Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A specific benefit of retrieval-based concept mapping to enhance learning from texts

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research has shown that retrieval activities, that is, actively recalling previously studied information, may substantially contribute to learning from complex educational materials, sometimes more so than other more popular techniques such as rereading and elaborative study. In this context, recent studies (Blunt and Karpicke, J Educ Psychol 106:849–858, 2014) have reported that two different retrieval formats (free recall by writing down as many ideas as possible and creating a concept map in the absence of texts) are equally effective as learning tools. Given the benefits frequently attributed to concept mapping and the potential practical implications of this finding, we aimed to further examine the relative effectiveness of both retrieval-based activities. In Experiment 1, we conceptually replicated the main finding from Blunt and Karpicke’s study to show that the two formats may lead to similar learning outcomes. In Experiment 2, we coupled both retrieval formats but manipulated the order in which the activities were performed. Results revealed that retrieval-based concept mapping before free recall by means of paragraph writing resulted in better learning on a 2-week delayed test than performing the same activities the other way round. These findings contradict the general idea that it is retrieval itself, regardless of the activity it is embedded in, what promotes learning. From a more applied standpoint, our results join others from recent studies to show that combining different retrieval activities when dealing with educational materials might be particularly effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that this contrasts with the generalized idea that concept mapping offers an advantage by providing better organization at encoding (Chevron 2014; Hay et al. 2008; Novak and Gowin 1984; Vanides et al. 2005). Interestingly, our results indicate that elaborating a concept map may also be useful for organizing relevant information at retrieval, which allows us to suggest that concept mapping might enhance learning in a variety of circumstances.

References

  • Álvarez, M., & Fernández, R. (1999). Cuestionario de Hábitos y Técnicas de Estudio, CHTE. Madrid: TEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, F. (1620; 2000). Francis Bacon: The New Organon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  • Bae, C. L., Therriault, D. J., & Redifer, J. L. (2018). Investigating the testing effect: Retrieval as a characteristic of effective study strategies. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blunt, J. R., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014). Learning with retrieval-based concept mapping. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 849–858. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwmeester, S., & Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L. (2011). Why do some children benefit more from testing than others? Gist trace processing to explain the testing effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 32–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridger, E. K., Herron, J. E., Elward, R. L., & Wilding, E. L. (2009). Neural correlates of individual differences in strategic retrieval processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1175–1186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. K. (2009). Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: The benefits of elaborative retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1563–1569. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. K. (2011). Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1547–1552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. K., & Yeung, K. L. (2017). The role of mediator strength in learning from retrieval. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.06.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevron, M. P. (2014). A metacognitive tool: Theoretical and operational analysis of skills exercised in structured Concept Maps. Perspectives in Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pisc.2014.07.001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimaldi, P. J., & Karpicke, J. D. (2012). When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding? Memory and Cognition, 40, 505–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimaldi, P. J., Poston, L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2015). How does creating a concept map affect item-specific encoding? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1049–1061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D., Kinchin, I., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2008). Making learning visible: The role of concept mapping in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herron, J. E., & Wilding, E. L. (2004). An electrophysiological dissociation of retrieval mode and retrieval orientation. NeuroImage, 22, 1554–1562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpicke, J. D. (2012). Retrieval-based learning active retrieval promotes meaningful learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412443552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-based learning: A decade of progress. In J. Wixted (Ed.), Cognitive psychology of memory. Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (Vol. 2, J. H. vByrne, Series Edition). Oxford: Elsevier.

  • Karpicke, J. D. (2018). Concept mapping. In B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation (pp. 351–354). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331, 772–775. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practice retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17, 471–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpicke, J. D., & Grimaldi, P. J. (2012). Retrieval-based learning: A perspective for enhancing meaningful learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9202-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpicke, J. D., Lehman, M., & Aue, W. R. (2014). Retrieval-based learning: An episodic context account. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 61, pp. 237–284). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpicke, J. D., & Smith, M. A. (2012). Separate mnemonic effects of retrieval practice and elaborative encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornell, N., Bjork, R. A., & Garcia, M. A. (2011). Why tests appear to prevent forgetting: A distribution-based bifurcation model. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechuga, M. T., Ortega-Tudela, J. M., & Gómez-Ariza, C. J. (2015). Further evidence that concept mapping is not better than repeated retrieval as a tool for learning from texts. Learning and Instruction, 40, 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, M., Smith, M. A., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014). Toward an episodic context account of retrieval-based learning: Dissociating retrieval practice and elaboration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1787–1794.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., Howard, D. C., & Einstein, G. O. (2009). The Read–Recite–Review study strategy: Effective and portable. Psychological Science, 20, 516–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzes, J. J., Canas, A., Coffey, J., Gorman, J., Gurley, L., Hoffman, R., et al. (2011). Comment on “Retrieval Practice produces more learning than elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping”. Science, 334, 453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, N. W., & Polyn, S. M. (2016). A predictive framework for evaluating models of semantic organization in free recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76, 413–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2006). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them. Technical Report IHMC Cmap Tools. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. Retrieved February 18, from http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf.

  • Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, L. D., & Karpicke, J. D. (2015). Retrieval-based learning: Research at the interface between cognitive science and education. In R. A. Scott & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–16). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, H., Mintzes, J., & Laws, R. A. (2003). Successive concept mapping: Assessing understanding in college science classes. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33, 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson, K. A., Vaughn, K. E., & Carpenter, S. K. (2015). Does the benefit of testing depend on lag, and if so, why? Evaluating the elaborative retrieval hypothesis. Memory and Cognition, 43, 619–633. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0477-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repetto, E., Sutil, I., & Manzano, N. (2004). Comprender y aprender en el aula. Programa para la integración en el curriculum de las estrategias de comprensión lectora. UNED.

  • Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2010). Recent research on human learning challenges conventional instructional strategies. Educational Researcher, 39(5), 406–412. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x10374770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosburg, T., Johansson, M., Sprondel, V., & Mecklinger, A. (2014). Retrieving self-vocalized information: An event-related potential (ERP) study on the effect of retrieval orientation. Brain and Cognition, 92C, 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1432–1463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugg, M. D., & Wilding, E. L. (2000). Retrieval processing and episodic memory. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 108–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenberg, G., Johansson, M., & Rosén, I. (2006). Conceptual and perceptual memory: Retrieval orientations reflected in event-related potentials. Acta Psychologica, 122, 174–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanides, J., Yin, Y., Tomita, M., & Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2005). Using concept maps in the science classroom. Science Scope, 28(8), 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The current study was completed thanks to financial support by a grant from the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad to Carlos J. Gómez-Ariza (PSI2015-65502-C2-2-P).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pedagogy, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain

    Juana M. Ortega-Tudela

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain

    M. Teresa Lechuga & Carlos J. Gómez-Ariza

Authors
  1. Juana M. Ortega-Tudela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Teresa Lechuga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carlos J. Gómez-Ariza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juana M. Ortega-Tudela.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ortega-Tudela, J.M., Lechuga, M.T. & Gómez-Ariza, C.J. A specific benefit of retrieval-based concept mapping to enhance learning from texts. Instr Sci 47, 239–255 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9476-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9476-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation