Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Uncertainty Aversion on the Call Option Market

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the effects of uncertainty aversion in competitive call option markets using a partial equilibrium model with the Choquet-expected utility setup. We find that the trading volume of a call option is negatively affected by uncertainty aversion, whereas the price of the call is practically independent of it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carr P., Madan D. (2001), Optimal positioning in derivative securities. Quantitative Finance 1: 19–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chateauneuf A., Dana R.-A., Tallon J.-M. (2000), Optimal risk-sharing rules and equilibria with Choquet-expected-utility. Journal of Mathematical Economics 34: 191–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekel E. (1989), Asset demand without the independence axiom.Econometrica 57: 163–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow J., Werlang S.R.C. (1992), Uncertainty aversion, risk aversion, and the optimal choice of portfolio. Econometrica 60: 197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffie D. (2001), Dynamic Asset Pricing Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein L.G., Wang T. (1994), Intertemporal asset pricing under Knightian uncertainty. Econometrica 62: 283–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghirardato P., Marinacci M. (2002), Ambiguity made precise: A comparative foundation. Journal of Economic Theory 102: 251–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa I. (1987), Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. Journal of Mathematical Economics 16: 65–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey D., Milne F. (1995), The arbitrage pricing theorem with non-expected utility preferences. Journal of Economic Theory 65: 557–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell A., Whinston M.D., Green J.R. (1995), Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Montesano A., Giovannoni F. (1996), Uncertainty aversion and aversion to increasing uncertainty. Theory and Decision 41: 133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montesano A. (1999) Risk and uncertainty aversion with reference to the theories of expected utility, rank dependent expected utility, and Choquet-expected utility. In: Luini L. (eds) Uncertain Decision. Bridging Theory and Experiments. Kluwer, Boston, pp 3–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukerji S., Tallon J.-M. (2001), Ambiguity aversion and incompleteness of financial markets. Review of Economic Studies 68: 883–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley L.S. (1971), Cores of convex games. International Journal of Game Theory 1: 11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler D. (1989), Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57: 571–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian H.L. (1992), Microeconomic Analysis. W. W. Norton & Co., New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aldo Montesano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montesano, A. Effects of Uncertainty Aversion on the Call Option Market. Theory Decis 65, 97–123 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9095-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9095-6

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation