Allen, S., Hughes, M., & Skarabela, B. (2015). The role of cognitive accessibility in children’s referential choice. In L. Serratrice & S. Allen (Eds.), The acquisition of reference (pp. 123–155). Amsterdam: Palgrave.
Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.
Arnold, J. E., Kaiser, E., Kahn, J., & Kim, L. (2013). Information structure: Linguistic, cognitive, and processing approaches. WIREs Cognitive Science. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1234.
Baldwin, D. A. (1995). Understanding the link between joint attention and language. In C. Moore & P. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 131–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bartsch, K., & Wellman, H. M. (1995). Children talk about the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., et al. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59, 1–26.
Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bohnemeyer, J. (2018). Yucatec demonstratives in interaction: Spontaneous versus elicited data. In S. C. Levinson, S. Cutfield, M. Dunn, N. Enfield, & S. Meira (Eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 176–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bonfiglioli, C., Finocchiaro, C., Gesierich, B., Rositani, F., & Vescovi, M. (2009). A kinematic approach to the conceptual representations of this and that. Cognition, 111, 270–274.
Burenhult, N. (2003). Attention, accessibility, and the addressee. Pragmatics, 13, 363–379.
Campbell, A. L., Brooks, P., & Tomasello, M. (2000). Factors affecting young children’s use of pronouns as referring expressions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1337–1349.
Carpenter, M., & Liebal, K. (2011). Joint attention, communication, and knowing together in infancy. In A. Seemann (Ed.), Joint attention: New developments in psychology, philosophy of mind, and social neuroscience (pp. 159–181). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., Tomasello, M., Butterworth, G., & Moore, C. (1998). Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63, 1–143.
Carroll, J. B. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2016). Creating language: Integrating evolution, acquisition, and processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Christiansen, M. H., & Kirby, S. (Eds.). (2003). Language evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chu, C. Y., & Minai, U. (2018). Children’s demonstrative comprehension and the role of non-linguistic cognitive abilities: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47, 1343–1368.
Cifuentes-Honrubia, J. L. (1989). Lengua y espacio: Introducción al problema de la deixis en español. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.
Clark, E. V. (1978). From gesture to word: On the natural history of deixis in language acquisition. In J. S. Bruner & A. Garton (Eds.), Human growth and development (pp. 85–120). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite knowledge and mutual knowledge. In A. Joshi, B. Webber, & I. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, E. V., & Sengul, C. J. (1978). Strategies in the acquisition of deixis. Journal of Child Language, 5, 457–475.
Coventry, K. R., Griffiths, D., & Hamilton, C. J. (2014). Spatial demonstratives and perceptual space: Describing and remembering object location. Cognitive Psychology, 69, 46–70.
Coventry, K. R., Valdés, B., Castillo, A., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2008). Language within your reach: Near–far perceptual space and spatial demonstratives. Cognition, 108, 889–895.
Culbertson, J., & Adger, D. (2014). Language learners privilege structured meaning over surface frequency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 5842–5847.
Dale, P. S., & Crain-Thoreson, C. (1993). Pronoun reversals: Who, when, and why? Journal of Child Language, 20(3), 573–589.
Dayal, V. (2018). (In)definiteness without articles: Diagnosis, analysis, implications. In G. Sharma & R. Bhatt (Eds.), Trends in Hindi linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
de Cat, C. (2011). Information tracking and encoding in early L1: Linguistic competence versus cognitive limitations. Journal of Child Language, 38, 828–860.
de Cat, C. (2013). Egocentric definiteness errors and perspective evaluation in preschool children. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 58–69.
de Cock, B. (2013). Entre distancia, discurso, e intersubjetividad: Los demostrativos neutros en español. Anuario de Letras: Lingüística y Filología, 1, 7–36.
de Villiers, J. G. (1999). On acquiring the structural representations for false complements. In B. Hollebrandse (Ed.), New perspectives on language acquisition. Amherst, MA: UMOP.
de Villiers, J. G. (2007). The interface of language and Theory of Mind. Lingua, 117, 1858–1878.
de Villiers, P. A., & de Villiers, J. G. (1974). On this, that, and the other: Non-egocentrism in very young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 438–447.
Dediu, D., Cysouw, M., Levinson, S. C., Baronchelli, A., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., et al. (2013). Cultural evolution of language. Cultural evolution: Society, technology, language, and religion. Strüngmann forum reports (Vol. 12, pp. 303–332). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Diessel, H. (1999). The morphosyntax of demonstratives in synchrony and diachrony. Linguistic Typology, 3, 1–49.
Diessel, H. (2003). The relationship between demonstratives and interrogatives. Studies in Language, 27, 635–655.
