Skip to main content
Log in

Modification of gibberellin signalling (metabolism & signal transduction) in sugar beet: analysis of potential targets for crop improvement

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Transgenic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sugar beet, Beta vulgaris spp. vulgaris is a biennial long day plant with an obligate requirement for vernalization (prolonged exposure to low temperature). As a spring crop in temperate European climates, it is vulnerable to vernalization-induced premature bolting and flowering, resulting in reduced crop yield and quality. Gibberellins (GAs) play important roles in key physiological processes including stem elongation (bolting) and flowering and are, therefore, potential targets for controlling reproductive growth in sugar beet. We show that the BvGA20ox gene, which encodes an enzyme necessary for GA biosynthesis, was transcriptionally activated in apices of sugar beet plants after vernalization and that GA metabolism can be manipulated to delay bolting in vernalized plants. We demonstrate that down-regulation of GA responses by transformation with the Arabidopsis thaliana gai gene (which represses GA signalling), under its own promoter (pgai::gai) or deactivation of GA by over-expression of the Phaseolus coccineus (bean) GA2ox1 gene, which inactivates GA, increased the required post vernalization thermal time (an accurate and stable measure of physiological time), to bolt by ~300°Cd. This resulted in agronomically significant bolting time delays of ~2 weeks and 3 weeks in the pgai::gai and 35S::PcGA2ox1 plants, respectively. Our data represent the first transgenic sugar beet model to (1) show that GA signalling can be used to improve crops by manipulation of the transition to reproductive growth; and (2) provide evidence that GA is required for seed set in sugar beet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Abe J, Guan GP, Shimamoto Y (1997) A gene complex for annual habit in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Euphytica 94:129–135. doi:10.1023/A:1002963506818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achard P, Herr A, Baulcombe DC, Harberd NP (2004) Modulation of floral development by a gibberellin-regulated microRNA. Development 131:3357–3365. doi:10.1242/dev.01206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Achard P, Cheng H, De Grauwe L, Decat J, Schoutteten H, Moritz T et al (2006) Integration of plant responses to environmentally activated phytohormonal signals. Science 311:91–94. doi:10.1126/science.1118642

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amador V, Monte E, Garcia-Martinez JL, Prat S (2001) Gibberellins signal nuclear import of PHOR1, a photoperiod-responsive protein with homology to Drosophila armadillo. Cell 106:343–354. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00445-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Qin L, Lee S, Fu X, Richards DE, Cao D et al (2004) Gibberellin regulates Arabidopsis floral development via suppression of DELLA protein function. Development 131:1055–1064. doi:10.1242/dev.00992

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chia TYP, Mueller A, Jung C, Mutasa-Gottgens ES (2008) Sugar beet contains a large CONSTANS-LIKE gene family including a CO homologue that is independent of the early-bolting (B) gene locus. J Exp Bot 59(10):2735–2748. doi:10/jxb/ern129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Debenham GB (1999) Bolting and flowering mechanisms in sugar beet, Beta vulgaris, spp vulgaris (L). PhD., University of Nottingham, UK

  • Dijkstra C, Adams E, Bhattacharya A, Page AF, Anthony P, Kourmpetli S et al (2008) Over-expression of a gibberellin 2-oxidase gene from Phaseolus coccineus L. enhances gibberellin inactivation and induces dwarfism in Solanum species. Plant Cell Rep 27:463–470. doi:10.1007/s00299-007-0471-z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Draycott AP (2006) Introduction. In: Draycott AP (ed) Sugar beet. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK, pp 1–8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin JE, Warner RM, Smith AG (2002) Vernalization, photoperiod and GA3 interact to affect flowering of Japanese radish (Raphanus sativus Chinese Radish Jumbo Scarlet). Physiol Plant 115:298–302. doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1150217.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fleet CM, Sun TP (2005) A DELLAcate balance: the role of gibberellin in plant morphogenesis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8:77–85. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2004.11.015

