Abstract
In the age of the Internet, people have increased access to information along multiple dimensions. It might seem that we are on our way to an epistemic utopia in which we spend less time and effort on basic cognitive tasks while devoting more time and effort to complex deliberation. However, though there are many accurate sources on the Internet, they must be sifted from the spammers, concern trolls, practical jokers, conspiracy theorists, counterintelligence sock-puppets, and outright liars who also proliferate online. We can approach this problem via the individual or via the network, asking two questions. First, holding the topology of the network constant, which moral and epistemic dispositions (e.g., trust, distrust, skepticism, curiosity) are conducive to successful inquiry by nodes at different positions within it? Second, holding the distribution of people’s epistemic dispositions constant, which network topologies are more likely to produce epistemic goods and avoid epistemic ills? To answer these questions, we need to combine virtue-theoretic reflection on individual dispositions with a nuanced understanding of the dynamics of networks. In this paper, I highlight and explore some important properties of such networks and connect those properties with dispositions that make someone an excellent member of an epistemic network.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See Alfano and Klein (2019) for more.
For those who are not extremely online, spammers send a large number of irrelevant messages, often with the hope of getting money or other resources from recipients. Concern trolls pretend to care about a movement in complicated ways in order to distract advocates for that movement from their main task into pointless infighting. Counterintelligence sock-puppets are employed by their governments to impersonate citizens of other countries or dissidents within their own countries in order to muddy the epistemic and political waters.
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2015/jun/01/the-counted-police-killings-us-database. Accessed 15 September 2015.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/186308/americans-say-crime-rising.aspx. Accessed 15 September 2016.
For a book-length case study of this, see Benkler et al. (2020).
For further thoughts on the potential benefits of severing connections of trustful communication in certain contexts, see Peels and Blaauw (2016).
Thanks to Dennis Whitcomb for this formulation.
The literature on transactive memories (Dixon and Gould 1996) may also be construed in terms of virtuous (and vicious) echoes. Thanks to Alessandra Tanesini for pointing this out.
References
Alfano, M. (2013). Character as moral fiction. Cambridge University Press.
Alfano, M. (2014). What are the bearers of virtues? In H. Sarkissian & J. C. Wright (Eds.), Advances in experimental moral psychology. (pp. 73–90). Continuum.
Alfano, M. (2015). Becoming less unreasonable: A reply to Sherman. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 4(7), 59–62
Alfano, M. (2016). Friendship and the structure of trust. In A. Masala & J. Webber (Eds.), From personality to virtue: Essays in the psychology and ethics of character. (pp. 186–206). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alfano, M. (2017). The topology of communities of trust. Russian Sociological Review, 15(4), 30–56
Alfano, M. (2018). The Nietzschean precedent for anti-reflective, dialogical agency. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, e37, 12–13
Alfano, M., & Klein, C. (2019). Trust in a social and digital world. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 8(10), 1–8
Alfano, M., & Robinson, B. (2017). Gossip as a burdened virtue. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 20, 473–482
Alfano, M., & Skorburg, A. (2017b). The embedded and extended character hypotheses. In J. Kiverstein (Ed.), Handbook of philosophy of the social mind.Routledge.
Alfano, M., & Skorburg, A. (2017a). Extended knowledge, the recognition heuristic, and epistemic injustice. In D. Pritchard, J. Kallestrup, O. Palermos, & A. Carter (Eds.), Extended knowledge.Oxford University Press.
Baehr, J. (2015). Cultivating good minds: A philosophical and practical guide to educating for intellectual virtues. Retrieved 9 February, 2021, from https://intellectualvirtues.org/why-should-we-educate-for-intellectual-virtues-2-2/.
Beckman, M. (2016). Which countries’ terrorist attacks are ignored by the U.S. media? Fivethirtyeight. Retrieved 20 July, 2016, from http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/which-countries-terrorist-attacks-are-ignored-by-the-u-s-media/.
Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2020). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in american politics. Oxford University Press.
Black, D. (2013). Certitude, justification, and the principles of knowledge in Avicenna’s epistemology. In P. Adamson (Ed.), Interpreting Avicenna. (pp. 120–142). Cambridge University Press.
Blustein, J. (2008). The moral demands of memory. Cambridge University Press.
Boehm, C. (2012). Moral origins: The evolution of virtue, altruism, and shame. Basic Books.
