Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with extracorporeal tailoring and direct nipple ureteroneocystostomy for adult obstructive megaureter: long-term outcomes and comparison to open procedure

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with extracorporeal tailoring and direct nipple ureteroneocystostomy for adult obstructive megaureter and compare the results with the open procedure.

Methods

From January 2007 to July 2013, 22 patients underwent laparoscopic and 28 patients underwent open ureteral reimplantation for adult obstructive megaureter. For laparoscopic group, the dilated ureter was delivered out of through a 12-mm port and the distal end was tailored and formed into an antireflux nipple extracorporeally. The ureteral nipple was intracorporeally reimplanted into the posterolateral wall of the bladder. Demographics, complications and follow-up data were analyzed and compared retrospectively between the groups.

Results

Baseline characteristics including age, gender, body mass index, affected side, age at diagnosis and follow-up time were statistically similar for the groups. All of the surgeries were performed successfully, and no major complications occurred. Comparing with the open group, the use of our novel laparoscopic procedure resulted in less estimated blood loss (50.0 vs. 71.0 ml; P = 0.001), less narcotic analgesic (3.0 vs. 18.0 mg; P = 0.01) and shorter hospital stay (5.1 vs. 7.9 days; P < 0.001). Long-term outcomes including rates of recurrent ureteral stricture (4.5 vs. 0%; P = 0.25), rates of vesicoureteral reflux (9.1 vs. 3.6%, P = 0.42) and success rates (86.4 vs. 96.9%; P = 0.45) did not significantly differ between the two groups.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with extracorporeal tailoring and direct nipple ureteroneocystostomy is a safe and equally effective as the open surgery for the long-term outcomes of adult obstructive megaureter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Im YJ, Jung HJ, Lee YS, Hong CH, Han SW (2013) Impact of ectopic insertion on treatment outcome of primary non-refluxing megaureter. Urology 81(2):402–406. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2012.11.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. King LR (1980) Megaloureter: definition, diagnosis and management. J Urol 123(2):222–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fraser L, Khan MH, Ross M, Patterson PJ (2007) Rare case of non-refluxing non-obstructive megaureter in an adult. Int Urol Nephrol 39(2):421–423. doi:10.1007/s11255-006-9054-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peters CA, Mandell J, Lebowitz RL, Colodny AH, Bauer SB, Hendren WH, Retik AB (1989) Congenital obstructed megaureters in early infancy: diagnosis and treatment. J Urol 142(2 Pt 2):641–645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rubenwolf P, Herrmann-Nuber J, Schreckenberger M, Stein R, Beetz R (2016) Primary non-refluxive megaureter in children: single-center experience and follow-up of 212 patients. Int Urol Nephrol 48(11):1743–1749. doi:10.1007/s11255-016-1384-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. He Y, Chen X, Chen Z, Luo YC, Li NN (2012) Treatment of symptomatic primary obstructive megaureter by laparoscopic intracorporeal or extracorporeal ureteral tapering and ureteroneocystostomy: experience on 11 patients. J Endourol 26(11):1454–1457. doi:10.1089/end.2012.0236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abraham GP, Das K, Ramaswami K, Siddaiah AT, George D, Abraham JJ, Thampan OS (2012) Laparoscopic reconstruction for obstructive megaureter: single institution experience with short- and intermediate-term outcomes. J Endourol 26(9):1187–1191. doi:10.1089/end.2012.0039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Link BA, Slobodov G, Campbell JB, Kropp BP (2007) Radiographic changes following excisional tapering and reimplantation of megaureters in childhood: long-term outcome in 46 renal units. J Urol 178(4 Pt 1):1474–1478. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guseinov E (2000) Long-term results of the surgical treatment of primary obstructive megaureter in children. Urologiia 5:35–40

    Google Scholar 

  10. He R, Yu W, Li X, Yao L, He Z, Zhou L (2013) Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with extracorporeal tailoring and direct nipple ureteroneocystostomy for adult obstructed megaureter: a novel technique. Urology 82(5):1171–1174. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pfister RC, Hendren WH (1978) Primary megaureter in children and adults. Clinical and pathophysiologic features of 150 ureters. Urology 12(2):160–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hanna MK, Wyatt JK (1975) Primary obstructive megaureter in adults. J Urol 113(3):328–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dorairajan LN, Hemal AK, Gupta NP, Wadhwa SN (1999) Primary obstructive megaureter in adults: need for an aggressive management strategy. Int Urol Nephrol 31(5):633–641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hemal AK, Nayyar R, Rao R (2009) Robotic repair of primary symptomatic obstructive megaureter with intracorporeal or extracorporeal ureteric tapering and ureteroneocystostomy. J Endourol 23(12):2041–2046. doi:10.1089/end.2009.0103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Garcia-Aparicio L, Blazquez-Gomez E, Martin O, Palazon P, Manzanares A, Garcia-Smith N, Bejarano M, de Haro I, Ribo JM (2013) Use of high-pressure balloon dilatation of the ureterovesical junction instead of ureteral reimplantation to treat primary obstructive megaureter: Is it justified? J Pediatr Urol 9(6 Pt B):1229–1233. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.05.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fu W, Zhang X, Zhang X, Zhang P, Gao J, Dong J, Chen G, Xu A, Ma X, Li H, Shi L (2014) Pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic reconstructive surgery in congenital megaureter: a single institution experience. PLOS ONE 9(6):e99777. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099777

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hemal AK, Ansari MS, Doddamani D, Gupta NP (2003) Symptomatic and complicated adult and adolescent primary obstructive megaureter–indications for surgery: analysis, outcome, and follow-up. Urology 61(4):703–707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ehrlich RM, Gershman A, Fuchs G (1994) Laparoscopic vesicoureteroplasty in children: initial case reports. Urology 43(2):255–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rassweiler JJ, Gozen AS, Erdogru T, Sugiono M, Teber D (2007) Ureteral reimplantation for management of ureteral strictures: a retrospective comparison of laparoscopic and open techniques. Eur Urol 51(2):512–522. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ansari MS, Mandhani A, Khurana N, Kumar A (2006) Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with extracorporeal tailoring for megaureter: a simple technical nuance. J Urol 176(6 Pt 1):2640–2642. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tatlisen A, Ekmekcioglu O (2005) Direct nipple ureteroneocystostomy in adults with primary obstructed megaureter. J Urol 173(3):877–880. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000152533.93716.3c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bondarenko S (2013) Laparoscopic extravesical transverse ureteral reimplantation in children with obstructive megaureter. J Pediatr Urol 9(4):437–441. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.01.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to the medical illustrator Madam Xinying Ma.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiongjun Ye or Xuesong Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

 All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 44 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhong, W., Yao, L., Cui, H. et al. Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with extracorporeal tailoring and direct nipple ureteroneocystostomy for adult obstructive megaureter: long-term outcomes and comparison to open procedure. Int Urol Nephrol 49, 1973–1978 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1687-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1687-7

Keywords

Navigation