Aarrevaara, T., Dobson, I. R., & Pekkola, E. (2011). Finland: CAPtive academics—An examination of the binary divide. In W. Locke, W. K. Cummings, & D. Fisher (Eds.), Changing governance and management in higher education: The perspectives of the academy (pp. 243–262). Springer.
Arnkil, R., Järvensivu, A., Koski, P., & Piirainen, T.(2010). Exploring quadruple helix – outlining user-oriented innovation models. University of Tampere, Institute for Social Research, Work Research Centre. Retrieved from: http://urn.fi/urn:isbn:978-951-44-8209-0
Begg, I. (2016). The economic theory of cohesion policy. In S. Piattoni & L. Polverani (Eds.), Handbook on cohesion policy in the EU (pp. 325–338). Elgar 2016.
Breznitz, M. S., & Feldman, M. P. (2012). The engaged university. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 139–157.
Charalampous, M., Grant, C. A., Tramontano, C., & Michailidis, E. (2019). Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: A multidimensional approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 51–73.
Charles, D., Kitagawa, F., & Uyarra, E. (2014). University in Crisis? - new challenges and strategies in two English city-regions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(2), 475–496.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Davey, T., Baaken, T., Galán-Muros, V., & Meerman, A. (2011). Study on the cooperation between higher education institutions and public and private organizations in Europe. European Commission, DG Education and Culture.
Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209–227.
Elmgren, M., Forsberg, E., Lindberg-Sand, Å., & Sonesson, A. (2016). The formation of doctoral education, report, joint faculties of humanities and. Lund University.
Etzkowitz, H., Ranga, M., Benner, M., Guaranys, L., Macukan, A. M., & Kneller, R. (2008). Pathways to the entrepreneurial university: Towards a global convergence. Science and Public Policy, 35, 681–695.
Fitjar, R.D. (2020). The pandemic and the regional role of the university, RUNIN Blog post. Available at: https://runinproject.eu/the-pandemic-and-the-regional-role-of-the-university/
Fitjar, R. D., & Gjesvik, M. (2018). Why do firms collaborate with local universities? Regional Studies, 52(11), 1525–1536.
Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2017). Nothing is in the air. Growth and Change, 48(1), 22–39.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
Foss, L., & Gibson, D.V. (eds.) (2015). The entrepreneurial university. Context and institutional change, Routledge studies in Innovation, Organization and Technology.
Galán-Muros, V., & Plawa, C. (2016). What drives and inhibits university-business cooperation in Europe? A comprehensive assessment. R&D Management, 46(2), 369–382.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.
Gibb, B., & Hannon, P. (2006). Towards Entpreneurial University? International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 4, 73–110.
Goddard, J., & Vallance, P. (2013). The University and the City. Routledge.
Göransson, B., Maharajh, R., & Schmoch, U. (2009). New activities of universities in transfer and extension: Multiple requirements and manifold solutions. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 157–164.
Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh-dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057.
Heino, P. 2017. Meeting the challenges of user-driven research, development, and innovation in universities of applied sciences. In Saraketo, H. & Nevalainen, T. (eds.) Theories and experiences on team learning – Academic adventures in Proakatemia, Tampere University of Applied Sciences, 98–120.
Hellström, T., Jacob, M., & Sjöö, K. (2017). From thematic to organizational prioritization the challenges of implementing RDI priorities. Science and Public Policy, 44(5), 599–608.
Jaeger, A., & Koppler, J. (2014). Third mission potential in higher education. Review on Regional Research, 34, 95–118.
Kajaste, M. (2018). Quality management of research, development and innovation activities in Finnish universities of applied sciences. Quality in Higher Education, 24(3), 271–288.
Kettunen, J. (2011). Innovation pedagogy for universities of applied sciences. Creative Education, 2(1), 56–62.
Kitagawa, F., Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M., & Uyarra, E. (2016). Third mission as institutional strategies: Between isomorphic forces and heterogeneous pathways. Science and Public Policy, 43(6), 736–750.
Melin, G., Zuijdam, F., Good, B., Anglis, H., Enberg, H., Fikkers, D. F., Puukka, J., Swenning, A. K., Kosk, K., Lastunen, J., & Zegel, S. (2015). Towards a future proof system for higher education and research in Finland. Publications of the Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland, 2015, 11.
Miller, K., McAdam, M., & McAdam, R. (2014). The changing university business model: A stakeholder perspective. R&D Management, 44(3), 265–287.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practise (4th ed.). SAGE publications Inc..
Plewa, C., Korff, N., Baaken, T., & Macpherson, G. (2013). University-industry linkage ecolution: An empirical investigation of relational success factors. R&D Management, 43(4), 365–380.
Saldaña, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
Salomaa, M. (2019). Third mission and regional context: Assessing universities’ entrepreneurial architecture in rural regions, regional studies. Regional Science, 6(1), 233–249.
Sansone, G., Battaglia, D., Landoni, P., & Paolucci, E. (2019). Academic spinoffs: The role of entrepreneurship education. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students (7th ed.). Pearson.
Seikkula-Leino, J., & Salomaa, M. (2020). Entrepreneurial competencies and organisational change—Assessing entrepreneurial staff competencies within higher education institutions. Sustainability, 2020(12), 7323.
Silva, A. L., & Merino, G. S. A. D. (2017). Potentialities of remote teams in the innovation process in an organization through the design management. Strategic Design Research Journal, 10(3), 204–214.
Taylor, J. (2008). Quality and standards: The challenge or the professional doctorate. Higher Education in Europe, 33, 1.
Teichler, U. (2008). The biased discourse diversification? Trends and explanations of the shape and size of higher education. Higher Education, 56, 349–379.
The Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council. (2011). Evaluation of research, development and innovation activities of Finnish universities of applied sciences, A preliminary report, 16:2011. Retrieved from: https://karvi.fi/app/uploads/2014/09/KKA_1611.pdf
Universities of Applied Sciences Act 932/2014. (n.d.) Retrieved from: https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2014/en20140932
Urbano, D., Aparicio, S., Guerrero, M., Noguera, M., & Torrent-Sellens, J. (2017). Institutional determinants of student employer entrepreneurs at Catalan universities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 271–282.
Uyarra, E. (2010). Conceptualizing the regional roles of universities, implications and contradictions. European Planning Studies, 18(8), 1227–1246.
Welter, F., & Smallbone, D. (2011). Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 107–125.
Welter, F., Baker, T., & Wirsching, K. (2019). Three waves and counting: The rising tide of contextualization in entrepreneurship research. Small Business Economy, 52(319), 319–330.
Wildavsky, B. (2010). The great brain race. How global universities are reshaping the world. Princeton University Press.
Wright, M. (2014). Academic entrepreneurship, technology transfer and society: Where next? Journal of Technology Transfer, 39, 322–334.
Zahra, S., & Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship’s next act. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 67–83.