Diessel, H. (2005). Distance contrasts in demonstratives. In M. Haspelmath, M. Dryer, D. Gil, & B. Comrie (Eds.), World atlas of language structures (pp. 170–173). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Diessel, H. (2006). Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 17, 463–489.
Diessel, H. (2007). Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 108–127.
Diessel, H. (2012a). Where do grammatical morphemes come from? On the development of grammatical markers from lexical expressions, demonstratives, and question words. In K. Davidse, T. Breban, L. Brems, T. Mortelmans, B. Cornillie, H. Cuyckens, & T. Leuschner (Eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: New reflections. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Diessel, H. (2012b). Deixis and demonstratives. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Eds.), An international handbook of natural language meaning (Vol. 3, pp. 2407–2431). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Diessel, H. (2013). Where does language come from? Some reflections on the role of deictic gesture and demonstratives in the evolution of language. Language and Cognition, 5, 239–249.
Diessel, H. (2014). Demonstratives, frames of reference, and semantic universals of space. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8, 116–132.
Eguren, L. J. (1999). Pronombres y adverbios demonstrativos. Las relaciones deícticas. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española (Vol. 1, pp. 929–974). Madrid: Espasa.
Enfield, N. J. (2015). Linguistic relativity from reference to agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 207–224.
Evans, N. (2006a). Who said polysynthetic languages avoid subordination? Multiple subordination strategies in Dalabon. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 26, 31–58.
Evans, N. (2006b). View with a view: Towards a typology of multiple perspective. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 31, 93–120.
Evans, N., Bergqvist, H., & San Roque, L. (2018a). The grammar of engagement I: Framework and initial exemplification. Language and Cognition, 10, 110–140.
Evans, N., Bergqvist, H., & San Roque, L. (2018b). The grammar of engagement II: Typology and diachrony. Language and Cognition, 10, 141–170.
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429–448.
Fedzechkina, M., Jaeger, T. F., & Newport, E. L. (2012). Language learners restructure their input to facilitate efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 17897–17902.
Fedzechkina, M., Newport, E. L., & Jaeger, T. F. (2017). Balancing effort and information transmission during language acquisition: Evidence from word order and case marking. Cognitive Science, 41(2), 416–446.
Flavell, J. H. (1992). Perspectives on perspective-taking. In H. Beilin & P. B. Pufall (Eds.), Piaget’s theory: Prospects and possibilities (pp. 107–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Friedman, L., Lorang, E., & Sterling, A. (2019). The use of demonstratives and personal pronouns in fragile X syndrome and autism spectrum disorder. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 33(5), 420–436.
Geurts, B. (2010). Quantity implicatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greenberg, J. H. (1978). How does a language acquire gender markers. Universals of Human Language, 3, 47–82.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58)., Speech acts New York: Academic Press.
Gundel, J. K., & Johnson, K. (2013). Children’s use of referring expressions in spontaneous discourse: Implications for Theory of Mind development. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 43–57.
Gundel, J. K., Ntelitheos, D., & Kowalsky, M. (2007). Children’s use of referring expressions: Some implications for Theory of Mind. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 48, 1–21.
Hacquard, V., & Lidz, J. (2019). Children’s attitude problems: Bootstrapping verb meaning from syntax and pragmatics. Mind and Language, 34, 73–96.
Hanks, W. F. (2005). Explorations in the Deictic field. Current Anthropology, 46, 191–220.
Hanks, W. F. (2011). Deixis and indexicality. In W. Bublitz & N. R. Norrick (Eds.), Foundations of pragmatics (pp. 315–346). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Harris, P. L. (1996). Desires, beliefs and language. In P. Carruthers & P. K. Smith (Eds.), Theories of theories of mind (pp. 200–220). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harris, P. L. (1999). Acquiring the art of conversation: Children’s developing conception of their conversation partner. In M. Bennett (Ed.), Developmental psychology: Achievements and prospects (pp. 89–105). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Heyes, C. M. (2014). False belief in infancy: A fresh look. Developmental Science, 17, 647–659.
Heyes, C. M. (2018). Cognitive gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Heyes, C. M., & Frith, C. D. (2014). The cultural evolution of mind reading. Science, 344(6190), 1243091.
Hickmann, M., Schimke, S., & Colonna, S. (2015). From early to late mastery of reference: Multifunctionality and linguistic diversity. In L. Serratrice & S. Allen (Eds.), The acquisition of reference (pp. 181–211). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (1993/2003). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horton, W. S., & Gerrig, R. J. (2005). Conversational common ground and memory processes in language production. Discourse Process, 40, 1–35.
Ionin, T., Zubizarreta, M. L., & Philippov, V. (2009). Acquisition of article semantics by child and adult L2-English learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 337–361.
Jara-Ettinger, J., Gweon, H., Schulz, L. E., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2016). The naïve utility calculus: Computational principles underlying commonsense psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 589–604.
Jarbou, S. O. (2010). Accessibility versus physical proximity: An analysis of exophoric demonstrative practice in spoken Jordanian Arabic. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 3078–3097.
Jungbluth, K. (2003). Deictics in the conversational dyad: Findings in Spanish and some cross-linguistic outlines. In F. Lenz (Ed.), Deictic conceptualisation of space, time and person (pp. 13–40). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Kemmerer, D. (1999). ‘Near’ and ‘far’ in language and perception. Cognition, 73, 35–63.
Kirby, S., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2008). Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 10681–10686.
Kirby, S., Griffiths, T., & Smith, K. (2014). Iterated learning and the evolution of language. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 28, 108–114.
Kita, S. (Ed.). (2003). Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Küntay, A. C. (2002). Development of the expression of indefiniteness: Presenting new referents in Turkish picture-series stories. Discourse Processes, 33, 77–101.
Küntay, A. C. (2012). Crosslinguistic research. In E. Hoff (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to research methods in child language (pp. 287–299). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Küntay, A. C., Nakamura, K., & Ates Sen, B. (2014). Crosslinguistic and crosscultural approaches to pragmatic development. In D. Matthews (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition (pp. 317–341). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Küntay, A. C., & Özyürek, A. (2006). Learning to use demonstratives in conversation: What do language specific strategies in Turkish reveal? Journal of Child Language, 33, 303–320.
Levinson, S. C. (2004). Deixis and pragmatics. In L. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 97–121). Oxford: Blackwell.
Levinson, S. C. (2006). Cognition at the heart of human interaction. Discourse Studies, 8, 85–93.
Levinson, S. C. (2018). Demonstratives: Patterns in diversity. In S. C. Levinson, S. Cutfield, M. Dunn, N. Enfield, & S. Meira (Eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 1–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lohmann, H., & Tomasello, M. (2003). The role of language in the development of false belief understanding: A training study. Child Development, 74, 1130–1144.
Loveland, K. A. (1984). Learning about points of view: Spatial perspective and the acquisition of ‘I/you’. Journal of Child Language, 11(3), 535–556.
Lyons, C. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Malle, B. F. (2002). The relation between language and Theory of Mind in development and evolution. In T. Givón & B. F. Malle (Eds.), The evolution of language out of pre-language (pp. 265–284). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Matsui, T., Yamamoto, T., & McCagg, P. (2006). On the role of language in children’s early understanding of others as epistemic beings. Cognitive Development, 21, 158–173.
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2006). The effect of perceptual availability and prior discourse on young children’s use of referring expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 403–422.
Milligan, K., Astington, J. W., & Dack, L. A. (2007). Language and Theory of Mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78, 622–646.
Mithun, M. (1984). How to avoid subordination. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 10, 493–509.
Moll, H., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Fourteen-month-olds know what others experience only in joint engagement. Developmental Science, 10, 826–835.
Moll, H., & Kadipasaoglu, D. (2013). The primacy of social over visual perspective-taking. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 558.
Moll, H., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2011a). Perspective-taking and its foundation in joint attention. In N. Eilan, H. Lerman, & J. Roessler (Eds.), Perception, causation, and objectivity. Issues in philosophy and psychology (pp. 286–304). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moll, H., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2011b). Joint attention as the fundamental basis of perspectives. In A. Seemann (Ed.), Joint attention: New developments in psychology, philosophy of mind, and social neuroscience (pp. 393–413). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Moll, H., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2011c). How does it look? Level 2 perspective-taking at 36 months. Child Development, 82, 661–673.
Moll, H., Richter, N., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Fourteen-month-olds know what “we” have shared in a special way. Infancy, 13, 90–101.
Moll, H., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Level 1 perspective-taking at 24 months of age. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 603–613.
Moore, R. (under review). Extended social cognition and the cultural evolution of mind-modelling.
Moore, C., & Dunham, P. J. (1995). Joint attention: Its origins and role in development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs. Science, 308(5719), 255–258.
Özyürek, A. (1998). An analysis of the basic meaning of Turkish demonstratives in face-to-face conversational interaction. In S. Santi, I. Guaitella, C. Cave, & G. Konopczynski (Eds.), Oralite et Gestualite: Communication multimodale, interaction. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J., & Trueswell, J. (2008). Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 108, 155–184.
Peeters, D., Azar, Z., & Ozyurek, A. (2014). The interplay between joint attention, physical proximity, and pointing gesture in demonstrative choice. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1144–1149).
Peeters, D., Hagoort, P., & Özyürek, A. (2015). Electrophysiological evidence for the role of shared space in online comprehension of spatial demonstratives. Cognition, 136, 64–84.
