using a hierarchical Bayesian model and GIS. Plant Ecol 191:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirzel AH, Le Lay G, Helfer V, Randin C, Guisan A (2006) Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presence. Ecol Model 199:142–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland BW (2006) Township & range survey system. In: Goins CR, Goble D (eds) Historical atlas of Oklahoma. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, pp 114–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland BW, Johnson FL (2001) Vascular flora of the Chickasaw National Recreation Area, Murray County, Oklahoma. Castanea 66:383–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland BW, Butler IH, Johnson FH, Glenn S (1999) The cross timbers. In: Anderson RC, Fralish JS, Baskin JM (eds) Savannas Barrens and rock outcrop plant communities of North America. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 231–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson M (1988) A guide to understanding, interpreting, and using Public Land Survey field notes in Illinois. Nat Areas J 8:245–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp LD, Bonham-Carter GF, Raines GL (1999) WofE: Arcview extension for weights of evidence mapping. http://www.ige.unicamp.br/wofe/project.htm. Accessed 14 March 2009

  • MacNally R (2007) Consensus weightings of evidence for inferring breeding success in broad-scale bird studies. Austral Ecol 32:479–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manies KL, Mladenoff DJ (2000) Testing methods to produce landscape-scale presettlement vegetation maps from the U.S. Public Land Survey Records. Landsc Ecol 15:741–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masetti M, Poli S, Sterlacchini S (2007) The use of the weights-of-evidence modeling technique to estimate the vulnerability of groundwater to nitrate contamination. Nat Resour Res 16:109–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhäuser B, Terhorst B (2007) Landslide susceptibility assessment using “weights-of-evidence” applied to a study area at the Hurassic escarpment (SW-Germany). Geomorphology 86:12–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porwal A, Carranza EJM, Hale M (2001) Extended weights-of-evidence modelling for predictive mapping of base metal potential in Aravalli Province, western India. Explor Min Geol 10:273–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radeloff VC, Mladenoff DJ, He HS, Boyce MS (1999) Forest landscape change in the northwestern Wisconsin pine barrens from pre-European settlement to the present. Can J For Res 29:1649–1659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice EL, Penfound WT (1959) The upland forests of Oklahoma. Ecology 40:593–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Calcerrada R, Luque S (2006) Habitat quality assessment using weights-of-evidence based GIS modelling: the case of Picoides tridactylus as species indicator of the biodiversity value of the Finnish forest. Ecol Model 196:62–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawatzky DL, Raines GL, Bonham-Carter GF, Looney CG (2009) Spatial Data Modeller (SDM): ArcMap 9.3 geoprocessing tools for spatial data modelling using weights of evidence, logistic regression, fuzzy logic, and neural networks. http://www.ige.unicamp.br/sdm/ArcSDM93/source/ReadMe_ArcSDM2009.pdf

  • Sears PB (1925) The natural vegetation of Ohio I: a map of the virgin forest. Ohio J Sci 25:139–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Shutler A (2001) Change in the distribution of forest and grasslands: a landscape-lavel analysis of Carter County, Oklahoma, 1871 and 1897. Thesis, University of Oklahoma

  • Shutler A, Hoagland BW (2004) Vegetation patterns in Carter County, Oklahoma. 1871. Proc Okla Acad Sci 84:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Suneson NH (1997) The geology of the eastern Arbuckle Mountains in Pontotoc and Johnston Counties, Oklahoma: an introduction and field-trip guide. Oklahoma Geological Survey Open-File Report, Norman

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2008) National elevation dataset. EROS Data Center. http://ned.usgs.gov/. Dec 2008

  • USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS) (2007) State Soil Geographic (STATSGO2) data base: data use information. US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch JT (1925) Soil maps as a basis for mapping original forest cover. Mich Acad Sci 15:267–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y-C (2005) Presettlement land survey records of vegetation: geographic characteristics, quality, and modes of analysis. Progr Phys Geog 28:568–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y-C (2007) Spatial patterns and vegetation-site relationships of the presettlement forests in western New York, USA. J Biogeogr 34:500–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y-C, Larsen PS (2006) Do coarse resolution U.S. presettlement land survey records adequately represent the spatial pattern of individual tree species? Landscape Ecol 21:1003–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney GG, DeCant JP (2001) Government Land Office Surveys and other early land surveys. In: Egan D, Howell EA (eds) Historical ecology handbook. Island Press, Washington, pp 147–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney GG, Steiger JR (1985) Site-factor determinants of the presettlement prairie-forest border areas of north-central Ohio. Bot Gaz 146:421–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd D. Fagin.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Weights Tables

(ZIP 1446 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fagin, T.D., Hoagland, B.W. Patterns from the past: modeling Public Land Survey witness tree distributions with weights-of-evidence. Plant Ecol 212, 207–217 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-010-9815-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-010-9815-9

Keywords

Navigation