Abstract
Ecosystem services (ESs) valuation is important for advancing biodiversity objectives and investing in green infrastructure (GI) establishment. Little is known about the potential of health clinic gardens (HCGs) to provide ESs and their potential values. This study sought to determine the plant and bird species composition and potential value of ESs provided by 32 HCGs in two South African district municipalities. HCG sizes range from 513.0m2 to 13531.0m2 and each had at least one micro-garden. Among the 312 plant species observed across all HCGs, 60% were exotic. The small HCGs had 31 ± 3.6 different plant species per garden, compared to the medium-sized (32 ± 3.7) and large ones (49 ± 5.2). Provisioning ESs from the observed species were prominent with 17.4 ± 1.16 species potentially used for general well-being, 13.66 ± 1.08 as potential food plants, and 11.91 ± 0.93 potentially raw materials. Trees in HCGs were estimated to sequester up to 163481.87 kg of carbon from trees covering an area of up to 9620.80m2. Approximately 1390.70 ± 427.50m2 of HCG space had the potential to provide a habitat for plants and birds, and 11 bird species were observed across all HCGs. Sixty-three bird nests encountered in 18 HCGs are believed to belong to the Passer domesticus. HCGs resemble other types of gardens like home and domestic gardens, and their rich plant biodiversity positions them as ideal ecosystems to benefit even the most vulnerable members of society. They provide an opportune platform for knowledge upscaling in the cultivation and use of plant species as a supplement of primary healthcare and food security issues in the summer months to the rural, urban, and peri-urban poor in the Global South.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Assessing ecosystem service (ES) values is a key action for the advancement of biodiversity objectives like better protecting ecosystems and the services they provide through green infrastructure (GI) establishment (Maes et al. 2016). While it is crucial to understand people’s subjective evaluations of ESs for better communication, maintenance, and ES benefits enhancement (Larson et al. 2019), such evaluations can be distorted by people’s perceptions, preferences, and demands for ESs (Plieninger et al. 2013). Thus, actual (real) ESs values may be crucial motivating factors for GI establishments and expansion, maintenance, and stakeholder engagement in environmental stewardship action to protect GI (Langemeyer et al. 2018).
The value of ecosystems can be divided into three types: ecological, economic, and socio-cultural value (De Groot et al. 2002). The ecological value of a system is determined by the integrity of the regulation and habitat functions of the ecosystem and by ecosystem parameters including complexity, diversity, and rarity (De Groot et al. 2002). The tracing of the social and political trajectories of local practices and decision-making are the core to better understand the changing value of ESs, and Sutherland et al. (2016) suggest the concept of ecological economics to understand the economic value of Ess, which focuses on creating markets for ESs and payments for ecosystem services (PESs) programmes to value the environment. Human perceptions are crucial in determining the socio-cultural value of an ecosystem, and social reasons facilitate the identification of crucial environmental functions (De Groot et al. 2002).
Gardens are essential types of GI that are important hubs for multiple ESs provision (Cubino et al. 2014). In South Africa, health clinic gardens (HCGs) are community gardens developed and managed by a variety of stakeholders for the community on government-owned land (Cilliers et al. 2018; Gwedla et al. 2022). They were first developed after 1994 around health clinics to contribute towards the nutritional needs of the surrounding community through the provision of fresh fruits and vegetables to malnourished patients (Voster et al., 2011). HCGs in the North-West province structurally resemble the Tswana tshimo garden layout (Cilliers et al. 2018), which refers to “a traditional home-garden structure characterized by a variety of micro-gardens, including lebala (bare soil), naga (natural vegetation), lawn, vegetable garden, medicinal garden, ornamental garden, hedge, shade trees and an orchard” (Molebatsi et al. 2010).
Extensive scholarly research has been conducted on the value of ESs provided by various types of gardens (Ge et al. 2022). However, little is known about the structure, composition, ESs value, and efficacy of community gardens associated with hospitals and healthcare centres (George and Ethridge 2023), specifically HCGs in South Africa. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the actual presence and ecological, socio-cultural, and economic value of ESs provided by vegetation in urban and peri-urban HCGs, thereby making a case for the establishment and maintenance of these garden systems beyond food provision. Ecosystem disservices (EDS) in the HCGs, such as allergies, accidents, and infrastructure damage caused by branches and roots are acknowledged (Muller, 2019) but not included in this paper.
