Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Micropropagation of Brassavola nodosa (L.) Lindl. using SETIS™ bioreactor

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Brassavola nodosa (L.) Lindl. is a tropical epiphytic orchid showing characteristics of interest for the ornamental nursery industry, as well as considered as an endangered species. Problems with traditional propagation methods limit the development of a large-scale commercial production system. The use of micropropagation has been investigated for this species, and the use of liquid in vitro systems showed potential for use of temporary immersion systems, also called temporary immersion bioreactors (TIB) for micropropagation of B. nodosa. This study evaluated the efficiency of the SETIS™ TIBs for the micropropagation of B. nodosa. Explants consisting of young shoots tips measuring between 0.3 and 0.5 cm were collected from 1-yr-old in vitro seedlings of B. nodosa and used for shoot multiplication. Four culture systems were evaluated: a semi-solid in vitro system consisting of 160 mm × 100 mm TP1600 Microbox containing 500 ml semi-solid medium as a control, and a liquid in vitro system consisting of 4 L temporary immersion bioreactor (SETIS™, VERVIT, Belgium) containing 500 ml liquid medium with immersion and aeration frequencies of 2 h, 4 h, and 8 h. For all bioreactor treatments, duration of immersion and aeration was 2 min. Results showed that temporary immersion of B. nodosa explants with a frequency of 2 h and duration of 2 min returned the highest multiplication rates, with 4.6 shoots produced per explant compared with 2.8 shoots per explant in semi-solid agar-based systems. The use of bioreactors also promoted increased growth and development and in vitro rooting, therefore improving survival, and facilitating acclimatization of in vitro-derived plantlets. This is the first study demonstrating a successful protocol for micropropagation of B. nodosa using SETIS™ bioreactors, which could have significant value and impact for the commercial production of this species as well as for conservation purposes.

Key message

Micropropagation of Brassavola nodosa was achieved using SETIS temporary immersion bioreactors, showing good multiplication rates, increased growth and development and in vitro rooting, thus improving survival and acclimatization ex vitro.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Afreen F (2008) Temporary immersion bioreactor. Plant tissue culture engineering. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 187–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Aragón CE, Escalona M, Rodriguez R, Cañal MJ, Capote I, Pina D, González-Olmedo J (2010) Effect of sucrose, light, and carbon dioxide on plantain micropropagation in temporary immersion bioreactors. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 46(1):89–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragón CE, Sánchez C, Gonzalez-Olmedo J, Escalona M, Carvalho L, Amâncio S (2014) Comparison of plantain plantlets propagated in temporary immersion bioreactors and gelled medium during in vitro growth and acclimatization. Biol Plant 58(1):29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arditti J, Ernst R (1993) Micropropagation of orchids. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello-Bello JJ, Cruz-Cruz CA, Pérez-Guerra JC (2019) A new temporary immersion system for commercial micropropagation of banana (Musa AAA cv. Grand Naine). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 55(3):313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhoite HA, Palshikar GS (2014) Plant tissue culture: a review. World J Pharm Sci 2:565–572

  • Chiapim C, Souza-Leal T, Cordeiro GM, Massaro R, Moraes CP (2012) Crescimento in vitro em diferentes meios de cultura: avaliação do híbrido Brassavola perrinii Lindl. X Cattleya Loddigesii Lindl Orquidário 26:57–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Chugh S, Guha S, Rao IU (2009) Micropropagation of orchids: a review on the potential of different explants. Sci Hort 122(4):507–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devi J, Borthakur B, Deka P (1997) Clonal propagation of Dendrobium moschatum and Cymbidium aloifolium through shoot tip culture. J Orchid Soc India 11(1–2):19–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Divakaran M, Babu KN, Ravindran PN, Peter KV (2015) Biotechnology for micropropagation and enhancing variations in vanilla. Asian J Plant Sci Res 5:52–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Escalona M, Lorenzo JC, González B, Daquinta M, González JL, Desjardins Y, Borroto CG (1999) Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr) micropropagation in temporary immersion systems. Plant Cell Rep 18(9):743–748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne H, Berthouly M (2002) Temporary immersion systems in plant micropropagation. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 69:215–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiev V, Schumann A, Pavlov A, Bley T (2014) Temporary immersion systems in plant biotechnology. Eng Life Sci 14(6):607–621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hempfling T, Preil W (2005) Application of a temporary immersion system in mass propagation of Phalaenopsis. In: Hvoslef-Eide AK, Preil W (eds) Liquid culture systems for in vitro plant propagation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 231–242

