Abstract
Purpose
Due to the data paucity about the functional outcomes post pyeloplasty for patients diagnosed with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) with a preoperative age above the age of 45 years and according to the elderly definition (age ≥ 65 years), we conducted this study to clarify the different outcomes in adults presented with late hydronephrosis.
Methods
We included patients who were managed by pyeloplasty with a preoperative age ≥ 45 years. We further subdivided those patients into; group (A) patient’s age ≥ 65 years and group (B) patient’s age ≥ 45 and < 65 years. Split renal function (SRF) difference was evaluated by the changes between the last follow-up and the baseline renogram, where 5% change was considered a significant change. Functional outcomes and factors predicting the functional recoverability post pyeloplasty were evaluated.
Results
A total of 119 patients were included. The mean age was 62.3 ± 16.4 years. Group (A) and group (B) included 47 and 72 patients, respectively. After 24 months, GFR and SRF were increased at the last follow-up (P = 0.32 and 0.57, respectively). No significant functional changes were noted between both groups. Sixty two, 7 and 13 patients showed static, decreased and improved renal function. Lower preoperative SRF was the only predictor for poor functional recoverability in patients with age ≥ 45 years who were managed by pyeloplasty.
Conclusion
Elderly patients should not be excluded from the corrective surgery for UPJO. Lower preoperative SRF was the only predictor for renal function deterioration post pyeloplasty.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hashim H, Woodhouse CR (2012) Ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Eur Urol Suppl 11(2):25–32
Grasso M III, Caruso RP, Phillips CK (2001) UPJ obstruction in the adult population: are crossing vessels significant? Reviews in urology 3(1):42
Elbaset M, Zahran MH, Sharaf M, Elmeniar A, Ezzat O, Elgamal M et al (2019) Long term functional success after pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteral junction obstruction in unilateral poorly functioning kidney in exclusively adults population. Urology. 131:234–239
Khalaf IM, Shokeir AA, El-Gyoushi FI, Amr HS, Amin MM (2004) Recoverability of renal function after treatment of adult patients with unilateral obstructive uropathy and normal contralateral kidney: a prospective study. Urology 64(4):664–668
Li X-D, Wu Y-P, Wei Y, Chen S-H, Zheng Q-S, Cai H et al (2018) Predictors of recoverability of renal function after pyeloplasty in adults with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urol Int 100(2):209–215
Elbaset MA, Zahran MH, Elrefaie E, Elgamal M, Sharaf M, Ezzat O et al (2020) Functional outcomes after pyeloplasty in solitary kidneys: structured analysis with the implication of Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) staging criteria to predict long-term renal function recoverability. BJU Int 126:502–508
Orimo H, Ito H, Suzuki T, Araki A, Hosoi T, Sawabe M (2006) Reviewing the definition of “elderly.” Geriatr Gerontol Int 6(3):149–158
Sabharwal S, Wilson H, Reilly P, Gupte CM (2015) Heterogeneity of the definition of elderly age in current orthopaedic research. Springerplus 4(1):1–7
Giri SK, Murphy D, Costello AJ, Moon DA (2011) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty outcomes of elderly patients. J Endourol 25(2):251–256
Fernbach S, Maizels M, Conway J (1993) Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol 23(6):478–480
Clavien PA, Barkun J, De Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196
Sennewald K, Taylor JA (1993) A pitfall in calculating differential renal function in patients with renal failure. Clin Nucl Med 18(5):377–381
Lowe FC, Marshall FF (1984) Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. Urology 23(4):331–335
Göğüş Ç, Karamürsel T, Tokatli Z, Yaman Ö, Özdiler E, Göğüş O (2004) Long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in 180 adults in the era of endourologic procedures. Urol Int 73(1):11–14
Palese MA, Stifelman MD, Munver R, Sosa RE, Philipps CK, Dinlenc C et al (2005) Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: a combined experience. J Endourol 19(3):382–386
Elbaset M, Ezzat O, Elgamal M, Sharaf M, Elmeniar A, Abdelhamid A et al (2020) Supranormal differential renal function in adults with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Does it really exist? Indian J Urol 36(3):205
Elbaset MA, Osman Y, Elgamal M, Sharaf MA, Ezzat O, Elmeniar AM et al (2020) Long-term outcomes after pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in adults associated with renal congenital anomalies: age, sex and renal function matched analysis. Arab J Urol, pp 1–6
Cherrie RJ, Kaufman JJ (1983) Pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults: correlation of radiographic and clinical results. J Urol 129(4):711–714
Albani JM, Desai MM, Gill IS, Streem SB (2006) Repair of adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the solitary kidney: effect on renal function. Urology 68(4):718–722
Ortapamuk H, Naldoken S, Tekdogan UY, Aslan Y, Atan A (2003) Differential renal function in the prediction of recovery in adult obstructed kidneys after pyeloplasty. Ann Nucl Med 17(8):663–668
Özel Ş, Emir H, Dervişoğlu S, Akpolat N, Şenel B, Kazez A et al (2010) The roles of extracellular matrix proteins, apoptosis and c-kit positive cells in the pathogenesis of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Pediatr Urol 6(2):125–129
Funding
No funds were received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elbaset, M.A., Elmeniar, A.M., Sharaf, M.A. et al. Critical analysis of pyeloplasty role in adults with late diagnosis of ureteropelvic junction obstruction—a comparative study. Int Urol Nephrol 53, 2051–2056 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-021-02939-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-021-02939-y