Abstract
This study aimed to rank potential drivers of cow productivity and welfare in tropical smallholder dairy farms (SDFs) in Vietnam. Forty-one variables were collected from 32 SDFs located in four geographically diverse dairy regions, with eight SDFs per region. Twelve variables, including milk yield (MILK), percentages of milk fat (mFA), protein (mPR), dry matter (mDM), energy-corrected milk yield (ECM), heart girth (HG), body weight (BW), ECM per 100 kg BW (ECMbw), body condition score (BCS), panting score (PS), inseminations per conception (tAI), and milk electrical resistance (mRE) of cows, were fitted as outcome variables in the models. Twenty-one other variables describing farm altitude, housing condition, and diet for the cows, cow genotypes, and cow physiological stage were fitted as explanatory variables. Increased farm altitude was associated with increases in ECM and mRE and with decreases in PS and tAI (P < 0.05). Increases in roof heights and percentage of shed side open were associated with increases in ECM, mFA, and mDM (P < 0.05). Increased dry matter intake and dietary densities of dry matter and fat were associated with increased MILK, ECM, and ECMbw and decreased tAI (P < 0.05). Increased dietary lignin density was associated with increased PS. Increased genetic proportion of Brown Swiss in the herd was associated with increased MILK, ECM, and ECMbw (P < 0.05). Thus, to improve cow productivity and welfare in Vietnamese SDFs, the following interventions were identified for testing in future cause-effect experiments: increasing floor area per cow, roof heights, shed sides open, dry matter intake, dietary fat density, and the genetic proportion of Brown Swiss and decreasing dietary lignin density.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Smallholder dairy farms (SDFs) are the most popular type of dairy farming system in tropical developing countries in South East Asia (SEA), including Vietnam (Devendra, 2001; Moran, 2015). For example, in Vietnam, approximately 28,695 SDFs were raising an average of 20 cows per farm or less and accounting for 80% of the national fresh milk production in 2016 (General Statistics Office of Vietnam, 2016; Nguyen et al., 2016; Vinamilk, 2017). Currently, there are relatively limited studies on SDFs in SEA, and the majority of the available studies on SDFs are limited to describing basic characteristics such as cow numbers, herd structure, and farmer-reported milk yields (Moran and Brouwer, 2013). Common characteristics of SDFs across SEA countries are low milk production relative to both genetic potential and cows under similar environmental conditions in developed countries: poor welfare as shown by panting in response to heat stress, low fertility, and high incidence of mastitis (Lam et al., 2010; Moran and Brouwer, 2013; Östensson et al., 2013; Moran and Morey, 2015). The few studies that have estimated average individual milk yields indicate that it is 14 to 15 kg/cow/d for cows in some northern provinces (Ashbaugh, 2010; Vu et al., 2016) of Vietnam, 8.3 to 15.3 kg/cow/d in Indonesia (Moran and Doyle, 2015), and 12.4 to 14.1 kg/cow/d in Thailand (Koonawootrittriron et al., 2009; Wongpom et al., 2017).
Finding the reasons for the low productivity and welfare of SDF cows is important but complicated because SDFs, like any agricultural system, are multidimensional and complex systems where many factors, including weather, shed conditions, nutrition, and genotype, simultaneously influence cow productivity and welfare. It is reasonable to propose that the low productivity and welfare of the cows in SDFs in SEA prevail for the following reasons. Firstly, the hot and humid weather conditions in SEA are not conducive to raising high-producing dairy cows. Secondly, the dairy cattle in SEA are commonly crossbreeds between internationally popular dairy breeds, mainly Holsteins (HOL), with local multipurpose Zebu breeds (ZEB). These crossbreeds might adapt well to the local conditions but be less productive than the pure dairy breeds such as HOL, Brown Swiss (BSW), or Jersey (JER) (Koonawootrittriron et al., 2009; Lam et al., 2010; Wongpom et al., 2017). Thirdly, the low quality of tropical roughage and by-product types commonly used by farmers, such as Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) or rice straw, and simple diet formulation such as roughage plus concentrate pellets added at a ratio of 1 kg per 2 kg of expected milk yield, does not supply enough or an appropriate balance of nutrients for the cows (Chu et al., 2005; Cuong et al., 2006; Lam et al., 2010; Moran, 2012; Pilachai et al., 2013; Bernard, 2015; Hiep et al., 2016; Phong and Thu, 2016). Furthermore, the poor design of the cowsheds, including a lack of cow-cooling facilities, most likely makes the cows uncomfortable and less productive (Chu et al., 2005; Moran and Brouwer, 2013; Phong and Thu, 2016).
While all the above-mentioned reasons can simultaneously serve to lower the productivity and welfare of cows, some might be more important than others. Identification of those that have the greatest impact on herd productivity and welfare is of practical importance as it can help to define the most needed short-term and long-term interventions. Mathematically, if all the input management and output data of the SDFs are available, the key drivers of cow productivity and welfare can be identified by building multivariate models which include only factors with significant effects. However, this type of study on SDFs is currently very limited because of the lack of accurate and complete dairy farming data. SDF farmers in SEA commonly do not record the production data properly. For example, a study in Thailand reported that 70% of all farms in the survey did not record production data (Yeamkong et al., 2010). Currently, the common strategies that farmers are applying to improve cow productivity appear to focus on genetic and nutritional aspects of herd management. Backcrossing current dairy herds with imported dairy sires of high genetic merit, mainly HOL, and directly importing HOL heifers, are common genetic strategies (Lam et al., 2010; Moran, 2015). Buying high-quality commercial concentrated pellets rich in protein and energy, and offering them at least twice a day to complement the balance of nutrients in basal forage, is the common nutritional strategy (Lam et al., 2010). Choosing highland rather than lowland regions to develop dairy farms was also a common strategy in the past, but currently, this is limited as the demand for milk in the cities, all in hot lowland areas, is rapidly increasing, while the availability of affordable land in the highlands is rapidly decreasing. Dairying in the lowlands is also considered to be more attractive than in the highlands as fresh milk can be delivered to market more cheaply and more reliably in terms of quality assurance (Su and Binh, 2001; Cai and Long, 2002; Moran and Morey, 2015; Herawati et al., 2016).
