Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of genetic diversity and relationship of the two Sanga type cattle of Botswana based on microsatellite markers

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study was performed to evaluate genetic variation on two Sanga type cattle found in Botswana: Tswana and Tuli using twelve microsatellite markers. All amplified loci were polymorphic with 75 and 77 alleles genotyped in the Tswana and Tuli populations, respectively. The total number of alleles per locus ranged from 2 (BM1818) to 10 (TGLA227) with total mean of 6.25 for Tswana and 6.43 for Tuli population. Almost all the markers showed high polymorphic information content (PIC) apart from BM1818 (0.375) and INRA23 (0.393) which were moderately informative in Tswana population. Most of the markers were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium except for CSSRM60 and CSSM66 loci in Tswana population and ETH10, ETH225 and CSSM66 loci in Tuli population. A total of 103 unique alleles were genotyped across the two breeds with 49-shared, and 26 and 28 were unique to Tswana and Tuli populations, respectively. The expected heterozygosity (He) values were higher than the observed heterozygosity (Ho) in both populations: Tswana (He = 0.7895 ± 0.033 vs Ho = 0.631 ± 0.091) and Tuli (He = 0.8123 ± 0.033 vs Ho = 0.556 ± 0.021). The inbreeding coefficient was 0.200 ± 0.002 and 0.332 ± 0.001 in Tswana and Tuli populations, respectively. Analysis of molecular variance revealed 6.8% of the total genetic variation corresponding to differences between the two breeds and 93.2% within populations. The genetic identity between the two breeds was 56% and there were similar levels of multilocus heterozygosity and allelic diversity in the two breeds. The use of Tswana and Tuli breeds in a crossbreeding programme is likely to result in minimal heterosis and therefore not recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The analysed data is available upon request from the corresponding author.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Barendse, W., Armitage, S.M., Kossarek, L.M., Shalom, A., Kirkpatrick, B.W., Ryan, A.M., Clayton, D., Li, L., Neibergs, H.L., Zhang, N. and Grosse, W.M., 1994. A genetic linkage map of the bovine genome. Nature genetics, 6(3), 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0394-227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baylor College of Medicine Human Genome Sequencing Centre. 2006. Bovine Whole Genome Assembly release Btau-3.1. http://www.hgsc.tmc.edu/project/bovine

  • Beja-Pereira, A., Alexandrino P., Bessa, I., Carretero, Y., 2003. Genetic Characterization of South-Westwern European Bovine Breeds. A historical and Biogeographical Reassessment with a set of 16 microsatellite markers. France. Journal of Heredity, 94(3), 243-50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bessa, I., Pinheiro, I., Matola, M., Dzama, K., Rocha, A. and Alexandrino, P., 2009. Genetic diversity and relationships among indigenous Mozambican cattle breeds. South African Journal of Animal Science, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v39i1.43548

  • Bishop, M.D., Kappes, S.M., Keele, J.W., Stone, R.T., Sunden, S.L.F., Hawkim, G.A., Toldo, A.S., Fries, R., Grosz, M.D., Yoo, J. and Beatti L.W. 1994. A genetic Linkage map for cattle. Genetic Society of America, 136, 619-639.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brezinsky, L.S., Kemp, J. and Teale, A.J., 1993. ILST006 a polymorphic bovine microsatellite. Animal Genetics, 24(1),73-.14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.1993.tb00932.x

  • Cervini, M., Henrique-Silva, F., Mortari, N. and Matheucci Jr, E., 2006. Genetic variability of 10 microsatellite markers in the characterization of Brazilian Nellore cattle (Bos indicus). Genetics and Molecular Biology, 29(3), 486-490.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ema, P.N., Manjeli, Y., Meutchieyié, F., Keambou, C., Wanjala, B., Desta, A.F., Ommeh, S., Skilton, R. and Djikeng, A., 2014. Genetic diversity of four Cameroonian indigenous cattle using microsatellite markers. Journal of Livestock Science, 5, 9-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture organizatin (FAO), 2011. Molecular Genetics Characterization of animal genetic resources. FAO Animal production and Health guidelines. No.9. Rome, Italy http://www.fao.org/home/en/

  • Felius, M., Beerling, M.L., Buchanan, D.S., Theunissen, B., Koolmees, P.A. and Lenstra, J.A., 2014. On the history of cattle genetic resources. Diversity, 6(4), 705-750. https://doi.org/10.3390/d6040705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georges, M. and Massey, J., 1992. Polymorphic DNA markers in Bovidae. World Intellectual Property Organization. Geneva (Patent application WO PUBL NO 92/13102).

