Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social Studies Teachers’ Attitudes and Beliefs About Immigration and the Formal Curriculum in the United States South: A Multi-Methods Study

  • Published:
The Urban Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teachers’ beliefs and awareness regarding immigration policy is an area of research that has been largely unexplored in the broader discussion of socio-political consciousness and critical social studies education. This study is based on a multi-methods methodology, particularly a partially mixed sequential equal status design (Leech and Onwuegbuzie in Qual Quant 43(2):265–275, 2009). The quantitative portion of this study is based on a survey conducted in 2017 among K-12 teachers nationwide (n = 5190) and a nested sample of 200 Southern Social Studies teachers. (McCorkle in The awareness and attitudes of teachers towards educational restrictions for immigrant students. Doctoral dissertation, Clemson University, 2018a). The qualitative sample is a content analysis from an examination of South Carolina social studies textbooks (n = 8). The quantitative analysis revealed a concerning pattern of unawareness of immigration policy among many teachers as well as a strong relationship between embrace of false immigration narratives and exclusionary attitudes towards immigrant students. The analysis of the textbooks showed little in the formal curriculum that would problematize false immigration narratives and instead demonstrated a tendency to bolster these narratives. The results reveal a need of teacher education programs and additional professional development to help critique these “common-sense” (mis)understandings about immigration that are factually incorrect and help contribute to the larger patterns of xenophobia in the society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Southern region was based on the region defined as the South in the U.S. Census. It includes the states of Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, Texas, and Oklahoma.

  2. In her ethnographic research about race relations and Latinx racial formation in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, Jones (2019) shares a somewhat similar anecdote of a teacher calling ICE, rather than school security, for a disruptive student. Perhaps more innocuous, yet still problematic, Verma et al. (2017) and Dillard (2018) point out how minor behaviour incidents can place undocumented students into contact with the criminal justice system and into the school to deportation pipeline.

  3. Generally speaking, our use of awareness is rooted in teacher’s (lack of) understanding of the specific and local socio-political contexts, and its resulting material effects, (undocumented) immigrant students find themselves in. Unless stated specifically, this means teacher understanding of (macro and micro) immigrant rights, (past and present) immigration policy, and the lived realities of their (undocumented) immigrant students.

  4. There is emerging research that offers a spatial, rather than singularly temporal, understanding of Latinx growth in the U.S. South. Such work not only troubles “exotic” narratives of spontaneity and novelty, but also shows longer histories of Latinx connection to the region (Monreal, forthcoming; Guerrero 2017; Weise 2015).

  5. We do not mean to suggest that the categories immigrant and teacher are mutually exclusive. Rather, we point to the fact that we still have a teaching force in the United States that is overwhelmingly white, middle class, and born in the United States.

  6. To quote Foucault (1984), “Nothing is fundamental. That is what is interesting in the analysis of society…There are only reciprocal relations, and the perpetual gaps between intentions in relation to one another” (p. 247).

  7. The four questions were: 1. States can prohibit undocumented/illegal immigrants from receiving in-state tuition at public colleges and universities. 2. States can prohibit undocumented/illegal immigrants from studying at public colleges and universities. 3. Undocumented/Illegal Immigrants are prohibited from receiving Federal Financial Aid for education. 4. Most states prohibit undocumented/illegal immigrants from receiving state scholarships and grants.

  8. The Cronbach Alpha numbers are derived from the reliability analysis of the original nationwide survey data comprised of teachers from all grades/subject areas.

  9. All congressional districts and the District of Columbia were listed by population density, then every second and fourth districts were selected for a total of 109 districts. Wright et al. (2015) argue that this sampling based on congressional districts population density ensures that the “the districts were geographically dispersed, but also that they encompassed a range of settings including rural, urban central city, suburban, and small-town location” (p. 193).

  10. We do not state this to make an argument about teacher training and credentialing. For example, Conklin (2010) found that generalist-trained teachers held higher expectations and conceptions regarding the intellectual abilities of middle school (social studies) students.

  11. On a scale of 6–42 with 6 being the most exclusionary response and 42 being the most inclusive.

  12. Also telling is the move to compare African migration to that of pioneers. This is striking because it (perhaps unintentionally) compares the ancient movement of people with the colonial and imperialist migrations of United States (white) “pioneers”.