In this study, we focused on the multidimensionality of Vietnamese SDFs. The aim was to combine the data from the different themes of previous studies by the same authors (Bang et al., 2021b, 2021a, 2021c, 2021d) to build multivariate explanatory models to enable the identification and ranking of potential factors affecting the productivity and welfare of dairy cows in SDFs. The factors include milk yield and quality, body weight and body condition score, heat stress level, fertility, and udder health of the cows. We hypothesized that current improvement strategies found to varying extents in 32 SDF herds, such as increased altitude, infusion of HOL genetics, and increased dietary energy and protein concentrations, are all associated with the improvement of some key productivity and welfare indicators of the cows.
Materials and methods
Study sites, time, and data
The study was conducted from 24 August to 7 October 2017 on 32 SDFs selected randomly from four key dairy regions of Vietnam, including a southern lowland, a southern highland, a northern lowland, and a northern highland region, with eight farms per region. To ensure the representativity of the data, firstly, the lists of SDFs in each region were obtained by contacting the regional District Agriculture Departments. Then, 40 SDFs per region, which account for 5 to 20% of total SDFs in each region, were randomly chosen from those lists to be included in a collaborative economic survey of SDFs (Nga, 2017a; b). Finally, eight SDFs per region were randomly selected from the SDFs in that economic survey who agreed to continued involvement in further studies. More details about the process to select the SDFs for the current study can be found in our previous studies (Bang et al., 2021c, 2021b, 2021a, 2021d).
Each farm was visited over a 24-h period to collect the necessary data. Microclimate data from 0600 to 1800 h within the cowshed of each SDF was measured by a Kestrel 5400 Heat Stress Tracker (NIELSEN-KELLERMAN, USA). Means (± SD) of ambient temperature, humidity, and temperature-humidity index (THI) in South Lowland were 29.5 ± 1.1°C, 81.8 ± 3.8%, and 82.5 ± 1.3 units, respectively; in South Highland, 25.4 ± 1.3°C, 80.5 ± 4.9%, and 75.5 ± 1.6 units; in North Lowland, 29.7 ± 1.5°C, 82.0 ± 6.0%, and 82.9 ± 2.0 units; and in North Highland, 26.0 ± 1.1°C; 80.6 ± 4.1%, and 76.7 ± 1.3 units (Bang et al., 2021c).
A total of 41 variables were used (Table 1). These variables were obtained from previous studies which were conducted concurrently on the same SDFs and by the same authors (Bang et al., 2021c, 2021b, 2021a, 2021d). In Table 1, to assist with the interpretation of the models and results, these variables were divided into three groups. Firstly, housing management; these were variables 1 to 7, from a housing management study (Bang et al., 2021c). Secondly, nutrition; these were variables 8 to 23, from a nutrition study (Bang et al., 2021a). Thirdly, animal; these were variables 24 to 41, from a cow welfare and productivity study (Bang et al., 2021b) and a cow genetic study (Bang et al., 2021d). The animal variables were grouped into three subgroups, including genetic (variables 24 to 27), physiological stage (variables 28 and 29), and productivity and welfare (variables 30 to 41). All cow-level variables were average per farm to obtain farm-level variables. Then, only farm-level variables were used to build the models.
Building the models
Models
Milk production, panting score (PS), number of artificial inseminations (tAI), and milk electrical resistance (mRE) are productivity and welfare indicators because they reflect the status of production, heat stress, fertility, and udder health of the cows, respectively. High productivity, low PS, low tAI, and high mRE are preferable because they indicate that a cow is productive, not suffering from heat stress, fertile, and has good udder health. Since the aim was to build explanatory models of cow productivity and welfare indices, these indicators were chosen as outcome variables (or dependent variables), and the variables that theoretically reflect the causal structure of the outcome variables were chosen as the predictor (independent) variables (Shmueli, 2010) (Table 1). The management, nutrition, genetic, and physiological stage variables, all well-known as cow productivity and welfare drivers, were chosen as candidate predictor variables (NRC, 2001; Food and Agriculture Organization, 2011; USDA, 2016). The matrix notation describing the models was:
where y was the vector of dependent variables, β was the vector of fixed effects (independent variables), e was the vector of residual random effects [assumed e ~ N(0, Iσ2e)], and X was the incidence matrices of the fixed effects.
Identification of initial independent variables
When building the models, firstly, multicollinearity was assessed using variance inflation factor (VIF) statistics. Predictor variables with VIF > 10 were excluded from the initial multivariate model (Kock and Lynn, 2012). Based on this procedure, 13 variables (Region, FanCow, NEL, CP, ADF, NDF, Starch, Ca, K, Mg, S, HOL, and HG) were excluded from all models. Table 2 summarizes the included variables.
Since the excluded variables may still be correlated with explanatory and outcome variables included in the models, a Pearson correlation matrix was determined (Shmueli, 2010) (Table 3). Pearson correlations between variables included in the models are presented in Table 7 in the Appendix. In Table 3, correlations were only considered significant if they passed a Bonferroni corrected P-value. Farms with high altitude were associated with fewer fans per cow. Farms with high NFC were associated with low ADF, low NDF, and high Starch. Farms with high lignin concentration were associated with lower NEL and ADF. Farms with high P were associated with high CP and Ca. Farms with high JER were associated with low HOL. Magnesium was the only variable that was associated positively with MILK and ECM.
Model building and model selection
After the initial independent variables were identified for each model, the Bayesian model averaging (BMA) method was applied to select the final multi-multivariate linear regression models using R package ‘BMA’ (Raftery et al., 2019). BMA method was chosen because it accounts for the uncertainty of variables included in the linear regression model by averaging over the best models identified, based on posterior model probability (Raftery et al., 2019). For each outcome variable, BMA method suggested the five best explanatory models, which were the ones with the highest coefficient of determination (R2) and the lowest Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Those best models included only the explanatory variables, which are suggestively (P ≤ 0.1) or significantly (P ≤ 0.05) associated with the outcome variables. Among the five best explanatory models for each outcome variable, only one explanatory model that either had highest R2 and lowest BIC or had the most biological meanings was selected to present. The final selected model was summarized by linear regression analysis to obtain regression coefficients ± SE and corresponding P-values. The final models were also further evaluated by looking at standardized residuals and leverage to ensure model assumptions were met (Richards et al., 2014). Specifically, the outliers, linearity of the data, normality of residuals, homoscedasticity, and independence of residuals error terms of models were checked by drawing diagnostic plots which visualize the residual errors of the models.