Methods
Study areas
This study was part of a larger study on HCGs and community engagement conducted in the Dr Kenneth Kaunda District Municipality in the North-West province, and the Frances Baard District Municipality in the Northern Cape province of South Africa (Fig. 1). Data were collected in 32 HCGs situated in urban and peri-urban areas of the two districts (Fig. 1). The Dr Kenneth Kaunda District is situated in the grassland biome, with small patches of savanna biome throughout the district, while the Frances Baard District is in the savanna biome (Mucina and Rutherford 2006). Both districts experience summer rainfall (Mucina and Rutherford 2006).
The locations of HCGs sampled in the two districts of the North-West and Northern Cape provinces in South Africa (Muller, 2019)
Data collection and analysis
Data were collected during the spring and summer seasons in each health clinic identified to have at least one micro-garden. Micro-gardens refer to different pockets of vegetation and bare ground intended for specific uses such as food cultivation and ornamental plants propagation within a larger garden space (Molebatsi et al. 2010; Nemudzudzanyi et al. 2010). Gardens were subjectively categorized into small, medium-sized, and large based on the sum areas of the HCGs. Table 1 outlines the objectives and brief methods employed in conducting this study. Various quantifiable provisioning, regulating, supporting and cultural Ess as described in the MEA (2005) (Table 1) were subjectively selected for the study (Muller, 2019). Data analyses were conducted on IBM-SPSS 29.0.
Results
The sizes of the sampled HCGs ranged from 513.0m2 to 13531.0m2 (Table 2). Each had at least one micro-garden, where 82.1% of HCGs had ornamental and vegetable micro-gardens, respectively (Fig. 2). The smallest had 3±0.26 micro-gardens compared to the medium-sized (4±0.29) and large HCGs (4±0.26) (F=2.3, p=0.12). There were 312 plant species observed across all HCGs (Appendix 1), 60% of which were exotic. On average, the small HCGs had 31±3.6 plant species per garden, compared to the medium-sized (32±3.7) and large ones (49±5.2) (F=5.8; p=0.008). Examples of HCG layouts, depicting the presence of at least one micro-garden, including (a) the lawn, lebala, shade trees, vegetable garden, and (b) the ornamental gardens.
Provisioning ESs from the observed species were prominent and 17.4 ± 1.16 species had the potential to contribute to general well-being (F = 4.5; p = 0.019); 13.66 ± 1.08 were potential food plants (F = 3.4; p = 0.048), and 11.91 ± 0.93 had the potential to be used as raw materials (F = 4.3; p = 0.024) (Table 2). Trees covering an area of up to 9620.80m2 in HCGs were estimated to sequester up to 163481.87 kg of carbon (Table 2). No significant relationship was established between the size of HCGs and total tree cover per garden (r2 = 0.26; p = 0.15) or potential carbon sequestration (r2 = 0.34; p = 0.06).
Cynodon dactylon was found in 23 HCGs and has the potential to improve general well-being and the ecological value of the HCGs. On the other hand, Portulaca oleracea and Prunus persica were the most frequently occurring potential food plants each found in 20 HCGs (Appendix 2). One hundred and sixteen plant species were identified to have a potential ornamental value, and the most common of these species are outlined in Appendix 3. 65% of all encountered ornamental species were exotic, and 44% of HCGs had at least one plant species with potential cultural value. All encountered species associated with potential spiritual cultural value are indigenous to Southern Africa, for example, several parts of Celtis africana and Dietes.bicolor species are used for spiritual cleansing and as protective charms across different ethnic groups in South Africa (Table 3).
Approximately 1390.70 ± 427.50m2 of HCG space had the potential to provide a habitat and food for plants and birds (Table 2). Eleven bird species were observed across all HCGs, and the most common bird species was the house sparrow (Passer domesticus) (Table 4). The size of HCGs had no significant bearing on the potential to provide bird habitat based on the number of observed bird species (χ2 = 10.03; p = 0.12) and size of habitat for plants and birds (χ2 = 30.2; p = 0.45). Sixty-three bird nests observed in 18 HCGs are believed to belong to P. domesticus, while 59 observed in 12 HGCs are believed to belong to Southern masked weaver (Ploceus velatus).
