Abstract
Development of suitable strategy to overcome genotypic limitations of in vitro regeneration in sorghum would help utilize high yielding but poor tissue culture responsive genotypes in genetic manipulation programmes. A factorial experiment was conducted with two explants (immature embryos and inflorescences), eight genotypes (five Sorghum sudanense and three Sorghum bicolor genotypes), three levels of 2,4-D (1 mg l−1, 3 mg l−1, and 5 mg l−1), and two levels of kinetin (0.0 mg l−1 and 0.5 mg l−1). The induced callus was transferred to the regeneration media with factorial combinations of IAA (1.0 mg l−1 and 2.0 mg l−1) and kinetin (0.5 mg l−1 and 1.0 mg l−1). S. sudanense regenerated at significantly higher frequency (38.91%) and produced shoots more intensely (2.2 shoots/callus) than S. bicolor (26.93%, 1.26 shoots/callus). Immature inflorescences regenerated at a much higher frequency (46.48%) and produced significantly more number of shoots (2.71 shoots/callus) than immature embryos (22.35%, 0.99 shoots/callus). Moreover, differences for plant regeneration between genotypes of the same species were minimal when using immature inflorescences. Increase in the 2,4-D concentration in callus induction media exhibited inhibitory effect on callus induction, growth, shoot induction and number of shoots/callus but inclusion of kinetin in callus induction media improved these responses. Use of immature inflorescence explant and inclusion of kinetin in callus induction media could overcome genotypic limitations of plant regeneration to a large extent. The extent of variability, heritability and expected genetic advance was more in plant regeneration traits than in callus induction traits. This indicated that the variability in respect of these attributes in the genotypes may be due to the additive gene action and selection of genotypes for these characters would be rewarding.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bai ZL, Wang LQ, Zheng LP, Li AJ, Wang FL (1995) A study on the callus induction and plant regeneration of different sorghum explants. Acta Agric Boreali Sinica 10:60–63
Beckert M, Qing CM (1984) Results of a diallel trial and a breeding experiment for in vitro aptitude in maize. Theor Appl Genet 68:247–251
Bhat S, Kuruvinashetti MS (1995) Callus induction and plant regeneration from immature embryos of maintainer line (B) of kharif sorghum. J Maharashtra Agric Univ 20:159
Bhat S, Kuruvinashetti MS, Bhat S (1994) Callus induction and plantlet regeneration from immature inflorescence in some maintainer (B) lines of kharif sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.). Karnataka J Agric Sci 7:387–390
Bhat S, Kuruvinashetti MS, Bhat S (1995) Plant regeneration from tissue cultures of cytoplasmic genetic male-sterile maintainer lines of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Ind J Agric Sci 65:127–129
Boyes CJ, Vasil IK (1984) Plant regeneration by somatic embryogenesis from cultured young inflorescences of Sorghum arundinaceum (Desv.) Stapf. var. Sudanense (Sudan grass). Plant Sci Lett 35:153–157
Burton GW, Devane EH (1953) Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festuca arundanacea) from replicated clonal material. Agron J 45:478–481
Cai T, Butler L (1990) Plant regeneration from embryogenic callus initiated from immature inflorescences of several high tannin sorghums. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 20:101–110
Dewey DR, Lu KH (1959) A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production. Agron J 51:515–518
Elkonin LA, Pakhomova NV (1996) Influence of nitrogen sources on induction and growth of embryogenic callus in sorghum. Int Sorghum Millets Newsl 37:68–69
Gupta S, Khanna VK, Singh R, Garg GK (2004) Identification of in vitro responsive immature embryo size for plant regeneration in sudan grass (Sorghum sudanense). Ind J Biotechnol 3:124–127
Han FG, Zhao HY, Lin F, Yang LG (1997) Screening for salt tolerant lines through in vitro culture under salt stress conditions and studies on their different characters. Acta Agron Sinica 23:491–495
Hollander M, Wolfe DA (1973) Non-parametric statistical methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, pp 114–136
Isbell VR, Morgan PW (1982) Manipulation of apical dominance in sorghum with growth regulators. Crop Sci 22:30–35
Johnson HK, Robinson HF, Comstock RE (1955) Genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agron J 47:314–318
Kaeppler HF, Pedersen JF (1997) Evaluation of 41 elite and exotic inbred sorghum genotypes for high quality callus production. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 48:71–75
Langer RHM, Prasad PC, Laude HM (1973) Effect of kinetin on tiller bud elongation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Ann Bot 37:565–571
Lazar MD, Baenziger PS, Schaeffer GW (1984) Combining ability and heritability of callus formation and plantlet regeneration in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) anther culture. Theor Appl Genet 68:131–134
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Nahadi S, de-Wet JMJ (1995) In vitro regeneration of Sorghum bicolor lines from shoot apexes. Int Sorghum Millets Newsl 36:88–90
Patil VM, Kuruvinashetti MS (1998) Plant regeneration from leaf sheath cultures of some rabi sorghum cultivars. South Afr J Bot 64:217–219
Shyamala D, Devi P (2003) Efficient regeneration of sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench, from shoot-tip explant. Ind J Exp Biol 41:1482–1486
Wang DY, Vasil IK (1982) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from inflorescence segments of Pennisetum purpureum Schum. (Napier or Elephant grass). Plant Sci Lett 25:147–154
Wu CY, Chen Y (1987) Study of differences between genotypes in anther culture of Japonica rice. Acta Genet Sinica 14:168–174
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gupta, S., Khanna, V.K., Singh, R. et al. Strategies for overcoming genotypic limitations of in vitro regeneration and determination of genetic components of variability of plant regeneration traits in sorghum. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 86, 379–388 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-006-9140-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-006-9140-0