Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of split-cuff nipple and modified Lich-Gregoir ureteroneocystostomy in iatrogenic distal ureteral injuries: tertiary care center experience

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In this study, we aimed to compare the results of split-cuff nipple and modified Lich-Gregoir ureteroneocystostomy, which are the most commonly used techniques in stage ≥ 3 iatrogenic distal ureteral injuries.

Methods

The files of patients who were treated for iatrogenic distal ureteral injuries in our clinic between January 2013 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 60 patients who underwent either intra-vesical split-cuff nipple ureteroneocystostomy (Group A) or extra-vesical modified Lich-Gregoir ureteroneocystostomy (Group B) operations were included in the study. The success of ureteroneocystostomy was defined as no additional surgery requirement, no progression of hydronephrosis on imaging, and normal contrast transition on imaging.

Results

Thirty-four patients underwent split-cuff nipple and 26 patients underwent modified Lich-Gregoir ureteroneocystostomy. The treatment was successful in 53 (88.3%) patients and failed in seven (11.7%). Complications occurred in 19 (31.7%) patients, of whom 14 (23.3%) had minor and five (8.3%) had major complications. The rate of postoperative complications was significantly higher in Group A than in Group B (p = 0.019). There was no significant difference between Group A and Group B in terms of the success ratio (p = 1), rate of major complications (p = 0.372), and postoperative hospitalization times (p = 0.254).

Conclusion

In this study, a higher complication rate was found in patients with iatrogenic ureteral injuries who underwent ureteroneocystostomy with the split-cuff ureteral nipple technique compared to those who underwent this operation with the modified Lich-Gregoir technique. However, no significant difference was observed between these two techniques in terms of treatment success and major complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kitrey ND, Djakovic N, Hallscheidt P et al. EAU Guidelines (2021) Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Milan. EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, the Netherlands

  2. Baser A, Alkis O, Toktas C (2016) A rare cause of ureteral injuries; simultaneous common iliac artery and ureter injury during posterior lumbar disc surgery. Turk J Urol 42(2):108–110. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2016.70105

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Arlen AM, Pan S, Colberg JW (2018) Delayed diagnosis of isolated ureteral injury from blunt trauma. Urol Case Rep 19:50–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2018.04.010

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ditz I, Bizjak J (2019) A rare case report of the use of allium stent in management of a gunshot injury with incomplete tear of the proximal part of the right ureter. J Endourol Case Reports 5(4):154–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Phillips B, Holzmer S, Turco L et al (2017) Trauma to the bladder and ureter: a review of diagnosis, management, and prognosis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 43(6):763–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-017-0817-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ortega SJ, Netto FS, Hamilton P, Chu P, Tien HC (2008) CT scanning for diagnosing blunt ureteral and ureteropelvic junction injuries. BMC Urol 8(1):3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bryk DJ, Zhao LC (2016) Guideline of guidelines: a review of urological trauma guidelines. BJU Int 117(2):226–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zaid UB, Bayne DB, Harris CR (2015) Penetrating trauma to the ureter, bladder, and urethra. Current Trauma Reports 1(2):119–124

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zou Q, Fu Q (2015) Diagnosis and treatment of acute urogenital and genitalia tract traumas: 10-year clinical experience. Pak J Med Sci 31(4):925

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Malangoni MA, Jurkovich GJ, Shackford SR, Champion HR, McAninch JW (1995) Organ injury scaling. Surg Clin 75(2):293–303

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Witters S, Cornelissen M, Vereecken R (1986) Iatrogenic ureteral injury: aggressive or conservative treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155(3):582–584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ku JH, Kim ME, Jeon YS, Lee NK, Park YH (2003) Minimally invasive management of ureteral injuries recognized late after obstetric and gynaecologic surgery. Injury 34(7):480–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Awadi K, Kehinde EO, Al-Hunayan A, Al-Khayat A (2005) Iatrogenic ureteric injuries: incidence, aetiological factors and the effect of early management on subsequent outcome. Int Urol Nephrol 37(2):235–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Baston C, Gîngu C, Omer A, Margaritis-Guler SS, Manea I, Dudu C, Sinescu I (2016) Split-cuff ureteral nipple versus Lich-Gregoir în transplantul renal de la donatorul în moarte cerebrala-studiu prospectiv al complicatiilor urologice/Split-cuff ureteral nipple versus Lich-Gregoir ureteroneocystostomy in kidney transplantation from deceased donors-a prospective study of urological complications. Roman J Urol 15(2):94

    Google Scholar 

  15. Silay MS, Turan T, Kayalı Y, Basibuyuk I, Gunaydin B, Caskurlu T, Karaman MI (2018) Comparison of intravesical (Cohen) and extravesical (Lich–Gregoir) ureteroneocystostomy in the treatment of unilateral primary vesicoureteric reflux in children. J Pediatric Urol 14(1):65.e1-65.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhong W, Yao L, Cui H, Yang K, Wang G, Xu T, Ye X, Li X, Zhou L (2017) Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with extracorporeal tailoring and direct nipple ureteroneocystostomy for adult obstructive megaureter: long-term outcomes and comparison to open procedure. Int Urol Nephrol 49(11):1973–1978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1687-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ambani SN, Skupin P, Malaeb BS, Barboglio-Romo P, Stoffel JT (2020) Does early ureteroneocystostomy after iatrogenic ureteral injury jeopardize outcome? Urology 136:245–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stearns GL, Tin AL, Benfante NE, Sjoberg DD, Sandhu JS (2021) Outcomes of ureteroneocystostomy in patients with cancer. Urology 158:131–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim TN, Kim JH, Oh CK, Lee W, Nam JK, Lee KS (2021) Three different laparoscopic techniques for the management of iatrogenic ureteral injury: a multi-institutional study with medium-term outcomes. Asian J Surg 44(7):964–968

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Manassero F, Mogorovich A, Fiorini G, Di Paola G, De Maria M, Selli C (2012) Ureteral reimplantation with psoas bladder hitch in adults: a contemporary series with long-term followup. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/379316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ding G, Li X, Fang D, Hao H, Li X, Zhou L (2021) Etiology and ureteral reconstruction strategy for iatrogenic ureteral injuries: a retrospective single-center experience. Urol Int 105(5–6):470–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rock J, Jones A, Howard W (2008) Operative injuries to the ureter: prevention, recognition and management. The Linde’s operative gynecology, 10th edn. Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 961–971

    Google Scholar 

  23. Martin A, Wells A, Anderson ML, Chern JY, Rutherford TJ, Shahzad MM, Hoffman MS (2021) Trends in ureteral surgery on an academic gynecologic oncology service. Gynecol Oncol 163(3):552–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kominsky HD, Shah NC, Beecroft NJ, Diab D, Crescenze IM, Posid T, Baradaran N (2021) Does timing of diagnosis and management of iatrogenic ureter injuries affect outcomes? Experience from a tertiary center. Urology 149:240–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emre Bulbul.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demirdag, C., Bulbul, E., Gultekin, M.H. et al. Comparison of split-cuff nipple and modified Lich-Gregoir ureteroneocystostomy in iatrogenic distal ureteral injuries: tertiary care center experience. Int Urol Nephrol 55, 605–611 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03449-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03449-1

Keywords

Navigation