Discussion
Urban ecosystems are highly modified by humans, affecting plant community composition and leading to reductions in various ESs (Hane and Korfmacher 2022). Although highly altered and managed by humans, the HCGs in this study demonstrate the potential for optimal ES provision. Evidence of this is found in the abundance and diversity of plant species and thus the potential for ES provision and enhancement in the gardens. The plant species abundance in HCGs is reminiscent of home, domestic, and other types of community gardens both in South Africa and elsewhere (Clarke et al. 2014; Lubbe et al. 2010; Molebatsi et al. 2010). This also positions HCGs as an ideal ecosystem for biodiversity conservation and restoration. Gardens typically contain an eclectic mix of indigenous and exotic species, although exotic plant species usually account for the largest proportion of plant species (van Heezik et al. 2013). This was evident in HCGs in this study, a pattern McLean et al. (2018) attribute to plant species naturalization and the relative abundance of exotic species with increased urbanization.
An important purpose of HCGs was geared towards food security and assisting ailing patients around the community to meet their nutritional needs through the cultivation of various fruits and vegetables (Voster et al., 2011). However, this study reveals that HCGs are spaces for ESs provision beyond food provision. Provisioning ESs are some of the most widely recognized ESs of gardens (Maroyi 2022) and the results of this study support this assertion. In keeping with this purpose, HCGs in this study had a high number of potential food plants, comparable to domestic gardens in the North-West Province (Molebatsi et al. 2010; Lubbe et al. 2010). Given the rates of undernourishment globally and locally (Omotayo and Aremu 2020), food production is crucial in HCGs, and community gardens may promote access to fresh nutritious foods (Shisanya and Hendricks, 2011), especially from leafy vegetables and grains.
Sutherland et al. (2016) found that the wood for fuel and sticks for building houses, fencing yards, and making brooms, were some of the useful goods derived from the trees and grasslands in selected peri-urban areas in Durban, South Africa. The potential for raw materials harvesting in HCGs was high. This is particularly important in the southern Africa context where poor communities need to have access to alternative means of getting resources such as building materials, fuel, and other crafts such as thatching, weaving, and brooms (van Wyk and Gericke 2018).
While a substantial number of species with the potential to contribute to general well-being were enumerated, no HCG had a delineated medicinal micro-garden, implying an absence of concerted efforts to cultivate such plants around health clinics. This is expected, given the attitudes and perceptions around the use of plants for general well-being in their most natural form in contemporary South Africa which is inclined towards Western biomedicine or removed from the use of “traditional medicine” (Aston-Philander et al. 2011). Notwithstanding, there is a high demand for plants with properties to improve general well-being in most parts of South Africa, with an estimated 27 million citizens expected to self-medicate with such plant species at some stage in their lives (Nwafor et al. 2021). Many species classified as having potential to contribute to general well-being also have a dual use as food plants. This resonates with Chazovachii et al. (2013), medical plants found in selected community gardens in Zimbabwe such as Allium sativum and Allium cepa may be used to improve digestion and stimulate appetite, alongside their use as flavoring in food. The common grass species, Cynodon dactylon also has several potential uses. Due to its rhizomatous nature, it is a good colonizer, arresting soil erosion and is well adapted to disturbances such as trampling and grazing (Cilliers et al. 1998; Du Toit et al. 2021). C. dactylon is also widely used in traditional medicine in Africa for different ailments, such as diarrhea and healing of wounds, due to the antimicrobial activities of all its organs (Gebashe et al. 2019).
The impact of urban trees, and thus their potential for carbon sequestration, on climate change is often disregarded because their ESs are not well understood or quantified (Nowak et al. 2013). However, ecosystems and environments with substantial room for trees have the highest potential for carbon sequestration (Kuittinen et al. 2016). The carbon sequestration potential of vegetation in HCGs is comparable to that of other types of UGI like domestic gardens and parks. Ariluoma et al. (2021) estimated that the carbon sequestration and storage potential of urban green areas in residential yards of Kuninkaantammi, Helsinki would be 95 kg CO2 sequestered per resident and 2.4 kg CO2/m2 of floor space over a period of 50 years.
