Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of Controlled Modulation on Interface Tribology and Deformation in Machining

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Tribology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of superimposed, low-frequency modulation on contact conditions at the tool–chip interface and mechanics of machining are analyzed. It is shown that modulation can disrupt the severity of the tool–chip contact, enabling enhanced lubrication of this contact; and discretize chip formation to small dimensions with controlled size and shape. The deformation strain in the chip is also reduced, suggesting a 40% reduction in energy of machining due to the modulation. Conditions of frequency and amplitude for achieving these effects are presented and confirmed using a compact modulation device that can be retro-fitted onto conventional machine platforms. Implications for enhancing efficiency of industrial machining processes are briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shaw, M.C.: Metal Cutting Principles, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nakayama, K.: Studies on the mechanisms of metal cutting. Bull. Fac. Eng. Yok. Natl. Univ. Jap. 8, 1–26 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Doyle, E.D., Horne, J.G., Tabor, D.: Frictional interactions between chip and rake face in continuous chip formation. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. Sect. A 366, 173–183 (1979)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ackroyd, B., Chandrasekar, S., Compton, W.D.: A model for the contact conditions at the tool-chip interface in low-speed cutting of pure metals. J. Tribol. 125, 649–660 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Williams, J.A., Tabor, D.: The role of lubricants in machining. Wear 43, 275–292 (1977)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. De Chiffre, L.: Mechanics of metal cutting and cutting fluid action. Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res. 17, 225–234 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wakabayashi, T., Williams, J.A., Hutchings, I.M.: The kinetics of gas-phase lubrication in the orthogonal machining of an aluminium alloy. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J: J. Eng. Tribol. 209, 131–136 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huang, C., Lee, S., Sullivan, J.P., Chandrasekar, S.: In situ measurement of fluid film thickness in machining. Tribol. Lett. 28, 39–44 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tobias, S., Fishwick, W.: The chatter of lathe tools under orthogonal cutting conditions. Trans. ASME 80, 1079–1088 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Findley, H.: Method and apparatus for cutting material. US Patent 3,174,404, 1965

  11. Kumabe, J.: Vibration cutting—basic principle and application, Jikkyo Shuppan Books (1979), as cited in Zhang, D., Wang, L.: Investigation of chip in vibration drilling, Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manuf. 38–3, 165–176 (1998)

  12. Moriwaki, T., Shamoto, E.: Ultraprecision diamond turning of stainless steel by applying ultrasonic vibration. CIRP Ann. 40, 559–562 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moscoso, W., Olgun, E., Compton, W.D., Chandrasekar, S.: Effect of low-frequency modulation on lubrication of chip-tool interface in machining. J. Tribol. 127, 238–244 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shamoto, E., Moriwaki, T.: Study on elliptical vibration cutting. CIRP Ann. 43, 35–38 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Toews III, H.G., Compton, W.D., Chandrasekar, S.: A study of the influence of superimposed low-frequency modulation on the drilling process. Precis. Eng. 22, 1–9 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chhabra, P.N., Ackroyd, B., Compton, W.D., Chandrasekar, S.: Low-frequency modulation-assisted drilling using linear drives. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 216, 321–330 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mann, J. B., Chandrasekar, S., Compton, W. D.: Tool holder assembly and method for modulation-assisted machining, US Patent Pending, Ser. No. 11/381,513 (2006)

  18. Mann, J.B., Saldana, C., Chandrasekar, S., Compton, W.D., Trumble, K.P.: Metal particulate production by modulation-assisted machining. Scr. Mater. 57, 909–912 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sevier, M.: A finite element approach to predicting deformation field parameters in plane strain machining. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California—Santa Barbara (2007)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation STTR Award 0822879, a National Science Foundation grant CMMI 0654250, the State of Indiana 21st Century Fund and M4 Sciences. We would like to thank Dr. Michael Sevier (University of California, Santa Barbara, CA) for sharing with us some of the results of a finite element analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Chandrasekar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mann, J.B., Saldana, C., Moscoso, W. et al. Effects of Controlled Modulation on Interface Tribology and Deformation in Machining. Tribol Lett 35, 221–227 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-009-9451-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-009-9451-5

Keywords

Navigation