Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characterizing air pollution patterns on multiple time scales in urban areas: a landscape ecological approach

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantifying the spatiotemporal patterns of air pollution in urban areas is essential for studying ecological processes, environmental quality, and human health in cities. To adequately characterize or monitor air pollution patterns, one important issue is scale because the concentrations of air pollutants are temporally dynamic and spatially heterogeneous. Our research addresses the scale issue in air quality monitoring and analysis by considering the following research questions: (1) How does the spatial pattern of ozone change with the temporal scale of analysis? (2) How does the spatial pattern of PM10 change with the temporal scale of analysis? (3) What implications do these scale effects have for designing and evaluating air pollution monitoring networks? We systematically examined these questions based on data from official air pollution monitoring networks in the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Our results showed that spatial patterns of both ozone and PM10 may change substantially with the temporal scale of analysis. Ozone patterns at broader (but not finer) temporal scales were more consistent across years, and exhibited a more uniform, regionalized pattern. PM10 patterns were less consistent across years than ozone, and exhibited a more localized effect. Spatial patterns of PM10 also varied seasonally. Our study demonstrates that it is critically important to consider the temporal and spatial scales in designing or evaluating air monitoring networks in particular and in conducting air pollution research in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (2009) Air quality plans: nonattainment areas and attainment areas with maintenance plans. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/air/plan/notmeet.html. Accessed October 1, 2009

  • Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (2010) Analysis of PM2.5 exceedances in Pinal County Arizona: demonstration that PM2.5 concentrations are driven by local sources of PM10 near the Cowtown Monitor. Air Quality Division, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Phoenix

  • Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (2011a) ADEQ annual reports. http://www.azdeq.gov/function/forms/reports.html. Accessed August 15, 2011

  • Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (2011b) air quality monitoring. http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/air/monitoring/index.html. Accessed August 15, 2011

  • Berling-Wolff S, Wu J (2004) Modeling urban landscape dynamics: a case study in Phoenix, USA. Urban Ecosyst 7(3):215–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolin B, Matranga E, Hackett EJ, Sadalla EK, Pijawka KD, Brewer D, Sicotte D (2000) Environmental equity in a sunbelt city: the spatial distribution of toxic hazards in Phoenix, Arizona. Environ Hazards 2:11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung W, Chen Q, Osammor O, Nolan A, Zhang X, Sharifi V, Swithenbank J (2012) Characterisation of particulate matter on the receptor level in a city environment. Environ Monit Assess 184(3):1471–1486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Code of Federal Regulations (2009) Title 40, code of federal regulations part 58, appendix A, quality assurance standards for state and local air monitoring stations (SLAMS). U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.

  • Cressie N (1990) The origins of Kriging. Math Geol 22(3):239–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diem JE (2003) A critical examination of ozone mapping from a spatial-scale perspective. Environ Pollut 125(3):369–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diem JE, Comrie AC (2002) Predictive mapping of air pollution involving sparse spatial observations. Environ Pollut 119(1):99–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Digar A, Cohan DS, Bell ML (2011) Uncertainties influencing health-based prioritization of ozone abatement options. Environ Sci Technol 45(18):7761–7767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis AW, Hildebrandt ML, Fernando HJS (1999) Evidence of lower-atmospheric ozone “sloshing” in an urbanized valley. Phys Geogr 20(6):520–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis AW, Hildebrandt ML, Thomas WM, Fernando HJS (2000) Analysis of the climatic mechanisms contributing to the summertime transport of lower atmospheric ozone across metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, USA. 15(1):13–31

  • ESRI (2010) ArcMap version 10.0. ESRI (Environmental Systems Resource Institute), Redlands, CA

  • Fortin MJ, Dale MRT (2005) Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamma Design Software (2006) GS+: geostatistics for the environmental sciences. 7.0 (Build 25) edn. Gamma Design Software, Plainwell, Michigan USA

