Abstract
The study examined effects of feeding iso-nutrient (150 g CP, 17.3 MJ ME kg−1) raw (RCP), sprouted (SPC), or roasted (RSCP) cowpea diets to Windsnyer (W), Large White (LW) × Landrace (LR), and the 3-way crossbred (W × LW × LR) growing pigs. Diet dry matter (DM) digestibility was estimated using standard, 3-step (gastric, small intestines, colon) in vitro digestion. Dietary in vivo nutrient digestibility and nitrogen balance were evaluated using 3 weaned pigs of each genotype. Pigs were housed in individual metabolic cages. The diets were assigned to pigs in a 3 × 3 change-over factorial experiment within three balanced, 3 × 3 Latin squares. Feeding periods consisted of 7 days adaption + 5 days’ measurement of feed intake, and the total faecal and urine excretions. The SPC diet increased step 3 in vitro DM digestibility compared to RSCP (P < 0.05). Metabolic size-scaled feed consumption was higher on the RCP compared to the RSCP diet (P < 0.05). Cowpea processing reduced apparent DM and ash digestibility (P < 0.05). LW × LR pigs exhibited lower digestibility of ash and acid detergent fiber (ADF) compared to 3-way crossbred pigs (P < 0.05). Significant genotype-diet interactions were observed for nitrogen intake (P < 0.0001), digestible nitrogen (P = 0.043), urinary nitrogen output (P < 0.0001), faecal nitrogen output (P < 0.0001), total nitrogen excretion (P < 0.0001), and nitrogen retention (P < 0.001). The biological value of feed protein was higher for W pigs than 3-way crossbred pigs (P < 0.05). Genotype-diet interactions suggested unique digestive and, or metabolic adaptive traits in the utilization of the differently processed cowpeas, which need further investigation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In the advent of climate change, in the arid and semi-arid tropical farming systems, ecologically adaptable native legumes could provide cost-effective, sustainable solutions to increasingly restricted and erratic local commercial plant protein feed supply chains (Ameen et al., 2005; Adino et al., 2018). There is wide quantitative and qualitative variation among legume species and their cultivars in protein content (Gilani et al., 2005, 2011), and in antinutritional secondary compounds (Garry et al., 2007; Jezierny et al., 2011). Typical of the legumes, cowpea protein is rich in lysine and tryptophan, though relative to animal protein, it is deficient in the sulphur containing amino acids (methionine, cysteine) (Khattab and Arntfield, 2009; Frota et al., 2017). Structural details relevant to the utilization of the main cowpea storage protein, vicilin, were previously described by Kimura et al. (2008), Oliveira et al. (2011), and Rocha et al. (2014). Through impaired digestion (Garry et al., 2007), and by endogenous wastage via damaged gut epithelial cells and secretory protective mucoprotein (Brenes et al., 2004), antinutritional factors (ANFs) may aggravate the inferior protein quality of native legume-based diets (Sauvant et al., 2004; National Research Council, 2012). Therefore, for maximal dietary efficacy, native legumes require tailored thermal (Farran et al., 2001) or biological (Malomo et al., 2013) processing, optimally calibrated for effective deactivation of ANFs, without deleterious impact on protein quality.
Nutrigenetic studies suggest the pig genotype may be important in its capacity to digest and metabolize nutrients from typically chemically complex novel diets. Previous studies suggested different gut morphology (Barea et al., 2011) and profiles of gut microbiota (Fairbrother et al., 2005; van der Meulen et al., 2010; Rist et al., 2013). The genotype also determines the nutrient requirement (Fontanesi et al., 2015). Such genetic differentiation in nutritional traits should be expected after prolonged natural (native pigs) or artificial (exotic pigs) selection in different production systems.
The objective of the present study was to examine the effects on nutrient digestibility and N utilization of processing cowpeas by either sprouting or roasting, for feeding as the primary plant protein source in maize-based diets for Windsnyer (W), Large White × Landrace (LW), and Windsnyer × Large White × Landrace (W × LW × LR) crossbred growing pigs.
Methods and materials
Cowpea processing and preparation of experimental diets
Table 1 shows the chemical composition and trypsin inhibitor activity of raw, sprouted, and roasted cowpeas. Cowpeas were bulk-germinated by 12-h pre-soaking in water and 4-day open-air sprouting at ambient conditions, and rapid sun drying. Cowpeas were roasted by placing 20 kg lots of in a cylindrical (L = 1.5 m; Diameter = 0.50 m) manually rotating, cast-iron, gas-heated drum. The procedure involved pre-heating the drum to an initial constant maximal empty interior temperature of 150 °C, followed by introduction of cowpeas for 20-min roasting, to a grain temperature of 105 °C.
