Skip to main content
Log in

Persuasive strategies and emotional states: towards designing personalized and emotion-adaptive persuasive systems

  • Published:
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Persuasive strategies have been widely operationalized in systems or applications to motivate behaviour change across diverse domains. However, no empirical evidence exists on whether or not persuasive strategies lead to certain emotions to inform which strategies are most appropriate for delivering interventions that not only motivate users to perform target behaviour but also help to regulate their current emotional states. We conducted a large-scale study of 660 participants to investigate if and how individuals including those at different stages of change respond emotionally to persuasive strategies and why. Specifically, we examined the relationship between perceived effectiveness of individual strategies operationalized in a system and perceived emotional states for participants at different stages of behaviour change. Our findings established relations between perceived effectiveness of strategies and emotions elicited in individuals at distinct stages of change and that the perceived emotions vary across stages of change for different reasons. For example, the reward strategy is associated with positive emotion only (i.e. happiness) for individuals across distinct stages of change because it induces feelings of personal accomplishment, provides incentives that increase the urge to achieve more goals, and offers gamified experience. Other strategies are associated with mixed emotions. Our work links emotion theory with behaviour change theories and stages of change theory to develop practical guidelines for designing personalized and emotion-adaptive persuasive systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was undertaken, in part, thanks to funding from the Canada Research Chairs Program. We acknowledge the support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) through the Discovery Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

OO designed and conducted the research study including data collection, data analysis, and manuscript writing. RO also contributed to the study design, data collection, analysis, and manuscript writing. DS contributed to study design, data collection, and report review. RO supervised the research.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oladapo Oyebode.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Figures 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 show the prototypes illustrating the self-monitoring, reminder, goal setting, rehearsal, opportunity to plan for barriers, expertise, distraction or avoidance, suggestion, and recognition strategies, respectively.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Prototype illustrating the Self-monitoring strategy

Fig. 6
figure 6

Prototype illustrating the Reminder strategy

Fig. 7
figure 7

Prototype illustrating the Goal-setting strategy

Fig. 8
figure 8

Prototype illustrating the Rehearsal strategy

Fig. 9
figure 9

Prototype illustrating the Opportunity to plan for barriers strategy

Fig. 10
figure 10

Prototype illustrating the Expertise strategy

Fig. 11
figure 11

Prototype illustrating the Distraction or Avoidance strategy

Fig. 12
figure 12

Prototype illustrating the Suggestion strategy

Fig. 13
figure 13

Prototype illustrating the Recognition strategy

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oyebode, O., Steeves, D. & Orji, R. Persuasive strategies and emotional states: towards designing personalized and emotion-adaptive persuasive systems. User Model User-Adap Inter (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-023-09390-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-023-09390-x

Keywords

Navigation