Peeters, D., & Özyürek, A. (2016). This and that revisited: A social and multimodal approach to spatial demonstratives. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 222.
Pinker, S. (2007). The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. New York: Viking.
Piwek, P., Beun, R. J., & Cremers, A. (2008). ‘Proximal’ and ‘distal’ in language and cognition: Evidence from deictic demonstratives in Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 694–718.
Prince, E. (1992). The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information-status. In S. Thompson & W. Mann (Eds.), Discourse description: Diverse analyses of a fund-raising text (pp. 295–325). Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rakoczy, H. (2017). In defense of a developmental dogma: Children acquire propositional attitude folk psychology around age 4. Synthese, 194, 689–707.
Reinhart, T. (1981). Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 27, 53–94.
Rocca, R., Wallentin, M., Vesper, C., & Tylén, K. (2018). This and that back in context: Grounding demonstrative reference in manual and social affordances. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1522–1527).
Rocca, R., Wallentin, M., Vesper, C., & Tylén, K. (2019). This is for you: Social modulations of proximal versus distal space in collaborative interaction. Scientific Reports, 9, 14967.
Rozendaal, M. I., & Baker, A. E. (2008). A cross-linguistic investigation of the acquisition of the pragmatics of indefinite and definite reference in two-year-olds. Journal of Child Language, 35(4), 773–807.
Rozendaal, M., & Baker, A. (2010). The acquisition of reference: Pragmatic aspects and the influence of language input. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1866–1879.
Rubio-Fernandez, P. (2017). The director task: A test of Theory-of-Mind use or selective attention? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(4), 1121–1128.
Rubio-Fernandez, P. (2019). Theory of Mind. In C. Cummins & N. Katsos (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of experimental semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: OUP.
Rubio-Fernandez, P., Mollica, F., Ali, M. O., & Gibson, E. (2019). How do you know that? Automatic belief inferences in passing conversation. Cognition, 193, 104011.
Ruffman, T. (2014). To belief or not belief: Children’s Theory of Mind. Developmental Review, 34, 265–293.
Scott-Phillips, T. (2014). Speaking our minds. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Serratrice, L. (2008). The role of discourse and perceptual cues in the choice of referential expressions in English preschoolers, school-age children, and adults. Language Learning and Development, 4, 309–332.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 623–656.
Shatz, M., Wellman, H. M., & Silber, S. (1983). The acquisition of mental verbs: A systematic investigation of the first reference to mental state. Cognition, 14, 301–321.
Skarabela, B. (2007). Signs of early social cognition in children’s syntax: The case of joint attention in argument realization in child Inuktitut. Lingua, 117, 1837–1857.
Skarabela, B., & Allen, S. E. (2002). The role of joint attention in argument realization in child Inuktitut. In Proceedings of the 26th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 620–630). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Skarabela, B., Allen, S. E., & Scott-Phillips, T. C. (2013). Joint attention helps explain why children omit new referents. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 5–14.
Slobin, D. I. (1996). From ‘‘thought and language’’ to ‘‘thinking for speaking’’. In J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, K. (2018). The cognitive prerequisites for language: Insights from iterated learning. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 21, 154–160.
Sperber D. (Ed.). (2000). Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In Metarepresentations: A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 117–137). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986/1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Stevens, J., & Zhang, Y. (2013). Relative distance and gaze in the use of entity-referring spatial demonstratives: An event-related potential study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26, 31–45.
Stevens, J., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Brain mechanisms for processing co-speech gesture: A cross-language study of spatial demonstratives. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 30, 27–47.
Strauss, S. (2002). This, that, and it in spoken American English: A demonstrative system of gradient focus. Language Sciences, 24, 131–152.
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tomasello, M. (2018). How children come to understand false beliefs: A shared intentionality account. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(34), 8491–8498.
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675–691.
Tomasello, M., & Haberl, K. (2003). Understanding attention: 12-and 18-month-olds know what is new for other persons. Developmental Psychology, 39, 906–912.
Tompkins, V., Farrar, M., & Montgomery, D. E. (2019). Speaking your mind: Language and narrative in young children’s Theory of Mind development. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 56, 109–140.
Webb, P. A., & Abrahamson, A. A. (1976). Stages of egocentrism in children’s use of ‘this’ and ‘that’: A different point of view. Journal of Child Language, 3, 349–367.
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.
Woensdregt, M., Cummis, C., & Smith, K. (2020). A computational model of the cultural co-evolution of language and mindreading. Synthese. Special issue on The cultural evolution of human social cognition.
Wolff, P., & Holmes, K. J. (2011). Linguistic relativity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2, 253–265.
Zimmermann, M. (2016). Information structure. In M. Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford bibliographies in linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0130.