  13. Current United States immigration policy is heavily slanted toward family-based categories. Still, the federal immigration act only reserves 226,000 slots each year for immigrants under such categories. For example, the U.S. has a numerical limit of 23,400 green cards reserved for unmarried children age 21 or older of U.S. citizens. Further, given “numerical caps and per-country caps on certain green-card categories, there are significant waits for some categories…For example, as of April 2019, the wait for U.S. citizens to sponsor adult, unmarried children was more than seven years for most parts of the world, but was 12 years for relatives from the Philippines—and more than 21 years for those from Mexico” (Gelatt 2019).

  14. Although not the focus of this paper, it is clear, once again, that such textbook language also erases the presence of native and indigenous groups in the region.

  15. This quote is taken directly from proposed bill H.4022 (05-06), The South Carolina Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act, in South Carolina. For more examples of how policy discourse works to create undeserving immigrant subjects see Rodriguez and Monreal (2017).

  16. “We are all immigrants” is often seen as a more progressive way of discussing the American “melting pot,” but ignores indigenous peoples, enslaved peoples, and those in which the border crossed them.

  17. These examples come from Guerrero (2017, p. 14). For others, see Ngai (2004) and Migration Policy Institute (2013).

  18. The executive branch has a high level of discretion in determining the numerical ceiling for refugee admissions each year in addition to directives for asylum claims (American Immigration Council 2016).

  19. One need not look farther than recent comments by Ken Cuccinelli, the acting director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, who twisted the famous words on the Statue of Liberty stating, "Give me your tired and your poor who can stand on their own two feet and who will not become a public charge" (Ingber and Martin 2019, emphasis ours).

  20. As Popkewitz (1998) explains, “the words are not as much words in a dictionary but given meaning through the relations in which they are embedded as knowing, thinking, ‘seeing,’ and acting on the objects of schooling” (p. 97).

  21. For more detailed insight into the 287 g program see Arriaga (2017) and American Immigration Council (2017).

  22. Although we do not know of any substantial efforts such as these in South Carolina, Bajaj et al. (2017) article outlining a socio-politically relevant pedagogy (SPRP) offers insights and examples of a school that centers the economic and political dimensions of undocumented and newcomer youth.

References

  • Alba, R., & Nee, V. (2003). Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, P. (2017). What the waiting list for legal residency actually looks like. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/09/what-the-waiting-list-for-legal-residency-actually-looks-like/540408/.

  • Alvidrez, J., & Weinstein, R. S. (1999). Early teacher perceptions and later student academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 731–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Immigration Council. (2016). How the United States immigration system works. Retrieved from https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/how-united-states-immigration-system-works.

  • American Immigration Council. (2017). The 287(g) Program: An overview. Retrieved from: https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/287g-program-immigration.

  • Amos, D. (2018). 2018 was a year of drastic cuts to U.S. refugees admissions. National Public Radio.

  • Arriaga, F. (2017). Relationships between the public and crimmigration entities in North Carolina: A 287(g) program focus. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 3(3), 417–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajaj, M., Argenal, A., & Canlas, M. (2017). Socio-politically relevant pedagogy for immigrant and refugee youth. Equity & Excellence in Education, 50(3), 258–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2017.1336499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J. A., & Banks, C. A. M. (2016). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (9th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bess, M. K. (2012). Obreros in the Peach State: The growth of Georgia’s working-class Mexican immigrant communities from a transnational perspective. In R. Zieger (Ed.), Life and labor in the New New South (pp. 214–231).

  • Bier, D. (2018). Why the legal immigration system is broken: A short list of problems. Washington, DC: CATO Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutte, G. S. (2015). Educating African American students: And how are the children?. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle-Baise, L., & Goodman, J. (2009). The influence of Harold O Rugg: Conceptual and pedagogical considerations. The Social Studies, 100(1), 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. K., & Bean, F. D. (2006). Assimilation models, old and new: Explaining a long-term process. Retrieved from http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/assimilation-models-old-and-new-explaining-long-term-process.

  • Brown, K. D., & Brown, A. L. (2010). Silenced memories: An examination of the sociocultural knowledge on race and racial violence in official school curriculum. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(2), 139–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., & Lopez, M. H. (2013). Mapping the Latino population, by state, county and city. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/hispanic/2013/08/29/mapping-the-latino-population-by-state-county-and-city/.