Maize grain, the RCP, RSCP, and SCP lots which were used in constituting the dietary treatments were hammer-milled (Jacobson hammer mill, model P160 Teardrop 10HP, China) through a 3-mm screen and mixed (MORHLANG VERTA MIX, 1200VM, USA) for 20 min in 1-tonne lots including amino acid, mineral, and vitamin supplements. The iso-nutrient growing balanced diets are presented in Table 2.
Determination of dietary nutrient digestibility and N balance
The digestibility of dietary components was determined using both in vitro (dry matter) and in vivo (fibre, nutrients) techniques. In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) evaluation was included to separately predict the effects of cowpea processing on compartmental, upper versus lower gut digestion, while the in vivo evaluation enabled the evaluation of dietary effects on intake, on the apparent total tract digestibility of the complete diet and specific chemical components, and effects on measured and calculated parameters of N utilization.
In vitro dry matter digestibility
The stepwise in vitro pig digestion procedure of Boisen and Fernández (1997) was adapted for micro (5 g) sample digestion in a completely randomized design with 14 replications per sample. Samples were milled through a 1-mm sieve, after which they were oven-dried to a constant weight in a 105 °C, forced-air oven. Samples were then dry-cooled in a desiccator. Approximately 0.5 g samples were weighed into similarly dried Ankom® F57 filter bags which had been pre-rinsed in pure acetone (Acetone for HPLC, ≥ 99.8% (Sigma-Aldrich® product) 34,850). Empty and sample filter bags were pre-weighed and suspended in digestive media within 250-ml glass digestion bottles immersed in a shaking water bath (CNW Model, WBS 450-B) set at 39 °C. Samples were digested in a setup which accommodated 7 treatments × 250-ml digestion bottles in a run, each bottle holding (7 sample + 1 blank (no sample)) filter bags. Given the small micro substrate samples and the relatively large filter bag surface, empty bags were considered necessary to correct for potentially treatment-dependent exchange of fine, non-digestible particulate matter, including particle attachment to the filter bag matrix, to effectively account for the net flux of the fine particles. The digestion procedures were follows: Step 1 (gastric digestion): 87.5 ml phosphate buffer (pH 7.2, 0.1 M, pH 6.0), 35 ml 0.2 M HCl, pH adjusted to 2.0 using 1 M HCl/M NaOH solutions, 3.5 ml aliquot freshly prepared pepsin solution [10 mg/ml pepsin (Pepsin from porcine gastric mucosa powder, ≥ 250 units/mg solid, (Sigma148 Aldrich® product P7000)], 1.7 ml of a chloramphenicol solution (0.5 g Chloramphenicol ≥ 98% (HPLC) (Sigma-Aldrich® product C0378, per 100 ml ethanol), 2-h digestion in a 39 °C shaking water batch. Step 2 (small intestine digestion); after the pepsin digestion, pH adjusted to 6.8 by adding 35 ml of sodium phosphate buffer solution (0.2 M, pH 6.8), 17.5 ml NaOH (0.6 M, pH 13.8), 3.5 ml aliquot freshly prepared pancreatin solution containing 50 mg pancreatin [(Pancreatin from porcine pancreas) (Sigma-Aldrich® product P3292)], 5-h digestion in a 39 °C shaking water batch. Filter bags sequentially gently rinsed in warm tap water, 95% ethanol, and 99% acetone and forced-air oven-drying to constant weight at 105 °C over 24 h for calculation of the in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD). Step 3 (colon or large intestine digestion): step 2 media discarded, 218.75 ml freshly prepared phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 4.8), 1.75 ml Viscozyme [(Viscozyme® L, mixture of beta-glucanase, pectinase, hemicellulase, and xylanase enzymes) (Sigma-Aldrich® product V2010)], 18-h digestion in a 39 °C shaking water batch. Filter bags were gently sequentially similarly rinsed and dried for calculation of the IVDMD.
In vivo digestibility
Nine male pigs, three each of Windsnyer (W), Large White (LW) × Landrace (LR), and 3-way crossbred (W × LW × LR) pig genotypes, were used. The pigs were bred at the Agricultural Research Council-Irene Pig Breeding Unit, from where they were selected from different litters born after natural sow mating, which had been weaned onto a commercial weaner diet at 4 weeks. Mature weights for the parent commercial (LW and LR) and the indigenous, W-type pure breed populations were previously estimated between 300 and 350 kg and 100 and 150 kg, respectively (Kanengoni et al., 2015) . At the start of the experiment, the W, LW × LR, and W × L W × LR groups weighed in at 11 ± 1.15 kg, 14 ± 1.15 kg, and 12 ± 1.15 kg live weight, respectively. The terminal weights were 27.3 ± 1.15 kg, 28.3 ± 1.15 kg, and 27.01 ± 2.0 kg respectively. Prior to the trial, all pigs received a 1-ml subcutaneous injection of Ivomec antiparasitic drug (Reg. No. G2858). The trial was set up in a naturally ventilated house in which each pig was placed within a 57 cm × 118 cm metabolism cage fitted with individual feeders and nipple drinkers. Pigs of the three genotypes were randomly assigned to test diets in a 3 (diet) × 3 (genotype) factorial experiment within three Latin squares, each square with one pig of each genotype rotated through the diets in three feeding periods, in a balanced crossover experiment. The first 7 days of each feeding period in a Latin square were used to adapt the pigs to the dietary treatments, followed by 5 days of measuring the voluntary feed intake, and total faeces and urine collection. Faeces and urine collection and sampling were performed between 08:00 and 09:00 h. The daily urine was collected in 50 ml of 20% HCl, to prevent N volatilization AOAC. 2005. Faecal and urine samples were stored at − 04 °C until analyzed. Frozen faecal samples were dried in a forced-air oven to constant weight at 60 °C, and ground to pass through a 3-mm screen AOAC. 2000.
Feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and nitrogen balance parameters were estimated from the difference between dietary intake and excretion in faeces and urine, and the intake and N parameters expressed on a metabolic body weight (LW0.75) basis.
Chemical analyses
Feed samples were hammer-milled through a 1-mm sieve. Dry matter was determined using the AOAC (2000; method 976.050). Ash was determined using the AOAC (2000; method 923.03). Nitrogen was determined using the micro-Kjeldahl method (AOAC, 2000; method 976.05). Ether extract (EE) was determined by soxlet extraction (AOAC, 2000; method 920.39). Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were analyzed according to Goering and Van Soest (1970).
Mathematical and statistical analysis
The nitrogen balance parameters are calculated as outlined in Table 3.
The IVDMD digestibility coefficients were subjected to one-way ANOVA in using the GLM of MINITAB software (Version 17.0), based on the model:
where:
- Y ij :
-
= observation.
- µ :
-
= overall mean.
- T i :
-
= effect of the ith processing.
- Ɛ ij :
-
= random error.
The in vivo measurements of dry matter, fibre, and nutrients digestibility coefficients and of N utilization parameters were subjected to ANOVA in a factorial model which included the fixed effects of the pig genotype, diet, Latin square, periods within Latin squares, the random effects of the animals within Latin squares, and the pig genotype × cowpea diet interaction;
where:
- Y ijklmn :
-
- the nth observation
- µ :
-
- the overall mean
- G i :
-
- effect of the ith pig genotype (i =1,2,3)
- D j :
-
- effect of the jth diet (j= 1,2,3)
- S k :
-
- effect of the kth Latin square (k = 1,2,3)
- P i :
-
- effect of the lth period within Latin squares (l= 1,2,3)
- Am:
-
- effect of the mth animal within Latin squares (m = 1,2,3)
- (G x D ) ij :
-
the pig genotype × diet interaction
- Ɛijlmnk :
-
- the residual error
Tukey’s test was used to compare means where significant (P ≤ 0.05) treatment effects occurred.
Results
In vitro digestibility
Table 4 shows effects of cowpea processing on in vitro dietary DM digestibility (IVDMD). The roasting cowpeas reduced the dietary step-3 IVDMD compared to sprouting, with no (P > 0.05) processing effect on step-2, and the total IVDMD.
In vivo evaluation
Table 5 shows treatment effects on in vivo diet utilization. On metabolic weight basis, feed consumption was higher on the RCP compared to the roasted diet (P < 0.05). Sprouting and roasting significantly reduced the apparent dry matter and ash digestibility. Ash and ADF digestibility were lower for LW × LR compared to W × LW × LR pigs.
Treatment effects on nitrogen balance parameters scaled to the pig metabolic weight are shown in Table 6. Genotype × diet interactions were significant for nitrogen intake (P < 0.0001), digestible N (P = 043), urinary nitrogen output (P < 0.0001), faecal nitrogen output (P < 0.0001), total nitrogen excretion (P < 0.0001), and nitrogen retention (P < 0.001). The biological value of feed protein was higher (P < 0.05) for W pigs, compared to W × LW × LR pigs.