Callaway, E. (2011). Report finds massive fraud at Dutch universities. Nature, 479(7371), 15
Chinnery, A. (2013). On epistemic vulnerability and open-mindedness. Philosophy of Education, 63–66.
Clark, A. (2002). Towards a science of the bio-technological mind. International Journal of Cognition and Technology, 1(1), 21–33
Coady, C. (1995). Testimony: A philosophical study. Clarendon Press.
DesAutels, P. (2009). Resisting organizational power. In L. Tessman (Ed.), Feminist Ethics And Social And Political Philosophy: Theorizing the non-ideal.Springer.
DeVita Raeburn, E. (2004). The empty room: Surviving the loss of a brother or sister at any age. Scribner.
Dixon, R., & Gould, O. (1996). Adults telling and retelling stories collaboratively. In P. Baltes & U. Staudinger (Eds.), Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition.Cambridge University Press.
Doris, J. (2015). Talking to ourselves: Reflection, ignorance, and agency. Oxford University Press.
Dropp, K., Kertzer, J., & Zeitzoff, T. (2014). The less Americans know about Ukraine’s location, the more they want U.S. to intervene. Retrieved 20 July, 2016, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/04/07/the-less-americans-know-about-ukraines-location-the-more-they-want-u-s-to-intervene.
Dunbar, R. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 100–110
Fire, M., Katz, G., & Elovici, Y. (2012). Strangers intrusion detection—Detecting spammers and fake profiles in social networks based on topology anomalies. Human Journal, 1(1), 26–39
Fisher, P., Frenkel, T., Noll, L., Berry, M., & Yockelson, M. (2016). Promoting healthy child development via a two-generation translational neuroscience framework: The Filming Interactions to Nurture Development video coaching program. Child Development Perspectives, 10(4), 251–256
Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1984). Social cognition. Addison-Wesley.
Freeman, L. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
Gilson, E. (2011). Vulnerability, ignorance, and oppression. Hypatia, 26(2), 308–332
Goldberg, S. (2010). Relying on others: An essay in epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, S. (2013). Self-trust and extended trust. Res Philosophica, 90(2), 277–292
Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109(1), 75–90
Gottlieb, J. (2016). Report: Baylor regents say 19 football players accused of sexual assault since 2011. The Washington Post. Retrieved 17 November, 2016, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2016/10/28/report-baylor-regents-say-19-football-players-accused-of-sexual-assault-since-2011/.
Govier, T. (1993). Self-trust, autonomy, and self-esteem. Hypatia, 8(1), 99–120
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech Acts.Academic Press.
Haberman, M. (2016). Donald Trump retweets post with quote from Mussolini. The New York Times. Retrieved 27 March, 2017, from https://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/02/28/donald-trump-retweets-post-likening-him-to-mussolini.
Hardwig, J. (1991). The role of trust in knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy, 88(12), 693–708
Hatch, J. (2016). How the women on Obama’s staff made sure their voices were heard: “Amplification” is where it’s at. Huffington Post. Retrieved 27 March, 2017, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/how-the-women-on-obamas-staff-made-sure-their-voices-were-heard_us_57d94d9fe4b0aa4b722d79fe.
Heersmink, R. (2017). A virtue epistemology of the internet: Search engines, intellectual virtues and education. Social Epistemology, 32, 1–12
James, W. (1896/1979). The will to believe. In Burkhardt et al. (Eds.), The will to believe and other essays in popular philosophy (pp. 291–341). Harvard University Press.
Jones, K. (2012). The politics of intellectual self-trust. Social Epistemology, 26(2), 237–251
Kawall, J. (2002). Other-regarding epistemic virtues. Ratio, 15(3), 257–275
Khaleeli, H. (2016). #SayHerName: Why Kimberlé Crenshaw is fighting for forgotten women. The Guardian. Retrieved 27 March, 2017, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/how-the-women-on-obamas-staff-made-sure-their-voices-were-heard_us_57d94d9fe4b0aa4b722d79fe.
Krebs, V. (2002). Mapping networks of terrorist cells. Connections, 24(3), 43–52
Kvanvig, J. (1992). The intellectual virtues and the life of the mind. Rowman & Littlefield.
Lehrer, K. (1997). Self-trust: A study of reason, knowledge, and autonomy. Oxford University Press.
Lotan, G. (2014). Israel, Gaza, war & data: Social networks and the art of personalizing propaganda. The World Post. Retrieved 1 June, 2017, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gilad-lotan/israel-gaza-war-social-networks-data_b_5658557.html.
Martin, J., & Cushman, F. (2015). To punish or to leave: Distinct cognitive processes underlie partner control and partner choice behaviors. PLoS ONE, 10(4), e0125193. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125193
McLeod, C. (2015). Trust. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 1 September, 2016, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/trust/.
Medina, J. (2012). The epistemology of resistance: Gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and resistant imaginations. Oxford University Press.
Morton, A. (2013). Bounded Thinking: Intellectual Virtues For Limited Agents. Oxford University Press.
Nguyen, T. (2016). Donald Trump Jr. shares white supremacist meme. Vanity Fair. Retrieved 27 March, 2017, from https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/may/30/sayhername-why-kimberle-crenshaw-is-fighting-for-forgotten-women.
O’Connor, C., & Weatherall, J. (2019). The misinformation age: How false beliefs spread. Yale University Press.
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.
Pasnau, R. (2015). Disagreement and the value of self-trust. Philosophical Studies, 172(9), 2315–2339
Peels, R., & Blaauw, M. (2016). The epistemic dimensions of ignorance. Cambridge University Press.
Pennebaker, J. (2011). The secret life of pronouns: What our words say about us. Bloomsbury.
Quealy, K. (2017). If Americans can find North Korea on a map, they’re more likely to prefer diplomacy. The New York Times. Retrieved 24 May, 2017, from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/05/14/upshot/if-americans-can-find-north-korea-on-a-map-theyre-more-likely-to-prefer-diplomacy.html.
Reid, E., Qin, J., Zhou, Y., Lai, G., Sageman, M., Weimann, G., & Chen, H. (2005). Collecting and analyzing the presence of terrorists on the web: A case study of jihad websites. In P. Kantor, G. Muresan, F. Roberts, D. D. Zeng, F. Y. Wang, H. C. Chen, & R. C. Merkle (Eds.), Intelligence and security informatics.Springer.
Roberts, R., & Wood, J. (2007). Intellectual virtues: an essay in regulative epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Roman, R., & Colle, R. (2003). Content creation for ICT development projects: Integrating normative approaches and community demand. Information Technology for Development, 10(2), 85–94
Sable, M., Danis, F., Mauzy, D., & Gallagher, S. (2006). Barriers to reporting sexual assault for women and men: Perspectives of college students. Journal of American College Health, 55(3), 157–162
Savage, D., Zhing, X., Yu, X., Chou, P., & Wang, Q. (2014). Anomaly detection in online social networks. Social Networks, 39(4), 62–70
Senturk, R. (2005). Narrative social structure: Anatomy of the hadith transmission network, 610–1505. Stanford University Press.
Shay, J. (1994). Achilles in Vietnam: Combat trauma and the undoing of character. Simon & Schuster.
Shay, J. (2003). Odysseus in America: Combat trauma and the trials of homecoming. Scribner.
Smith, C. P., & Freyd, J. (2014). Institutional betrayal. American Psychologist, 69(6), 575–587
Šubelj, L., Furlan, U., & Bajec, M. (2011). An expert system for detecting automobiles insurance fraud using social network analysis. Expert Systems Applications, 38(1), 1039–1052
Tessman, L. (2005). Burdened virtues: Virtue ethics for liberatory struggles. Oxford University Press.
Tirrell, L. (2017). Toxic speech: Toward an epidemiology of discursive harm. Philosophical Topics, 45(2), 139–162
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232
Vargas, M. (2016). Responsibility and the limits of conversation. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 10, 221–240
Williams, J. & Cave, D. (2017). Australia grapples with campus assaults, and reprisals against victims. The New York Times. Retrieved 29 June, 2017, from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/21/world/australia/australia-land-of-bro-culture-grapples-with-campus-assaults.html.
Wong, D. (2006). Natural Moralities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zollman, K. (2007). The communication structure of epistemic communities. Philosophy of Science, 74(5), 574–587
Zollman, K. J. (2010). The epistemic benefit of transient diversity. Erkenntnis, 72(1), 17
Acknowledgements
This publication was supported by a subaward agreement from the University of Connecticut with funds provided by Grant No. 58942 from John Templeton Foundation and by grants from the John Templeton Foundation (#61378) and the Australian Research Council (DP190101507). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of UConn or John Templeton Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The article belongs to the topical collection on New Directions in Social Epistemology, edited by Adam Carter and Christoph Kelp.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alfano, M. Virtues for agents in directed social networks. Synthese 199, 8423–8442 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03169-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03169-6