Advertisement

Transport in Porous Media

, Volume 124, Issue 3, pp 743–766 | Cite as

Guidelines for Numerically Modeling Co- and Counter-current Spontaneous Imbibition

  • Abdul Saboor Khan
  • Abdul Rafey Siddiqui
  • Abdul Salam Abd
  • Nayef Alyafei
Article
  • 115 Downloads

Abstract

We present guidelines for accurately simulating both co- and counter-current spontaneous imbibition (SI) phenomenon in 1D systems. We first consider several cases for this study, which involve strongly water-wet, weakly water-wet and mixed-wet wettability states, to simulate co- and counter-current SI in an oil–water system. We create two separate 1D models on a numerical simulator to simulate and obtain saturation profiles for the different cases. We then match simulation results with saturation profiles obtained through the capillary dominated flow semi-analytical solution proposed by Schmid et al. (Water Resour Res 47(2), 2011, SPE J 21:2–308, 2016). The numerical study evaluates the effect of model orientation and co-ordinate system on the saturation profiles. Moreover, we perform grid sensitivity analysis to choose the optimal number of grid cells, as well as the optimal time steps for the model. We find that capturing 0.25% of core volume in each grid cell is sufficient to numerically model an SI experiment within the acceptable margin of error of 5%. Simulations are performed for 23 different cases based on the SI mode, wettability and mobility ratios. The simulation results in saturation profiles have a mean absolute percentage error from the profile obtained from the semi-analytical solution between 0.14 and 5.41% for counter-current SI for the different wettability states. For most wettability states for the co-current SI, however, we do not get a close match, indicating that the semi-analytical solution does not hold for co-current SI. The paper lists some useful guidelines for simulating SI phenomenon, such as selecting the optimum number of grid cells for the SI model and accounting for capillary backpressure, which could be extended to be applied for simulating coreflooding experiments. This paper also discusses current limitations of the semi-analytical solution. These calibration and sensitivity studies can significantly improve the accuracy of the simulation results.

Keywords

Spontaneous imbibition Capillary dominated flow Numerical simulation Semi-analytical solution Wettability 

List of symbols

F

Capillary dominated fractional flow

F

First derivative of F

F

Second derivative of F

f

Buckley–Leverett fractional flow

ɸ

Porosity

C

Imbibition constant (m/√s)

D

Capillary dispersion coefficient (m2/s)

k

Permeability (m2)

λw

Water mobility (1/Pa s)

λo

Oil mobility (1/Pa s)

λt

Total mobility (1/Pa s)

dPc/dx

Capillary pressure gradient (Pa/m)

qw

Water flow rate (m3/s)

qo

Oil flow rate (m3/s)

krw

Water relative permeability

kro

Oil relative permeability

krw max

Maximum water relative permeability

kro max

Maximum oil relative permeability

Sw

Water saturation

Sw*

Water saturation when capillary pressure is zero

So

Oil saturation

Swi

Initial water saturation

Sor

Residual oil saturation

Pc

Capillary pressure (Pa)

RF

Recovery factor

Pc

Capillary pressure (Pa)

Pentry

Entry capillary pressure (Pa)

Pcb

Capillary back pressure (Pa)

n

Wetting phase exponent

m

Non-wetting phase exponent

l

Capillary pressure exponent

At

Actual value

Ft

Forecast value

ni

Total number of data points

t

Time (s)

x

Distance in the core (m)

ω

Scaling factor (m/√s)

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Texas A&M University at Qatar for funding this project. In addition, we would like to thank Prof. Martin J. Blunt for his insightful comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Akin, S., Schembre, J.M., Bhat, S.K., Kovscek, A.R.: Spontaneous imbibition characteristics of diatomite. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 25(3), 149–165 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alyafei, N., Al-Menhali, A., Blunt, M.J.: Experimental and analytical investigation of spontaneous imbibition in water-wet carbonates. Transp. Porous Media 115(1), 189–207 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alyafei, N., Blunt, M.J.: Estimation of relative permeability and capillary pressure from mass imbibition experiments. Adv. Water Resour. 115, 88–94 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersen, P.Ø., Brattekås, B., Walrond, K., Aisyah, D.S., Nødland, O., Lohne, A., Haugland, H., Føyen, T.L., Fernø, M.A.: Numerical interpretation of laboratory spontaneous imbibition-incorporation of the capillary back pressure and how it affects SCAL. In: SPE Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2017)Google Scholar
  5. Andersen, P.Ø., Qiao, Y., Standnes, D.C., Evje, S.: Co-current spontaneous imbibition in porous media with the dynamics of viscous coupling and capillary back pressure. In: SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2018)Google Scholar
  6. Armstrong, J.S., Forecasting, L.R.: From crystal ball to computer. New York ua (1985)Google Scholar
  7. Behbahani, H., Blunt, M.J.: Analysis of imbibition in mixed-wet rocks using pore-scale modeling. SPE J. 10(04), 466–474 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Behbahani, H.S., Di Donato, G., Blunt, M.J.: Simulation of counter-current imbibition in water-wet fractured reservoirs. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 50(1), 21–39 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blunt, M.J.: Multiphase flow in permeable media: a pore-scale perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buckley, S.E., Leverett, M.: Mechanism of fluid displacement in sands. Trans. AIME 146(01), 107–116 (1942)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, Z.X., Bodvarsson, G.S., Witherspoon, P.A.: Comment on “Exact integral solutions for two-phase flow” by David B. McWhorter and Daniel K. Sunada. Water Resour. Res. 28(5), 1477–1478 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cil, M., Reis, J.C.: A multi-dimensional, analytical model for counter-current water imbibition into gas-saturated matrix blocks. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 16(1–3), 61–69 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans, C.E., Guerrero, E.T.: Theory and application of capillary pressure. In: SPWLA 20th annual logging symposium. Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts (1979)Google Scholar
  14. Fernø, M.A., Haugen, Å., Mason, G., Morrow, N.R.: Measurement of core properties using a new technique–two ends open spontaneous imbibition. In: Proceedings of Society of Core Analysts held in Avignon, France (2014)Google Scholar
  15. Foley, A.Y., Nooruddin, H.A., Blunt, M.J.: The impact of capillary backpressure on spontaneous counter-current imbibition in porous media. Adv. Water Resour. 107, 405–420 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haugen, Å., Fernø, M.A., Mason, G., Morrow, N.R.: Capillary pressure and relative permeability estimated from a single spontaneous imbibition test. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 115, 66–77 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kashchiev, D., Firoozabadi, A.: Analytical solutions for 1D countercurrent imbibition in water-wet media. SPE J. 8(04), 401–408 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Khan, A.S., Alyafei, N.: Investigation of an analytical solution for spontaneous imbibition to effectively estimate special core analysis SCAL properties (Russian). In: SPE Annual Caspian Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2017)Google Scholar
  19. Li, K., Horne, R.N.: Characterization of spontaneous water imbibition into gas-saturated rocks. In: SPE/AAPG Western Regional Meeting. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2000)Google Scholar
  20. Li, K., Horne, R.N.: Generalized scaling approach for spontaneous imbibition: an analytical model. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 9(03), 251–258 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mason, G., Fischer, H., Morrow, N.R., Johannesen, E., Haugen, Å., Graue, A., Fernø, M.A.: Oil production by spontaneous imbibition from sandstone and chalk cylindrical cores with two ends open. Energy Fuels 24(2), 1164–1169 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mason, G., Morrow, N.R.: Developments in spontaneous imbibition and possibilities for future work. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 110, 268–293 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McWhorter, D.B., Sunada, D.K.: Exact integral solutions for two-phase flow. Water Resour. Res. 26(3), 399–413 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McWhorter, D.B., Sunada, D.K.: Reply [to “Comment on ‘Exact integral solutions for two-phase flow’ by David B. McWhorter and Daniel K. Sunada”]. Water Resour. Res. 28(5), 1479 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morrow, N.R., Mason, G.: Recovery of oil by spontaneous imbibition. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 6(4), 321–337 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nooruddin, H.A., Blunt, M.J.: Analytical and numerical investigations of spontaneous imbibition in porous media. Water Resour. Res. 52(9), 7284–7310 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pooladi-Darvish, M., Firoozabadi, A.: Cocurrent and countercurrent imbibition in a water-wet matrix block. SPE J. 5(01), 3–11 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Qi, R., LaForce, T.C., Blunt, M.J.: Design of carbon dioxide storage in aquifers. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 3(2), 195–205 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ruth, D.W., Mason, G., Fernø, M.A., Haugen, Å., Morrow, N.R., Arabjamaloei, R.: Numerical simulation of combined co-current/counter-current spontaneous imbibition. In: International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, pp. 16–21 (2015)Google Scholar
  30. Schembre, J., Akin, S., Kovscek, A.R.: Spontaneous imbibition in low permeability media. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University (1998)Google Scholar
  31. Schmid, K.S., Geiger, S., Sorbie, K.S.: Semianalytical solutions for cocurrent and countercurrent imbibition and dispersion of solutes in immiscible two-phase flow. Water Resour. Res. 47(2), W02550 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmid, K.S., Geiger, S.: Universal scaling of spontaneous imbibition for water-wet systems. Water Resour. Res. 48(3), W03507 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schmid, K.S., Geiger, S.: Universal scaling of spontaneous imbibition for arbitrary petrophysical properties: water-wet and mixed-wet states and Handy’s conjecture. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 101, 44–61 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmid, K.S., Alyafei, N., Geiger, S., Blunt, M.J.: Analytical solutions for spontaneous imbibition: fractional-flow theory and experimental analysis. SPE J. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.2118/184393-PA Google Scholar
  35. Suzanne, K., Hamon, G., Billiotte, J., Trocme, V.: Experimental relationships between residual gas saturation and initial gas saturation in heterogeneous sandstone reservoirs. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2003)Google Scholar
  36. Unsal, E., Mason, G., Morrow, N.R., Ruth, D.W.: Co-current and counter-current imbibition in independent tubes of non-axisymmetric geometry. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 306(1), 105–117 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yortsos, Y.C., Fokas, A.S.: An analytical solution for linear waterflood including the effects of capillary pressure. Soc. Petrol. Eng. J. 23(01), 115–124 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang, X., Morrow, N.R., Ma, S.: Experimental verification of a modified scaling group for spontaneous imbibition. SPE Reserv. Eng. 11(04), 280–285 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdul Saboor Khan
    • 1
  • Abdul Rafey Siddiqui
    • 1
  • Abdul Salam Abd
    • 1
  • Nayef Alyafei
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Petroleum EngineeringTexas A&M University at QatarDohaQatar

Personalised recommendations