Discussion
In the present study, a combination of compartmental pig gut in vitro (dry matter digestibility) and apparent in vivo (fibre, nutrient digestibility, N balance) evaluation was employed to estimate the effects of sprouting versus roasting of cowpeas on diet utilization by weaned pigs of diverse genotypes. Low partial step-3 IVDMD of sprouted compared to roasted cowpeas reflected the cumulative effect of greater quantitative steps 1–2 digestion, and of escape residues, mainly consisting of poorly or slowly digestible, fibrous cell-wall structural matter in the sprouts. Unfortunately, the micro-gravimetric digestion setup excluded molecular insight into the nature of the biochemical effects, which could have important implications on pig nutrition. In contrast, both roasting and sprouting cowpeas similarly reduced the in vivo apparent ash and DM digestibility, which, particularly for DM, implied outflow rate-dependent escape of slowly digested plant embryonic secondary tissues in cowpea sprouts, and of cross-linked compounds in roasted cowpeas from all including spontaneous disintegration, and the endogenous enzyme hydrolytic (steps 1–2) or microbial (step 3) fermentative digestion. In pigs, the fate of feed passage and nutrient digestibility in the gut is subject to the dietary chemical and physical properties, such as the type and levels of dietary fibre, and the feeding level (Le Goff et al., 2002). The DM for the RCP, SPC, or RSCP diets that escaped the foregut could be of variable bulkiness, which is known to influence gut emptying in growing pigs (Kyriazakis and Emmans, 1995). However, in vivo, less escape, particularly of fibrous matter, should be expected, since, compared to a commercial product such as Viscozyme, the greater diversity of pig gut microbial fibrolytic activity (Fushai et al., 2019) should confer higher digestibility of fibrous compounds in the colon. Fibrolytic advantage of the indigenous pig gut was previously reported from genomic evaluation of faecal microbiota (Kanengoni et al., 2015). We hypothesized that superior fibrolytic capacity may also theoretically present a mechanism for broader tolerance of toxic feed ANFs. In the present study, W × LW × LR had higher ADF digestibility than the LW × LR pigs, though both had similar ADF digestibility to the W pigs. A similar, though quantitative, pattern was observed for NDF.
Metabolic size-scaled feed consumption was higher on the RCP compared to the SPC and RSCP diet (P < 0.05). We interpreted high intake to be due to energy deficit–induced upregulation of intake to compensate for inefficient digestion and, or metabolism of nutrients.
In livestock production, efficient utilization of protein depends on understanding the optimum levels that meet protein needs for growth, reproduction, and maintenance (Paul et al., 2007). Imprecise supply of protein cannot support optimal protein deposition, and is detrimental to pig performance (Whittemore et al., 2001; Noblet et al., 2001; Nørgaard et al., 2014). Excess dietary protein increases waste nitrogen excretion through the urine (Carpenter et al., 2004). The conservation of dietary N is therefore critical to meet both environmental and economic objectives (Rotz, 2004). To achieve these objectives, diet formulation should strike the correct balance between the quantitative and qualitative protein intake and the animal requirement, to minimize N excretion, and optimize animal productivity. Aquilani et al. (2019) highlighted that slow growing pigs have lower protein requirements compared to that of lean genotypes, and should theortically be more tolerant to inferior dietary protein.
On standard, multiphase-feeding diets, like poultry, commercial growing pigs are highly N efficient, as high as 40% nitrogen use efficiency (Rotz, 2004). In the current study, NU ranged between 34.0 and 35.5%, with BVFP (%) of 39. 2–46.2%. The values at the low end of these parameters are for inferior protein quality in terms of digestion and/or imbalance in the profile absorbed amino acids, and reflect poor tissue utilization (Smiricky et al., 2002). Significant dietary N wastage occurs through both protein indigestion and poor tissue protein assimilation (Rotz, 2004). Depending on the diet, protein digestion is highly variable, as is the partition of N excreted via the urinary, relative to the faecal routes (Ball et al., 2013).
Complex gut-systemic exchange of endogenous and dietary protein, amino acids, and urea occurs, which is dependent on the diet quality (Ball et al., 2013) and intake (Ball et al., 2013). In the current study, ND was overall high for the RCP (90%), sprouted (89%), and roasted (89%) cowpea diets. In vitro, El-Jasser (2011) reported 75–79% protein digestibility of sprouted cowpeas. In vivo, sprouting (Urbano et al., 2005) and thermal processing (Doblado et al., (2007) of cowpeas improved protein digestibility, though excessive heating reduced its digestibility, reflecting negative effects of non-enzymatic (Maillard) reactions between the reducing sugars and proteins, and thermally induced amino acid cross-linking (Tuśnio et al., 2017). Unfortunately, in the present study, neither in vitro nor in vivo evaluation measured the ileal protein or amino acid digestibility, to properly predict processing effects on protein quality (Mosenthin et al., 2000; Święch, 2017).
Legume seeds contain ANFs that affect feed intake and nutrient digestibility and also compromise functions of the liver, kidneys, and intestines (Ndou et al., 2015). Variable dietary DM, protein, and amino acid digestibility should therefore be expected of diets in which the legume feed contains significant antinutritional factors (Kumar et al., 2006; Kayembe, 2013). In the present study, pigs were fed diets equally balanced in N and energy RCP, SPC, or RSCP diets. Chemical analyses suggested significant residual trypsin inhibitors in the sprouted, but less so in the roasted cowpeas.
