Skip to main content
Log in

Low Intensity Warfarin Anticoagulation is Safe and Effective as a Long-Term Venous Thromboembolism Prevention Strategy

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Longitudinal studies indicate a high rate of recurrence of venous thromboembolism after an episode of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Extended anticoagulant therapy will decrease the recurrence rate, but there is controversy as to the optimal intensity of therapy that will be effective, yet safe. The PREVENT trial addresses the question of whether long-term low intensity therapy (INR 1.5–2.0) will effectively prevent recurrence compared to placebo treatment, yet be safe without a significant increase in major bleeding. The results of this trial show a significant reduction in recurrent venous thromboembolism with a major bleeding rate that is no different than the placebo arm of the study (0.9 vs 0.4 per 100 patient years; p = 0.25). Although the ELATE trial showed greater effectiveness with no increase in bleeding in the standard intensity arm vs the low intensity arm, the question remains whether such safety can be obtained in the real world management of oral anticoagulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schulman S, Rhedin AS, Lindmarker P, et al. A comparison of six weeks with six months of oral anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of venous thromboembolism. Duration of Anticoagulation Trial Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995;332(25):1661–1665.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Cogo A, et al. The long-term clinical course of acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 1996;125(1):1–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heit JA, Mohr DN, Silverstein MD, Petterson TM, O'Fallon WM, Melton LJ, 3rd. Predictors of recurrence after deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based cohort study. Arch Intern Med 2000;160(6):761–768.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kearon C, Gent M, Hirsh J, et al. A comparison of three months of anticoagulation with extended anticoagulation for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 1999;340(12):901–907.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ridker PM, Goldhaber SZ, Danielson E, et al. Long-term, low-intensity warfarin therapy for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2003;348(15):1425–1434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schulman S, Granqvist S, Holmstrom M, et al. The duration of oral anticoagulant therapy after a second episode of venous thromboembolism. The Duration of Anticoagulation Trial Study Group. N Engl J Med 1997;336(6):393–398.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Kovacs MJ, et al. Comparison of low-intensity warfarin therapy with conventional-intensity warfarin therapy for long-term prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2003;349(7):631–639.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Z. Goldhaber MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goldhaber, S.Z. Low Intensity Warfarin Anticoagulation is Safe and Effective as a Long-Term Venous Thromboembolism Prevention Strategy. J Thromb Thrombolysis 21, 51–52 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-006-5576-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-006-5576-7

Key Words

Navigation