Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 53–77

Social ecological complex adaptive systems: a framework for research on payments for ecosystem services

  • Wayde C. Morse
  • William J. McLaughlin
  • J. D. Wulfhorst
  • Celia Harvey


The environment is both a setting for and a product of human interactions. Understanding the dynamic nature of human-environment interactions is critical for mitigating the impacts of human induced environmental change and understanding how the environment shapes social systems. Current research has focused on the reduced ability of many natural systems to provide ecosystem services and the subsequent impact on human well-being. Furthermore, there has been a proliferation of cases analyzing the impacts of payment programs designed to enhance ecosystem services. However, analyses that link environmental policies through to their ecological results are not common and methods to do so are not thoroughly developed. To better analyze these interactions, a theory or framework is necessary. This article presents a framework of social ecological complex adaptive systems (SECAS). The framework links structuration theory from social science with the theories of complex adaptive systems from ecology to provide an enhanced understanding of the human drivers and responses to environmental change. The framework is presented as a recursive process where social and ecological systems are both the medium for and product of social action and ecological disturbance. A case study of Costa Rica’s ecosystem service payment program is presented as a demonstration of empirical applicability. This framework is proposed as a method to evaluate payments for ecosystem services, conservation policies, urban ecosystems, and for land use change in general.


Social ecological systems Structuration Ecosystem services Theory 


  1. Alberti M (2008) Advances in urban ecology: integrating humans and ecological processes in urban ecosystems. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asah ST (2008) Empirical social-ecological systems analysis: from theoretical framework to latent variable structural equation model. J Environ Manag 42:1077–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bebbington A (1999) Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Dev 27(12):2021–2044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkes F, Turner NJ (2006) Knowledge, learning and the evolution of conservation practice for social-ecological system resilience. Hum Ecol 34(4):479–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyd J, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystem services? Then need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ 63:616–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown TC, Bergstrom JC, Loomis JB (2007) Defining, valuing, and providing ecosystem goods and services. Nat Res J 47:329–376Google Scholar
  8. Butterfield RP (1994) The regional context: land colonization and conservation in Sarapiqui. In: McDade LA, Bawa KS, Hespenheide HA, Hartshorn GS (eds) La Selva: ecology and natural history of a neotropical rain forest. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  9. Daniels A, Bagstad K, Esposito V, Moulaert A, Rodriguez C (2010) Understanding the impact of Costa Rica’s PES: are we asking the right questions? Ecol Econ 69:2116–2126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Camino R, Segura O, Arias LG, Perez I (2000) Costa Rica forest strategy and the evolution of land use. The World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  11. de Haan L, Zoomers A (2005) Exploring the frontier of livelihoods research. Dev Change 36(1):27–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diamond J (1999) Guns, germs, and steel: the fates of human societies. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Diamond J (2005) Collapse: how societies choose to fail or succed. Viking, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Farley J, Costanza R (2010) Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global. Ecol Econ 69:2060–2068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farley J, Aquino A, Daniels A, Moulaert A, Lee D, Krause A (2010) Global mechanisms for sustaining and enhancing PES schemes. Ecol Econ 69:2075–2084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferraro PJ, Pattanayak SK (2006) Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments. PLoS Biol 4(4):0482–0488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ 68:643–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily G, Gibbs H, Helkowski J, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Franklin JF (2005) Spatial pattern and ecosystem functioning: reflections on current knowledge and future directions. In: Lovett GM, Jones CG, Turner MG, Weathers KC (eds) Ecosystem function in heterogeneous landscapes. Springer, New York, pp 427–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geist HJ, Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience 52(2):143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Grieg-Gran M, Porras I, Wunder S (2005) How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Primary lessons from Latin America. World Dev 33(9):1511–1527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grimm NB, Grove JM, Pickett STA, Redman CL (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50(7):571–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grove JM, Burch WRJ (1997) A social ecology approach and applications of urban ecosystem and landscape analyses: a case study of baltimore, Maryland. Urban Ecosyst 1:259–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grove JM, Troy AR, O’neil-Dunne JPM, Burch WR Jr, Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA (2006) Characterization of households and its implications for the vegetation of urban ecosystems. Ecosystems 9:578–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gunderson LH (1999) Resilience, flexibility and adaptive management: antidotes for spurious certidude? Conserv Ecol 3(1):http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/articles/89.html