  • Brown-Jeffy, S., & Cooper, J. E. (2011). Toward a conceptual framework of culturally relevant pedagogy: An overview of the conceptual and theoretical literature. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(1), 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo, J. F., & Rodriguez, E. (2016). She doesn’t even act Mexican: smartness trespassing in the new south. Race Ethnicity and Education, 19(6), 1236–1246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, T. K., & Grant, C. A. (2010). Thirty years of scholarship in multicultural education. Race, Gender & Class, 17(1/2), 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools (2019). Enrollment data. https://www.cms.k12.nc.us/cmsdepartments/StudentPlacement/PlanningServices/Pages/Enrollmentdata.aspx.

  • Chavez, L. (2008). The Latino threat: Constructing immigrants, citizens, and the nation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, J. M., & Provine, D. M. (2009). Race and the response of state legislatures to unauthorized immigrants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 623(1), 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citrin, J., Lerman, A., Murakami, M., & Pearson, K. (2007). Testing huntington: Is Hispanic immigration a threat to American identity? Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M. (1995). Color blindness and basket making are not the answers: Confronting the dilemmas of race, culture, and language diversity in teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 493–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, H. (2010). Preparing for the educational black hole? Teachers’ learning in two pathways into Middle School Social Studies teaching. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38(1), 48–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, P., & Krogstad, J.M. (2018). For the first time, the U.S. resettles less refugees than the rest of the world. Pew Research Center.

  • Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 209, 240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, E. (2014). Examining teachers’ knowledge and attitudes towards immigration and undocumented immigrants. Master’s Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.

  • Dabach, D. B. (2014). “You can’t vote, right?” When language proficiency is a proxy for citizenship in a civics classroom. Journal of International Social Studies, 4(2), 7–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabach, D. B., Merchant, N. H., & Fones, A. K. (2018). Rethinking immigration as a controversy. Social Education, 82(6), 307–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darder, A. (2015). Freire and education. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Genova, N. (2013). Spectacles of migrant ‘illegality’: The scene of exclusion, the obscene of inclusion. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(7), 1180–1198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delpit, L. D. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillard, C. (2018). The School-to-Deportation Pipeline. Retrieved from: https://www.tolerance.org/magazine/fall-2018/the-school-to-deportation-pipeline.

  • Eisner, E. W. (1985). The art of educational evaluation: A personal view. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettinger, P. W. (2009). Imaginary lines, border enforcement and the origins of undocumented immigration, 1882–1930. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairman, S. (2016). Courageous conversations about race. Educational Leadership, 74(3), 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 19721977. In C. Gordon (Ed.). New York, NY: Vintage.

  • Foucault, M. (1984). Space, knowledge and power. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The foucault reader (pp. 239–256). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, S., & Link, H. (2016). Exploring the borderlands: Elementary school teachers’ navigation of immigration practices in a new Latino diaspora community. Journal of Latinos and Education, 15(3), 180–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelatt, J. (2019). Explainer: How the U.S. Legal Immigration System Works. Retrieved from https://www.migrationpolicy.org/content/explainer-how-us-legal-immigration-system-works.

  • Gershenon, S., & Papageorge, N. (2018). The power of teacher expectations. Education Next, 18(1), 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs Smith Education. (2013). The South Carolina journey. Layton, UT: Gibbs Smith Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, H. (2010). The Latino migration experience in North Carolina: New roots in the Old North State. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., & Krieger, L. H. (2006). Implicit bias: Scientific foundations. California Law Review, 94(4), 945–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, P. M. (2017). Nuevo South: Latina/os, Asians, and the remaking of place. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hachfeld, A., Hahn, A., Schroeder, S., Anders, Y., & Kunter, M. (2015). Should teachers be colorblind? How multicultural and egalitarian beliefs differentially relate to aspects of teachers’ professional competence for teaching in diverse classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 44–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harklau, L., & Colomer, S. (2015). Defined by language: The role of foreign language departments in Latino education in Southeastern new diaspora communities. In E. T. Hamann, S. E. F. Wortham, & E. G. Murillo (Eds.), Revisiting education in the New Latino diaspora (pp. 153–170). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heafner, T. L., & Fitchett, P. G. (2012). Tipping the scales: National trends of declining social studies instructional time in elementary schools. The Journal of Social Sudies Reseach, 36(2), 190–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. J. (1996). Power, subjectification and resistance in Foucault. SubStance, 25(1), 78–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D. E. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hos, R. (2016). Caring is not enough: Teachers’ enactment of ethical care for adolescent students with limited or interrupted formal education (SLIFE) in a newcomer classroom. Education and Urban Society, 48(5), 479–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (2004). The Hispanic challenge. Foreign Policy, 141, 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingber, S., & Martin, R. (2019). Immigration Chief: “Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor Who Can Stand on Their Own 2 Feet.” Retrieved from NPR.org website: https://www.npr.org/2019/08/13/750726795/immigration-chief-give-me-your-tired-your-poor-who-can-stand-on-their-own-2-feet.

