Skip to main content
Log in

Miscible and Immiscible Foam Injection for Mobility Control and EOR in Fractured Oil-Wet Carbonate Rocks

  • Published:
Transport in Porous Media Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foam injection is a proven enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technique for heterogeneous reservoirs, but is less studied for EOR in fractured systems. We experimentally investigated tertiary \(\text {CO}_{2}\) injections, and \(\text {N}_{2}\)- and \(\text {CO}_{2}\)-foam injections for enhanced oil recovery in fractured, oil-wet limestone core plugs. Miscible \(\text {CO}_{2}\) and \(\text {CO}_{2}\)-foam was compared with immiscible \(\text {CO}_{2}\)- and \(\text {N}_{2}\)-foam as tertiary recovery techniques, subsequent to waterfloods, in fractured rocks with different wettability preferences. At water-wet conditions waterfloods produced approximately 40 % OOIP, by spontaneous imbibition. Waterflood oil recovery at oil-wet conditions was below 20 % OOIP, due to suppressed imbibition where water predominantly flowed through the fractures, unable to mobilize the oil trapped in the matrix. Tertiary, supercritical \(\text {CO}_{2}\)-mobilized oil trapped in the matrix, particularly at weakly oil-wet conditions, by diffusion. Recovery by diffusion was high due to small core samples, high initial oil saturation and a continuous oil phase at oil-wet conditions. Both immiscible \(\text {CO}_{2}\)- and \(\text {N}_{2}\)-foams and miscible, supercritical \(\text {CO}_{2}\)-foam demonstrated high ultimate oil recoveries, but immiscible foam was less efficient (30 pore volumes injected) compared to miscible foam (2 pore volumes injected) to reach ultimate recovery. This is explained by the capillary threshold pressure preventing the injected \(\text {N}_{2}\) gas from entering the matrix, verified by computed X-ray tomography, and the mobilized oil was displaced by the aqueous surfactant in the foam. At miscible conditions, there exists no capillary entry pressure between the oil-saturated matrix and the injected \(\text {CO}_{2}\), allowing foam to invade the matrix for efficient oil recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Rf:

Recovery factor (fraction or % of OIP)

MMP:

Minimum miscibility pressure

EOR:

Enhanced oil recovery

IFT:

Interfacial tension

OOIP:

Original oil in place

\(\text {f}_\mathrm{g}\) :

gas fraction

\(\Phi \) :

Porosity

Pc:

Capillary pressure

\(A\) :

Cross section area

\(K\) :

Absolute permeability

\(K_{\text {e,i}}\) :

Effective permeability

\(k_\mathrm{r,w}\) :

Relative permeability for water

\(k_\mathrm{r,o}\) :

Relative permeability for oil

\(L\) :

Core length

Sg :

Gas saturation

\(S_{\text {oi}}\) :

Initial oil saturation

\(S_{\text {o}}\) :

Oil saturation

BET:

Brunauer–Emmett–Teller

\(S_{\text {wi}}\) :

Initial water saturation

\(S_{\text {or,w}}\) :

Residual oil saturation after waterflood

\(S_{\text {or},CO_2}\) :

Residual oil saturation after \(\text {CO}_{2}\) flood

\(S_{\text {or,foam}}\) :

Residual oil saturation after foam flood

\(R_{\text {f,w}}\) :

Recovery factor from waterflood (% OIP)

\(R_{\mathrm{f},CO_2}\) :

Recovery factor from CO2 flood (% OIP)

\(R_\mathrm{{f,foam}}\) :

Recovery factor from foam flood (% OIP)

\(R_\mathrm{{f,total}}\) :

Total recovery factor from all floods (% OIP)

\(I_\mathrm{{AH}}\) :

Amott–Harvey wettability index

\(\upmu \) :

Fluid viscosity

\(\Delta P\) :

Pressure drop

P:

Pressure

T:

Temperature

References

  • Alkan, H., Goktekin, A., Satman, A.: A Laboratory Study of CO\(_2\)-Foam Process for Bati Raman Field, Turkey. Middle East Oil Show, Bahrain (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Amott, E.: Observations relating to the wettability of porous rock. Trans. AIME 216, 156–162 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Asghari, K., Torabi F.: Effect of Miscible and Immiscible CO\(_2\) Injection on Gravity Drainage: Experimental and Simulation Results, Society of Petroleum Engineers (2008)

  • Aspenes, E., Graue, A., Ramsdal, J.: In situ wettability distribution and wetting stability in outcrop chalk aged in crude oil. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 39(3–4), 337–350 (2003)

  • Bertin, H.J., Apaydin, O.G., Castanier, L.M., Kovscek, A.R.: Foam flow in heterogeneous porous media: effect of cross flow. SPE J. (06) (1999)