  27. Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  28. Hein L, van Koppen K, de Groot RS, van Ierland EC (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57:209–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holling CS (1993) Investing in research for sustainability. Ecol Appl 34:552–555Google Scholar
  30. Kaspersen LB (1995) Anthony giddens: an introduction to a social theorist. Blackwell Publishers, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  31. Kemkes RJ, Farley J, Koliba CJ (2010) Determining when payments are an effective policy approach to ecosystem service provision. Ecol Econ 69:2069–2074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kondrat ME (2002) Actor-centered social work: re-visioning “Person-in-environment” Through a critical theory lens. Soc Work 47(4):435–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kosoy N, Martinez-Tuna M, Muradian R, Martinez-Alier J (2007) Payments for environmental services in watersheds: insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America. Ecol Econ 61(2–3):446–455Google Scholar
  34. Kremen C (2005) managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? Ecol Lett 8:468–479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kroeger T, Casey F (2007) An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands. Ecol Econ 64:321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lambin EF, Geist HJ, Lepers E (2003) Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annu Rev Environ Resour 28:205–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leach M, Mearns R, Scoones I (1999) Environmental entitlements: dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management. World Dev 27(2):225–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Levin S (1999) Fragile dominion. Perseus Publishing, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Levin SA (1998) Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems 1:431–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Machlis G, Force JE, Burch WR Jr (1997) The human ecosystem part 1: the human ecosystem as an organizing concept in ecosystem management. Soc Nat Resour 10:347–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  42. Miranda M, Porras IT, Moreno ML (2004) The social impacts of carbon markets in costa rica. International Institute for Environment and Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Miranda M, Dieperink C, Glasbergen P (2006) Costa rican environmental service payments: the use of a financial instrument in participatory forest management. Environ Manage 38:562–571CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Montanye DR, Vargas JR, Hall CAS (2000) The internationalization of the Costa Rican economy: a two edged sword. In: Hall CAS (ed) Quantifying sustainable development. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  45. Morse WC (2007a) Payments for environmental services in costa rica: conservation and production decisions within the San Juan–La Selva biological corridor. Dissertation, University of Idaho, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  46. Morse WC (2007b) Linking social and ecological systems: a theoretical perspective. In: Laband DN (ed) Emerging issues along urban-rural interfaces II: linking land-use science and society. Auburn Univeristy, Atlanta, pp 246–250Google Scholar
  47. Morse WC, Schedlbauer J, Sesnie S, Finegan B, Harvey CA, Hollenhorst S, Kavanagh KL, Wulfhorst JD (2009) Consequences of environmental service payments for forest retention and recruitment in a costa rican biological corridor. Ecol Soc 14(1):23Google Scholar
  48. Munch R (1994) Sociological theory: development since the 1960s. Nelson-Hall Publishers, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  49. Muradian R, Corera E, Pascual U, Kosoy N, May P (2010) Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecol Econ 69:1202–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Norberg J, Cumming GS (2008) Complexity theory for a sustainable future. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Norgaard RB (2010) Ecosystem serevices: from eye opening metaphor to complexity binder. Ecol Econ 69:1219–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  53. Pagiola S (2008) Payments for environmental services in costa rica. Ecol Econ 65:721–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pagiola S, Bishop J, Landell-Mills N (2002) Selling forest environmental services market based mechanisms for conservation and development. Earthscan Publications Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Parker DC, Manson SM, Janssen MA, Hoffmann MJ, Deadman P (2003) Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: a review. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 93(2):314–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pickett STA, White PS (1985) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, Inc., OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  57. Pickett STA, Burch WRJ, Dalton SE, Foresman TW, Grove JM, Rowntree R (1997) A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosyst 1:185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pickett STA, Wu J, Cadenasso ML (1999) Patch dynamics and the ecology of disturbed ground. In: Walker LR (ed) Ecosystems of disturbed ground: ecosystems of the world, vol 16. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 707–722Google Scholar
