Abstract
The paper considers elastic contact of rough surfaces and develops a simple analytical expression for the stiffness of the contact under tangential loading, which predicts that the contact stiffness is proportional to normal load and independent of Young’s Modulus. The predictions of this model are compared to a full numerical analysis of a rough elastic contact of finite size. The two approaches are found to be in good agreement at low loads, when the asperity spacing is large, but the numerical approach predicts much lower stiffnesses at medium and high loads. It is shown that the overall stiffness cannot exceed that of the equivalent smooth contact, and a simple means of modifying the analytical approach is proposed and validated.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11249-012-0049-y/MediaObjects/11249_2012_49_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11249-012-0049-y/MediaObjects/11249_2012_49_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11249-012-0049-y/MediaObjects/11249_2012_49_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11249-012-0049-y/MediaObjects/11249_2012_49_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11249-012-0049-y/MediaObjects/11249_2012_49_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11249-012-0049-y/MediaObjects/11249_2012_49_Fig6_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11249-012-0049-y/MediaObjects/11249_2012_49_Fig7_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11249-012-0049-y/MediaObjects/11249_2012_49_Fig8_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11249-012-0049-y/MediaObjects/11249_2012_49_Fig9_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The fact that the theorem provides results for Poisson’s ratio equal to zero implies that the tangential and normal stiffness computed using this technique are identical (see Eq. (30)). We have implemented the tangential stiffness calculations to perform explicit comparisons between the analytical and the numerical results.
References
Dowson, D.: History of Tribology. Professional Engineering Publishing, London (1998)
Amontons, G.: De la résistance causée dans les machines. Mémoires de l’Académie Royale A 257–282 (1699)
Coulomb, C.A.: Théorie des machines simples, en eyant égard au frottement de leurs parties et a la roideur des cordages. Mémoires de Mathématique et de Physique de l’Académie Royale 161–342 (1785)
Hertz, H.: Uber die Beruhrung fester elasticher Korper. Jnl. reine und angewandte Mathematik 92, 156–171 (1882)
Cattaneo, C.: Sul contatto di due corpi elastici: distribuzion locale degli sforzi. Reconditi dell Accademia nazionale dei Lincei 27, 342–348, 434–436, 474–478 (1938)
Mindlin, R.D.: Compliance of elastic bodies in contact. J. Appl. Mech. 16, 259–268 (1949)
Johnson, K.L.: Surface interaction between elastically loaded bodies under tangential forces. Proc. R. Soc. A320, 531–548 (1955)
Greenwood, J.A., Williamson, J.P.B.: Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc. R. Soc. A295, 300–319 (1966)
Nowell, D., Dini, D., Hills, D.A.: Recent developments in the understanding of Fretting Fatigue. Eng. Fract. Mech. 73, 207–222 (2006)
Petrov, E.P., Ewins, D.J.: Effects of damping and varying contact area at blade-disk joints in forced response analysis of bladed disk assemblies. Trans. ASME: J. Turbomach. 128(2), 403–410 (2006)
Kartal, M.E., Mulvihill, D.M., Nowell, D., Hills, D.A.: Determination of the frictional properties of titanium and nickel alloys using the digital image correlation method. Exp. Mech. 51(3), 359–371 (2011)
Filippi, S., Akay, A., Gola, M.M.: Measurement of tangential contact hysteresis during microslip. Trans. ASME: J. Tribol. 126, 482–489 (2004)
Berthoud, P., Baumberger, T.: Shear stiffness of a solid–solid multicontact interface. Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 454, 1615–1634 (1998)
Królikowski, J., Szczepek, J.: Assessment of tangential and normal stiffness of contact between rough surfaces using ultrasonic methods. Wear 160, 253–258 (1993)
Johnson, K.L.: Contact Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)
Kartal, M.E., Mulvihill, D.M., Nowell, D., Hills, D.A.: Measurements of pressure and area dependent tangential contact stiffness between rough surfaces using digital image correlation. Tribol. Int. 44, 1188–1198 (2011)
Medina, S., Dini, D., Olver, A.V., Hills, D.A.: Fast computation of frictional energy dissipation in rough contacts under partial slip. Proceedings of the STLE/ASME International Joint Tribology Conference, IJTC 2008, pp. 573–575. ASME (2009)
Akarapu, S., Sharp, T., Robbins, M.O.: Stiffness of contacts between rough surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 204301 (2011)
Campañá, C., Persson, B.N.J., Müser, M.H.: Transverse and normal interfacial stiffness of solids with randomly rough surfaces. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 23, 085001 (2011)
Putignano, C., Ciavarella, M., Barber, J.R.: Frictional energy dissipation in contact of nominally flat rough surfaces under harmonically varying loads. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 59, 2442–2454 (2011)
Jaeger, J.: New Solutions in Contact Mechanics. WIT Press, Southampton, UK (2005)
Greenwood, J.A.: Constriction resistance and the real area of contact. Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 17, 1621–1632
Barber, J.R.: Bounds on the electrical resistance between contacting elastic rough bodies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 459, 53–66 (2003)
Beck, J.V.: Effects of multiple sources in the contact conductance theory. Trans. ASME—J. Heat Transf. 101(1), 132–136 (1979)
Das, A.K., Sadhal, S.S.: Thermal constriction resistance between two solids for random distribution of contacts. Heat Mass. Transf. 35, 101–111 (1999)
Venner, C.H., Lubrecht, A.A.: Multilevel Methods in Lubrication. Tribology Series 37Elsevier, Amsterdam (2000)
Ciavarella, M.: The generalized Cattaneo partial slip plane contact problem. I—Theory, II—Examples. Int. J. Solids Struct. 35, 2349–2378 (1998)
Jäger, J.: A new principle in contact mechanics. Trans. ASME: J. Tribol. 120, 677–684 (1998)
Dini, D., Hills, D.A.: Frictional energy dissipation in a rough hertzian contact. Trans. ASME: J. Tribol. 131, Paper No. 021401 (2009)
Medina, S., Olver, A.V., Dini, D.: The influence of surface topography on energy dissipation and compliance in tangentially loaded elastic contacts, Trans. ASME: J. Tribol. 134, Paper No. 011401 (2012)
Whitehouse, D.J., Archard, J.F.: The properties of random surfaces of significance in their contact. Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 316, 97–121 (1970)
Johnson, K.L., Greenwood, J.A., Poon, S.Y.: A simple theory of asperity contact in elastohydrodynamic lubrication. Wear 19, 91–108 (1972)
Gonzalez-Valadez, M., Baltazar, A., Dwyer-Joyce, R.S.: Study of interfacial stiffness ratio of a rough surface in contact using a spring model. Wear 268, 373–379 (2010)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council under grant numbers EP/E058337/1 and EP/E057985/1. The authors are grateful to Professor J.R. Barber for suggesting the unit cell approach presented in Sect. 2.2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Medina, S., Nowell, D. & Dini, D. Analytical and Numerical Models for Tangential Stiffness of Rough Elastic Contacts. Tribol Lett 49, 103–115 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-012-0049-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-012-0049-y