Skip to main content
Log in

Jost-Lehmann-Dyson representation, analyticity in the angular variable, and upper bounds in noncommutative quantum field theory

  • Published:
Theoretical and Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We prove the existence of an analogue of the Jost-Lehmann-Dyson representation in noncommutative quantum field theory for the case where the noncommutativity affects only the spatial variables. Using this representation, we show that there is a certain class of elastic scattering amplitudes that have an analytic continuation to the complex cos ϑ plane with the Martin ellipse as the related analyticity domain. Using the analyticity in the angular variable and the unitarity as a basis, we establish an analogue of the Froissart—Martin bound for the total cross section in the noncommutative case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. H. Lehmann, Nuovo Cimento, 10, 579 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Martin, Nuovo Cimento, 42, 930 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Sommer, Nuovo Cimento A, 48, 92 (1967); 52, 373, 850, 866 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. D. Bessis and V. Glaser, Nuovo Cimento A, 50, 568 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  5. O. W. Greenberg and F. E. Low, Phys. Rev., 124, 2047 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Froissart, Phys. Rev., 123, 1053 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Martin, Phys. Rev., 129, 1432 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Łukashúk and A. Martin, Nuovo Cimento A, 52, 122 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. M. Roy, Phys. Rep. C, 5, 125 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yu. S. Vernov and M. N. Mnatsakanova, Phys. Part. Nucl., 32, 589 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. Singh and S. M. Roy, Ann. Phys., 57, 461 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Connes, Noncommutative Geometry, Acad. Press, New York (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. S. Snyder, Phys. Rev., 71, 38 (1947).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhagen, and J. E. Roberts, Phys. Lett. B, 331, 39 (1994); Comm. Math. Phys., 172, 187 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. Seiberg and E. Witten, JHEP, 9909, 032 (1999); hep-th/9908142 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. R. Douglas and N. A. Nekrasov, Rev. Modern Phys., 73, 977 (2001); hep-th/0106048 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Gomis and T. Mehen, Nucl. Phys. B, 591, 265 (2000); hep-th/0005129 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. Seiberg, L. Susskind, and N. Toumbas, JHEP, 0006, 044 (2000); hep-th/0005015 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Chaichian, K. Nishijima, and A. Tureanu, Phys. Lett. B, 568, 146 (2003); hep-th/0209008 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Chaichian, M. Mnatsakanova, A. Tureanu, and Yu. Vernov, Nucl. Phys. B, 673, 476 (2003); hep-th/0306158 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yu. S. Vernov and M. N. Mnatsakanova, Theor. Math. Phys., 139, 451 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Y. Liao and K. Sibold, Phys. Lett. B, 549, 352 (2002); hep-th/0209221 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Chaichian and A. Tureanu, “Jost-Lehmann-Dyson representation and Froissart—Martin bound in quantum field theory on noncommutative space—time,” hep-th/0403032 (2004).

  24. N. N. Bogoliubov, A. A. Logunov, and I. T. Todorov, Introduction to Axiomatic Quantum Field Theory [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1969); English transl., Benjamin, Reading, Mass. (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  25. L. Álvarez-Gaumé and J. L. F. Barbon, Internat. J. Mod. Phys. A, 16, 1123 (2001); hep-th/0006209 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  26. V. S. Vladimirov, Methods of the Theory of Functions of Many Complex Variables [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1964), Chap. 5; English transl., MIT, Cambridge, Mass. (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  27. N. N. Bogoliubov and D. V. Shirkov, Introduction to the Theory of Quantum Fields [in Russian] (4th ed.), Nauka, Moscow (1984), Chap. 10; English transl. prev. ed., Wiley, New York (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. S. Schweber, An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory, Row, Peterson and Co., Evanston, Ill. (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. A. Logunov, M. A. Mestvirishvili, and O. A. Khrustalev, Phys. Part. Nucl., 3, 1 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  30. E. T. Whittaker and G. N. Watson, A Course of Modern Analysis, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. Bros, H. Epstein, and V. Glaser, Nuovo Cimento, 31, 1264 (1964); Comm. Math. Phys., 1, 240 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  32. A. Martin, Nuovo Cimento, 29, 993 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. A. Logunov, Nguen Van Hieu, and I. T. Todorov, Usp. Fiz. Nauk, 88, 51 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Y. S. Jin and A. Martin, Phys. Rev. B, 135, 1375 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika, Vol. 142, No. 2, pp. 388–403, February, 2005.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vernov, Y.S., Mnatsakanova, M.N. Jost-Lehmann-Dyson representation, analyticity in the angular variable, and upper bounds in noncommutative quantum field theory. Theor Math Phys 142, 324–336 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11232-005-0015-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11232-005-0015-z

Keywords

Navigation