  59. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Costanza R (2001) Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 32:127–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pires M (2004) Watershed protection for a world city: the case of new York. Land Use Pol 21:161–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Porras I, Grieg-Gran M, Neves N (2008) All that glitters: a review of payments for watershed services in developing countries. International Institute for Environment and Development (UK), LondonGoogle Scholar
  62. Postel S, Thompson BH Jr (2005) Watershed protection: capturing the benefits of nature’s water supply services. Nat Res For 29:98–108Google Scholar
  63. Pritchard L Jr, Sanderson SE (2002) The dynamics of political discourse in seeking sustainability. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) Panarchy. Island Press, Washington, pp 147–169Google Scholar
  64. Rammel C, Stagl S, Wilfing H (2007) Managing complex adaptive systems—a co-evolutionary perspective on natural resource management. Ecol Econ 63:9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Redman CL, Grove JM, Kuby LH (2004) Integrating social science into the long-term ecological research (lter) network: social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems 7:161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ritzer G, Goodman DJ (2004) Modern sociological theory. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  67. Scheffer M, Westley F, Brock WA, Holmgren M (2002) Dynamic interactions of societies and ecosystems—llinking theories from ecology, economy, and sociology. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, Island PressGoogle Scholar
  68. Schelhas J (1996) Land use choice and change: intensification and diversification in the lowland tropics of Costa Rica. Hum Org 55(3):298–306Google Scholar
  69. Schelhas J, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA (2006) Post-frontier forest change adjacent to Brauilio Carrillo National Park, Costa Rica. Hum Ecol 34(3):407–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Scoones I (1999) New ecology and the social sciences: what prospects for fruitful engagement? Ann Rev Anthropol 28:479–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sewell WHJ (1992) A theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformation. Am J Sociol 98(1):1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stones R (2005) Structuration theory. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  73. Thacher T, Lee ER, Schelhas JW (1997) Farmer participation in reforestation incentive programs in costa rica. Agrofor Syst 35:269–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Turner MG, Chapin FS III (2005) Causes and consequences of spatial heterogeneity in ecosystem function. In: Lovett GM, Jones CG, Turner MG, Weathers KC (eds) Ecosystem function in heterogeneous landscapes. Springer, NY, pp 9–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  76. Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter S, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):5Google Scholar
  77. Walker B, Gunderson LH, Kinzig A, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Schultz L (2006) A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1):13Google Scholar
  78. Walters CJ (1986) Adaptive management of renewable resources. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  79. Watson V, Cervantes S, Castro C, Mora L, Solis M, Porras IT et al (1998) Making space for better forestry: Policy that works for forests and people (No. 6). Institute for Environment and Development, Centro Cientifico Tropical, San Jose, Costa RicaGoogle Scholar
  80. Weisbuch G (2000) Environment and institutions: a complex dynamical systems approach. Ecol Econ 34:381–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Westley F, Carpenter SR, Brock WA, Holling CS, Gunderson LH (2002) Why systems of people and nature are not just social and ecological systems. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) Panarchy understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, pp 103–119Google Scholar
  82. White EP, Brown JH (2005) The template: patterns and processes of spatial variation. In: Lovett GM, Jones CG, Turner MG, Weathers KC (eds) Ecosystem function in heterogeneous landscapes. Springer, New York, pp 31–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wu J, David JL (2002) A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applications. Ecol Model 153:7–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wu J, Loucks OL (1995) From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. Q Rev Biol 70(4):439–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wunscher T, Engle S, Wunder S (2008) Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services: a tool for boosting conservation benefits. Ecol Econ 65:822–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wayde C. Morse
    • 1
  • William J. McLaughlin
    • 2
  • J. D. Wulfhorst
    • 3
  • Celia Harvey
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Forestry and Wildlife SciencesAuburnUSA
  2. 2.Department of Conservation Social SciencesUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural SociologyUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA
  4. 4.Conservation InternationalArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations