Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cross-age peer tutors in asynchronous discussion groups: A study of the evolution in tutor support

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores cross-age peers’ tutoring behavior to support freshmen collaborating online. The study fits in with the need to inquire into the process of peer facilitation in CSCL-environments and focuses on types of peer support and on the evolution over time. The study was conducted with 19 pairs of fourth-year students, each tutoring one asynchronous discussion group of about 10 freshmen during one semester. A content analysis scheme was developed to analyze tutors’ contributions [Weinberger & Fisher (2006). Computers & Education, 46, 71–95; Garrison et al. (2000). The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87–105]. Full transcripts were coded and units of meaning were chosen as units of analysis. As to the types of peer support, the results reveal a variety of tutoring interventions. Most often tutors provide organizational and social support. Further, they facilitate knowledge construction and concentrate on elucidating learning contents. Only exceptionally tutors engage in off-task talk. As to the evolution over time, the results show a gradual decline in the amount of tutor contributions. Further, multinomial logistic regressions reveal variation in the occurrence of different types of support. Peer tutors did however not evolve from modeling high-quality discussion behavior to eliciting this in the tutees (coaching). At all times tutors preferred addressing their interventions to the entire group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ally, M. (2004). Staff training and development for open and distance learning. Distance Education in China, 3, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communicative research. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (1996). Situated learning: Bridging sociocultural and cognitive theorising. Learning and Instruction, 6, 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagiltay, K. (2006). Scaffolding strategies in electronic performance support systems: Types and challenges. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43, 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderhead, J. (1981). A method for research on teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 211–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, M. (1996). Peer tutoring: Can medical students teach biochemistry? Biochemical Education, 24, 13–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. R. (1991). The discussion teacher in action: Questioning, listening, response. In C. R. Christensen, D. A. Garvin, & A. Sweet (Eds.), The artistry of discussion leadership (pp. 153–172). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Smet, M., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (in press). Blending asynchronous discussion groups and peer tutoring in higher education: An exploratory study of online peer tutoring behaviour. Computers & Education.

  • De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46, 6–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duran, D., & Monereo, C. (2005). Styles and sequences of cooperative interaction in fixed and reciprocal peer tutoring. Learning and Instruction, 15, 179–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falchikov, N. (2001). Learning together. Peer tutoring in higher education. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, H., Eckart, T., Lauver, E., Van Leeuwen, R., & Langemeyer, D. (1990). Learners’ questions and comprehension in a tutoring setting. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, R. D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical Inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, B. W., & Griffin, M. M. (1997). The effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on graduate students’ achievement, test anxiety, and academic self-efficacy. The Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 397–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53, 449–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, M. (2000). Communication within online forums: The opportunities, the constraints and the value of a communicative approach. Computers & Education, 35, 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaramillo, J. A. (1996). Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory and contributions to the development of constructivist curricula. Education, 117, 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. R., & Jenkins, L. M. (1987). Making peer tutoring work. Educational Leadership, 44, 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F. (1993). Two modes of reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9, 317–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyle, J. (2003). Stimulated recall: A report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29, 861–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2000). Asking mathematical questions mathematically. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31, 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2007). When to jump in: The role of the instructor in online discussions forums. Computers & Education, 49, 193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLuckie, J., & Topping, K. J. (2004). Transferable skills for online peer learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 563–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millis, B. J., & Cottell, P. G. Jr. (1998). Cooperative learning for higher education faculty. Phoenix, Arizona: American Council on Education and Oryx Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moust, J. H. C., & Schmidt, H. G. (1994). De effectieve tutor: meer dan alleen een vakinhoudelijke deskundige? Tijdschrift voor Hoger Onderwijs, 2, 95–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narciss, S. (2004). The impact of informative tutoring feedback and self-efficacy on motivation and achievement in concept learning. Experimental Psychology, 51, 214–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath, L. R., & Ross, S. M. (2001). The Influence of a Peer-Tutoring Training Model for implementing cooperative groupings with elementary students. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49, 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packham, G., Cramphorn, C., & Miller, C. (2001) Module development through peer assisted student support: An initial evaluation. Mentoring & Tutoring, 9, 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packham, G., Jones, P., Miller, C., & Thomas, B. (2004). Perceptions of effective E-moderation: A tutors viewpoint. Paper presented at the Networked Learning Conference Lancaster University, Lancaster.

  • Parr, J. M., & Townsend, M. A. R. (2002). Environments, processes, and mechanisms in peer learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 403–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pata, K., Sarapuu, T., & Lehtinen, E. (2005). Tutor scaffolding styles of dilemma solving in network-based role-play. Learning and Instruction, 15, 571–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pata, K., Sarapuu, T., & Archee, R. (2005). Collaborative scaffolding in synchronous environment: Congruity and antagonism of tutor/student facilitation acts. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Taipei, Taiwan.

  • Pelliccione, L., & Albon, R. (2004). Beyond the comfort zone: Using informal mentoring to create lifelines for students in disequilibrium. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D., Jonas-Dwyer, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 770–776). Perth, 5–8 December. Retrieved July 2, 2005, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/pelliccione.html

  • Rickard, K. (2004). E-mentoring and pedagogy: A useful nexus for evaluating online mentoring programs for small business? Mentoring & Tutoring, 12, 383–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, L., Anderson T., Garrison R. D., & Archer W. (2001). Assessing Social Presence in Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing. American Journal of Distance Education. Retrieved May 17, 2006, from http://www.communitiesofinquiry.com

  • Rovai, P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree, D. (2005). The tutor’s role in teaching via computer conferencing. Milton Keynes: The Open University. Retrieved April 25, 2006, from http://www-iet.open.ac.uk/pp/D.G.F.Rowntree/Supporting%20online.htm.

  • Rueda, R., & Monzó, L. D. (2002). Apprenticeship for teaching: Professional development issues surrounding the collaborative relationship between teachers and paraeducators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 503–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, G. (2000). A model for CMC in education and training. E-moderating. The key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2005). Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 957–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seale, J. K., & Cann, A. J. (2000). Reflection online or off-line: The role of learning technologies in encouraging students to reflect. Computers & Education, 34, 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data. Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, M., & Baron, W. (2004). An analysis of mentoring conversations with beginning teachers: Suggestions and responses. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tagg, A. C. (1994). Leadership from within: Student moderation of computer conferences. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8, 40–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K. J. (1996). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. Higher Education, 32, 321–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, S., & Ley, J. (1999). The multigrade classroom: A resource handbook for small, rural schools. Book 5: Instructional delivery and grouping. Retrieved April 24, 2006 from http://www.nwrel.org/ruraled/publications/multig3.pdf.

  • Webb, N. M. (1992). Testing a theoretical model of student interaction and learning in small groups. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46, 71–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was funded in part by the Flemish Government under the BOF program, 1107104.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Studies, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, Ghent, 9000, Belgium

    Marijke De Smet, Hilde Van Keer & Martin Valcke

Authors
  1. Marijke De Smet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hilde Van Keer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin Valcke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marijke De Smet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Smet, M., Van Keer, H. & Valcke, M. Cross-age peer tutors in asynchronous discussion groups: A study of the evolution in tutor support. Instr Sci 37, 87–105 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9037-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9037-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation