Abstract
Cavitation has been extensively treated in numerical models for lubrication using boundary conditions in the pressure equation, and several criteria are available. However, an inappropriate choice can lead to imprecise results, thus having serious implications for performance prediction. This work proposes the numerical solution for lubrication analysing the changes suffered by the lubricant along a journal bearing, considering the release of gas from the liquid and the existence of a two-phase flow. Results obtained are compared with those using the Reynolds, or Swift-Steiber, boundary condition. The influence of fluid properties on the main parameters of bearing operation is also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Taylor C.M., (1973)J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 15:237
B. Jacobsson and L. Floberg, Trans. Chalmers Univ. Tech. 189 (1957)
Dowson D., Taylor C.M., (1979) Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 11: 35
M. Priest, R.I. Taylor, D. Dowson and C.M. Taylor, Proc. 22nd Leeds-Lyon Symp. Tribology 1995, Tribology Series 31. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1996), p. 441
Priest M., Dowson D. and Taylor C.M., (2000) Proc. IMechE C 214: 435
Tao L., Diaz S., San Andrés L. and Rajagopal K.R., (2000) J. Tribol. 122: 205
Elrod H.G., (1981) J. Lub. Technol. 103: 350
Brewe D.E., (1986) J. Tribol. 108: 628
Talmage G. and Carpino M., (2002) Tribol. Trans. 45:310
Kumar A. and Booker J.F., (1991) J. Tribol. 113:276
Tønder K., (1977) J. Lub. Technol. 99:354
Smith E.H., (1990) J. Lub. Technol. 102: 91
Kicinski J., (1983) Wear 91:65
S. Natsumeda and T. Someya, Proc. 13th Leed-Lyon Symp. Tribology (1986) 65
T. Kawase and T. Someya, Proc. 4th European Tribology Cong. (1987)
Someya T., (2003) Meccanica 38: 643
Barbosa J.R. Jr., Lacerda V.T. and Prata A.T., (2004)Int. J. Ref. 27:129
Feng N.S. and Hahn E.J., (1986) ASLE Trans. 29:361
Motta S.F.Y., Braga S.L. and Parise J.A.R., (2001) HVAC&R Res. 7:331
Na B.C., Chun K.J. and Han D.C., (1997) Tribol. Int. 30:707
Ciantar C., Hadfield M., Smith A.M. and Swallow A., (1999) Wear 236:1
F.P. Grando, M. Priest and A.T. Prata, Proc. 31st Leeds-Lyon Symp. Tribology 2004, Tribology and Interface Eng. Series. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005), p. 481
Zeidan F.Y. and Vance J.M., (1989) Tribol. Trans. 32:100
Yokozeki A., (2002) Int. J. Ref. 25:695
A. Prata, F. Grando, A. Silva and J. Barbosa Jr. Proc. Int. Compressor Conf. at Purdue (2004) C071
Cullen E.J. and Davidson J.F., (1957) Trans. Faraday Soc. 52: 113
Tsuchiya K., Mikasa H. and Saito T., (1997) Chem. Eng. Sci. 52: 4119
Lacerda V.T., Prata A.T. and Fagotti F., (2000) Proc. ASME Adv. Eng. Sys. Div., 40:101
Pinkus O. and Sternlicht B., (1961) Theory of Hydrodynamic Lubrication. McGraw-Hill, New York
Carey V.P., (1992) Liquid-Vapor Phase Change Phenomena. Hemisphere, New York
Nikolajsen J., (1999) Tribol. Trans. 42: 186
Patankar S.V., (1980) Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. McGraw-Hill, New York
Hamrock B.J., (1994) Fundamentals of Fluid Film Lubrication. McGraw-Hill, New York
McLinden M.O., Klein S.A., Lemmon E.W. and Peskin A.W., (1998) REFPROP version 6.0. NIST, Washington DC
Parkins D.W., (1985) Tribol. Int. 18:50
A. Silva, Kynetics and Dynamics of Gas Absorption by Lubricant Oil. Deng Thesis, Fed. Univ. of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil (2004)
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the Programme Al \(\upbeta\) an, the European Union Programme of High Level Scholarships for Latin America, identification number E03D22219BR. Assistance from the Brazilian Compressor Company EMBRACO SA is duly acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A: Calculation of physical properties
Appendix A: Calculation of physical properties
Empiricism is the most common procedure to determine physical properties for oil–refrigerant mixtures, very often adjusting curves from experimental data that has been made available. In this work, properties for the mixture of refrigerant R134a and oil ICI EMKARATE RL10H were calculated using mainly data provided in graphical form by the oil manufacturer. For pure refrigerant, data were obtained from the software REFPROP [34]. This appendix presents the numerical correlations adopted to calculate the physical properties required. For further discussion on the properties of the fluids and the behaviour of this specific mixture, reference is made to Silva [36].