Results
Variables associated with milk production
The detailed models for each of the milk production outcome variables (Table 2) are presented in Table 4. The R2 was moderate for the mPR model (55%), high for mDM model (72%), and very high for other models (> 84% for the mFA, MILK, ECM and ECMbw models).
For housing management variables, increased per cent of shed sides open was associated with increases in the corrected milk yields (ECM and ECMbw) and milk components mFA and mDM but not mPR. Increased altitude was associated with increased ECM but decreased mPR. Increased floor area per cow was associated with increased MILK but decreased mFA and mPR. Increased ridge roof height was associated with increases in ECM and mFA. Increased eave height was associated with decreased mDM. Increased mat area per cow was associated with decreased MILK.
For nutritional variables, increases in dietary DMIbw, DM, and fat were associated with increases in MILK, ECM, and ECMbw. However, increased dietary DM was associated with decreases in mFA and mDM. Increased dietary Na was associated with decreased MILK (but not associated with ECM or ECMbw) and with increases in mFA and mDM. Increased dietary NFC was associated with decreases in mFA, ECM, and ECMbw.
For animal variables, higher BSW was associated with increases in MILK, ECM, and ECMbw. However, higher ZEB was associated with decreases in ECMbw and mPR. JER was not found to be associated with any milk yield or component variables. Increased BW was only associated with increased ECM. Increased DIM was associated with decreased MILK but with increased mFA. Increased number of lactations was associated with increased ECMbw. Increased BCS was associated with decreased MILK but with increased mPR.
Increased PS was associated with increases in mFA, mPR, ECM, and ECMbw.
Variables associated with cow conformation
The models identifying the variables associated with body conformation showed moderate R2 ranging from 51 to 58% (Table 5). The variables associated with HG were also those associated with BW, which was to be expected as BW was estimated from HG. Increases in mat area per cow, eave height, and the number of lactations were associated with increases in both HG and BW. In contrast, increases in ZEB and JER were associated with decreases in both HG and BW. Increases in eave height, dietary fat, BRW, and PS were associated with increased BCS. In contrast, increases in dietary P and JER were associated with decreased BCS.
Variables associated with the level of heat stress, reproduction, and udder health of the cows
The R2 was low for the mRE model (44%) but high for the PS model (75%) and tAI model (76%) (Table 6). A decreased tAI was associated with increases in altitude, DMIbw, dietary fat, and BW, and decreases in mat area per cow, NFC, and DIM. A decreased PS was associated with increases in altitude, eave height, and floor area per cow but with decreases in NFC, lignin, P, and BCS. An increase in mRE was associated with increases in altitude and DMIbw.
Discussion
This study aimed to build explanatory models to prioritize potential housing, nutrition, and animal variables affecting the productivity and welfare of dairy cows in SDFs. Except for the mRE model, with a relatively low R2 of 44%, the R2 of all other models ranged from moderate (51%) for BCS to very high (94%) for MILK, indicating that the important independent variables have been included in each model. Those important independent variables suggested a wide range of interventions worthy for the future research. The most inclusive models were for ECM and ECMbw, and since these indicators have already been corrected for variation in mFA and mPR (ECM) and BW (ECMbw), the variables affecting them deserve the most immediate attention. The variables most associated with ECM and ECMbw were altitude, ridge roof height, per cent of shed sides open, DMIbw, dietary DM concentration, dietary fat concentration, genetic proportions of BSW and ZEB, BW, and PS.
Housing variables
Housing management variables, of all the variable groupings, were identified as the worthiest of future intervention research. Each 100-m increase in altitude was associated with an increase of 0.2 kg in daily ECM per cow, 0.08 unit decrease in mean PS, 0.1 times decrease in mean tAI, and 3 unit increase in mean mRE. These results are consistent with a case study of SDFs in Indonesia which reported that the daily milk yield of the lowland farms (8.3 kg/cow/d) was much lower than that of the highland farms (13.5 kg/cow/d), although this was only a simple comparison between regions without accounting for the effects of confounding variables associated with each region (Moran and Doyle, 2015).
Besides altitude, increased eave or ridge height of the cowshed roof was associated with increased ECM, mFA, mDM, HG, BW, and BCS and decreased PS, all of which are desirable. Similarly, increased floor area per cow was associated with increased MILK and decreased PS, and increased per cent of shed sides open was associated with an increased mFA and mDM and decreased PS. These associations are logical as altitude, roof height, floor area per cow, or per cent of shed sides open are all major variables affecting cow comfort by improving airflow, which should enhance the opportunity for evaporative cooling (Moran, 2012; Renaudeau et al., 2012; Fournel et al., 2017). The current study was conducted under conditions likely to induce heat stress - in autumn when the THI ranged from 71.9 to 85.6 units, which is considered hot to very hot for the cows (Zimbleman et al., 2009). These results consolidate those in our previous publication (Bang et al., 2021c), which used the same housing management data as the current study and indicated that increased altitude, floor area per cow, roof heights, and per cent of shed sides open increased ventilation and decreased THI inside the cowshed. Many studies have found that decreased THI was associated with decreased heat stress, which then increased feed intake, milk production, and cow fertility (Preez et al., 1990; Ravagnolo et al., 2000; Bouraoui et al., 2002; Könyves et al., 2017). Thus, our results suggest that building farms in high altitude regions, increasing floor area per cow, and increasing eave and ridge roof heights could be effective strategies to increase milk production of Vietnamese SDF cows.
Mats over concrete flooring are supplied for cows in Vietnam SDFs to make them more comfortable when resting. However, in the current study, it has been found that increasing mat area per cow could be more problematic than beneficial as it was associated with a decrease of 0.41 kg/cow/d in MILK and an increase of 0.5 times in tAI. With respect to this issue, Ashbaugh (2010) reported that many Vietnamese SDF farmers did not provide bedding on top of the concrete floors for cows because of hygiene issues, which then caused mastitis. This might indicate that the current type of mats (mainly polyethylene foam mats) used in SDFs might not be suitable. However, the negative association between mat area and MILK might indicate that mat area is an indicator of other variables that were not included in the model.
Nutritional variables
Increased DMIbw and dietary DM concentration were associated with increased MILK, ECM, ECMbw, and mRE and with decreased tAI, which are all desirable. The cows were in heat-stressed conditions, and the feed intake of heat-stressed cows is commonly depressed as an adaptive response of cows to reduce metabolic heat production (Gaughan and Mader, 2009; Renaudeau et al., 2012). Consequently, a decrease in feed intake was expected, and the decrease in feed intake explains the decrease in milk production associated with cows in heat-stressed conditions (Knapp and Grummer, 1991; West, 2003; West et al., 2003). Although the mechanisms that mediate the effect of heat stress on the reduced milk yield can be multifactorial, at least half of the reduction in milk yield can be explained by the decrease in feed intake caused by heat stress (Tao et al., 2020). The feed intake can be improved by using more concentrates or supplying cows with higher-quality grasses or roughage (less fibre) instead of the current roughage such as Napier grass or rice straw that farmers commonly used for their cows (Chu et al., 2005; Lam et al., 2010; Phong and Thu, 2016). Reducing dietary fibre results in decreasing bulk density of the diet, thus encouraging intake (West, 2003; Renaudeau et al., 2012). Cummins (1992) reported that during heat stress, dry matter intake and milk yield of cows given diets containing 14% to 17% ADF (DM basis) were higher than those of cows offered diets containing 21% ADF.
Increased dietary fat concentrations were associated with increased MILK, ECM, ECMbw, and BCS and associated with decreased PS, which are all desirable. These results are in line with those of other researchers who reported that increasing dietary fat was an effective strategy to eliminate the effects of heat stress on the dairy cow during summer. Lactating cows commonly experience negative energy balance during heat stress (West, 2003; Shwartz et al., 2009). This is because heat-stressed dairy cows are often unable to consume enough feed to meet their energy demands during lactation (Gaughan and Mader, 2009; Renaudeau et al., 2012). As a result, they typically mobilize their body reserves to maintain their milk production until the intake of feed can match or exceed their nutritional requirements (West, 2003). Therefore, a strategy to feed cows during heat stress is to increase dietary nutrient density, especially energy density by supplementing their diets with fat or increasing concentrate to compensate for the decline in feed intake.
In contrast to fat, increased dietary NFC, supplied mainly by the concentrate component of the diet, was negatively associated with mFA, mPR, ECM, and ECMbw and positively associated with PS and tAI. These results were hard to explain because NFC is also a main source of NEL and so is contrary to our hypothesis. However, consistent with our results are those of Drackley et al. (2003), who conducted a study to compare productivity, and heat stress level of HOL cows offered either a control diet (fat: 2.63% DM, NFC: 40.76% DM), high-fat diet (fat: 6.04% DM, NFC: 38.10% DM), or high NFC diet (fat: 2.70% DM, NFC: 46.26% DM) during summer in the midwest of the USA. This study showed that mFA, fat corrected milk yield (3.5% fat), and the efficiency of milk production of the cows offered the high-fat diet were higher than those of cows offered the high NFC diet (Drackley et al., 2003). Respiration rate and rectal temperature were also lower in cows provided with high-fat diets than in cows provided with high NFC diets (Drackley et al., 2003).
Higher dietary lignin was associated with higher PS (more heat-stressed cows), which was to be expected. Diets rich in lignin are also likely to be rich in ADF (Adesogan et al., 2019). In the current study, dietary lignin was also and positively correlated with dietary ADF (r = 0.68, P < 0.05) and negatively associated with dietary NEL (r = −0.56, P < 0.05). Generally, the heat increment from the metabolic utilization of dietary fibre is considered higher than that from the metabolic utilization of starch or fat because the fermentation of fibre generates more heat and is less efficient (Renaudeau et al., 2012). Thus, under heat stress conditions, high fibre diets make cows more heat-stressed. It has also been suggested that feeding cows a diet containing high-quality NDF (low lignin concentration and high digestibility) instead of a diet with low-quality NDF can reduce the negative effects of heat stress on their productivity, body temperature, and feeding behaviour (Arieli et al., 2004; Soriani et al., 2013). Interventions that specifically reduce the lignin but not necessarily the NDF concentration in SDF cows’ diets should be targeted for future research.
Although dietary Na concentration was not associated with either ECM or ECMbw, each per cent (DM basis) increase in dietary Na concentration was associated with a decrease of up to 6 kg of MILK per cow per day. This is inconsistent with the results of Schneider et al. (1986), who reported that increased dietary Na was associated with increased feed intake and milk yield of cows in hot weather. In Vietnamese SDFs, there could be two possible explanations for the negative associations between dietary Na and milk yields. Firstly, cows in Vietnam may not be supplied with enough drinking water during hot weather. Water is crucial for milk excretion, and the need for water increases when dietary Na is increased, especially during hot weather (West, 2003; Meyer et al., 2004; Appuhamy et al., 2016). Two studies on SDFs in Vietnam showed that 51% of SDFs provided less than 30 l of water for a cow per day, while only around 29 to 35% provided fresh water ad libitum for the cows (Suzuki et al., 2006; Lam et al., 2010). Our results in previous study (Bang et al., 2021c) also showed quite similar results. A second explanation for the negative associations between dietary Na and milk yields is that during the current study, it was observed that, in the hope of increasing feed intake, Vietnamese SDFs farmers commonly supplemented Na in the form of NaCl rather than NaHCO3, whereas a study by Coppock et al. (1982) showed that NaHCO3 is likely to be more effective than NaCl in increasing cows’ feed intake and milk yield during heat stress. Similarly, Gaughan and Mader (2009) found that during hot conditions, adding NaCl to the diet can decrease the dry matter intake of cattle. Therefore, the dietary Na finding suggests the importance of research that tests the effect of ad libitum versus restricted provision of drinking water on cows in Vietnamese SDFs.
Each per cent increase in dietary P concentration was associated with an increase of up to 4.3 units in PS. To our knowledge, evidence of an association between dietary P and heat stress has not previously been reported. This association might reflect the effects of dietary CP on PS. Crude protein was not included in the PS model due to its variance inflation factor ≥ 10, but the correlation coefficient between P and CP was high. The CP concentration of the diet (16.5% DM) was also in excess relative to energy concentration (1.4 MCal/kg DM) when compared with the concentrations suggested by NRC (2001). When cows are offered diets with excess protein, the excess protein leads to an increase in metabolic heat generated during the excretion of excess nitrogen as urea (Huber et al., 1994; Dunshea et al., 2013), which then might cause an increase in PS.