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goudriaan J, Monteith JL (1990) A mathematical function for crop growth based on light interception and leaf area expansion. Ann Bot (Lond) 66:695–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall RD, Riksen-Bruinsma T, Weyens GJ, Rosquin IJ, Denys PN, Evans IJ et al (1996) A high efficiency technique for the generation of transgenic sugar beets from stomatal guard cells. Nat Biotechnol 14:1133–1138. doi:10.1038/nbt0996-1133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hedden P, Phillips AL (2000) Gibberellin metabolism: new insights revealed by the genes. Trends Plant Sci 5:523–530. doi:10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01790-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hedden P, Phillips AL, Rojas MC, Carrera E, Tudzynski B (2001) Gibberellin biosynthesis in plants and fungi: a case of convergent evolution? J Plant Growth Regul 20:319–331. doi:10.1007/s003440010037

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Cerny RE, Qi Y, Bhat D, Aydt CM, Hanson DD et al (2003) Transgenic studies on the involvement of cytokinin and gibberellin in male development. Plant Physiol 131:1270–1282. doi:10.1104/pp.102.018598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaggard KW, Werker AR (1999) An evaluation of the potential benefits and costs of autumn-sown sugar beet in NW Europe. J Agric Sci 132:91–102. doi:10.1017/S002185969800608X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko M, Inukai Y, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Itoh H, Izawa T, Kobayashi Y et al (2004) Loss-of-function mutations of the rice GAMYB gene impair alpha-amylase expression in aleurone and flower development. Plant Cell 16:33–44. doi:10.1105/tpc.017327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lenton JR, Pocock TO, Radley ME (1975) Endogenous gibberellins and bolting of sugar beet. Rothamsted Experimental Station: UK. Rothamsted. Exp Stn Rep 1:44–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Lexander K (1980) Present knowledge of sugar beet bolting mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the 43rd winter congress of the international institute of sugar beet research. Institut International de Resherches Betteravieres, Brussels, pp 245–258

  • Longden P, May MJ, Fisher S (2002) Weed beet control 2002. Br Sugar Beet Rev 7:38–41

    Google Scholar 

  • May MJ (2003) Economic consequences for UK farmers of growing GM herbicide tolerant sugar beet. Ann Appl Biol 142:41–48. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2003.tb00227.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger JD, Dusbabek K (1991) Determination of the cellular mechanisms regulating thermo-induced stem growth in Thlaspi arvense L. Plant Physiol 97:630–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murray F, Kalla R, Jacobsen J, Gubler F (2003) A role for HvGAMYB in anther development. Plant J 33:481–491. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01641.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Owen FV, Carsner E, Stout M (1940) Photothermal induction of flowering in sugar beet. J Agric Res 61:101–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Harberd NP (1993) Derivative alleles of the Arabidopsis gibberellin-insensitive (gai) mutation confer a Wild-type phenotype. Plant Cell 5:351–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Carol P, Richards DE, King KE, Cowling RJ, Murphy GP et al (1997) The Arabidopsis GAI gene defines a signaling pathway that negatively regulates gibberellin responses. Genes Dev 11:3194–3205. doi:10.1101/gad.11.23.3194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips AL, Ward DA, Uknes S, Appleford NE, Lange T, Huttly AK et al (1995) Isolation and expression of three gibberellin 20-oxidase cDNA clones from Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 108:1049–1057. doi:10.1104/pp.108.3.1049

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porter JR, Semenov MA (2005) Crop responses to climatic variation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:2021–2035. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rieu I, Ruiz-Rivero O, Fernandez-Garcia N, Griffiths J, Powers SJ, Gong F et al (2008) The gibberellin biosynthetic genes AtGA20ox1 and AtGA20ox2 act, partially redundantly, to promote growth and development throughout the Arabidopsis life cycle. Plant J 53:488–504. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03356.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwechheimer C (2008) Understanding gibberellic acid signaling—are we there yet? Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:9–15. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2007.10.011

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Semenov MA (2008) Simulation of extreme weather events by a stochastic weather generator. Clim Res 35:203–212. doi:10.3354/cr00731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit AL (1983) Influence of external factors on growth and development of sugar-beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Agricultural Research Reports, PUDOC

  • Sorce C, Stevanato P, Biancardi E, Lorenzi R (2002) Physiological mechanisms of floral stem elongation (bolting) control in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris L.). Agroindustria 1:87–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauch E, Wohlleben W, Puhler A (1988) Cloning of a phosphinothricin N-acetyltransferase gene from Streptomyces viridochromogenes Tu494 and its expression in Streptomyces lividans and Escherichia coli. Gene 63:65–74. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(88)90546-X

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Talon M, Koornneef M, Zeevaart JAD (1990) Accumulation of C19-gibberellins in the gibberellin-insensitive dwarf mutant gai of Arabidopsis thaliana (L) Heynh. Planta 182:501–505. doi:10.1007/BF02341024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas SG, Phillips AL, Hedden P (1999) Molecular cloning and functional expression of gibberellin 2-oxidases, multifunctional enzymes involved in gibberellin deactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:4698–4703. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.8.4698

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas B, Adams S, Collier R, Fellows J, Jenner C, Jaggard KW, Qi A, Semenov MA, Wossink A (2008) AC0301: vulnerability of UK agriculture to extreme events. Interim Report, UK Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), p. 12. http://www.defra.gov.uk/science/project_data/documentlibrary/AC0301/AC0301_6900_IR.doc

  • Tseng TS, Salome PA, McClung CR, Olszewski NE (2004) SPINDLY and GIGANTEA interact and act in Arabidopsis thaliana pathways involved in light responses, flowering, and rhythms in cotyledon movements. Plant Cell 16:1550–1563. doi:10.1105/tpc.019224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Ashikari M, Nakajima M, Itoh H, Katoh E, Kobayashi M et al (2005) GIBBERELLIN INSENSITIVE DWARF1 encodes a soluble receptor for gibberellin. Nature 437:693–698. doi:10.1038/nature04028

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werker AR, Jaggard KW (1997) Modelling asymmetrical growth curves that rise and then fall: applications to foliage dynamics of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L). Ann Bot (Lond) 79:657–665. doi:10.1006/anbo.1997.0387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi S, Kamiya Y (2000) Gibberellin biosynthesis: its regulation by endogenous and environmental signals. Plant Cell Physiol 41:251–257. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcd074

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zentella R, Zhang ZL, Park M, Thomas SG, Endo A, Murase K et al (2007) Global analysis of della direct targets in early gibberellin signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19:3037–3057. doi:10.1105/tpc.107.054999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Broom’s Barn receives financial support from the UK beet industry, administered through the British Beet Research Organisation (http://www.bbro.co.uk/). Rothamsted Research receives grant-aided support from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council of the United Kingdom (http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk/). Dr. Birgitta Debenham is gratefully acknowledged for contributions to the vernalization time-course experiment. Sarah Yallop, and Roz Williamson are gratefully acknowledged for providing technical assistance with preparation, cultivation and analysis of GM plants. Kevin Sawford is acknowledged for assistance with culture and maintenance of plants in the glasshouse and controlled environment rooms. We are grateful to all those who have provided us with sugar beet seeds as specified; and to SES VanderHave, Tienen, Belgium for licensing the guard cell protoplast transformation method to Broom’s Barn. Special thanks go to Guy Weyens and Marc Lefevre for assisting Dr Richard (Rick) Scott in getting the method originally established at Broom’s Barn.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Effie Mutasa-Gottgens.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

11248_2008_9211_MOESM1_ESM.ppt

MOESM1 [Supplement Figure (i) Schematic representation of the PcGA2ox1 expression cassette, with CaMV termination sequences and driven by the strong CaMV35S promoter, in the pFC2 vector backbone; part of the pFC1-6 shuttle vector series (ampicillin resistance marker and ColE1 replication origin), originally developed at John Innes by Dr. David Lonesdale in which the pBluescript SK+ polylinker (MCS) is flanked by rare cutting enzymes. In pFC1-3, the pSK+ polylinker is as shown and in pFC4-6 it is in the opposite orientation.