The pattern of NI across the genotype × diets treatments reflected that of the feed intake. However, different diet × genotype interactions were observed for ND, FNO, TNE, NU, and the NR, which suggested genotype-differentiated N metabolism depending on cowpea processing. Nitrogen extraction (ND) from the gut seemed more efficient in W pigs on the SPC, while the W × LW × LR pigs were similarly efficient in extracting N from the sprouted cowpeas diet, with poor extraction of N in RSCP diet by LW × LR pigs. The pattern of ND either directly reflected the dietary N availability or inversely reflected the endogenous wastage, a function of dietary ANFs. Moreira et al. (2004) reported that the total nitrogen excretion is determined by certain factors, primarily the crude protein content of diet. Canh et al. (1998) reported a 45% reduction in urinary nitrogen excretion when the dietary crude protein content decreased from 16.5 to 12.5%. In the present study, faecal N wastage (FNO) was highest for LW × LR pigs on the RSCP diet, the W × LW × LR on the SPC diet, and the W on the RCP diet and was lowest for the LW × LR pigs on the sprouted cowpeas. Similar to the ND, the pattern of faecal N excretion likely reflected the undigested fraction, along with the endogenous N wastage, both of which are affected by ANFs. Urinary wastage (UNO) was highest for W × LW × LR pigs on the SPC diet and the W pigs on the sprouted cowpeas diet, with the low wastage by LW × LR pigs on the SPC diet. The urine N excretion could reflect excess dietary N or an imbalanced amino acid profile relative to the pig requirement, or a dietary energy deficit which required partial protein utilization for energy. Imbalance in amino acids supplied for protein synthesis for growth and other functions results in catabolism of excess amino acids, with excess N converted to urea, which increase its excretion in urine (Ball et al., 2013). On the other hand, protein indigestion in the upper tract diverts N to colon fermentation (Bindelle et al., 2009). With adequate fermentable energy supply, colon bacteria assimilate both endogenous and dietary N, to lock it and shift excretion from urea in urine to microbial protein in faeces (Bindelle et al., 2009). Hlongwana et al. (2021) confirmed high N excretion through faeces as a consequence of either dietary or endogenous N diverted to microbial protein synthesis, thereby increasing microbial biomass in the hindgut. If energy is deficient, increased colon protein fermentation may also produce toxic nitrogenous metabolites (Tuśnio et al., 2017). The pattern of total excreted N (TNE) was consisted with the summative FNO and UNO, the net effect of which was similarly high total N excretion for LW × LR pigs on the RSCP diet, the W × LW × LR on the sprouted cowpeas diet and the W on the SPC diet compared to other treatment combinations. The AN mirrored the ND, with the highest observed values for W × LW × LR pigs on the SPC diet, and the lowest values observed for W pigs on the SPC diet. The nitrogen which was assimilated into tissues (NR) was highest for W × LW × LR pigs on the SPC diet and for W pigs on the sprouted cowpeas diet, and lowest for W pigs on the SPC diet. Measured by the NU, protein efficiency was not differentiated by the pig genotype, or the diet, and not subject to the genotype × diets interaction. However, measured as the BVFP, protein efficiency was low for W × LW × LR pigs compared to W pigs, which suggested imbalance in either the dietary amino acids, or the protein-energy ratio, in relation to the genotype requirement.
In conclusion, in the present study, the pattern of compartmental and the total IVDMD suggested that, compared to roasting, sprouting increased and/or shifted fibrous substrates and their digestion to the lower gut, without effect on total IVDMD. In contrast, in vivo, roasting and sprouting of cowpeas similarly reduced dietary DM digestibility compared to raw cowpeas, which implied outflow rate-dependent escape from total digestion of slowly digested plant embryonic secondary tissues in cowpea sprouts, and of cross-linked compounds in roasted cowpeas. The W × LW × LR expressed higher capacity to digest ADF than the LW × LR pigs, though both had similar ADF digestibility to the W pigs. Though partly the effect of intake induced differences in outflow rate, the genotype differentiation in capacity to digest different fibre fractions could reflect different microbiota ecosystems in the hindgut. The nitrogen balance responses were characterized by interaction of diet with the pig genotype. Nitrogen extraction from the gut (ND) seemed more efficient in W pigs on the SPC, while that of W × LW × LR pigs was efficient in extracting N from the sprouted cowpeas diet. The LW × LR pigs were inefficient in extracting N from the RSCP diet. The pattern of ND was explained by either different extraction of dietary N or inversely by different endogenous wastage, both functions of dietary ANFs. In the present study, faecal N wastage (FNO) was highest for LW × LR pigs on the RSCP diet, the W × LW × LR on the SPC diet, and the W on the sprouted cowpeas diet and was lowest for the LW × LR pigs on the sprouted cowpeas. The UNO was highest for W × LW × LR and W pigs on the SPC diet, with low wastage by LW × LR pigs on the SPC diet. We attributed this pattern of urine N excretion to excess dietary its imbalance in amino acids relative to the pig requirement, or a dietary energy deficit, which triggered protein utilization for energy. The pattern of TNE was consisted with the summated FNO and UNO, the net effect of which was similarly high total N excretion for LW × LR pigs on the RSCP diet, the W × LW × LR on the SPC diet, and the W on the SPC diet compared to other treatment combinations. The AN mirrored the ND, with the highest observed values for W × LW × LR pigs on the SPC diet, and the lowest values observed for W pigs on the SPC diet. The nitrogen which was assimilated into tissues (NR) was highest for W × LW × LR pigs on the SPC diet and for W pigs on the SPC diet, and lowest for W pigs on the SPC diet. Overall, measured by the NU, protein efficiency was not differentiated by the pig genotype, or the diet, and not subject to genotype × diet interaction. However, measured as the BVFP, protein efficiency was low for W × LW × LR pigs compared to W pigs, which suggested imbalance in either the dietary amino acids or the protein-energy ratio, in relation to the genotype requirement, inefficient nitrogen extraction, or excessive endogenous gut mucous excretion due to antinutrients. The “period” in the experimental setup represented incremental age of the pigs, which increased the NI, UNO, FNO, and NR, with a somewhat inverse trend for the TNE and AN. We concluded that both sprouting and roasting caused chemical changes which decrease the dietary intake and depress mineral, and the DM digestibility. The LW × LR expressed lower digestibility of the more recalcitrant ADF. Pig × genotype interaction with the biological versus thermal cowpea processing resulted in significant variation in pig responses in terms of N balance parameters which relate to different amino acid metabolism, effects which suggested unique digestive and metabolic adaptive traits among the experimental pig genotypes to the diets. The implications need verification in large-scale performance trials, with more extensive dietary chemical characterization.