Avian ecological composition and diversity is an important proxy for evaluating the functionality and quality of different types of green spaces (Sandstrom et al., 2006). The bird species richness encountered in HCGs in this study suggests that HCGs are functional ecosystems with the potential for habitat and food provision HCGs thus present considerable opportunity for bird conservation and enhance human experiences with wildlife (Goddard et al. 2017). Moreover, gardens represent potential refugia for native plant and animal communities, including birds which tend to play keystone ecological roles because they form central nodes that hold pollination webs together where many plant species depend on them for pollination (Pauw and Louw 2012). In the HCGs a frequent visitor, Ploceus velatus, has documented pollination associations with at least eight plants species (Craig 2014) including Aloes (Symes et al. 2008). The most frequently observed bird in the HCGs, Passer domesticus, play an important role as natural pest controller due to its omnivorous diet (Narayanappa et al. 2022). A review on the ES provided by birds lists several studies that quantified the contribution of birds as pest-control agents (Whelan et al. 2008). The calming effect of birdsong on humans is also an important cultural ES provided by birds (Ratcliffe et al. 2013). A study in Australia, however, also highlighted the role frugivorous birds play in seed dispersal of alien plants such as Celtis sinensis (Stansbury and Vivian-Smith 2003) which commonly occurred in HCGs. The preferential consumption of fruits of alien plants by birds and the resulting unintended seed dispersal of these plants is an important issue that should not be overlooked (Mokotjomela et al. 2013).
The use of vegetation in spirituality and cultural practices is widespread in African culture which contributes to improved general well-being holistically. Two of the plant species encountered in the HCGs with potential uses in this regard are C. africana and D. bicolor. Zukulu et al. (2012) state that D. bicolor is widely used for ritual washing after a death in the family and in the ritual cleansing of cattle a few days after a funeral in the eastern parts of South Africa. C. africana stems are believed to have magical properties and are predominantly used to make magical sticks which are driven into the ground to protect against witchcraft in the northern parts of the country (Constant and Tshisikhawe 2018). Rituals, ceremonies, spiritual practices, and other traditions associated with plant use also serve to pass on institutional memory and cultural internalization to support knowledge generation, accumulation, and transmission (Berkes et al. 2000).
It is evident from this study that only a few of the HCGs provide a variety of ESs with high economic, ecological, and socio-cultural values (Muller, 2019). These HCGs could serve as good examples of how the others can be improved, by optimizing the ESs provided by the gardens (Cilliers et al. 2018) through increasing the number and size of the micro-gardens (Molebatsi et al. 2010) and by using plant species which are adapted to specific environmental conditions in the HCG, and following the principles of waterwise gardening (Van Jaarsveld 2013). Several different stakeholders with different perceptions of the “value of nature” are involved in designing, planning and managing the HCG, and that needs to be understood and communicated to the larger community (Cilliers et al. 2018; Gwedla et al. 2022). Great care needs to be taken to increase awareness of the benefits provided by these HCG as complex social-ecological systems (Cilliers et al. 2018) and this study has contributed greatly to our current knowledge on the value of these gardens. By just listing the ESs provided by a specific ecosystem and explain their values, can already increase awareness and recognition in public policy (Costanza et al. 2017) leading to the development of a community-based resource management framework for HCGs for the North-West Province in South Africa, but also for future expansion to other provinces and other African countries (Cilliers et al. 2018).
Conclusion
HCGs in South Africa are important hubs for knowledge upscaling to the larger community and for provision and enhancement of ESs, due to their centrality and accessibility through the primary healthcare system in South Africa. This is made possible by the variety and abundance of plant and bird life present in the gardens, providing ESs beyond the provision of food. The identified ESs included plant species for potential improvement of general health and well-being, food, and raw material, carbon sequestration, habitat provisioning, and the availability of species which can potentially be used for spiritual and ritualistic purposes.