  • Gregg JW, Jones CG, Daws TE (2003) Urbanization effects on tree growth in the vicinity of New York City. Nature 424:183–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith DA (1992) What is spatial autocorrelation? Reflections on the past 25 years of spatial statistics. l’Espace Géogr 21:265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito K, Thurston GD, Nádas A, Lippmann M (2001) Monitor-to-monitor temporal correlation of air pollution and weather variables in the North-Central U.S. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 11(1):21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ito K, De Leon S, Thurston GD, Nadas A, Lippmann M (2004) Monitor-to-monitor temporal correlation of air pollution in the contiguous US. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 15(2):172–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelinski DE, Wu JG (1996) The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 11(3):129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoder M (2009) Diurnal, seasonal and weekdays–weekends variations of ground level ozone concentrations in an urban area in greater Cairo. Environ Monit Assess 149(1):349–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73(6):1943–1967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loo T (2007) Disturbing the peace: environmental change and the scales of justice on a northern river. Environ Hist 12(4):895–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck MA, Wu J (2002) A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landsc Ecol 17(4):327–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maricopa County Air Quality Department (2009) Emissions inventory-Maricopa County air quality department. http://www.maricopa.gov/aq/divisions/planning_analysis/emissions_inventory/Default.aspx. Accessed October 6, 2009

  • Maricopa County Air Quality Department (2011) Annual air monitoring network reviews. Maricopa County air quality department. http://www.maricopa.gov/aq/divisions/monitoring/network.aspx. Accessed August 15, 2011

  • Meisel JE, Turner MG (1998) Scale detection in real and artificial landscapes using semivariance analysis. Landsc Ecol 13(6):347–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1991) Rethinking the ozone problem in urban and regional air pollution. The National Academies Press

  • Nejadkoorki F, Nicholson K, Hadad K (2011) The design of long-term air quality monitoring networks in urban areas using a spatiotemporal approach. Environ Monit Assess 172(1):215–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pardyjak ER, Fernando HJS, Hunt JCR, Grachev AA, Anderson J (2009) A case study of the development of nocturnal slope flows in a wide open valley and associated air quality implications. Meteorol Z 18(1):85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (1995) Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science 269(5222):331–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pohjola MA, Kousa A, Kukkonen J, Härkönen J, Karppinen A, Aarnio P, Koskentalo T (2002) The spatial and temporal variation of measured urban PM10 and PM2.5 in the Helsinki metropolitan area. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 2(5/6):189–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson GP, Gross KL (1994) Assessing the heterogeneity of below ground resources: quantifying pattern and scale. In: Caldwell MM, Pearcy RW (eds) Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants: ecophysiological processes above and below ground. Academic, San Diego, pp 237–253

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi RE, Mulla DJ, Journel AG, Eldon HF (1992) Geostatistical tools for modeling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence. Ecol Monogr 62(2):277–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN (2006) Atmospheric chemistry and physics—from air pollution to climate change, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:171–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2011) Profile of general population and housing characteristics: 2010. U.S. Census Bureau. Accessed August 21, 2011

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2009a) The green book non-attainment areas for criteria pollutants. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/oaqps001/greenbk/index.html. Accessed October 1, 2009

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2009b) Technology transfer network air quality system. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/. Accessed October 2, 2009

  • Wise EK, Comrie AC (2005) Meteorologically adjusted urban air quality trends in the Southwestern United States. Atmos Environ 39(16):2969–2980

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J (2004) Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations. Landsc Ecol 19(2):125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J (2007) Scale and scaling: A cross-disciplinary perspective. In: Wu JG, Hobbs RJ (eds) Key Topics in Landscape Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 115–142

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Loucks OL (1995) From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. Q Rev Biol 70(4):439–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Jelinski DE, Luck M, Tueller PT (2000) Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: scale variance and pattern metrics. Geogr Inf Sci 6:6–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Jones K, Loucks OL (eds) (2006) Scaling and uncertainty analysis in ecology; methods and applications. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Jenerette GD, Buyantuyev A, Redman CL (2011) Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urbanization: the case of the two fastest growing metropolitan regions in the United States. Ecol Complex 8(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the members of the Landscape Ecology and Sustainability Laboratory (LESL) at Arizona State University for their suggestions on this study. We also thank Zhengjun Wang for his assistance with the GS + software and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments which helped improve the quality of the paper. JW’s research in urban ecology has been supported in part by the National Science Foundation under grant no. BCS-1026865 (CAP3), DEB-0423704 (CAP2), and DEB-9714833 (CAP1) for the Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research (CAP-LTER).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald Pope.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 149 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pope, R., Wu, J. Characterizing air pollution patterns on multiple time scales in urban areas: a landscape ecological approach. Urban Ecosyst 17, 855–874 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0357-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0357-0

Keywords

Navigation