  • Gororo, E., Makuza, S.M., Chatiza, F.P., Chidzwondo, F. and Sanyika, T.W., 2018. Genetic diversity in Zimbabwean Sanga cattle breeds using microsatellite markers. South African Journal of Animal Science, 48(1), 128–141. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-e4553e87f

  • Goudet, J., 2002. Fstat version 2.9.3. Lausame (Switzerland). Institute of Ecology. http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.html

  • Guo, S.W. and Thompson, E.A., 1992. Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics, 1:361-72. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, T., Babar, M.E., Peters, S.O., Wajid, A., Ali, A., Azam, A., Ahmad, Z., Wasim, M., Ali, A., Kizilkaya, K. and De Donato, M., 2016. Microsatellite Markers Based Genetic Evaluation of Pakistani Cattle Breeds. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 48(6), 1633-1641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibeagha-Awemu, E.M., Jann, O.C., Weimann, C. and Erhardt, G., 2004. Genetic diversity, introgression and relationships among West/Central African cattle breeds. Genetics Selection Evolution, 36(6), 1-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantanen, J., Olsaker, I., Holm, L.E., Lien, S., Vilkki, J., Brusgaard, K., Eythorsdottir, E., Danell, B. and Adalsteinsson, S., 2000. Genetic diversity and population structure of 20 North European cattle breeds. Journal of heredity, 91(6), 446-457. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/91.6.446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, P., Freeman, A.R., Loftus, R.T., Gallard, C., Fuller, D.Q. and Bradley, D.G., 2003. Admixture analysis of South Asian cattle. Heredity, 91,43-50. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, R.T., MacHugh, D.E., Ngere, L.O., Balain, D.S., Badi, A.M., Bradley, D.G., Cunningham, E.P., 1994. Mitochondrial genetic variation in European, African an Indian cattle populations. Animal Genetics. 25, 265-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.1994.tb00203.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, M.D. and Grosz, M.D., 2002. Genome-wide scans for QTL affecting carcass traits in Hereford x composite double backcross populations. Journal of Animal Science, 80(9):2316-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/ansci/80.9.2316

  • Madilindi, M.A., Banga, C.B., Bhebhe, E., Sanarana, Y.P., Nxumalo, K.S., Taela, M.G., Magagula, B.S. and Mapholi, N.O., 2020. Genetic diversity and relationships among three Southern African Nguni cattle populations. Tropical animal health and production, 52(2),753-762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-02066-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mapiye, C., Chikwanha, O.C., Chimonyo, M., Dzama, K., 2019 Strategies for Sustainable Use of Indigenous Cattle Genetic Resources in Southern Africa. Diversity, 11(11):214. https://doi.org/10.3390/d11110214

  • Metta, M., Kanginakudru, S., Gudiseva, N. and Nagaraju, J., 2004. Genetic characterization of the Indian cattle breeds, Ongole and Deoni (Bos indicus), using microsatellite markers–a preliminary study. BMC genetics, 5(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-5-16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mpofu, N., 2002. The multiplication of Africa’s indigenous cattle breeds internationally: The story of the Tuli and Boran breeds. AGTR Case Study. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI.

  • Ndiaye, N.P., Sow, A., Dayo, G.K., Ndiaye, S., Sawadogo, G.J. and Sembène, M., 2015. Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships in local cattle breeds of Senegal based on autosomal microsatellite markers. Veterinary world, 8(8), 994. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.994-1005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, A.P., Alencar, M.M.D., Oliveira, H.N.D. and Regitano, L.C.D.A., 2005. Association of GH and IGF-1 polymorphisms with growth traits in a synthetic beef cattle breed. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 28(2), 230-236.