Data availability
There is no additional or supplementary data to the study.
References
Adino, S., Wondifraw, Z. and Addis, M., 2018. Replacement of Soybean Grain with Cowpea Grain (Vigna unguiculata) as Protein Supplement in Sasso x Rir Crossbred Chicks Diet. Poultry Fish Wildlife Science 6: 188. https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-446X.1000188
Ameen, O.M., Fatope, O.M., Usman, L.A. and Adebayo, S.A., 2005. Bioactive metabolites in improved cowpea seeds. African Journal of Biotechnology, 4: 513-516.
AOAC., 2000. Official Methods of Analysis, Arlington, VA, USA.
AOAC., 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. Arlington, VA, USA.
Aquilani, C., Sirtori, F., Franci, O., Acciaioli, A., Bozzi, R., Benvenuti, D., Candek-Potokar., M. and Pugliese., C., 2019. Effects of different protein levels on the nitrogen balance, performance and slaughtering traits of Cinta senese growing Pigs. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 53: 364.
Ball, M. E. E., Magowan, E., McCracken, K. J., Beattie, V. E., Bradford, R., Gordon, F. J. and Henry, W., 2013. The effect of level of crude protein and available lysine on finishing pig performance, nitrogen balance and nutrient digestibility. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 26(4), 564.
Barea, R., Nieto, R., Vitari, F., Domeneghini, C. and Aguilera, J. F., 2011. Effects of pig genotype (Iberian v. Landrace× Large White) on nutrient digestibility, relative organ weight and small intestine structure at two stages of growth. Animal, 5(4), 547-557.
Bindelle, J., Buldgen, A., Delacollette, M., Wavreille, J., Agneessens, R., Destain, J.P. and Leterme, P., 2009. Influence of source and concentrations of dietary fiberon in vivo nitrogen excretion pathways in pigs reflected by in vitro fermentation and N incorporation by faecal bacteria. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 87, 583–593.
Boisen, S. and Fernández, J.A., 1997. Prediction of the total tract digestibility of energy in feedstuffs and pig diets by in vitro analyses. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 68(3-4), 277-286.
Brenes, A., Jansman, A.J.M. and Marquardt, R.R., 2004. Recent progress on research on the effects of antinutritional factors in legume and oil seeds in monogastric animals. Publication-European Association for Animal Production, 110, 195-218.
Canh, T.T., Aarnink, A.J.A., Schutte, J.B., Sutton, A., Langhout, D.J. and Verstegen, M.W.A., 1998. Dietary protein affects nitrogen excretion and ammonia emission from slurry of growing–finishing pigs. Livestock Production Science, 56(3), 181-191.
Carpenter, D.A., O'Mara, F.P. and O'Doherty, J.V., 2004. The effect of dietary crude protein concentration on growth performance, carcass composition and nitrogen excretion in entire grower-finisher pigs. IRISH Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 43(2), 227–236. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25562520. Accessed 19 September 2023.
Doblado, R., Frias, J. and Vidal-Valverde, C., 2007. Changes in vitamin C content and antioxidant capacity of RCP and germinated cowpea (Vigna sinensis var. carilla) seeds induced by high pressure treatment. FOOD CHEMISTRY, 101: 918-923.
El-Jasser, A.S.H., 2011. Chemical and biological properties of local cowpea seed protein grown in Gizan region, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of AgriculturE: Research and Review, 1(2), 68-75.