Animal variables
A higher genetic proportion of BSW in the herds was associated with increases in MILK, ECM, ECMbw, and BCS, which are all desirable. These results were consistent with the results of other researchers. A study by El-Tarabany et al. (2017) reported that pure BSW and F1HOL_BSW cows are more adaptable to the subtropical conditions in Egypt than pure HOL cows, as shown by a slower rate of reduction in milk yield when THI changed from a low to a high level. That study also showed that F1HOL_BSW had a lower incidence of clinical mastitis, metritis, and feet problems than pure HOL and that pure BSW cows had a lower incidence of retained placenta and metritis than pure HOL (El-Tarabany et al., 2017).
A higher genetic proportion of JER was not associated with milk productivity traits but was associated with decreases in HG or BW and BCS. This was expected because mature BW of JER (408 to 454 kg) is often smaller than mature BW of HOL (590–680 kg) and BSW (509–537 kg) (Capper and Cady, 2012; Piccand et al., 2013).
A higher genetic proportion of ZEB was associated with decreases in mPR, ECMbw, HG, and BW. The negative association between the genetic proportion of ZEB with ECMbw was consistent with the findings of a study by Branton et al. (1961), who reported that in a hot and humid climate, all crossbreeds of HOL with Red Sindhi (a ZEB breed) and crossbreeds of BSW with Red Sindhi yielded less milk and fat compared with their pure HOL or pure BSW mates during both winter and summer. Similarly, the negative associations between the genetic proportion of ZEB with HG and BW are understandable because the mature BW of Vietnamese ZEB cattle were very small (249–281 kg) (Duy et al., 2013). A study by Branton et al. (1961) also showed that the mean BW of F1HOL_RSI (1/2 HOL + 1/2 Red Sindhi) and B1HOL_RSI (3/4 HOL + 1/4 Red Sindhi) crossbred cows were smaller than the BW of pure HOL at various ages from birth to 90 days postpartum.
Thus, the associations between the genetic proportion of breeds and the productivity and welfare indicators in the current study suggest that increasing the genetic proportion of BSW rather than increasing the genetic proportion of ZEB could be a more appropriate breeding strategy for Vietnamese SDFs. Unfortunately, HOL were excluded from the models due to VIF > 10; thus, it was impossible to infer the effects of HOL genetic proportions directly.
The strong positive association between BCS and PS is consistent with a study by Cincović et al. (2011), who reported that high BCS cows (BCS > 4, 5-point scale) had less ability to acclimatize to heat stress than normal and thin cows, indicated by lower milk yield and quality and higher rectal temperature and respiration rate compared to other groups. Brown-Brandl et al. (2006) also reported that finished feedlot Angus and Charolais cattle with BCS ≥ 8 (9-point scale) had an average 6.8% higher respiration rate than the lean animals with BCS < 8.
Some limitations
A principal aim of the current study was to identify potential causes of the low productivity and welfare of Vietnamese SDF cows. However, it should be noted that similar to many epidemiological, public health, or social studies, it is by nature an observational study conducted in an inherently noisy environment rather than a randomized experimental study where the confounders are controlled (Glass et al., 2013). Thus, the associations found in our multivariate regression models may not be causal. An observed association can be due to the effects of one or more of the following: chance (random error), bias (systematic error), confounding, reverse causality, or true causality (Lucas and Mcmichael, 2005; Barratt et al., 2009). To minimize these negativities, we applied two strategies. Firstly, we collected as many biologically and theoretically sound independent variables as we could to be included in each model (Glass et al., 2013). Secondly, to judge whether an observed statistical association represents a cause-effect relationship between explanatory and response variables (Ward, 2009; Geneletti et al., 2011), we applied as many as possible of Hill’s (1965) criteria that are commonly applied to epidemiological studies. These criteria include the strength of association, consistency, specificity, temporality, biologic gradient, plausibility, analogy, coherence, and experiment (Hill, 1965). According to this method, briefly, explanations from the literature were searched and considered for each observed association to infer the likelihood of that association being a true cause-effect relationship. Then, intervention strategies were suggested based only on the most likely cause-and-effect relationships between explanatory variable and outcome variables. In the current study, we did not consider the associations between dietary NFC with milk production, between dietary P with PS, and between tAI and DIM as causal associations. Thus, further studies are needed to find clear explanations for these associations.
It also should be noted that changes in variables that could have casual effects need to be large enough to be of practical significance. For example, regarding the effect of altitude, each 100 m increase in altitude was associated with a 0.2-kg increase in ECM. So, when considering regions in which to build cowsheds, one region must be some hundred metres higher than the others to have significant benefit. Similarly, each metre increase in cowshed ridge height was associated with a 0.67-kg increase in ECM, so an increase of 2 to 3 m in ridge height could significantly improve ECM. Further, some effects appeared to be significant but had high standard errors, for example, the effects of eave height on mDM, mat area per cow on BW, or floor area per cow on PS. Thus, the impact of changing those variables in the targeted production and welfare parameters remains uncertain. Therefore, the interventions’ cost-effective and practical perspectives need to be considered, but these perspectives were not included in the current study.
In addition, the current study built the multivariate models only for some selected production and welfare indicators. Many other important production and welfare indicators such as reproduction parameters, mobility, and cow cleanness were not studied. Also, due to the limited number of observations, only 32 SDFs, this study did not consider interactions between the predictor variables.
Conclusion
For Vietnamese SDFs, the following research priorities were identified. Improving shed design to cool the cows ranked as the foremost opportunity to simultaneously improve milk production and cow welfare. Shed improvement research should target reductions in ambient temperature and increased airflow. If possible, build farms in highland regions, but even in highland regions, responses to increases in eave and ridge roof heights, percentage of shed side open, and floor area per cow require testing. Next are dietary interventions. Research needs to target increased dietary dry matter intake and the effects of increased dry matter and fat concentration in the diet on milk production. Research is also needed to test whether a decrease in dietary lignin and phosphorus concentrations can reduce panting score without reducing cows’ milk yield and milk fat concentration. Finally, genetic research should test whether increasing the genetic proportion of BSW but not ZEB in individual cows can improve milk production.
Data availability
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
References
Adesogan, A.T., Arriola, K.G., Jiang, Y., Oyebade, A., Paula, E.M., Pech-Cervantes, A.A., Romero, J.J., Ferraretto, L.F. and Vyas, D., 2019. Symposium review: Technologies for improving fiber utilization. Journal of Dairy Science, 102, 5726–5755 (Elsevier)
Appuhamy, J.A.D.R.N., Judy, J. V., Kebreab, E. and Kononoff, P.J., 2016. Prediction of drinking water intake by dairy cows Journal of Dairy Science, 99, 7191–7205 (Elsevier Inc.)
Arieli, A., Rubinstein, A., Moallem, U., Aharoni, Y. and Halachmi, I., 2004. The effect of fiber characteristics on thermoregulatory responses and feeding behavior of heat stressed cows Journal of Thermal Biology, 29, 749–751 (Pergamon)
Ashbaugh, H.R.B.A., 2010. A Descriptive survey of dairy farmers in Vinh Thinh commune, Vietnam (Master thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus: Ohio, USA)
Bang, N.N., Chanh, N. V., Trach, N.X., Khang, D.N., Hayes, B.J., Gaughan, J.B., Lyons, R.E., Hai, N.T. and David M. McNeill, 2021a. Issues of feeding strategy for lactating cows in Vietnamese smallholder dairy farms Animals, 11, 729
Bang, N.N., Chanh, N. V., Trach, N.X., Khang, D.N., Hayes, B.J., Gaughan, J.B., Lyons, R.E., Hai, N.T. and McNeill, D.M., 2021b. Assessment of performance and some welfare indicators of cows in vietnamese smallholder dairy farms Animals, 11, 674
Bang, N.N., Gaughan, J.B., Hayes, B.J., Lyons, R.E., Chanh, N. V, Trach, N.X., Khang, D.N. and Mcneill, D.M., 2021. Characteristics of cowsheds in Vietnamese smallholder dairy farms and their associations with microclimate — A preliminary study Animals, 11, 1–21
Bang, N.N., Hayes, B.J., Lyons, R.E., Randhawa, I.A.S., Gaughan, J.B. and McNeill, D.M., 2021. Genomic diversity and breed composition of Vietnamese smallholder dairy cows Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 139, 145–160
Barratt, H., Kirwan, M. and Shantikumar, S., 2009. Epidemiology: association and causation. Retrieved 18 August 2020, from https://www.healthknowledge.org.uk/public-health-textbook/research-methods/1a-epidemiology/association-causation
Bernard, J.K., 2015. Nutritional challenges of lactating dairy cattle in a tropical climate In: The 6th international seminar on tropical animal production integrated approach in developing sustainable tropical animal production, (Yogyakarta, Indonesia) (Vol. 1993, pp. 12–17)
Bouraoui, R., Lahmar, M., Majdoub, A., Djemali, M. and Belyea, R., 2002. The relationship of temperature-humidity index with milk production of dairy cows in a Mediterranean climate Animal Research, 51, 479–491
Branton, C., McDowell, R.E., Frye, J.B. and Johns, D.M., 1961. Growth and production characteristics of Holstein-Friesian, Brown Swiss, and Red Sindhi crossbred females in Louisiana and Maryland Journal of Dairy Science, 44, 1344–1355
Brown-Brandl, T.M., Eigenberg, R.A. and Nienaber, J.A., 2006. Heat stress risk factors of feedlot heifers Livestock Science, 105, 57–68 (Elsevier)
Cai, D. Van and Long, V.N., 2002. Investigation of the status of the use of dairy sires and semen straws in the southern Vietnam. Retrieved 27 July 2019, from http://www.trungtamqlkdg.com.vn/TTG_Res/Uploads/Acrobat/nghiencuukhoahoc/hientrangsudungtinh.pdf
Capper, J.L. and Cady, R.A., 2012. A comparison of the environmental impact of Jersey compared with Holstein milk for cheese production1 Journal of Dairy Science, 95, 165–176
Chu, T.K.L., Yokogawa, H. and Kawaguchi, T., 2005. An analysis of the factors affecting dairy cow production in the South east of Vietnam Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 50, 271–294
Cincović, M.R., Belić, B., Toholj, B., Potkonjak, A., Stevančević, M., Lako, B. and Radović, I., 2011. Metabolic acclimation to heat stress in farm housed Holstein cows with different body condition scores African Journal of Biotechnology, 10, 10293–10303 (Academic Journals)
Coppock, C.E., Grant, P.A., Portzer, S.J., Charles, D.A. and Escobosa, A., 1982. Lactating dairy cow responses to dietary sodium, chloride, and bicarbonate during hot weather Journal of Dairy Science, 65, 566–576 (Elsevier)
Cummins, K.A., 1992. Effect of dietary acid detergent fiber on responses to high environmental temperature Journal of Dairy Science, 75, 1465–1471 (Elsevier)
Cuong, V.C., Cuong, P.K. and Cuong, P.H., 2006. Test new diets for HF cows imported from the US raised in Moc Chau - Son La: initial results (in Vietnamese), (National Institue of Animal Science: Hanoi, Vietnam)
Devendra, C. (2001). Smallholder dairy production systems in developing countries: characteristics, potential and opportunities for improvement - review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 14(1), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2001.104 (Journal paper)
Drackley, J.K., Cicela, T.M. and LaCount, D.W., 2003. Responses of primiparous and multiparous Holstein cows to additional energy from fat or concentrate during summer Journal of Dairy Science, 86, 1306–1314 (American Dairy Science Association)
Dunshea, F.R., Leury, B.J., Fahri, F., Digiacomo, K., Hung, A., Chauhan, S., Clarke, I.J., Collier, R., Little, S., Baumgard, L. and Gaughan, J.B., 2013. Amelioration of thermal stress impacts in dairy cows Animal Production Science, 53, 965–975
Duy, N. Van, Tuong, N.D., Van, N.T.B., Huyen, N.T., Hiep, D.T., Phuong, N.V. and Ton, V.D., 2013. Growth performance of crossbred [Brahman x (Vietnamese Yellow x Sindhi)] cattle raising in Red River Delta Journal of Animal Husbandry Sciences and Technics, 6, 61–68
El-Tarabany, M.S., Roushdy, E.M. and El-Tarabany, A.A., 2017. Production and health performance of Holstein, Brown Swiss and their crosses under subtropical environmental conditions Animal Production Science, 57, 1137–1143
Food and Agriculture Organization, 2011. Guide to good dairy farming practice, (Food and Agriculture Organization and International Dairy Federation: Rome, Italy)
Fournel, S., Ouellet, V. and Charbonneau, É., 2017. Practices for alleviating heat stress of dairy cows in humid continental climates: a literature review Animals, 7, 37 (MDPI)
Gaughan, J.B. and Mader, T.L., 2009. Effects of sodium chloride and fat supplementation on finishing steers exposed to hot and cold conditions Journal of Animal Science, 87, 612–621
Geneletti, S., Gallo, V., Porta, M., Khoury, M.J. and Vineis, P., 2011. Assessing causal relationships in genomics: From Bradford-Hill criteria to complex gene-environment interactions and directed acyclic graphs Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, 8, 5 (BioMed Central)
General Statistics Office of Vietnam. 2016. Livestock survey of general statistic office. Retrieved 10 July 2019, from http://nhachannuoi.vn/phat-trien-chan-nuoi-bo-sua-quy-mo-vua-va-nho-hieu-qua-ben-vung/
Glass, T.A., Goodman, S.N., Hernán, M.A. and Samet, J.M., 2013. Causal inference in public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 34, 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124606 (Journal paper)
Herawati, T., Priyanto, D. and Purwantari, N.D., 2016. Economic value of dairy cattle business in the lowlands outside Java In: Proceedings of international seminar on livestock production and veterinary technology (pp. 222–231). https://doi.org/10.14334/proc.intsem.lpvt-2016-p.222-231
