Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Functional outcomes of pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: post-operative functional recovery is superior in infants compared to older children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) is less popular and considered less successful in infants compared to older children. There are few reports analyzing the functional results of LP in relation to age of surgery. The aim of this paper is to compare the functional results of LP in infants (group 1) with children over 1 year of age (group 2).

Material and methods

The data of all children undergoing LP between August 2016 and July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed for patient details and follow-up. Only children (n = 135) with at least 1-year follow-up and completed post-operative ultrasound and diuretic renogram were included. All children underwent pre-operative and post-operative ultrasound and diuretic renogram; pre-operative, operative and post-operative parameters were compared between both groups. Statistical analysis was done using software; Mann–Whitney U test, Student t test, and Fisher’s exact test were applied.

Results

There were 71 infants (group 1) and 64 children > 1 year (group 2). Pre-operatively, all kidneys had SFU grade 3 or 4 HDN and 131/135 kidneys had a renal pelvic APD > 20 mm; all kidneys had unequivocal obstruction on DR. At surgery, the preferred drainage method was intra-operative antegrade placement of a JJ stent in 68 (96%) group 1 and 63 (98%) group 2 children. The remaining 4 cases (3 group 1, 1 group 2) had a nephrostomy with trans-anastomotic external stent placement, because the JJ stent could not be negotiated into the bladder. The demographic data and comparison of pre- and post-operative parameters between both groups are summarized in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Group 1 had significantly more children with antenatal diagnosis of HDN (87% vs 56%, p = 0.0005). The 36 children with antenatal diagnosis in group 2 were initially followed expectantly; the indication for pyeloplasty was deterioration of SRF on serial DR, urinary infection, and pain, in 13, 14, and 9 children, respectively. The operating time was significantly longer in group 2 (p = 0.0001). There was no difference in the success of LP or complication rate in both groups. Group 2 had significantly more children with extrinsic obstruction (1.4% vs 17%, p = 0.001). All children underwent post-operative US and DR; a significant reduction in hydronephrosis (APD) on follow-up was noted in both groups (p = 0.0001). The mean pre-operative SRF in both groups was comparable (p = 0.088). The mean SRF in both groups improved significantly after LP; however, the mean post-operative SRF was significantly higher in group 1 when compared to group 2 (p = 0.0001). Furthermore, group 1 had significantly more kidneys demonstrating > 10% increase in SRF after LP (53% vs 26%, p = 0.0003).

Conclusions

The safety profile and success of LP in infants was comparable to older children. Infant LP took shorter time to perform, while older children had increased incidence of extrinsic obstruction. Infant kidneys demonstrated better functional improvement than older children after LP. These findings should encourage more surgeons to utilize LP for pyeloplasty even in infants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Metzelder ML, Schier F, Petersen C, Truss M, Ure BM (2006) Laparoscopic transabdominalpyeloplasty in children is feasible irrespective of age. J Urol 175:688–691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sweeney DD, Ost MC, Schneck FS, Docimo SG (2011) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. J LaparoendoscAdvSurg Tech 21:261–265

    Google Scholar 

  3. Turner RM II, Fox JA, Tomaszewski JJ, Schneck FX, Docimo SG, Ost MC (2013) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in Infants. J Urol 189:1503–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Subotic U, Rohard I, Weber DM, Gobet R, Moehrlen U, Gonzalez R (2012) A minimal invasive surgical approach for children of all ages with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J PediatrUrol 8:354–358

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jackson JS, Zee RS, Martin AS et al (2017) A practice pattern assessment of members of the society of pediatric urology for evaluation and treatment of urinary tract dilation. J PediatrUrol 13:602–607

    Google Scholar 

  6. Farhat W (2012) Editorial comment. J Urol 189:1506–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Szavay PO, Luithle T, Seitz G et al (2010) Functional outcome after laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J PediatrUrol 6:359–363

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ciftci H, Akin Y, Savas M et al (2016) Functional results of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: single institute experience in long-term. UrolInt 97:148–152

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Passoni NM, Peters CA (2020) Managing ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the young infant. Front Pediatr 8:242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chandrasekharam VVS, Srinivas M, Bal CS et al (2001) Functional outcome of pyeloplasty for unilateral symptomatic hydronephrosis. PediatrSurgInt 17:524–527

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Babu R, Rathish VR, Sai V (2015) Functional outcomes of early versus delayed pyeloplasty in prenatally diagnosed pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. J PediatrUrol 11:63e1-65e5

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang D, Tang B, Xu M et al (2017) Functional and morphological outcomes of pyeloplasty at different ages in prenatally diagnosed society of fetal urology grades 3–4 ureteropelvic junction obstruction: is it safe to wait? Urology 101:45–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nordenstrom J, Koutozi G, Holmdahl G et al (2020) Changes in differential renal function after pyeloplasty in infants and children. J PediatrUrol 16:329e1-329e8

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nishi M, Matsumoto K, Fujita T et al (2016) Improvement in renal function and symptoms of patients treated with laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction with less than 20% split renal function. J Endourol 30:1214–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weiss DA, Kadakia S, Kurzweil R, Srinivasan AK, Darge K, Shukla AR (2015) Detection of crossing vessels in pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Clinical patterns and imaging findings. J PediatrUrol 11:173e1-173e5

    Google Scholar 

  16. Asensio M, Gander R, Royo GF et al (2015) Failed pyeloplasty in children: is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible? J PediatrUrol 11:69e1-69e6

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mei H, Pu J, Yang C, Zhang H, Zheng L, Tong Q (2011) Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 25:727–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Noh PH, Vemana G (2012) Scarlesspyeloplasty in the pediatric population. Urology 80:200–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. V. S. Chandrasekharam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical approval

All parents gave informed consent for laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chandrasekharam, V.V.S., Babu, R., Arlikar, J. et al. Functional outcomes of pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: post-operative functional recovery is superior in infants compared to older children. Pediatr Surg Int 37, 1135–1139 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-021-04914-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-021-04914-1

Keywords

Navigation