Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Autologous rectus fascia graft in the treatment of high-stage apical vaginal prolapse: preliminary results of a new surgical approach with native tissue

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Since vaginal meshes in pelvic organ prolapse have been associated with more complications in the last decades, native tissue vaginal repair is still the mainstay of prolapse surgery. This study introduces a new transvaginal approach with bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation augmented by autologous rectus fascia graft to repair high-stage apical vaginal wall prolapse.

Methods

Between December 2018 and June 2020, 13 patients with high-stage apical vaginal wall prolapse (point C ≥  + 1) accompanied by high-stage anterior vaginal wall prolapse (paint Ba ≥  + 1) were included. In this procedure, the central part of the anterior rectus fascia graft (6–8 cm in length and 1–1.5 cm in width) is sutured to the underlying tissue of the vaginal apex or cervix and the arms of the rectus graft augmented to the sacrospinous ligament with a Capio suture capturing device (Boston Scientific). The patients are evaluated by history taking, physical examination, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) Questionnaire.

Results

The patient’s mean age was 61.2 ± 2.7 years and they were followed up to 12 months. The anatomical success rate was 92.3%. The PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 were significantly improved (P < 0.001). There were no significant perioperative complications. Three patients complained of unilateral groin or buttock pain which resolved gradually at the first post-operative month.

Conclusion

The transvaginal bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation augmented by autologous rectus fascia graft is an effective and safe surgical approach in treating high-stage apical vaginal prolapse with short-term follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lemack GE, Carmel M (2020) Campbell Walsh Wein Urology. E-Book Elsevier Health Sciences, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  2. Braga A, Serati M, Salvatore S, Torella M, Pasqualetti R, Papadia A et al (2020) Update in native tissue vaginal vault prolapse repair. Int Urogynecol J 31:2003–2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Paz-Levy D, Yohay D, Neymeyer J, Hizkiyahu R, Weintraub AY (2017) Native tissue repair for central compartment prolapse: a narrative review. Int Urogynecol J 28:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elliott CS, Yeh J, Comiter CV, Chen B, Sokol ER (2013) The predictive value of a cystocele for concomitant vaginal apical prolapse. J Urol 189:200–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Murphy AM, Clark CB, Denisenko AA, D’Amico MJ, Vasavada SP (2021) Surgical management of vaginal prolapse: current surgical concepts. Can J Urol 28:22–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang W, Cheon WC, Zhang L, Wang X, Wei Y, Lyu C (2022) Comparison of the effectiveness of sacrospinous ligament fixation and sacrocolpopexy: a meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 33:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Skoczylas LC, Turner LC, Wang L, Winger DG, Shepherd JP (2014) Changes in prolapse surgery trends relative to FDA notifications regarding vaginal mesh. Int Urogynecol J 25:471–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Makajeva J, Watters C, Safioleas P (2022) Cystocele. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2022, StatPearls Publishing LLC, Treasure Island (FL). PMID: 33231973. Bookshelf ID: NBK564303

  9. Sun ZJ, Guo T, Wang XQ, Lang JH, Xu T, Zhu L (2021) Current situation of complications related to reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a multicenter study. Int Urogynecol J 32:2149–2157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tibi B, Vincens E, Durand M, Bentellis I, Salet-Lizee D, Kane A et al (2019) Comparison of different surgical techniques for pelvic floor repair in elderly women: a multi-institutional study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 299:1007–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pollak J, Takacs P, Medina C (2007) Complications of three sacrospinous ligament fixation techniques. Int J Gynecol Obstet 99:18–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sederl J (1958) Surgery in prolapse of a blind-end vagina. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 18:824–828

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miyazaki FS (1987) Miya Hook ligature carrier for sacrospinous ligament suspension. Obstet Gynecol 70:286–288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shull BL (1999) Pelvic organ prolapse: anterior, superior, and posterior vaginal segment defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:6–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Culligan PJ, Blackwell L, Goldsmith LJ, Graham CA, Rogers A, Heit MH (2005) A randomized controlled trial comparing fascia lata and synthetic mesh for sacral colpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 106:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Culligan PJ, Salamon C, Priestley JL, Shariati A (2013) Porcine dermis compared with polypropylene mesh for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 121:143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Wheeler TL 2nd, Schaffer J, Chen Z et al (2009) Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 114:600–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Palmerola R, Rosenblum N (2019) Prolapse repair using non-synthetic material: what is the current standard? Curr Urol Rep 20:70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Giannini A, Caretto M, Russo E, Mannella P, Simoncini T (2019) Advances in surgical strategies for prolapse. Climacteric 22:60–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Brubaker L, Norton P, Gantz M, Richter HE et al (2018) Effect of uterosacral ligament suspension vs sacrospinous ligament fixation with or without perioperative behavioral therapy for pelvic organ vaginal prolapse on surgical outcomes and prolapse symptoms at 5 years in the OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA 319:1554–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author certifies that she has no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. In addition, the author did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farzaneh Sharifiaghdas.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The author has nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharifiaghdas, F. Autologous rectus fascia graft in the treatment of high-stage apical vaginal prolapse: preliminary results of a new surgical approach with native tissue. Int Urol Nephrol 54, 1017–1022 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03167-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03167-8

Keywords

Navigation