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi P, Joshi N, Purohit SD (2006) Stomatal characteristics during micropropagation of Wrightia tomentosa. Biol Plant 50(2):275–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalimuthu K, Senthilkumar R, Murugalatha N (2006) Regeneration and mass multiplication of Vanilla planifolia Andr.–a tropical orchid. Curr Sci 91:1401–1403

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Asthana M (2020) In vitro culture of commercial flowering plant: orchids. Society for Environmental Resources and Biotechnology Development (SERBD Books). Lawyers Colony, India

  • Kumar N, Reddy M (2011) In vitro plant propagation: a review. J for Environ Sci 27(2):61–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Larraburu EE, Bususcovich AC, Llorente BE (2016) Azospirillum brasilense improves in vitro and ex vitro rooting-acclimatization of jojoba. Sci Hort 209:139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leyva-Ovalle OR, Bello-Bello JJ, Murguía-González J, Núñez-Pastrana R, Ramírez-Mosqueda MA (2020) Micropropagation of Guarianthe skinneri (Bateman) Dressler et W. E. Higging in temporary immersion systems. 3 Biotech 10(1):26

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mancilla-Álvarez E, Pérez-Sato JA, Núñez-Pastrana R, Spinoso-Castillo JL, Bello-Bello JJ (2021) Comparison of different semi-automated bioreactors for in vitro propagation of taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott). Plants 10(1010):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Estrada E, Islas-Luna B, Pérez-Sato JA, Bello-Bello JJ (2019) Temporary immersion improves in vitro multiplication and acclimatization of Anthurium andreanum Lind. Sci Hort 249:185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mata-Rosas M, Lastre-Puertos E (2015) Long-term conservation of protocorms of Brassavola Nodosa (L.) Lind (Orchidaceae): effect of ABA and a range of cryoconservation techniques. CryoLetters 36(5):289–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mengarda LHG, Cola GPA, de Oliveira SC, de Freitas AR (2017) Multiplication, rooting in vitro, and acclimatization of Brassavola tuberculata Hook. (Orchidaceae), an orchid endemic to the Brazilian atlantic rainforest. Biosci J 33(3):730–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15(3):473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy HN, Paek K-Y, Park S-Y (2018) Micropropagation of orchids by using bioreactor technology. In: Lee Y-I, Yeung EC-T (eds) Orchid propagation: from laboratories to greenhouses—methods and protocols. Springer, New York, pp 195–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann KH, Kumar A, Imani J (2009) In vitro propagation of Cymbidium. In: Neumann KH, Kumar A, Imani J (eds) Plant cell and tissue culture—a tool in biotechnology—basics and application. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 83–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowakowska K, Marciniak P, Pacholczak, (2022) A protocol for efficient micropropagation of rare orchid Vanda brunnea Rchb.f. South Afr J Bot 150:233–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paek KY, Hahn EJ, Park SY (2011) Micropropagation of Phalaenopsis orchids via protocorms and protocorm-like bodies. In: Thorpe TA, Yeung C (eds) Methods in molecular biology. Plant embryo culture: methods and protocols, vol 392. Springer Science Business Media, Dordrecht, pp 293–306

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Panwar D, Ram K, Shekhawat HNS (2012) In vitro propagation of Eulophia nuda Lindl. an endangered orchid. Sci Hort 139:46–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips GC, Garda M (2019) Plant tissue culture media and practices: an overview. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 55:242–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez-Mosqueda MA, Cruz-Cruz CA, Cano-Ricardez A, Bello-Bello JJ (2019) Assessment of different temporary immersion systems in the micropropagation of anthurium (Anthurium andreanum). Biotech 9:307

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez-Mosqueda MA, Bello-Bello JJ (2021) SETIS™ bioreactor increases in vitro multiplication and shoot length in vanilla (Vanilla planifolia Jacks. Ex Andrews). Acta Physiol Plant 43(4):52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed BM, Sarasan V, Kane M, Bunn E, Pence VC (2011) Biodiversity conservation and conservation biotechnology tools. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 47(1):1–4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues LA, Paiva Neto VB, Boaretto AG, Oliveira JF, Torrezan MD, Lima SF, Otoni WC (2015) In vitro propagation of Cyrtopodium saintlegerianum rchb. f. (orchidaceae), a native orchid of the Brazilian savannah. Crop Breed Appl Biotech 15:10–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roels S, Noceda C, Escalona M, Sandoval J, Canal MJ, Rodriguez R, Debergh P (2006) The effect of headspace renewal in a temporary immersion bioreactor on plantain (Musa AAB) shoot proliferation and quality. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 84(2):155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shekhawat MS, Latha R, Priadharshini S, Manokari M (2022) Improved micropropagation, morphometric traits and photosynthetic pigments content using liquid culture system in Spathoglottis plicata Blume. Vegetos 35:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares JS, Sorgato JC, Ribeiro LM (2020) Protocol for asymbiotic germination and initial protocorm development of Brazilian Cerrado native orchids. Rodriguésia 71:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa GG, Rosa YBCJ, Macedo MC, Soares JS (2015) Aclimatização de Brassavola tuberculata com a utilização de ANA em diferentes substratos. Hort Brasil 33:208–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su Y-H, Liu Y-B, Zhang X-S (2011) Auxin-Cytokinin interaction regulates meristem development. Molec Plant 4(4):616–625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swarts ND, Dixon KW (2009) Terrestrial orchid conservation in the age of extinction. Ann Bot 104(3):543–556

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Teisson C, Alvard D (1995) A new concept of plant in vitro cultivation liquid medium: temporary immersion. In: Terzi M, Cella R, Falavigna A (eds) Current issues in plant molecular and cellular biology: proceedings of the VIIIth international congress on plant tissue and cell culture, Florence, Italy, 12–17 June, 1994. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 105–110

  • Teixeira da Silva JA, Tsavkelova EA, Ng TB, Parthibhan S, Dobranszi J, Cardoso JC, Rao MV, Zeng S (2015) Asymbiotic in vitro seed propagation of dendrobium. Plant Cell Rep 34:1685–1706

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tisserat B, Jones D (1999) Clonal propagation of orchids. In: Hall RD (ed) Methods in molecular biology, vol 111. Plant cell culture protocols. Humana Press, New York, pp 127–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisserat B, Vandercook CE (1985) Development of an automated plant culture system. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 5(2):107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokuhara K, Mii M (1993) Micropropagation of Phalaenopsis and Doritaenopsis by culturing shoot tips of flower stalk buds. Plant Cell Rep 13(1):7–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vendrame WA, Khoddamzadeh AA (2017) Orchid Biotechnology. In: Janick J (ed) Hort Rev, vol 44. pp 173–228

  • Villa F, Pasqual M, Silva EF (2014) Micropropagation of orchid hybrids in knudson culture medium with addiction of vitamins of MS culture medium, benzilaminopurine and activated charcoal. Ciênc Agrárias 35:683–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu RZ, Chakrabarty D, Hahn EJ, Paek KY (2007) Micropropagation of an endangered jewel orchid (Anoectochilus formosanus) using bioreactor system. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 48:376–380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu JJ, Beleski DG, Vendrame WA (2022) Effects of culture media and plant growth regulators on in vitro propagation of Brassavola nodosa. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 58:931–941

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young P, Murthy HN, Kee Yoeup P (2000) Mass multiplication of protocorm-like bodies using bioreactor system and subsequent plant regeneration in Phalaenopsis. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 63(1):67–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng S, Zhang Y, Silva JAT, Wu K, Zhang J, Duan J (2014) Seed biology and in vitro seed germination of Cypripedium. Crit Rev Biotech 34:358–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Sarsaiya S, Pan X, Jin L, Xu D, Zhang B, Duns GJ, Shi J, Chen J (2018) Optimization of nutritional conditions using a temporary immersion bioreactor system for the growth of Bletilla striata pseudobulbs and accumulation of polysaccharides. Sci Hort 240:155–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ziv M (2000) Bioreactor technology for plant micropropagation. Hort Rev 24:1–30

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project 1012202.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, Grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by JX, and DB. The first draft of the manuscript was written by WV and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wagner A. Vendrame.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Communicated by Jerico Jabin Bello Bello.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vendrame, W.A., Xu, J. & Beleski, D.G. Micropropagation of Brassavola nodosa (L.) Lindl. using SETIS™ bioreactor. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 153, 67–76 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-022-02441-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-022-02441-y

Keywords

Navigation