Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of a peer-tutoring training model for implementing cooperative groupings with elementary students

  • Research
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the effects of peer-tutoring training on elementary school student communication and collaboration skills when used in conjunction with cooperative learning. Within six classes (grades 2–6) in an inner-city school, cooperative learning pairs were randomly assigned to two groups (control and training). Multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA) of quantitative data from a systematic observation instrument used over an entire year showed that, in general, the training group surpassed the control group in both communication and collaborative skills. Students in grades 2–3 showed substantially more improvement than students in grades 4–6; also, students with average or below-average reading levels required more time to acquire these skills than did above-average students. The qualitative data further substantiated these findings while revealing a large variation among teachers in implementing cooperative learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balkcom, S., & Himmelfarb, H. (1993).Success for all. Education research consumer guide, number 5 (Report No. 93-3011). Washington, DC: Office of Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baris-Sanders, M. (1997). Cooperative education: Lessons from Japan.Phi Delta Kappa, 20, 619–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld, S.L. (1978).How to tutor, (pp. 15–27), Boise, ID: Arlington House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, R. (1987). On cooperation in schools: A conversation with David and Roger Johnson.Educational Leadership, 45(3), 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, T.A. (1998). Embedding cooperative learning into the design of the integrated learning systems: Rationale and guidelines.Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(3), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candler, A.C., Blackburn, G.M., & Sowell,V. (1981). Peer tutoring as a strategy individualizing instruction.Education, 101(4), 380–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P., Kulik, J.A., & Kulik, C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings.American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, K. (1988).Peer tutoring: Lake Washington High School, Benjamin Rush Elementary School. Effective practices in place: Snapshot no. 5, School Improvement Research Series II.Northwest Regional Educational Lab. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 296 413)

  • Denzin, N.K. (1970).The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Bentz, J., Phillips, N., & Hamlett, C. (1994). The nature of student interactions during peer tutoring with and without prior training and experience.American Educational Research Journal, 31, 75–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, J.P., & Le Compte, M.O. (1984).Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J.R., & Jenkins, L.M. (1985). Peer tutoring in elementary and secondary programs.Focus on Exceptional Children, 17(6), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J.R., & Jenkins, L.M. (1987). Making peer tutoring work.Educational Leadership, 44(6), 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1984). Cooperative small group learning.Curriculum Report, 14(1), 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1990). Social skills for successful group work.Educational Leadership, 47(4), 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1992). Implementing cooperative learning.Contemporary Education, 63(3), 173–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.T., & Johnson, D.W. (1985). Student-student interaction: Ignored but powerful.Journal of Teacher Education, 36(4), 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyton, J., & Dodson, N. (1996).Exploratory study of children's task groups: Instructional implications. Paper submitted to the Instructional Development Division, Southern States Communication Association.

  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: SagePublications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H., Glass, G., & Meister, C. (1984).Cost-effectiveness of four educational interventions. Stanford, CA: Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. (1986). Docemur docendo (He who teaches, learns).American Educator, 10(3), 22–25, 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mevarech, Z.R. (1994). The effectiveness of individualized versus cooperative computer-based integrated learning systems.International Journal of Educational Research, 21(1), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L.J., Kohler, F.W., Ezell, H., Hoel, K., & Strain, P.S. (1993). Winning with peer tutoring: A teacher's guide.Preventing School Failure, 37(3), 14–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L.L., & Fitz-Gibbon, C.T. (1978).How to measure program implementation (1st ed.). Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath, L.R., Ross, S., & Smith, L. (1996). A case study of cooperative learning in elementary classrooms.The Journal of Experimental Education, 64(2), 116–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedermeyer, F.C. (1970). Effects of training on the instructional behaviors of student tutors.The Journal of Educational Research, 64, 119–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and Comprehension monitoring activities.Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (1990).Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, E.S. (1988). Preventing academic failure.School Psychology Review, 17(4), 601–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E. (1987). Cooperative learning: Can students help students learn?Instructor, 96(7), 74–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E. (1988). Cooperative learning and student achievement.Educational Leadership, 46(2), 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E. (1991). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning.Educational Leadership, 48(5), 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E. (1995).Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E., & Madden, N.A. (2001). Summary of research on Success For All and Roots and Wings. In R.E. Slavin & N.A. Madden (Eds.),Success for all: Research and reform in elementary education (pp 12–48). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E., Madden, N.A., Dolan, L.J., Wasik, B.A., Ross, S.M., & Smith, L.J. (1994). Whenever and wherever we choose: The replication of success for all.Phi Delta Kappan, 75(8), 639–640, 642–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E., Stevens, R.J., & Madden, N.A. (1988). Accommodating studient diversity in reading and writing instruction: A cooperative learning approach.Remedial and Special Education, 9(1), 60–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringfield, S., Ross, S., & Smith, L. (Eds.). (1996).Bold plans for school restructuring. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warger, C.L. (1991).Peer tutoring: When working together is better than working alone. Research & Resources on Special Education, Number 30. Council for Exceptional Children, Reston, VA. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 345 459)

  • Webb, M. (1988). Peer helping relationships in urban schools.Equity and Choice, 4(3), 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, M., & Schwartz, W. (1988). Children teaching children: A good way to learn.PTA Today, 14(1), 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

and is Editor of the Research section of this journal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nath, L.R., Ross, S.M. The influence of a peer-tutoring training model for implementing cooperative groupings with elementary students. ETR&D 49, 41–56 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504927

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504927

Keywords

Navigation