  • Bijeljic, B., Muggeridge, A.H., Blunt, M.J.: Multicomponent mass transfer across water films during hydrocarbon gas injection. Chem. Eng. Sci. 58, 2377–2388 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blunt, M.J.: Flow in porous media-pore-network models and multiphase flow. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 6(3), 197–207 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boerrigter, P.M., Verlaan, M., Yang, D.: EOR Methods To Enhance Gas Oil Gravity Drainage. SPE/EAGE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference. Abu Dhabi, UAE (2007)

  • Brunauer, S., Emmett, P.H., Teller, E.: Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60(2), 309–319 (1938)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchgraber, M., Castanier, L M., Kovscek, A.R.: Microvisual investigation of foam flow in ideal fractures: role of fracture aperture and surface roughness. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. San Antonio, TX, Society of Petroleum Engineers (2012)

  • Casteel, J.F., Djabbarah, N.F.: Sweep improvement in CO\(_2\) flooding by use of foaming agents. SPE Reserv. Eng. 3(4), 1186–1192 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, S.H.L., Restrepo, A., Ocampo, A.: Use of divergent fluids as an alternative for enhanced recovery in naturally fractured cores. Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference. Cartagena de Indias, Colombia (2009)

  • Chou, S.I.: Conditions for generating foam in porous media. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Dallas, Texas (1991)

  • Du, D.X., Beni, A.N., Farajzadeh, R., Zitha, P.L.J.: Effect of water solubility on carbon dioxide foam flow in porous media: an X-ray computed tomography study. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47(16), 6298–6306 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enick, R.M., Olsen, D.K., Ammer, J.R., Schuller, W.: Mobility and Conformance Control for CO\(_2\) EOR via Thickeners, Foams, and Gels—A Literature Review of 40 Years of Research and Pilot Tests. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2012)

  • Farajzadeh, R., Andrianov, A., Bruining, H., Zitha, P.L.J.: Comparative study of CO\(_2\) and N\(_2\)-foams in porous media at low and high pressure-temperatures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48(9), 4542–4552 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farajzadeh, R., Andrianov, A., Zitha, P.L.J.: Investigation of immiscible and miscible foam for enhancing oil recovery. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49(4), 1910–1919 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farajzadeh, R., Wassing, L.B.M., Boerrigter, P.M.: Foam assisted gas oil gravity drainage in naturally-fractured reservoirs. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Florence, Italy (2010)

  • Fernø M. A., Haugen, Å., Graue, A.: Visualizing oil displacement in fractured carbonate rocks—impacts on oil recovery at different hydrostatic stress and wettability conditions. 44th US Rock Mechanics Symposium and 5th U.S.-Canada Rock Mechanics Symposium, Salt Lake City, UT, USA (2010)

  • Fernø, M.A., Torsvik, M., Haugland, S., Graue, A.: Dynamic laboratory wettability alteration. Energy Fuels 24(7), 3950–3958 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, F., Chen, W.H., Gauglitz, P.A.: Experimental and simulation study of high-temperature foam displacement in porous media. SPE Reserv. Eng. 6(1), 37–45 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger-Boschung, S., Matthäi, S.K., Niessner, J., Helmig, R.: Black-oil simulations for three-component, three-phase flow in fractured porous media. SPE J. 14(2), 338–354 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graue, A., Aspenes, E., Bogno, T., Moe, R.W., Ramsdal, J.: Alteration of wettability and wettability heterogeneity. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 33(1–3), 3–17 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graue, A., Nesse, K., Baldwin, B.A., Spinler, E.A., Tobola, D.: Impact of fracture permeability on oil recovery in moderately water-wet fractured chalk reservoirs. SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, OK, USA (2002)

  • Graue, A., Viksund, B.G., Baldwin, B.A.: Reproducible wettability alteration of low-permeable outcrop chalk. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 2(2), 134–140 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, A., Ferno, M.A., Graue, A., Bertin, H.J.: Experimental study of foam flow in fractured oil-wet limestone for enhanced oil recovery. SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA (2010)

  • Haugen, Å., Fernø, M.A., Graue, A., Bertin, H.J.: Experimental study of foam flow in fractured oil-wet limestone for enhanced oil recovery. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 2, 134–140 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, Å., Fernø, M.A., Graue, A., Bertin, H.J.: Experimental study of foam flow in fractured oil-wet limestone for enhanced oil recovery. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 15(2), 218–228 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, R.L., et al.: Field test of foam to reduce CO\(_2\) cycling. SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Tulsa, OK, USA (1996)

  • Hirasaki, G.J., Lawson, J.B.: Mechanisms of foam flow in porous media: apparent viscosity in smooth capillaries. SPEJ 25(2), 176–190 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirasaki, G.J., Miller, C.A., Szafranski, R., Tanzil, D., Lawson, J.B., Meinardus, H., Jin, M., Londergan, J.T., Jackson, R.E., Pope, G.A., Wade, W.H.: Field Demonstration of the Surfactant/Foam Process for Aquifer Remediation, Society of Petroleum Engineers (1997)