References
Ariluoma M, Ottelin J, Hautamäki R, Tuhkanen EM, Mänttäri M (2021) Carbon sequestration and storage potential of urban green in residential yards: a case study from Helsinki. Urban Urban Green 57:126939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126939
Aston-Philander LE, Makunga NP, Platten SJ (2011) Local medicinal plant knowledge in South Africa preserved by apartheid. Hum Ecol 39:203–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-011-9387-x
Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl 10(5):1251–1262. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2
Chazovachii B, Mutami C, Bowora J (2013) Community gardens and food security in rural livelihood development: the case of entrepreneurial and market gardens in Mberengwa. Zimbabwe Russ J Agric Soc -Econ Sci 13:8–17
Cilliers SS, Schoeman LL, Bredenkamp GJ (1998) Wetland plant communities in the Potchefstroom Municipal Area, North-West, South Africa. Bothalia 28(2):213–229. https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v28i2.642
Cilliers SS, Siebert SJ, Du Toit MJ, Barthel S, Mishra S, Cornelius SF, Davoren E (2018) Garden ecosystem services of Sub-saharan Africa and the role of health clinic gardens as social-ecological systems. Landsc Urban Plan 180:294–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.011
Clarke LW, Li L, Jenerette GD, Yu Z (2014) Drivers of plant biodiversity and ecosystem service production in home gardens across the Beijing Municipality of China. Urban Ecosyst 17:741–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0351-6
Constant NL, Tshisikhawe MP (2018) Hierarchies of knowledge: ethnobotanical knowledge, practices and beliefs of the Vhavenda in South Africa for biodiversity conservation. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 14:56
Costanza R, De Groot R, Braat L, Kubiszewski I, Fioramonti L, Sutton P, Farber S, Grasso M (2017) Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst Serv 28:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
Craig AJFK (2014) Nectar feeding by weavers (Ploceidae) and their role as pollinators. Ostrich 85(1):25–30. https://doi.org/10.2989/00306525.2014.900828
Cubino JP, Subirós JV, Lozano CB (2014) Examining floristic boundaries between garden types at the global scale. Investigaciones Geográficas 61:71–86. https://doi.org/10.14198/INGEO2014.61.05
De Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecolo Econ 41:393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
Du Toit MJ, Du Preez C, Cilliers SS (2021) Plant diversity and conservation value of wetlands along a rural-urban gradient. Bothalia 51(1):a4. https://doi.org/10.38201/btha.abc.v51.i1.4
Ge Q, Xu W, Fu M, Han Y, An G, Xu Y (2022) Ecosystem service values of gardens in the Yellow River Basin, China. J Arid Land 14:284–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-022-0061-5
Gebashe F, Aremu AO, Finnie JF, Van Staden J (2019) Grasses in South African traditional medicine: a review of their biological activities and phytochemical context. SA J Bot 122:301–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2018.10.012
George DR, Ethridge AE (2023) Hospital-based community gardens as a strategic partner in addressing community health needs. Am J Public Health (0) e1–e4. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307336
Goddard MA, Ikin K, Lerman SB (2017) Ecological and social factors determining the diversity of birds in residential yards and gardens. In: Murgui E, Hedblom M (eds) Ecology and conservation of birds in urban environments. Springer, Switzerland, pp 371–397
Gwedla N, Cornelius SFA, Du Toit MJ, Cilliers SS (2022) Stakeholder perceptions of the ecosystem services of health clinic gardens in settlements and small-to medium-sized cities in the North-West Province, South Africa. Land 11:1904. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11111904
Hane EN, Korfmacher KF (2022) Engaging students in redesigning a local urban space to improve ecosystem services. Urban Ecosyst 1:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-021-01184-6
Kuittinen M, Moinel C, Adalgeirsdottir K (2016) Carbon sequestration through urban ecosystem services: a case study from Finland. Sci Total Environ 563:623–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.168
Langemeyer J, Camps-Calvet M, Calvet-Mir L, Barthel S, Gómez-Baggethun E (2018) Stewardship of urban ecosystem services: understanding the value(s) of urban gardens in Barcelona. Landsc Urban Plan 170:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.013
Larson KL, Corley EA, Andrade R, Hall SJ, York AM, Meerow S, Coseo P, Childers DL, Hondula DM (2019) Subjective evaluations of ecosystem services and disservices. Ecol Soc 24(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26796962
Lubbe CS, Siebert SJ, Cilliers SS (2010) Political legacy of South Africa affects the plant diversity patterns of urban domestic gardens along a socioeconomic gradient. Sci Res Essay 5(19):2900–2910
Maes J, Liquete C, Teller A, Erhard M, Paracchini ML, Barredo JI, Grizzetti B, Cardoso A, Somma F, Petersen JE, Meiner A, Gelabert ER, Zal N, Kristensen P, Bastrup-Birk A, Biala K et al (2016) An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Ecosyst Serv 17:14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023
Maroyi A (2022) Traditional uses of wild and tended plants in maintaining ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes of the Eastern Cape Province in South Africa. J Ethnobio Ethnomedic 18:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-022-00512-0