Fairbrother, J.M., Nadeau, E. and Gyles, C.L., 2005. Escherichia coli in postweaning diarrhea in pigs: an update on bacterial types, pathogenesis, and prevention strategies. Animal Health Research Reviews, 6, 17-39.
Farran, M.T., Dakessian, P.B., Darwish, A.H., Uwayjan, M.G., Dbouk, H.K., Sleiman, F.T. and Ashkarian, V.M., 2001. Performance of broilers and production and egg quality parameters of laying hens fed 60% raw or treated common vetch (Vicia sativa) seeds. Poultry Science, 80(2), 203-208.
Fontanesi, L., Schiavo, G., Bovo, S., Mazzoni, G., Fanelli F. and Ribani A., 2015. Dissecting complex traits in pigs: Metabotypes illuminate genomics for practical applications. In: Book of Abstracts of the 66th Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science, Warsaw, Poland, 31 August-4 September. 152. Accessed on https://meetings.eaap.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/S11_04.pdf, on 19 September 2023.
Frota, K. D. M. G., Lopes, L. A. R., Silva, I. C. V., and Arêas, J. A. G. 2017. Nutritional quality of the protein of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) and its protein isolate. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 48 (5), 792-798. https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20170092
Fushai, F., Tekere, M., Masafu, M., Akinsola, C.M., Siebrits, F., Nherera-Chokuda, F.V. and Kanengoni, A.T., 2019. Co-products in maize-soybean growing-pig diets altered in vitro enzymatic insoluble fibre hydrolysis and fermentation in relation to botanical origin. South African Journal Animal Science, 49(2), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v49i2.1
Garry, B.P. Forgarty, M., Curran, T.P., O’connell, M.J. and O’doherty, J.V., 2007. The effect of cereal type and enzyme addition on pig performance, intestinal microflora, and ammonia and odour emission. Animal, 1(5), 751-757. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731107720190
Gilani, G.S., Cockell, K.A. and Sepehr, E., 2005. Effects of antinutritional factors on protein digestibility and amino acid availability in foods. Journal Of Aoac International, 88(3), 967-987.
Gilani, G.S., Xiao, C.W. and Cockell, K.A., 2011. Impact of Antinutritional Factors in Food Proteins on the Digestibility of Protein and the Bioavailability of Amino Acids and on Protein Quality. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 108, S315–S332.
Goering, H.K. and Van Soest, P.J., 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agricultural handbook no. 379. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, pp. 1–20.
Hlongwana, F.Y., Thabethe, F., Thomas, R.S. and Chimonyo, M., 2021. Nitrogen balance in slow‑growing Windsnyer pigs fed on incremental levels of amarula (Sclerocarya birrea subsp. cafra) nut cake. Tropical Animal Health and Production, (2021) 53: 364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02808-x
Jezierny, D., Mosenthin, R., Sauer, N., Roth, S., Piepho, H.P., Rademacher, M. and Eklund, M., 2011. Chemical composition and standardised ileal digestibilities of crude protein and amino acids in grain legumes for growing pigs. Livestock Science, 138(1-3), 229-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.12.024
Kanengoni, A.T., Chimonyo, M., Tasara, T., Cormican, P., Chapwanya, A., Ndimba, B.K. and Dzama, K. 2015. A comparison of faecal microbial populations of South African Windsnyer-type indigenous pigs (SAWIPs) and Large White × Landrace (LW × LR) crosses fed diets containing ensiled maize cobs. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 362(13), p.fnv100. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnv100
Kayembe, N.C., 2013. Germination as a processing technique for soybeans in small scale farming, South African Journal of Animal Science, 167-172.
Khattab, R.Y. and Arntfield, S.D. 2009. Nutritional quality of legume seeds as affected by some physical treatments. Antinutritional factors. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 42(6), 1113-1118.
Kimura, A., Fukuda, T., Zhang, M., Motoyama, S., Maruyama, N. and Utsumi, S., 2008. Comparison of physicochemical properties of 7s and 11s globulins from pea, fava bean, cowpea, and french bean with those of soybean french bean 7s globulin exhibits excellent properties. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 56(21), 10273-10279.
Kumar, V., Rani, A., Pandey, V. and Chauhan, G.S., 2006, “Changes in lipoxygenase isozymes and trypsin inhibitor activity in soybean during germination at different temperatures”, Food Chemistry, 563-568.
Kyriazakis, I. and Emmans, G. C., 1995. The voluntary feed intake of pigs given feeds based on wheat bran, dried citrus pulp and grass meal, in relation to measurements of feed bulk. British Journal of Nutrition, 73, 191-207.
Le Goff, G., Van Milgen, J. and Noblet, J., 2002. Influence of dietary fibre on digestive utilization and rate of passage in growing pigs, finishing pigs and adult sows. Animal Science, 74, 503-515.