  • Podisi B. 2000. Management of farm animal Genetic Resources in Botswana (ed. Chite S. M., Setshogo M.P. & Ben G.). In Proceedings of the second Botswana workshop on plant genetic resources. 20–23 June, Gaborone Botswana. pp50–59.

  • Raymond, M. and Rousset, F., 1995. Genepop (version 1.2) – Population Genetics data: New tools, old concept. Trands in Ecology and Evolution, 12, 313-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01104-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rege, J.E.O. and Tawah, C.L. 1999. The state of African cattle genetic resources II. Geographical distributions, characteristics and uses of present-day breeds and strains. FAO/UNEP Animal Genetic Resources Information Bulletin.26:1-25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehman Z. and Khan, M. S.,2009. Genetic Factors affecting Performance traits of Sahiwal cattle in Pakistan. Pakistan Veterinary Journal, 32(3), 329-333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanarana, Y., Visser, C., Bosman, L., Nephawe, K., Maiwashe, A. and van Marle-Köster, E., 2016. Genetic diversity in South African Nguni cattle ecotypes based on microsatellite markers. Tropical animal health and production, 48(2), 379-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0962-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, 2009. Statistical Analysis Systems (SAS 9.3) Qualification tools user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc: Cary N.C., USA.

  • Scholtz, M.M. and Theunissen A., 2010. The use of indigenous cattle in terminal crossbreeding to improve beef cattle production in Sub-Sahara Africa. Animal Genetic Resources, 46, 33 - 39 https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633610000676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R., Kishore, A., Mukesh, M., Ahlawat, S., Maitra, A., Pandey, A.K. and Tantia, M.S., 2015. Genetic diversity and relationship of Indian cattle inferred from microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA markers. BMC genetics, 16(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-015-0221-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, P., Eggen, A., Stranzinger, G., Fries, R., Dietz, A.B. and Womack, J.E., 1993. Isolation and mapping of polymorphic microsatellites in cattle. Animal Genetics 24(2):121-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.1993.tb00252.x

  • Sunden, L.F., Stones, R.T., Kappes, S.M., Bishop, M.P. and Grosz, M.D., 1993. Relationship between repeat composition and mapping utility of bovine microsatellite markers. In Proceedings of 8th North American Colloquium on Domestic Animal Cytogenetics and Gene Mapping. University of Guelph Guelph, Ontario, Canada (Vol. 175).

  • Toldo, S.S., Fries, R., Steffen, P., Neiberg, H.L., Barendse, W., Womack, J.E., Hetzel, D.J.S. and Stranzinger, G., 1993. Physically mapped, cosmid-derived microsatellite markers as anchor loci on bovine chromosomes. Mammalian Genome, 4(12), 720-727. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trail, J.C.M., Buck, N.G., Light, D., Rennie, T.W., Rutherford, A., Miller, M., Pratchett, D. and Capper, B.S., 1977. “Productivity of Africander, Tswana, Tuli and crossbred beef cattle in Botswana,” Animal Science. Cambridge University Press, 24(1), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100039209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaiman, D., Mercier, D., Moazami-Goudarzi, K., Eggen, A., Ciampolini, R., Lépingle, A., Velmala, R., Kaukinen, J., Varvio, S.L., Martin, P. and Levéziel, H., 1994. A set of 99 cattle microsatellites: characterization, synteny mapping, and polymorphism. Mammalian Genome, 5(5), 288-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389543

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, P., Burton, D. and Williams, J., 2004. Breed relationships and definition in British cattle: a genetic analysis. Heredity 93, 597–602. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800566

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Agricultural Research Council-Animal Production Institute for availing their laboratory (equipment and reagents) for microsatellite marker amplification and for further assisting with data analysis.

Funding

The study was funded by Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TB, SJN and PMK conceptualised the research problem. TB developed the proposal, collected and analysed data. PIM structured the manuscript and SJN and PMK edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. I. Monau.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The blood samples were collected with the assistance of the veterinary officer following animal welfare protocols.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All the authors read the manuscript and approved for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bakae, T., Monau, P.I., Nsoso, S.J. et al. Assessment of genetic diversity and relationship of the two Sanga type cattle of Botswana based on microsatellite markers. Trop Anim Health Prod 54, 210 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03212-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03212-9

Keywords

Navigation