A.1. Solubility
The solubility of R134a in the polyol ester oil ICI EMKARATE RL10H was provided by the oil manufacturer in a diagram and adjusted by curve fitting for the interval 0 < p < 1000 kPa and 0<T<60 °C as,
where a 1=0.6825, b 1=0.0701, c 1=0.0699, d 1=−1.2087× 10−4, e 1=−1.7157× 10−3, f 1=2.4124× 10−3, a 2=1.0, b 2=−3.1315× 10−3, c 2=0.0503, d 2=1.0541× 10−6, e 2=1.3645× 10−3, f 2=−6.4074× 10−5.
A.2. Density
The density for the mixture R134a-EMKARATE RL10H is calculated using the additive law of mixtures. Considering an ideal mixture, the result is presented in equation (A2),
where ρl is the density of the liquid mixture, ρoil the density of the pure oil, ρlr the density of the liquid refrigerant, and w r is the refrigerant mass fraction.
The oil density, provided by the manufacturer and adjusted in the range 20<T<120 °C is given by
where a 3=966.4364, b 3=−0.5739, c 3=−2.447× 10−4, and ρoil the density in kg/m3.
The density of the liquid refrigerant is obtained from the software REFPROP [34] and validated for the interval −5<T<50 °C as follows
where a 4=1294.6790, b 4=−3.2213, c 4=−0.0123, and ρlr the density in kg/m3.
A.3. Dynamic viscosity
The viscosity of the liquid mixture R134a and the polyol ester oil was provided by the oil manufacturer and the following fit is proposed for the interval 0<T<60 °C and 0<w r<1,
where a 5=0.0371, b 5=9.1603× 10−5, c 5=−0.0800, d 5=−2.7390× 10−7, e 5=−0.0435, f 5=−6.0485× 10−5, a 6=1.0, b 6=0.0531, c 6=2.2309, d 6=1.1656× 10−3, e 6=−0.3053, f 6=0.0334; and μl the viscosity (Pa s).
A.4. Properties for the refrigerant in gas phase
The properties of the gas were obtained using the software REFPROP [34], and for the interval 0<p<1600 kPa and 0<T<60 °C the following fits are proposed for density ρg (kg/m3) and viscosity μg (Pa s), respectively,
where a 7=4.2473× 10−3, b 7=−1.9077× 10−4, c 7=0.0448, d 7=3.4605× 10−5, e 7=−2.4624× 10−5, f 7=5.3830× 10−4, a 8=1.0, b 8=0.0155, c 8=−8.2500× 10−4, d 8=4.5680× 10−5, e 8=6.9326× 10−8, f 8=−2.1388× 10−6.
where a 9=10.8186, b 9=−2.6052× 10−3, c 9=0.1451, d 9=3.7658× 10−4, e 9=−2.0170× 10−7, a 9=1.0, b 10=−2.1278× 10−4, c 10=−7.752× 10−9, d 10=9.6695× 10−3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grando, F.P., Priest, M. & Prata, A.T. A two-phase flow approach to cavitation modelling in journal bearings. Tribol Lett 21, 233–244 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-006-9027-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-006-9027-6