Hiep, T., Bang, N.N., Trach, N.X. and Thang, C.M., 2016. Effects of dietary supplementation of cotton seed oil on intake, performance and enteric methane emissions from lactating cows Journal of Animal Husbandry Sciences and Technics (ISSN 1859-476X), 207, 48–56
Hill, A.B., 1965. The environment and disease: Association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58, 295–300 (SAGE Publications)
Huber, J.T., Higginbotham, G., Gomez-Alarcon, R.A., Taylor, R.B., Chen, K.H., Chan, S.C. and Wu, Z., 1994. Heat stress interactions with protein supplemental fat, and fungal cultures Journal of Dairy Science, 77, 2080–2090 (Elsevier)
Knapp, D.M. and Grummer, R.R., 1991. Response of lactating dairy cows to fat supplementation during heat stress Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 2573–2579 (J Dairy Sci)
Kock, N. and Lynn, G.S., 2012. Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 546–580
Könyves, T., Zlatković, N., Memiši, N., Lukač, D., Puvača, N., Stojšin, M., Halász, A. and Miščević, B., 2017. Relationship of temperature-humidity index with milk production and feed intake of Holstein-Frisian cows in different year seasons The Thai Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 47, 15–23
Koonawootrittriron, S., Elzo, M.A. and Thongprapi, T., 2009. Genetic trends in a Holstein × other breeds multibreed dairy population in Central Thailand Livestock Science, 122, 186–192
Lam, V., Wredle, E., Thao, N.T., Man, N. Van and Svennersten-sjaunja, K., 2010. Smallholder dairy production in Southern Vietnam: Production, management and milk quality problems African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5, 2668–2675
Lucas, R.M. and Mcmichael, A.J., 2005. Public health classics association or causation: evaluating links between “environment and disease” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 83, 792–795
Meyer, U., Everinghoff, M., Gädeken, D. and Flachowsky, G., 2004. Investigations on the water intake of lactating dairy cows Livestock Production Science, 90, 117–121 (Elsevier)
Moran, J., 2012. Managing high grade dairy cows in the tropics. Clayton, Victoria, Australia: CSIRO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1071/9780643107892
Moran, J., 2015. Tropical dairy farming: Feeding management for small holder dairy farmers in the humid tropics. CSIRO Publishing. Retrieved from https://anatomiayplastinacion.wikispaces.com/file/view/Tropycal+dairy+farming....pdf
Moran, J., & Doyle, R., 2015. Cow talk: understanding dairy cow behaviour to improve their welfare on Asian farms. Clayton, Victoria, Australia: CSIRO Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.publish.csiro.au/ebook/7929
Moran, J. and Morey, P., 2015. Strategies to increase the domestic production of raw milk in indonesia and other South East Asian Countries In: International Seminar on Tropical Animal Production (ISTAP) (pp. 1–11). (Conference proceeding)
Moran, J.B. and Brouwer, J.W., 2013. Interrelationships between measures of cow and herd performance and farm profitability on Malaysian dairy farms International Journal of Agriculture and Biosciences, 2, 221–233
Nga, B.T., 2017a. An analysis of the fresh milk chain in Ha Nam province of Vietnam Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 1, 33–39
Nga, B.T., 2017b. Efficiency of milk production in small holders of Cu Chi district, Ho Chi Minh city of Vietnam Scholars Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 4, 527–531
Nguyen, M.H., Cesaro, J.D., Pham, D.K., Hoang, V.Q. and Duteurtre, G., 2016. Which is a sustainable development of dairy sector in Vietnam: Dairy household farms or intensive and large scale farms Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 61, 12–21
NRC. (2001). Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://profsite.um.ac.ir/~kalidari/software/NRC/HELP/NRC2001.pdf
Östensson, K., Vo, L., Sjögren, N. and Wredle, E., 2013. Prevalence of subclinical mastitis and isolated udder pathogens in dairy cows in Southern Vietnam Tropical Animal Health and Production, 45, 979–986
Phong, L.V. and Thu, N.V., 2016. Investigation of growth, production and dairy techniques at Song Hau Farm, Long Hoa and Evergrowth Dairy Cow Cooperative in the Mekong Delta Can Tho University Journal of Science, 2, 48–55
Piccand, V., Cutullic, E., Meier, S., Schori, F., Kunz, P.L., Roche, J.R. and Thomet, P., 2013. Production and reproduction of Fleckvieh, Brown Swiss, and 2 strains of Holstein-Friesian cows in a pasture-based, seasonal-calving dairy system Journal of Dairy Science, 96, 5352–5363
Pilachai, R., Schonewille, J.T.T., Thamrongyoswittayakul, C., Aiumlamai, S., Wachirapakorn, C., Everts, H. and Hendriks, W.H., 2013. Diet factors and subclinical laminitis score in lactating cows of smallholder dairy farms in Thailand Livestock Science, 155, 197–204 (Elsevier)
Preez, J.H. du, Hattingh, P.J., Giesecke, W.H. and Eisenberg, B.E., 1990. Heat stress in dairy cattle and other livestock under southern African conditions. III. Monthly temperature-humidity index mean values and their significance in the performance of dairy cattle - PubMed Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 57, 243–248
Raftery, A., Hoeting, J., Volinsky, C., Painter, I., Yeung, K.Y. and Sevcikova, H., 2019. R Package ‘BMA’ version 3.18.10: Bayesian Model Averaging. Retrieved 5 November 2019, from http://stats.research.att.com/volinsky/bma.html
Ravagnolo, O., Misztal, I. and Hoogenboom, G., 2000. Genetic component of heat stress in dairy cattle, development of heat index function Journal of Dairy Science, 83, 2120–2125 (Elsevier)
Renaudeau, D., Collin, A., Yahav, S., De Basilio, V., Gourdine, J.L. and Collier, R.J., 2012. Adaptation to hot climate and strategies to alleviate heat stress in livestock production Animal, 6, 707–728
Richards, S., Vanleeuwen, J., Shepelo, G., Karuoya Gitau, G., Kamunde, C., Uehlinger, F. and Wichtel, J., 2014. Associations of farm management practices with annual milk sales on smallholder dairy farms in Kenya Veterinary World, 8, 88–96
Schneider, P.L., Beede, D.K. and Wilcox, C.J., 1986. Responses of lactating cows to dietary sodium source and quantity and potassium quantity during heat stress Journal of Dairy Science, 69, 99–110 (Elsevier)
Shmueli, G. (2010). To explain or to predict? Statistic Science, 25(3), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1214/10-STS330
Shwartz, G., Rhoads, M.L., Vanbaale, M.J., Rhoads, R.P. and Baumgard, L.H., 2009. Effects of a supplemental yeast culture on heat-stressed lactating Holstein cows Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 935–942 (Elsevier Inc.)
