Abstract
Envy is sometimes suggested as an underlying motive in the assessment of different economic allocations. In the theoretical literature on fair division, following Foley [Foley, D. (1967), Yale Economic Essays, 7, 45–98], the term “envy” refers to an intrapersonal comparison of different consumption bundles. By contrast, in its everyday use “envy” involves interpersonal comparisons of well-being. We present, discuss results from free-form bargaining experiments on fair division problems in which inter-and intrapersonal criteria can be distinguished. We find that interpersonal comparisons play the dominant role. The effect of the intrapersonal criterion of envy freeness is limited to situations in which other fairness criteria are not applicable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bereby-Meyer Y., Niederle M. (2005), Fairness in bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 56: 173–186
Bolton G., Ockenfels A. (2006), Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments: comment. American Economic Review 96/5: 1906–1911
Charness G., Rabin M. (2002), Understanding social preferences with simple test. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117: 817–869
Engelmann D., Strobel M. (2004), Inequality aversion, efficiency,, maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments. American Economic Review 94/4: 857–869
Engelmann D., Strohel M. (2006), Inequality aversion, efficiency,, maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments: comment. American Economic Review 96/5: 1918–1923
Fehr E., Schmidt K. (1999), A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 817–868
Fehr, E., Schmidt, K. (2002), Theories of fairness, reciprocity – evidence, economic applications, in Dewatripont, M., Hansen, L., Turnovsky, S. (eds.), Advances in Economics, Econometrics – 8th World Congress of the Econometric Society, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Fehr E., Naef M., Schmidt K. (2006), Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments: comment. American Economic Review 96/5: 1912–1917
Foley D. (1967), Resource allocation, the public sector. Yale Economic Essays 7: 45–98
Gaertner W. (2006), A Primer in Social Choice Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Herreiner, D.K. (2007), The relevance of envy freeness as fairness criterion, mimeo.
Herreiner, D.K., Puppe, C. (2006), Inequality aversion, efficiency with ordinal, cardinal social preferences – an experimental study, mimeo.
Herreiner, D.K., Puppe, C. (2007), Distributing indivisible goods fairly, Evidence from a questionnaire study, mimeo.
Konow J. (2003), Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. Journal of Economic Literature 41: 1188–1239
Kritikos A., Bolle F. (2001), Distributional concerns: equity- or efficiency-oriented?. Economics Letters 73/3: 333–338
Pazner E., Schmeidler D. (1978), Egalitarian-equivalent allocations: a new concept of economic equity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 92: 671–687
Yaari M., Bar-Hillel M. (1984), On dividing justly. Social Choice, Welfare 1: 1–24
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herreiner, D.K., Puppe, C.D. Envy Freeness in Experimental Fair Division Problems. Theory Decis 67, 65–100 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9069-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9069-8