  • Jager, S. (2001). Discourse and knowledge: Theoretical and methodological aspects of a critical discourse and dispositive analysis. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 32–62). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies, J., & Dabach, D. B. (2015). Breaking the silence: Facing undocumented issues in teacher practice. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 8(1), 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. A. (2019). The browning of the New South (1st ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Correa, M., & de Graauw, E. (2013). The illegality trap: The politics of immigration & the lens of illegality. Daedalus, 142(3), 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, J. C., Berry, T. R., & Lensmire, T. J. (2016). Second-wave white teacher identity studies: A review of white teacher identity literatures from 2004 through 2014. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1151–1191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabenick, S. A., & Noda, P. A. C. (2004). Professional development implications of teachers’ beliefs and attitudes toward English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 28(1), 55–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirshner, B., Hipolito-Delgado, C., & Zion, S. (2015). Sociopolitical development in educational systems: From margins to center. The Urban Review, 47(5), 803–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondracki, N. L., Wellman, N. S., & Amundson, D. R. (2002). Content analysis: Review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 34(4), 224–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content anaylsis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuntz, A. M. (2019). Qualitative inquiry, cartography, and the promise of material change. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, E. (2009). Cultural enclaves and transnational ties: Mexican immigration and settlement in South Carolina. In E. Lacy & M. Odem (Eds.), Latino immigrants and the transformation of the U.S. South (pp. 1–17). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, E., & Odem, M. E. (2009). Popular attitudes and public policies: Southern responses to Latino immigration. In M. Odem & E. Lacy (Eds.), Latino immigrants and the transformation of the US South (pp. 143–163). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2011). Yes, But How Do We Do It? In J. Landsman & C. W. Lewis (Eds.), White teachers/diverse classrooms: Creating inclusive schools, building on students’ diversity, and providing true educational equity (pp. 29–42). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: Aka the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity, 43(2), 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, M. H. (2011). Reaching Latinos Online, Pew Hispanic Center. Presented at the Reaching Latinos Online Meetup. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/bixal/lopez-reaching-latinos-online-phcapril-2011.

  • Lopez, G. (2017). How Trump both stokes and obscures his supporters’ racial resentment. Vox.

  • McCorkle, W. (2018a). The awareness and attitudes of teachers towards educational restrictions for immigrant students. Doctoral dissertation, Clemson University

  • McCorkle, W. D. (2018b). Using history to inform the modern immigration debate in the United States. Journal of International Social Studies, 8(1), 149–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCorkle, W.D., & Bailey, B. (2016). UN human rights violations here at home? The plight of undocumented and DACA students in South Carolina, USA. Journal of International Social Studies, 6(1), 161–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGraw-Hill. (2014). Contemporary cultures: 1600 to the present (South Carolina). Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migration Policy Institute. (2013). Major U.S. immigration laws, 1790-present. Retrieved from https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/timeline-1790.

  • Milner, H. R. (2006). Preservice teachers’ learning about cultural and racial diversity: Implications for urban education. Urban Education, 41(4), 343–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, H. R. (2010). What does teacher education have to do with reaching? Implications for diversity studies. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 118–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohl, R. A. (2009). Globalization and Latin American immigration in Alabama. In M. Odem & E. Lacy (Eds.), Latino immigrants and the transformation of the US South (pp. 51–69). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monreal, T. (2019). The middle grades social studies curriculum as a site of struggle for social justice in education. In R. Papa (Ed.), Springer handbook on promoting social justice in education (pp. 1–29). Springer.

  • Monreal, T. (forthcoming). Hecho en South Carolina. Latinx teachers made in, and remaking, El Sur Latinx. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina.

  • Muller, C. (2001). The role of caring in the teacher-student relationship for at-risk students. Sociological Inquiry, 71(2), 241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murillo, E. G., Jr. (2002). How does it feel to be a problem?:“Disciplining” the transnational subject in the American South. In S. Wortham, E. G. Murillo Jr., & E. T. Hamann (Eds.), Education in the new Latino diaspora: Policy and the politics of identity (pp. 215–240). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, I. E., & Milner, H. R. (2015). Toward a pedagogy of sociopolitical consciousness in outside of school programs. The Urban Review, 47(5), 893–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Geographic Society, Farah, M., & Karls, A. (1999). World history: The human experience. New York, NY: Glencoe/McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngai, M. M. (2004). Impossible subjects: Illegal aliens and the making of modern America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngai, M. (2014). Undocumented migration to the US: A history. In L. Lorentzen (Ed.), Hidden lives and human rights in the United States [3 volumes]: Understanding the controversies and tragedies of undocumented immigration. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odem, M. E., & Browne, I. (2014). Racializing Latinos in the Nuevo South: Immigrants, legal status, and the state in Atlanta. In M. Halter, M. S. Johnson, K. P. Viens, & C. E. Wright (Eds.), What’s new about the “new” immigration? (pp. 51–81). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odem, M. E., & Lacy, E. (Eds.). (2009). Latino immigrants and the transformation of the U.S. South. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omi, M., & Winant, H. (2014). Racial formation in the United States (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational researcher, 41(3), 93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (Eds.). (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pluye, P., & Hong, Q. N. (2014). Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: Mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. S. (1991). A political sociology of educational reform: Power/Knowledge in teaching, teacher education and research. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. S. (1998). Struggling for the soul: The politics of schooling and the construction of the teacher. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, P. R., & Salas, S. (2015). Nativity shifts, broken dreams, and the new Latino South’s Post-First Generation. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(3), 426–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, P. (2005). Crafting qualitative research: Working in the postpositivist traditions. New York, NY: ME Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice Hall. (2001). World explorer: Medieval times to today. Needham, MA: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Publishers, Homecourt. (2005). South Carolina: Great stories that embrace the history of the Palmetto State. Greenville, SC: Homecourt Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribas, V. (2015). On the line: Slaughterhouse lives and the making of the New South. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rist, R. (1970). Student social class and teacher expectations: The self-fulfilling prophecy in ghetto education. Harvard educational review, 40(3), 411–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. A. (2010). Toward a theory of culturally relevant critical teacher care: African American teachers’ definitions and perceptions of care for African American students. Journal of Moral Education, 39(4), 449–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, S. (2018). ‘Good, Deserving Immigrants’ join the Tea Party: How South Carolina policy excludes Latinx and undocumented immigrants from educational opportunity and social mobility. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(103), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, S., & McCorkle, W. (in Press). On the educational rights of undocumented students: A call to expand teachers’ awareness of policies impacting undocumented students and strategic empathy. Teachers College Record.

  • Rodriguez, S., & Monreal, T. (2017). “This state is racist.”: Policy problematization and undocumented youth experiences in the New Latino South. Educational Policy, 31(6), 764–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904817719525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, S., Monreal, T., & Howard, J. (2018). “It’s about hearing and understanding their Stories”: Teacher empathy and socio-political awareness toward newcomer undocumented students in the New Latino South. Journal of Latinos and Education, 19(2), 181–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sáenz, R., & Manges Douglas, K. (2015). A call for the racialization of immigration studies: On the transition of ethnic immigrants to racialized immigrants. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 1(1), 166–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas, S., & Portes, P. R. (2017). US Latinization: Education and the New Latino South. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santoro, N. (2009). Teaching in culturally diverse contexts: What knowledge about ‘self’ and ‘others’ do teachers need? Journal of Education for Teaching, 35(1), 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sas, M. M. (2009). Teacher candidates’ attitudes toward immigration and teaching leaners of English a second language. Dissertation. University of Nevada-Las Vegas.

  • Sassen, S. (1989). America’s Immigration” Problem”. World Policy Journal, 6(4), 811–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. (2012). The myth of the muslim tide: Do immigrants threaten the west?. New York, NY: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleeter, C. E. (2011). Keepers of the American dream: A study of staff development and multicultural education. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solis, D. (2018). Why don’t Mexicans just apply for citizenship? Retrieved from https://www.dallasnews.com/news/immigration/2018/08/29/dont-mexicans-just-apply-citizenship.

  • Spielvogel, J. J. (2014). Discovering our past: A history of the world, early ages. Bothell, WA: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielvogel, J. J., & National Geographic Society. (2005). World history: Journey across time, the early ages. New York, NY: Glencoe/McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielvogel, J. J., & National Geographic Society. (2006). World history: Journey across time. New York, NY: Glencoe/McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepler, R., & Lopez, M. H. (2016). Latino population growth and dispersion in U.S. slows since the recession. Retrieved October 3, 2018, from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2016/09/08/latino-population-growth-and-dispersion-has-slowed-since-the-onset-of-the-great-recession/.

  • The School District of Greenville County. (2019). Enrollment by grades: 45th Day. https://www.greenville.k12.sc.us/Departments/docs/1920/45_enroll_bygrade.pdf.

  • Thornton, S. J. (2013). Silence on gays and lesbians in Social Studies Curriculum. In D. J. Flinders & S. J. Thornton (Eds.), The curriculum studies reader (4th ed., pp. 331–338). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truscott, D. M., Swars, S., Smith, S., Thornton-Reid, F., Zhao, Y., Dooley, C., et al. (2010). A cross-disciplinary examination of the prevalence of mixed methods in educational research: 1995–2005. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(4), 317–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umaña-Taylor, A. J., Wong, J. J., Gonzales, N. A., & Dumka, L. E. (2012). Ethnic identity and gender as moderators of the association between discrimination and academic adjustment among Mexican origin adolescents. Journal of adolescence, 35(4), 773–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications or conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & health sciences, 15(3), 398–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh, L., Denessen, E., Hornstra, L., Voeten, M., & Holland, R. W. (2010). The implicit prejudiced attitudes of teachers: Relations to teacher expectations and the ethnic achievement gap. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 497–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, S., Maloney, P., & Austin, D. W. (2017). The school to deportation pipeline: The perspectives of immigrant students and their teachers on profiling and surveillance within the school system. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 673(1), 209–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, D. (2019). Texas teacher fired over tweets asking Trump to ‘remove’ immigrants. The New York Times.

  • Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 20–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villenas, S. (2001). Latina mothers and small-town racisms: Creating narratives of dignity and moral education in North Carolina. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 32(1), 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villenas, S. (2002). Reinventing educación in new Latino communities: Pedagogies of change and continuity in North Carolina. In S. Wortham, E. G. Murillo Jr., & E. T. Hamann (Eds.), Education in the new Latino diaspora: Policy and the politics of identity (pp. 17–35). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A., Shafer, J., & Iiams, M. (2004). Not in my classroom”: Teacher attitudes towards English language learners in the mainstream classroom. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 2(1), 130–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weise, J. M. (2015). Corazón de Dixie: Mexicanos in the US South since 1910. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winders, J. (2011). Commentary: New directions in the nuevo South. Southeastern Geographer, 51(2), 327–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. (2004). Post-structural methodologies: The body, schooling and health. In J. Evans, B. Davies, & J. Wright, (Eds.), Body knowledge and control: Studies in the sociology of education and physical culture (pp. 19–31).

  • Wright, B. R. E., Wallace, M., Wisnesky, A. S., Donnelly, C. M., Missari, S., & Zozula, C. (2015). Religion, race, and discrimination: A field experiment of how American churches welcome newcomers. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 54(2), 185–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngs, C. S., & Youngs, G. A. (2001). Predictors of mainstream teachers’ attitudes toward ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 97–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zion, S., Allen, C. D., & Jean, C. (2015). Enacting a critical pedagogy, influencing teachers’ sociopolitical development. The Urban Review, 47(5), 914–933.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy Monreal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Monreal, T., McCorkle, W. Social Studies Teachers’ Attitudes and Beliefs About Immigration and the Formal Curriculum in the United States South: A Multi-Methods Study. Urban Rev 53, 1–42 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-020-00561-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-020-00561-3

Keywords

Navigation