Soriani, N., Panella, G. and Calamari, L., 2013. Rumination time during the summer season and its relationships with metabolic conditions and milk production Journal of Dairy Science, 96, 5082–5094 (Elsevier)
Su, V. Van, & Binh, D. V. (2001). Cattle breeding in Vietnam. In J. Allen & A. Na-Chiangmai (Eds.), Development startegies for genetic evaluation for beef production in developing countries (pp. 98–101). Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR)
Suzuki, K., Kanameda, M., Ogawa, T., Nguyen, T.T.D., Dang, T.T.S., Luu, Q.H. and Pfeiffer, D.U., 2006. Productivity and socio-economic profile of dairy cattle farmers amongst rural smallholder communities in northern Vietnam Livestock Science, 101, 242–250 (Elsevier)
Tao, S., Orellana Rivas, R.M., Marins, T.N., Chen, Y.C., Gao, J. and Bernard, J.K., 2020. Impact of heat stress on lactational performance of dairy cows Theriogenology, 150, 437–444 (Elsevier Inc.)
USDA, 2016. Dairy 2014: Dairy cattle management practices in the United States, 2014, (USDA: Colorado, USA)
Vinamilk, 2017. Vinamilk invests in many high-tech dairy farms (in Vietnamese). Retrieved 14 January 2018, from https://www.vinamilk.com.vn/vi/vung-nguyen-lieu/chi-tiet-tin/383/1515/vinamilk-dau-tu-nhieu-trang-trai-bo-sua-cong-nghe-cao
Vu, N.H., Lambertz, C. and Gauly, M., 2016. Factors influencing milk yield, quality and revenue of dairy farms in southern Vietnam Asian Journal of Animal Sciences, 10, 290–299 (Science Alert)
Ward, A.C., 2009. The role of causal criteria in causal inferences: Bradford Hill’s “aspects of association” Epidemiologic Perspectives and Innovations, 6, 2 (BioMed Central)
West, J.W., 2003. Effects of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle Journal of Dairy Science, 86, 2131–2144
West, J.W., Mullinix, B.G. and Bernard, J.K., 2003. Effects of hot, humid weather on milk temperature, dry matter intake, and milk yield of lactating dairy cows Journal of Dairy Science, 86, 232–242
Wongpom, B., Koonawootrittriron, S., Elzo, M.A. and Suwanasopee, T., 2017. Milk yield, fat yield and fat percentage associations in a Thai multibreed dairy population Agriculture and Natural Resources, 51, 218–222
Yeamkong, S., Koonawootrittriron, S., Elzo, M.A. and Suwanasopee, T., 2010. Effect of experience, education, record keeping, labor and decision making on monthly milk yield and revenue of dairy farms supported by a private organization in central Thailand Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 23, 814–824 (Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
Zimbleman, R.B., Rhoads, R.P., Rhoads, M.L., Duff, G.C., Baumgard, L.H.. and Collier, R.J., 2009. A re-valuation of the impact of temperature humidity index (THI) and black globe humidity index (BGHI) on milk production in high producing dairy cows In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Southwest Nutrition and Management Conference (pp. 158–168)
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Bui Thi Nga and Nguyen Hai Nam for the assistance in getting permissions from local authorities and smallholder dairy farmers to collect the data. We acknowledge Nguyen Thi Thanh Thuy, Nguyen Thanh Hai, and Nguyen Cong Trinh for the assistance with collecting data. We thank the Faculty of Animal Science - Vietnam National University of Agriculture and Faculty of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine - Nong Lam University for preserving the feed and milk samples.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. This research was funded by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), through the project “Improving dairy cattle health and production in Vietnam - AH/2016/02”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, N.N.B., B.J.H., D.M.M., R.E.L., and J.B.G.; methodology, N.N.B., B.J.H., D.M.M., R.E.L., and J.B.G; software, N.N.B.; validation, N.N.B. and D.M.M.; formal analysis, N.N.B.; investigation, N.N.B., N.V.C., N.X.T., D.N.K., and D.M.M; resources, N.N.B., N.X.T., D.N.K., and D.M.M; data curation, N.N.B.; writing—original draft preparation, N.N.B.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, N.N.B.; supervision, B.J.H., D.M.M, R.E.L., and J.B.G.; project administration, D.M.M.; funding acquisition, D.M.M. and N.X.T.; all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the University of Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee, approval number 2016001815 (13 December 2016), and the University of Queensland Animal Ethics Unit, approval numbers ANRFA/SVS/565/16/VIETNAM (13 January 2017) and SVS/010/18/VIETNAM (26 March 2018).
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bang, N.N., Chanh, N.V., Trach, N.X. et al. Multivariate analysis identifying the main factors associated with cow productivity and welfare in tropical smallholder dairy farms in Vietnam. Trop Anim Health Prod 54, 313 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03303-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03303-7