Skip to main content
Log in

Limited non-linear impact of warm ischemia time on renal functional decline after partial nephrectomy: a propensity score-matched study

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To quantificationally illustrate the impact of ischemia time (IT) on renal function decline after partial nephrectomy (PN), especially for patients with compromised baseline renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2).

Methods

Patients undergoing PN during 2014–2021 from a prospectively maintained database were reviewed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance the possible covariates between patients with or without baseline compromised renal function. Specifically, the relationship of IT with postoperative renal function was illustrated. Two machine learning methods (logistic least absolute shrinkage and selection operator [LASSO] logistic regression and random forest) were applied to quantify the relative impact of each covariables.

Results

The average drop percent of eGFR was -10.9% (− 12.2%, − 9.0%). Multivariable Cox proportional regression and linear regression analyses identified five risk factors for renal function decline, namely RENAL Nephrometry Score (RNS), age, baseline eGFR, diabetes and IT (all p < 0.05). Specifically, the relationship of IT with postoperative functional decline emerged as non-linear, with an increase from 10–30 min and a plateau afterwards among patients with normal function (eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2), whereas with an increase from 10 to 20 min and a plateau afterwards among patients with compromised function (eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2). Furthermore, the coefficient’s path and random forest analysis revealed that the top two most important features were RNS and age.

Conclusion

IT exhibits the secondarily non-linear relationship with postoperative renal function decline. Patients with compromised baseline renal function are less tolerant to ischemia damage. The use of a single cut-off interval of IT in the setting of PN is flawed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Request from corresponding author with proper reasons.

References

  1. Campbell SC et al (2021) Renal mass and localized renal cancer: evaluation, management, and follow-up: AUA guideline: part I. J Urol 206(2):199–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Antonelli A et al (2018) Role of clinical and surgical factors for the prediction of immediate, early and late functional results, and its relationship with cardiovascular outcome after partial nephrectomy: results from the prospective multicenter RECORd 1 project. J Urol 199(4):927–932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Antonelli A et al (2022) Prediction of significant renal function decline after open, laparoscopic, and robotic partial nephrectomy: external validation of the Martini’s nomogram on the RECORD2 project cohort. Int J Urol 29(6):525–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jin D et al (2022) Development and validation of an integrated nomogram to predict personalized new baseline functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy. Transl Androl Urol 11(1):9–19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Crocerossa F et al (2022) Estimated glomerular filtration rate decline at 1 year after minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: a multimodel comparison of predictors. Eur Urol Open Sci 38:52–59

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Pecoraro A et al (2023) Estimating postoperative renal function after surgery for nonmetastatic renal masses: a systematic review of available prediction models. Eur Urol Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(23)01046-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carrion DM, Aguilera Bazán A, Martínez-Piñeiro L (2020) Re: do patients with stage 3–5 chronic kidney disease benefit from ischaemia-sparing techniques during partial nephrectomy? Eur Urol 78(4):629–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Abdel Raheem A et al (2022) Warm ischemia time length during on-clamp partial nephrectomy: does it really matter? Minerva Urol Nephrol 74(2):194–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Antonelli A et al (2022) Is off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy beneficial for renal function? Data from the CLOCK trial. BJU Int 129(2):217–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bessede T et al (2015) Are warm ischemia and ischemia time still predictive factors of poor renal function after partial nephrectomy in the setting of elective indication? World J Urol 33(1):11–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee H et al (2018) Impact of warm ischaemia time on postoperative renal function after partial nephrectomy for clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study. BJU Int 121(1):46–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiong L et al (2022) What happens to the preserved renal parenchyma after clamped partial nephrectomy? Eur Urol 81(5):492–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell SC et al (2023) Every decade counts: a narrative review of functional recovery after partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 131(2):165–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Anderson BG et al (2019) comparing off-clamp and on-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Urology 126:102–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Campbell SC, Yasuda Y (2022) Off-clamp partial nephrectomy: level 1 data regarding real-world utility (or futility). BJU Int 129(2):131–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bravi CA et al (2021) Toward individualized approaches to partial nephrectomy: assessing the correlation between ischemia time and patient health status (RECORD2 project). Eur Urol Oncol 4(4):645–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Abushamma F et al (2021) Global analysis of research trends on kidney function after nephron-sparing surgery: a bibliometric and visualised study. Cancer Manag Res 13:7479–7487

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Chung JS et al (2021) Impact of short warm ischemic time on longitudinal kidney function and survival rate after partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease stage III: a multi-institutional propensity score-matched study. Eur J Surg Oncol 47(2):470–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dagenais J et al (2019) “At-risk” kidney: how surgical factors influence renal functional preservation after partial nephrectomy. Int J Urol 26(5):565–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ebbing J et al (2019) Outcome of kidney function after ischaemic and zero-ischaemic laparoscopic and open nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell cancer. BMC Nephrol 20(1):40

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ishiyama Y et al (2021) Limited impact of warm ischemic threshold for partial nephrectomy in the robotic surgery era: a propensity score matching study. Int J Urol 28(12):1219–1225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ma YC et al (2006) Modified glomerular filtration rate estimating equation for Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 17(10):2937–2944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zargar H et al (2015) The impact of extended warm ischemia time on late renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 29(4):444–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nahar B, Bhat A, Parekh DJ (2019) Does every minute of renal ischemia still count in 2019? Unlocking the chains of a flawed thought process over five decades. Eur Urol Focus 5(6):939–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Volpe A et al (2015) Renal ischemia and function after partial nephrectomy: a collaborative review of the literature. Eur Urol 68(1):61–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dong W et al (2018) Ischemia and functional recovery from partial nephrectomy: refined perspectives. Eur Urol Focus 4(4):572–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Campi R et al (2022) Impact of frailty on perioperative and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing surgery or ablation for renal cancer: a systematic review. Minerva Urol Nephrol 74(2):146–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Choi JD et al (2010) Renal damage caused by warm ischaemia during laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: an assessment using Tc 99m-DTPA glomerular filtration rate. Eur Urol 58(6):900–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Choi JD et al (2012) Does prolonged warm ischemia after partial nephrectomy under pneumoperitoneum cause irreversible damage to the affected kidney? J Urol 187(3):802–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar RK et al (2014) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in patients with baseline chronic kidney disease: a multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis. Eur Urol 65(6):1205–1210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lane BR et al (2010) Performance of the chronic kidney disease-epidemiology study equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate before and after nephrectomy. J Urol 183(3):896–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Karabay E et al (2021) Identifying the predictors of estimated glomerular filtration rate after partial nephrectomy with a nonlinear regression model. Int J Clin Pract 75(3):e13763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Data acquisition: XL, DJ. Statistical analysis: DJ and SZ. Data analysis and interpretation: DJ, YZ. Drafting of the manuscript: DJ, YZ. Critical revision of the manuscript: YZ and XL. Administrative, technical, or material support: YZ and DJ. Supervision: SZ and YZ. Approval of the final manuscript: SZ.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sizhou Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Army Medical Center Ethical Committee and registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300069180).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 18 KB)

11255_2023_3630_MOESM2_ESM.jpg

Supplementary file2 a. Propensity score test demonstrating standardized bias before and after PSM. b. Propensity score graph demonstrating distribution of on- or off-support patients. RNS: RENAL nephrometry score; CVD: cardiovascular disease. (JPG 374 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Jin, D., Zhang, Y. et al. Limited non-linear impact of warm ischemia time on renal functional decline after partial nephrectomy: a propensity score-matched study. Int Urol Nephrol 55, 1699–1708 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-023-03630-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-023-03630-0

Keywords

Navigation