McLean P, Wilson JR, Gaertner M, Kritzinger-Klopper S, Richardson DM (2018) The distribution and status of alien plants in a small South African town. S Afr J Bot 117:71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2018.02.392
Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: synthesis. Island, Washington, DC
Mokotjomela TM, Musil CF, Esler KJ (2013) Frugivorous birds visit fruits of emerging alien shrub species more frequently than those of native shrub species in the South African Mediterranean climate region. S Afr J Bot 86:73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2013.02.004
Molebatsi LY, Siebert SJ, Cilliers SS, Lubbe CS (2010) The Tswana tshimo: a home garden system of useful plants with a particular layout and function. J Agric Res 5:2952–2963
Mucina L, Rutherford MC (2006) The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho, and Swaziland. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria
Muller M (2019) Valuation of ecosystem services at health clinic gardens in South Africa. Master’s dissertation, North-West University, South Africa
Narayanappa Y, Gautam A, Mahobiya K, Singh A (2022) Short communication: a pilot study on the occurrence and probable factors influencing the population decline of House Sparrow (Passer domesticus) along an urbanization gradient in Coimbatore district, India. Biodiversitas 23:3884–3889. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230804
Nemudzudzanyi AO, Siebert SJ, Zobolo AM, Molebatsi LY (2010) The Zulu muzi: a homegarden system of useful plants with a specific layout and function. Afr J Indigenous Knowl Syst 9:57–72
Nowak DJ, Greenfield EJ, Hoehn RE, Lapoint E (2013) Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in urban and community areas of the United States. Environ Pollut 178:229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.019
Nwafor I, Nwafor C, Manduna I (2021) Constraints to cultivation of medicinal plants by smallholder farmers in South Africa. Horticulturae 7:531. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7120531
Omotayo AO, Aremu AO (2020) Underutilized African indigenous fruit trees and food–nutrition security: opportunities, challenges, and prospects. Food Energy Secur 9:220. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.220
Pauw A, Louw K (2012) Urbanization drives a reduction in functional diversity in a guild of nectar-feeding birds. Ecol Soc 17(2):27. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04758-170227
PlantzAfrica (2022) https://pza.sanbi.org/
Plieninger T, Dijks S, Oteros-Rozas E, Bieling C (2013) Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 33:118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013
Ratcliffe E, Gatersleben B, Sowden PTN (2013) Bird sounds and their contributions to perceived attention restoration and stress recovery. J Env Psyc 36:221–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.08.004
Sandström UG, Angelstam P, Mikusiński G (2006) Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space. Landsc Urban Plan 77:39–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.01.004
Shisanya SO, Hendriks SL (2011) The contribution of community gardens to food security in the Maphephetheni uplands. Dev South Afr 28:509–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2011.605568
Stansbury CD, Vivian-Smith G (2003) Interactions between frugivorous birds and weeds in Queensland as determined from a survey of birders. Plant Prot Q 18(4):157–165
Sutherland C, Sim V, Buthelezi S, Khumalo D (2016) Social constructions of environmental services in a rapidly densifying peri-urban area under dual governance in Durban, South Africa. Bothalia 46:1–18. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-4a7ff47fb
Symes CT, Nicolson SW, McKechnie AE (2008) Response of avian nectarivores to the flowering of Aloe marlothii: a nectar oasis during dry South African winters. J Ornithol 149(1):13–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-007-0206-5
van Heezik Y, Freeman C, Porter S, Dickinson KJ (2013) Garden size, householder knowledge, and socio-economic status influence plant and bird diversity at the scale of individual gardens. Ecosystems 16:1442–1454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-013-9694-8
Van Jaarsveld E (2013) Waterwise Gardening in South Africa and Namibia. Penguin Random House, South Africa, p 392
Van Wyk B-E, Gericke N (2018) People’s plants: a guide to useful plants of southern Africa. Briza, Pretoria
Vorster HH, Kruger A, Margetts BM (2011) The nutrition transition in Africa: can it be steered into a more positive direction? Nutrients 3:429–441. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu3040429
Whelan CJD, Wenny G, Marquis RJ (2008) Ecosystem services provided by birds. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1134:25–60. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1439.003
Zukulu S, Dold T, Abbott T, Raimondo D (2012) Medicinal and charm plants of Pondoland. South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI)
Funding
Open access funding provided by North-West University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. M.M and S.S.C. collected the data and analysis were performed by all authors. M.J.D prepared Fig. 1. S.S.C., P.B., and C.N. supervised the study. The first draft of the manuscript was written by N.G. and M.M., and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gwedla, N., Muller, M., Cilliers, S.S. et al. Exploring the value of ecosystem services at health clinic gardens in a South African context. Urban Ecosyst (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01529-x
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01529-x