  • Holm, L.W., Garrison, W.H.: CO\(_2\) Diversion with foam in an immiscible CO\(_2\) field project. SPE Reserv. Eng. 3(1), 112–118 (1988)

  • Iglauer, S., Fernø, M.A., Shearing, P., Blunt, M.J.: Comparison of residual oil cluster size distribution, morphology and saturation in oil-wet and water-wet sandstone. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 375(1), 187–192 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovscek, A.R., Patzek, T.W., Radke, C.J.: A mechanistic population balance model for transient and steady-state foam flow in Boise sandstone. Chem. Eng. Sci. 50(23), 3783–3799 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovscek, A.R., Tang, G.Q., Radke, C.J.: Verification of Roof snap off as a foam-generation mechanism in porous media at steady state. Colloids Surf. A 302(1–3), 251–260 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovscek, A.R., Tretheway, D.C., Persoff, P., Radke, C.J.: Foam flow-through a transparent rough-walled rock fracture. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 13(2), 75–86 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lescure, B.M., Claridge, E.L.: CO\(_2 \) Foam flooding performance vs. rock wettability. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Copyright 1986, Society of Petroleum Engineers, New Orleans, Louisiana (1986)

  • Li, R., Bleu, R.B.L., Liu, S., Hirasaki, G.J., Miller, C.A.: Foam mobility control for surfactant EOR. SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA (2008)

  • Li, R.F., Yan, W., Liu, S., Hirasaki, G., Miller, C.A.: Foam mobility control for surfactant enhanced oil recovery. SPEJ 12(1), 5–18 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamun, C.K., Rong, J.G., Kam, S.I., Liljestrand, H.M., Rossen, W.R.: Extending Foam Technology from Improved Oil Recovery to Environmental Remediation. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2002)

  • Moortgat, J., Firoozabadi, A.: Higher-order compositional modeling with Fickian diffusion in unstructured and anisotropic media. Adv. Water Resour. 33(9), 951–968 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolov, A.D., Wasan, D.T., Huang, D.W., Edwards, D.A.: The effect of oil on foam stability: mechanisms and implications for oil displacement by foam in porous media. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. New Orleans, Louisiana (1986)

  • Panahi, H.: Improving the recovery factor of heavy crude reservoirs by co-injecting CO\(_2\) and other conventional gaseous injecting materials at immiscibility condition with foam. SPE International Petroleum Conference in Mexico. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Puebla Pue, Mexico (2004)

  • Pancharoen, M., Fernø, M.A., Kovscek, A.R.: Modeling foam displacement in fractures. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 100, 50–58 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossen, W.R.: Foam in enhanced oil recovery. In: Prud’homme, R.K., Khan, S. (eds.) Foams: Theory Measurement and Applications. Marcel Dekker, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryazanov, A.V., Dijke, M.I.J., Sorbie, K.S.: Two-phase pore-network modelling: existence of oil layers during water invasion. Transp. Porous Media 80(1), 79–99 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, A., Jones, R. M., Rabie, A., Putra, E., Linroth, M.A., Nguyen, Q.P.: Implementation of a CO\(_2\) Foam Pilot Study in the SACROC Field: Performance Evaluation. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2012)

  • Seth, S., Morrow, N.R.: Efficiency of the conversion of work of drainage to surface energy for sandstone and carbonate. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 10(4), 338–347 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J.E., Harpole, K.J., Zornes, D.R., Martin, F.D.: CO\(_2\) Foam Field Verification Pilot Test at EVGSAU: Phase II—Foam Injection Design and Operating Plan. Society of Petroleum Engineers (1992)

  • Lake, L.W.: Enhanced Oil Recovery. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G.C.: A Laboratory Study of CO\(_2\) Foam Properties and Displacement Mechanism. SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma (1984)

  • Yaghoobi, H., Heller, J.P.: Effect of capillary contact on CO\(_2\)-foam mobility in heterogeneous core samples. Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference. Midland, Texas (1996)

  • Yan, W., Miller, C.A., Hirasaki, G.J.: Foam sweep in fractures for enhanced oil recovery. Colloids Surf. A 282—-283, 348–359 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuta, J., Fjelde, I., Berenblym, R.A.: Oil Recovery during CO\(_2\)-foam injection in fractured chalk at reservoir conditions. International Symposium, Society of Core Analysts, Noordwijk, Netherlands (1990)

  • Zuta, J., Fjelde, I.: Transport of CO\(_2\)-foaming agents during CO\(_2\)-foam processes in fractured chalk rock. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 13(4), 710–719 (2010)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin A. Fernø.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haugen, Å., Mani, N., Svenningsen, S. et al. Miscible and Immiscible Foam Injection for Mobility Control and EOR in Fractured Oil-Wet Carbonate Rocks. Transp Porous Med 104, 109–131 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-014-0323-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-014-0323-6

Keywords

Navigation