Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of Uncoated and Coated Carbide Tools in the Ultra-Precision Machining of Stainless Steel

  • Published:
Tribology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultra-precision machines are widely used to turn aspherical or spherical profiles on mould inserts for the injection moulding of optical lenses. During the turning of a profile on a stainless steel mould insert, the cutting speed reduces significantly to 0 as the cutting tool is fed towards the centre of the machined profile. This paper reports experiments carried out to study the wear of uncoated and PVD-coated carbide tools (carbide tool coated with 2000 alternate layers of AlN and TiN, each layer 1.5 nm and carbide tool coated with 0.5 μm TiN, 5.5 μm TiCN and 0.5 μm TiN) in the ultra-precision machining of STAVAX (modified AISI 420 stainless steel) at low speeds with and without lubricant. A sprayed mixture of compressed air, liquid paraffin oil and cyclomethicone was used as lubricant. Examination of the wear at the rake face of the tool suggests that during machining of the alloy with a hardness of 55 HRC without lubricant, the cutting edge is subjected to high compressive stress, resulting in fracture. Reducing the hardness of the alloy would therefore result in a lower stress acting on the cutting edge, thus rendering the tool less susceptible to fracture. Both the rake and the flank faces of the coated tools exhibited lower wear than the uncoated tools. This was due to the former tools possessing higher fracture resistance owing to the presence of the coating. The lubricant was effective in improving surface finish, preventing surface fracture and reducing flank wear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. X. Ding, W. Y. H. Liew, B. K. A. Ngoi, J. G. K. Gan and S. H. Yeo, Tribol. Lett. 12 (2002) 3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Y. H. Liew, B. K. A. Ngoi and Y. G. Lu, Wear 254 (2003) 265.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Paul, C. J. Evans and R. S. Polvant, in: Proceedings ASPE Spring Topical Meeting on Principles of Cutting Mechanics (1993) 88.

  4. C. Evans, CIRP Ann. 40 (1991) 571.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. O. Ezugwu and K. A. Olajire, Tribol. Letts. 12 (2002) 183.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Jawaid, K. A. Olajire and E. O. Ezugwu, Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs 215 Part B (2001) 769.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Agrawal, A. K. Chakrabarti and A. B. Chattopadhyay, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 52 (1995) 610.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Paro, H. Ha¨ nninen and V. Kauppinen, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 119 (2001) 14.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Jiang, H. Ha¨ nninen, J. Paro and V. Kauppinen, Metall. Mater. Trans. 27A (1996) 2796.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. M. Trent and P. K. Wright, Metal Cutting (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. K. Wright, Metals Tech. 8 (1981) 150.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. K. Wright and E. M. Trent, Metals Tech. 1 (1974) 13.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Chandrasekaran and D. V. Kapoor, J. Eng. Ind., Trans. ASME 87 (1965) 495.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Ren and Y. Altintas, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., Trans. ASME, 122 (2000) 650.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. M. Elkhabeery and J. A. Bailey, J. Eng. Mater. Technol., Trans. ASME 106 (1984) 152.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liew, W., Lu, Y., Ding, X. et al. Performance of Uncoated and Coated Carbide Tools in the Ultra-Precision Machining of Stainless Steel. Tribology Letters 17, 851–857 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-004-8093-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-004-8093-x

Navigation