Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of pH and viscosity on bovine spermatozoa motility under controlled conditions

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Infertility in a large proportion of infertile couples is due, in part, to the male factor. Spermatozoa must survive the unique environment of the female reproductive tract in their path to fertilize the ovum. This fact is even more problematic for men with oligospermia. Of the many environmental factors that effect sperm motility in the female reproductive tract, we have decided to concentrate on the effect of pH and viscosity on bovine spermatozoa in the laboratory setting. Follicular fluid was harvested from heifer ovaries to serve as a chemo-attractant. Through image analysis, our data shows trends of sperm motility as a function of pH and viscosity. There is a significant increase in the number of immotile sperm seen as pH decreases from 6.5 to 6.0. Furthermore, an exponential relationship between sperm speed and environmental viscosity was observed in vitro. This suggests that modulating vaginal pH and vaginal secretion viscosity could greatly affect spermatozoa motility and therefore male fertility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balercia G, Regoli F, Armeni T, Koverech A, Mantero F, Boscaro M (2005) Placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trial on the use of L-carnitine, L-acetylcarnitine, or combined L-carnitine and L-acetylcarnitine in men with idiopathic astenozoospermia. Fertil Steril 84(3):662–671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beers MH (2003). “Vaginal infections.” The Merck Manual. http://www.merck.com/mmhe/sec22/ch247/ch247a.html

  3. Boskey ER, Telsch KM, Whaley KJ, Moench TR, Cone RA (1999) Acid production by Vaginal Flora in vitro is consistent with the rate and extent of vaginal acidification. Infect Immun 67(10):5170–5175

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boskey ER, Cone RA, Whaley KJ, Moench TR (2001) Origins of vaginal acidity: high D/L lactate ratio is consistent with bacteria being the primary source. Hum Reprod 16(9):1809–1813

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cerikcioglu N, Beksac MS (2004) Cytolytic vaginosis: misdiagnosed as candidal vaginitis. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 12:13–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenbach M (1999) Sperm chemotaxis. Rev Reprod 4:56–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gibbons RA (1959) Chemical properties of two mucoids from bovine cervical mucin. J Biochem 73:209–225

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gorodeski GI (2000) NO increases permeabilty of cultured human cervical epithelia by cGMP-mediated increase in G-actin. Am J Physiol—Cell Physiol 278(5):C942–C952

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guffanti AA, Susman P, Blanco R, Krulwich TA (1978) The protonmotive force and alpha-aminoisobutyric acid transport in an obligately alkalophilic bacterium. J Biol Chem 253:708–715

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harraway C, Berger NG, Dubin NH (2000) Semen pH in patients with normal versus abnormal sperm characteristics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 5(182):1045–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lefièvre L, De Lamirande E, Gagnon C (2000) The cyclic GMP-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor, sildenafil, stimulates human sperm motility and capacitation but not acrosome reaction. J Androl 21(6):929–937

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu DY, Baker HW (2004) High frequency of defective sperm-zona pellucida interaction in oligiospermic infertile men. Hum Reprod 19(2):228–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Love CC, Thompson JA, Brinsko SP, Rigby SL, Blanchard TL, Lowry VK, Varner DD (2003) Relationship between stallion sperm motility and viability as detected by two fluorescence staining techniques using flow cytometry. Theriogenology 60:1127–1138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McLachlan RI, Baker HW, Clarke GN, Harrison KL, Matson PL, Holden CA, de Kretser DM (2003) Semen analysis: its place in modern reproductive medical practice. Pathology 35:25–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mohammad SN, Barratt CL, Cooke ID, Moore HD (1997) Continuous assessment of human spermatozoa viability during cryopreservation. J Androl 1(18):43–50

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moreira S, Lipshultz L (2004) Management of male infertility. Digit Urol J http://www.duj.com/Article/Moreira.html

  17. Nallella KP, Sharma RK, Aziz N, Agarwal A (2006) Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility. Fertil Steril 85(3):629–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Overstreet JW, Katz DF, Yudin AI (1991) Cervical mucus and sperm transport in reproduction. Semin Perinatol 15:149–155

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ralt D, Goldenberg M, Fetterolf P, Thompson D, Dor J, Mashiach S, Garbers DL, Eisenbach M (1991) Sperm attraction to a follicular factor(s) correlates with human egg fertilizability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:2840–2844

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rikmenspoel R (1984) Movements and active moments of bull sperm flagella as a function of temperature and viscosity. J Exp Biol 108(1):205–230

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rikmenspoel R, Jacklet AC, Orris SE, Lindemann CB (1973) Control of bull sperm motility. Effects of viscosity, KCN, and thiourea. J Mechanochem Cell Motil 2(1):7–24

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rutllant J, López-Béjar M, Santolaria P, Yániz J, López-Gatius F (2002) Rheological and ultrastructural properties of bovine vaginal fluid obtained at oestrus. J Anat 201:53–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharlip ID, Jarow JP, Belker AM, Lipshultz LI, Sigman M, Thomas AJ, Schlegel PN, Howards SS, Nehra A, Damewood MD, Overstreet JW, Sadovsky R (2002) Best practice policies for male infertility. Fertil Steril 77:873–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Suarez SS, Pacey AA (2006) Sperm transport in the female reproductive tract. Hum Reprod Update 12(1):23–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Turner RM (2006) Moving to the beat: a review of mammalian sperm motility regulation. Reprod Fertil Dev 18:25–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Woolley DM (2003) Motility of spermatozoa at surfaces. Reproduction 126:259–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. World Health Organization (1997) Towards more objectivity in diagnosis and management of male fertility. Int J Androl 7:1–53

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yudin AI, Hanson FW, Katz DF (1989) Human cervical mucus and its interaction with sperm: a fine-structural view. Biol Reprod 40:661–671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our Biomedical Engineering mentors at Columbia University and specifically, Clark T. Hung, Ph.D., and Paul Sajda, Ph.D. Also, Nina C. Shapley, Ph.D. and Tracey L. Moraczewski, M.S. for kindly allowing us to conduct viscosity measurements in their laboratory.

Sources of support

Columbia University, Department of Biomedical Engineering

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avez A. Rizvi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rizvi, A.A., Quraishi, M.I., Sarkar, V. et al. The effect of pH and viscosity on bovine spermatozoa motility under controlled conditions. Int Urol Nephrol 41, 523–530 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-008-9493-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-008-9493-x

Keywords

Navigation