Malomo, O., Alamu, E. A. and Oluwajoba, S. O., 2013. Chemical Evaluation of Protein Quality of Sprouted Maize and Cowpea. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 2(5), 254–260. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20130205.17
Moreira, I., Fraga, A.L., Paiano, D., Oliveira, G.C, Scapinello, C. and Martins, E.N., 2004. Nitrogen Balance of Starting Barrow Pigs Fed on Increasing Lysine Levels. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 85-91.
Mosenthin, R., Sauer, W. C., Blank, R., Huisman, J., and Fan, M. Z., 2000. The concept of digestible amino acids in diet formulation for pigs. Livestock Production Science, 64(2-3), 265-280.
Ndou, S.P., Khanyile, M. and Chimonyo, M., 2015. Growth performance and nutrition-related serum metabolites in growing pigs fed on Acacia Tortilis leaf meal. Livestock Science, 182, 22-27.
Noblet, J., and Perez. J. M., 1993. Prediction of digestibility of nutrients and energy values of pig diets from chemical analysis. Journal of Animal Science, 71:3389–3398.
Noblet, J., Le Bellego, L., Van Milgen, J. and Dubois, S., 2001. Effects of reduced dietary protein level and fat addition on heat production and nitrogen and energy balance in growing pigs. Animal Research, 50, 227-238. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2001129
Nørgaard, J.V., Hansen, M.J., Soumeh, E.A., Adamsen, A.P.S. and Poulsen, H.D., 2014. Effect of protein level on performance, nitrogen utilisation and carcass composition in finisher pigs. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section A — Animal Science, 64(2), 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2014.943280
National Research Council. 2012. Nutrient Requirements of Swine: Eleventh Revised Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13298
Paul, S.S., Mandal, A.B., Chatterjee, P.N., Bhar, R., and Pathak, N.N., 2007. Determination of nutrient requirements for growth and maintenance of growing pigs under tropical conditions. Animal 1, 269-282. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731107284228
Rist, V.T.S., Weiss, E., Eklund, M. and Mosenthin, R., 2013. Impact of dietary protein on microbiota composition and activity in the gastrointestinal tract of piglets in relation to gut health: A review. Animal 7, 1067-1078.
Rocha, T., Hernandez, L.M.R., Chang, Y.K. and de Mejía, E.G., 2014. Impact of germination and enzymatic hydrolysis of cowpea bean (Vigna unguiculata) on the generation of peptides capable of inhibiting dipeptidyl peptidase IV. Food Research International, 64, 799-809.
Rotz, C.A., 2004. Management to reduce nitrogen losses in animal production. Journal of Animal Science. 82:E119-E137.
Sauvant, D., Perez, J.M. and Tran, G. eds., 2004. Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials: pigs, poultry, cattle, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses and fish. Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Smiricky, M.R., Grieshop, C.M., Albin, D.M., Wubben, J.E., Gabert, V.M., and Fahey Jr, G.C., 2002. The influence of soy oligosaccharides on apparent and true ileal amino acid digestibilities and faecal consistency in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 80(9), 2433-2441.
Święch, E. 2017. Alternative prediction methods of protein and energy evaluation of pig feeds. Journal of Animal Science And Biotechnology, 8(1), 39.
Tuśnio, A., Taciak, M., Barszcz, M., Święch, E., Bachanek, I. and Skomiał, J., 2017. Effect of Replacing Soybean Meal by RCP or Extruded Pea Seeds on Growth Performance and Selected Physiological Parameters of the Ileum and Distal Colon of Pigs. PLOS ONE, 12(1), 0169467.
Urbano, G., Aranda, P., Vılchez, A., Aranda, C., Cabrera, L., Porres, J.M. and López-Jurado, M., 2005. Effects of germination on the composition and nutritive value of proteins in Pisum sativum, L. Food Chemistry, 93(4), 671-679.
Van der Meulen, J., Panneman, H. and Jansman, A.J.M., 2010. Effect of pea, pea hulls, faba beans and faba bean hulls on the ileal microbial composition in weaned piglets. Livestock Science, 133, 135-137.
Whittemore, C.T., Green, D.M. and Knap, P.W., 2001. Technical review of the energy and protein requirements of growing pigs: protein. Animal science. 73, 363-373. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800058331
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the Agricultural Research Council (ARC)’s Institute of Animal Production, Irene, Gauteng, for breeding the research pigs.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Venda. The research was funded in part through a National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa bursary [Grant unique number 101431] and the University of Venda Research and Post Graduate Committee postgraduate [SARDF/17/ANS/07] and staff [SADRF/17/ANS/06] grants.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by MWL, with the assistance and guidance of JJB and FMF. The first draft of the manuscript was written by MWL, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The experimental protocols describing the management and care of animals were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Venda (Reference No: SARDF/17/ANS/07/0412).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lubisi, M.W., Baloyi, J.J. & Fushai, F. Nutrient digestibility and nitrogen balance in different pig breeds fed raw, sprouted, or roasted (Vigna unguiculata) diets. Trop Anim Health Prod 55, 334 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03742-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03742-w