Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Goal attainment in urban ecology research: A bibliometric review 1975–2004

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyze a core literature of urban ecology (all articles published in Urban Ecology and Urban Ecosystems from 1975–2004, n = 261) to support a reflexive analysis of the field. We structure this critical analysis based on criteria derived from programmatic statements made by scientific societies, research funding organizations and academic institutions regarding what urban ecology should be. Specifically, we assess the extent to which the literature reflects, and has evolved to reflect, a commitment to

  • strengthen and expand the discipline of ecology

  • create a transdisciplinary enterprise, and

  • contribute to social and ecological wellbeing through applied research and policy engagement.

Findings indicate that the literature strongly reflects these commitments, as these three tenets usefully describe the field and its evolution. We do, however, identify a tendency over time toward a more strictly disciplinary orientation. Ecological science is increasingly dominant and threatens to crowd out other scientific perspectives. This trend suggests that the field is maturing in the institutional sense, but perhaps at the cost of intellectual diversity, which many believe to be the basis of innovative solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berkes K, Folke C (eds) (1998) Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgman C (ed) (1990) Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics. 1st edn, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins J, Kinzig A, Grimm N, Fagan W, Hope D, Wu J, Borer E (2000) A New Urban Ecology. American Scientist 88(5):416–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronon W (1991) Nature's Metropolis. W.W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow K (2000) Social dimensions of gradients in urban ecosystems. Urban Ecosystems 4(4):255–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C (1997) Systems of Innovation: Technologies. Institutions and Organizations, Pinter Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (1998) The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies. Science and Public Policy 25(3):195–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazey I, Fischer J, Lindenmayer D (2005) What do conservation biologists publish?. Biological Conservation 124:63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer F (2000) Citizens, Experts, and the Environment. Duke University Press, Durham and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Foresman T, Pickett S, Zipperer W (1997) Methods for spatial and temporal land use and land cover assessment for urban ecosystems and application in the greater Baltimore-Chesapeake region. Urban Ecosystems 1(4):201–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouda Y (2001) A GIS for environmental assessment of air pollution impacts on urban clusters and natural landscape at Rosetta City and region. Egypt, Urban Ecosystems 5(1):5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen L, Hansson F, Wenneberg S (2003) The agora and the role of research evaluation. Evaluation 9(2):149–172, viewed 12 December 2005, http://evi.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/9/2/149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frickel S, Moore K (eds) (2006) The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Frickel S (2004) Scientist Activism in Environmental Justice Conflicts: An Argument for Synergy. Society and Natural Resources 17(4):359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajer M, Wagenaar H (eds) (2003) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel L (1996) Environmental Governance: the global challenge. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter I (2001) What do people want from urban forestry? The European experience. Urban Ecosystems 5(4):277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mission statement 2005Web site, Institute of Ecosystem Studies, viewed 8 September 2005 http://www.ecostudies.org/about_mission.html

  • Kaiser J (2000) Taking a Stand: Ecologists on a Mission to Save the World. Science 287(5456):1188–1192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kettl D (ed.) (2002) Environmental Governance. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed, vol 2, Foundations of the Unity of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons J (1997) Urban ecosystem management: bringing science and policy together. Urban Ecosystems 1(1):77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May R (2004) Editorial: On the role of the humanities in urban ecology: the case of St. Petersburg. Urban Ecosystems 7(1):7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazari-Hirart M, Cifuentes E, Velazquez E, Calva J (2000) Microbiological groundwater quality and health indicators in Mexico City. Urban Ecosystems 4(2):91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazmanian D, Kraft M (eds) (1999) Towards Sustainable Communities. 1st edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell M, Pickett S, Groffman P, Bohlen P, Pouyat R, Zipperer W, Parmelee R, Carreiro M, Medley K (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems 1(1):21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcintyre N, Knowles-Yanez K, Hope D (2000) Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: the differences in the use of “urban” between the social and natural sciences. Urban Ecosystems 4(1):5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musacchio L, Wu J (2004) Collaborative landscape-scale ecological research: Emerging trends in urban and landscape ecology. Urban Ecosystems 7(3):175–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ‘NSF Funds First Long-Term Studies of Urban Ecology’ [Press release] 1997, National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/news/index.jsp?org=BIO, viewed 7 October 2005

  • Pickett S, Wan R, Dalton S, Foresman T, Grove J, Rowntree R (1997) A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosystems 1(4):185–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter E, Forschner B, Blair R (2001) Woody vegetation and canopy fragmentation along a forest-to-urban gradient. Urban Ecosystems 5(2):131–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees W, Wackernagel M (1996) Urban Ecological Footprints: Why Cities Cannot Be Sustainable—And Why They Are A Key To Sustainabilit. Environmental Impact Review 16(4–6):223–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staerdahl J (2002) Editorial. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies 1(1):2–3

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2000) World Resources. The World Resources Institute, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 14853

    R. F. Young & S. A. Wolf

Authors
  1. R. F. Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. A. Wolf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. F. Young.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, R.F., Wolf, S.A. Goal attainment in urban ecology research: A bibliometric review 1975–2004. Urban Ecosyst 9, 179–193 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-006-8589-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-006-8589-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation