Abdellaoui, M. (2000). Parameter-free elicitation of utilities and probability weighting functions. Management Science, 46, 1497–1512.
Google Scholar
Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., & L’haridon, O. (2008). A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36, 245–266.
Article
Google Scholar
Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., & Paraschiv, C. (2007). Loss aversion under prospect theory: a parameter-free measurement. Management Science, 53, 1659–1674.
Article
Google Scholar
Agarwal, S., Driscoll, J. C., Gabaix, X., & Laibson, D. I. (2009). The age of reason: financial decisions over the lifecycle. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2009, 51–117.
Article
Google Scholar
Apicella, C. L., Azevedo, E. M., Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2014). Evolutionary origins of the endowment effect: evidence from hunter-gatherers. American Economic Review, 104, 1793.
Article
Google Scholar
Baillon, A., Bleichrodt, H., & Spinu, V. (2020). Searching for the reference point. Management Science, 66, 93–112.
Article
Google Scholar
Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: an adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1561–1580.
Article
Google Scholar
Bateman, I., Munro, A., Rhodes, B., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1997). A test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 479–505.
Article
Google Scholar
Becker, G. M., Degroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9, 226–232.
Article
Google Scholar
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 73–92.
Article
Google Scholar
Bibby, P. A., & Ferguson, E. (2011). The ability to process emotional information predicts loss aversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 263–266.
Article
Google Scholar
Bleichrodt, H., Abellan-Perpiñan, J. M., Pinto-Prades, J. L., & Mendez-Martinez, I. (2007). Resolving inconsistencies in utility measurement under risk: tests of generalizations of expected utility. Management Science, 53, 469–482.
Article
Google Scholar
Bleichrodt, H., & Pinto, J. L. (2000). A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Science, 46, 1485–1496.
Article
Google Scholar
Bleichrodt, H., & Pinto, J. L. (2002). Loss aversion and scale compatibility in two-attribute trade-offs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 315–337.
Article
Google Scholar
Booij, A. S., & Van De Kuilen, G. (2009). A parameter-free analysis of the utility of money for the general population under prospect theory. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 651–666.
Article
Google Scholar
Bowman, D., Minehart, D., & Rabin, M. (1999). Loss aversion in a consumption-savings model. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 38, 155–178.
Article
Google Scholar
Bruhin, A., Fehr-Duda, H., & Epper, T. (2010). Risk and rationality: uncovering heterogeneity in probability distortion. Econometrica, 78, 1375–1412.
Article
Google Scholar
Cachon, G. P., & Camerer, C. F. (1996). Loss-avoidance and forward induction in experimental coordination games. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 165–194.
Article
Google Scholar
Camerer, C. F. (2004). Prospect theory in the wild: evidence from the field. In C. F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, & M. Rabin (Eds.) Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton University Press
Camerer, C. F., Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., & Thaler, R. H. (1997). Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: one day at a time. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 407–441.
Article
Google Scholar
Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2000). Focusing on the forgone: how value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 360–370.
Article
Google Scholar
Chapman, J., Dean, M., Ortoleva, P., Snowberg, E., & Camerer, C. (2017). Willingness to pay and willingness to accept are probably less correlated than you think. NBER Working Paper Series # 23954
Chen, M. K., Lakshminarayanan, V., & Santos, L. R. (2006). How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from Capuchin monkey trading behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 517–537.
Article
Google Scholar
Crosetto, P., & Filippin, A. (2016). A theoretical and experimental appraisal of four risk elicitation methods. Experimental Economics, 19, 613–641.
Article
Google Scholar
Cubitt, R. P., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1998). On the validity of the random lottery incentive system. Experimental Economics, 1, 115–131.
Article
Google Scholar
De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Holt, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2009). The neurobiology of reference-dependent value computation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 3833–3842.
Article
Google Scholar
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9, 522–550.
Article
Google Scholar
Einiö, M., Kaustia, M., & Puttonen, V. (2008). Price setting and the reluctance to realize losses in apartment markets. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 19–34.
Article
Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., & Weber, M. (1995). Willingness-to-pay and willingness-to-accept for risky and ambiguous lotteries. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 10, 223–233.
Article
Google Scholar
Ericson, K. M. M., & Fuster, A. (2014). The endowment effect. Annual Review of Economics, 6, 555–579.
Article
Google Scholar
Ert, E., & Erev, I. (2013). On the descriptive value of loss aversion in decisions under risk: six clarifications. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 214–235.
Google Scholar
Fehr, E., & Goette, L. (2007). Do workers work more if wages are high? Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Economic Review, 97, 298–317.
Article
Google Scholar
Fehr-Duda, H., De Gennaro, M., & Schubert, R. (2006). Gender, financial risks, and probability weights. Theory and Decision, 60, 283–313.
Article
Google Scholar
Freund, C., & Ozden, C. (2008). Trade policy and loss aversion. American Economic Review, 98, 1675–1691.
Article
Google Scholar
Gal, D. (2006). A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 23–32.
Google Scholar
Gal, D. (2018). Why the most important idea in behavioral decision-making is a fallacy. Scientific American, 29, 52–54.
Article
Google Scholar
Gal, D., & Rucker, D. D. (2018). The loss of loss aversion: will it loom larger than its gain? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28, 497–516.
Article
Google Scholar
Genesove, D., & Mayer, C. (2001). Loss aversion and seller behavior: evidence from the housing market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1233–1260.
Article
Google Scholar
Goette, L., Huffman, D., & Fehr, E. (2004). Loss aversion and labor supply. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 216–228.
Article
Google Scholar
Haigh, M. S., & List, J. A. (2005). Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis. Journal of Finance, 60, 523–534.
Article
Google Scholar
Harbaugh, W., Krause, K., & Vesterlund, L. (2001). Are adults better behaved than children? Age, experience, and the endowment effect. Economics Letters, 70, 175–181.
Article
Google Scholar
Hardie, B. G. S., Johnson, E. J., & Fader, P. S. (1993). Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Science, 12, 378–394.
Article
Google Scholar
Harless, D. W. (1989). More laboratory evidence on the disparity between willingness to pay and compensation demanded. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 11, 359–379.
Article
Google Scholar
Harrison, G., & Rutström, E. (2009). Expected utility theory and prospect theory: one wedding and a decent funeral. Experimental Economics, 12, 133–158.
Article
Google Scholar
He, P., Veronesi, M., & Engel, S. (2018). Consistency of risk preference measures: an artefactual field experiment from rural China. The Journal of Development Studies, 54, 1955–1973.
Article
Google Scholar
Heidhues, P., & Koszegi, B. (2008). Competition and price variation when consumers are loss averse. American Economic Review, 98, 1245–1268.
Article
Google Scholar
Horowitz, J. K., & McConnell, K. E. (2002). A review of WTA/WTP studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44, 426–447.
Article
Google Scholar
Huck, S., Kirchsteiger, G., & Oechssler, J. (2005). Learning to like what you have—explaining the endowment effect. The Economic Journal, 115, 689–702.
Article
Google Scholar
Isoni, A., Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (2011). The willingness to pay–willingness to accept gap, the “endowment effect,” subject misconceptions, and experimental procedures for eliciting valuations: comment. American Economic Review, 101, 991–1011.
Article
Google Scholar
Jachimowicz, J. M., Duncan, S., Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2019). When and why defaults influence decisions: a meta-analysis of default effects. Behavioural Public Policy, 3, 159–186.
Article
Google Scholar
Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. (2003). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302, 1338–1339.
Article
Google Scholar
Johnson, E. J., Haeubl, G., & Keinan, A. (2007). Aspects of endowment: a query theory of value construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Learning Memory and Cognition, 33, 461–747.
Article
Google Scholar
Johnson, E. J., & Schkade, D. A. (1989). Bias in utility assessments—further evidence and explanations. Management Science, 35, 406–424.
Article
Google Scholar
Kachelmeier, S. J., & Shehata, M. (1992). Examining risk preferences under high monetary incentives—experimental evidence from the People’s Republic of China. American Economic Review, 82, 1120–1141.
Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325–1348.
Article
Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. H. (1991). Anomalies—the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status-quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193–206.
Article
Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory—analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
Article
Google Scholar
Knetsch, J. L. (1989). The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves. American Economic Review, 79, 1277–1284.
Google Scholar
Köbberling, V., & Wakker, P. P. (2005). An index of loss aversion. Journal of Economic Theory, 122, 119–131.
Article
Google Scholar
Köszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 1133–1165.
Article
Google Scholar
Kovalchik, S., Camerer, C. F., Grether, D. M., Plott, C. R., & Allman, J. M. (2005). Aging and decision making: A comparison between neurologically healthy elderly and young individuals. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 58, 79–94.
Article
Google Scholar
Li, Y., Baldassi, M., Johnson, E. J., & Weber, E. U. (2013). Complementary cognitive capabilities, economic decision making, and aging. Psychology and Aging, 28, 595–613.
Article
Google Scholar
Li, Y., Gao, J., Enkavi, A. Z., Zaval, L., Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2015). Sound credit scores and financial decisions despite cognitive aging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 65–69.
Article
Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (2006). The construction of preference. Cambridge University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
List, J. A. (2003). Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 41–71.
Article
Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G., & Adler, D. (1995). A bias in the prediction of tastes. Economic Journal, 105, 929–937.
Article
Google Scholar
Morewedge, C. K., & Giblin, C. E. (2015). Explanations of the endowment effect: an integrative review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 339–348.
Article
Google Scholar
Mrkva, K., Johnson, E. J., Gächter, S., & Herrmann, A. (2020). Moderating loss aversion: loss aversion has moderators, but reports of its death are greatly exaggerated. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30, 407–428.
Article
Google Scholar
Novemsky, N., & Kahneman, D. (2005). The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 119–128.
Article
Google Scholar
Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? Journal of Finance, 53, 1775–1798.
Article
Google Scholar
O'Donoghue, T., & Sprenger, C. (2018). Chapter 1—reference-dependent preferences. In B. D. Bernheim, S. DellaVigna, & D. Laibson (Eds.) Handbook of behavioral economics: applications and foundations 1.
Plott, C. R., & Zeiler, K. (2005). The willingness to pay-willingness to accept gap, the “endowment effect,” subject misconceptions, and experimental procedures for eliciting valuations. American Economic Review, 95, 530–545.
Article
Google Scholar
Plott, C. R., & Zeiler, K. (2011). The willingness to pay–willingness to accept gap, the “endowment effect,” subject misconceptions, and experimental procedures for eliciting valuations: reply. American Economic Review, 101, 1012–1028.
Article
Google Scholar
Prelec, D. (1998). The probability weighting function. Econometrica, 66, 497–527.
Article
Google Scholar
Rabin, M. (2000). Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: a calibration theorem. Econometrica, 68, 1281–1293.
Article
Google Scholar
Rabin, M., & Weizsäcker, G. (2009). Narrow bracketing and dominated choice. American Economic Review, 99, 1508–1543.
Article
Google Scholar
Read, D., Loewenstein, G., & Rabin, M. (1999). Choice bracketing. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 171–197.
Article
Google Scholar
Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296–320.
Article
Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. A. (2004). What and when of cognitive aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 140–144.
Article
Google Scholar
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7–59.
Article
Google Scholar
Sayman, S., & Onculer, A. (2005). Effects of study design characteristics on the WTA–WTP disparity: a meta analytical framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 289–312.
Article
Google Scholar
Schmidt, U., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2008). Third-generation prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36, 203–223.
Article
Google Scholar
Schmidt, U., & Zank, H. (2005). What is loss aversion? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30, 157–167.
Article
Google Scholar
Sheng, F., Ramakrishnan, A., Seok, D., Zhao, W. J., Thelaus, S., Cen, P., & Platt, M. L. (2020). Decomposing loss aversion from gaze allocation and pupil dilation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117, 11356–11363.
Article
Google Scholar
Sokol-Hessner, P., Hsu, M., Curley, N. G., Delgado, M. R., Camerer, C. F., & Phelps, E. A. (2009). Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals’ loss aversion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 5035–5040.
Article
Google Scholar
Starmer, C. (2000). Developments in non-expected utility theory: the hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 332–382.
Article
Google Scholar
Sugden, R. (2003). Reference-dependent subjective expected utility. Journal of Economic Theory, 111, 172–191.
Article
Google Scholar
Tom, S. M., Fox, C. R., Trepel, C., & Poldrack, R. A. (2007). The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science, 315, 515–518.
Article
Google Scholar
Tovar, P. (2009). The effects of loss aversion on trade policy: theory and evidence. Journal of International Economics, 78, 154–167.
Article
Google Scholar
Tunçel, T., & Hammitt, J. K. (2014). A new meta-analysis on the wtp/wta disparity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 68, 175–187.
Article
Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice—a reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039–1061.
Article
Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect-theory—cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.
Article
Google Scholar
Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371–384.
Article
Google Scholar
Wakker, P. P. (2005). Formalizing reference dependence and initial wealth in Rabin's calibration theorem. Working Paper, Econometric Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. http://people.few.eur.nl/wakker/pdf/calibcsocty05.pdf
Wakker, P. P. (2008). Explaining the characteristics of the power (CRRA) utility function. Health Economics, 17(1329), 1344.
Google Scholar
Wakker, P. P. (2010). Prospect theory: for risk and ambiguity. Cambridge University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Wang, M., Rieger, M. O., & Hens, T. (2017). The impact of culture on loss aversion. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30, 270–281.
Article
Google Scholar
Weaver, R., & Frederick, S. (2012). A reference price theory of the endowment effect. Journal of Marketing Research, 49, 696–707.
Article
Google Scholar
Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2006). Constructing preferences from memories. In The construction of preferences, ed. S. Lichtenstein, & P. Slovic. Cambridge University Press.
Weber, E. U., Blais, A.-R., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 263–290.
Article
Google Scholar
Yechiam, E. (2019). Acceptable losses: the debatable origins of loss aversion. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 83, 1327–1339.
Article
Google Scholar