Supplement Figure (ii) Schematic representation of the pgai::gai::35S::pat transformation construct in pBluescript. The gai gene was driven by its own up and down-stream cis regulatory sequences (~1.5 kb at each end). The pat selection marker gene encodes resistance to bialaphos. Not all restriction sites are shown but the unique sites are presented in red.

Supplement Figure (iii) Histogram showing differences in the actual time (days) taken to bolt in transgenic and non transgenic lines, which was significantly longer that in wild-type plants for both the 35S::PcGA2ox1 ((a); P < 0.01) plants and the pgai:: gai ((b); P < 0.05) plants] (PPT 113 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

Photoperiod and light intensity

Plants were grown at Broom’s Barn (52°16′ N 00°34′ E), except where specified, in the glasshouse at 20–22°C, with a 16 h photoperiod supplemented as necessary by Son/T 400W high pressure sodium lamps (supplied by Thermaforce Ltd, Cockermouth, Cumbria, UK), fixed at ~1.4 m above the bench. The lamps were set to work automatically between 5 am and 9 pm in order to maintain light levels within the glasshouse above 228 μmol m−2 s−1 and to switch off if light levels in the glasshouse exceeded 457 μmol m−2 s−1.

Plant material

The diploid biennial sugar beet line genotype NF, supplied by SES Vanderhave (formerly SES Advanta), Belgium, was used for guard cell protoplast transformation. The bolting susceptible biennial KWS breeding line VV-A/ZR10235 supplied by English Sugar Beet Seed, Sleaford, UK was used for the vernalization time course experiments.

Plant culture and propagation

Guard cell donor plants were grown as previously described (Hall et al. 1996) except that in the growth room (23°C/16 h photoperiod), light (photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) of ~60 μmol m−2 s−1) was supplied from a mixture of Sylvania 58 W Grolux and Biolux (Daystar) light bulbs (GEC Technology, Glasgow, UK). Regenerated plants were transferred to compost (Levington F2S, Scotts Company UK Ltd) and grown in the glasshouse (as above) after acclimation at high humidity in propagators for 1–2 weeks. Seed production from biennial lines required vernalization for 18 weeks as previously described (Chia et al. 2008). Undesired cross-pollination was avoided by using pollen isolation bags (PBS International, Scarborough, UK). When seeds ripened, inflorescences were cut off and hung in a well aerated room to dry for a further 2–3 weeks before seeds were harvested. For the vernalization time-course, post vernalization thermal buffering was achieved by slowly increasing temperature to ambient levels by 2°C every two days while plants remained under continuous low light.

Determining time taken to bolt

The time taken to bolt can be measured as days or as thermal time accumulated above a threshold air temperature, from the date when the fully vernalized plants are returned to the glasshouse until the date when they bolt. Because it was difficult to observe the exact date of bolting and the first bolt height measurement varied from plant to plant, a standard bolt height was required in order to calculate the time taken for the plants to bolt. This standard bolt height was taken to be 5 cm, the previously defined minimum height (Smit 1983), and a functional approach was adopted to determine the time required for the elongating bolt to reach this height. To account for daily temperature fluctuation in the glasshouse, the accumulated thermal time above a threshold of 3°C was related to the sequentially measured bolt height (Werker and Jaggard 1997). With respect to the various growth functions, the expolinear growth equation H = (c/r)ln(1 + exp[r(θθ b)] (Goudriaan and Monteith 1990) was most appropriate for describing the relationship between bolt height and thermal time; where H is the bolt height, θ is the accumulated thermal time after vernalization, r is the initial relative growth rate, c is the maximum absolute growth rate and θ b is the accumulated thermal time at which the bolt passes from exponential to linear growth. Once the parameters of c, r and θ b were estimated, the thermal time and the days taken to a standard bolt height were determined.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mutasa-Gottgens, E., Qi, A., Mathews, A. et al. Modification of gibberellin signalling (metabolism & signal transduction) in sugar beet: analysis of potential targets for crop improvement. Transgenic Res 18, 301–308 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-008-9211-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-008-9211-6

Keywords

Navigation