Adam, M., Reitenbach, I., Papenmeier, F., Gredebäck, G., Elsner, C., & Elsner, B. (2016). Goal saliency boosts infants’ action prediction for human manual actions, but not for mechanical claws. Infant Behavior and Development, 44, 29–37.
Article
Google Scholar
Ambrosini, E., Costantini, M., & Sinigaglia, C. (2011). Grasping with the eyes. Journal of Neurophysiology, 106(3), 1437–1442.
Article
Google Scholar
Ambrosini, E., Reddy, V., de Looper, A., Costantini, M., Lopez, B., & Sinigaglia, C. (2013). Looking ahead: Anticipatory gaze and motor ability in infancy. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e67916.
Article
Google Scholar
Ambrosini, E., Sinigaglia, C., & Costantini, M. (2012). Tie my hands, tie my eyes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(2), 263–266.
Google Scholar
Bach, K. (1978). A representational theory of action. Philosophical Studies, 34(4), 361–379.
Article
Google Scholar
Bakker, M., Sommerville, J. A., & Gredebäck, G. (2015). Enhanced neural processing of goal-directed actions after active training in 4-month-old infants. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(3), 472–482.
Article
Google Scholar
Behne, T., Carpenter, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Unwilling versus unable: Infants’ understanding of intentional action. Developmental Psychology, 41(2), 328–337.
Article
Google Scholar
Biro, S., Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2007). The role of behavioral cues in understanding goal-directed actions in infancy. In C. von Hofsten & K. Rosander (Eds.), Progress in brain research (Vol. 164, pp. 303–322). Amsterdam: Elsevier. (From action to cognition).
Google Scholar
Bruderer, A. G., Danielson, D. K., Kandhadai, P., & Werker, J. F. (2015). Sensorimotor influences on speech perception in infancy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(44), 13531–13536.
Article
Google Scholar
Butterfill, S. A. (2012). Interacting mindreaders. Philosophical Studies, 165(3), 841–863.
Article
Google Scholar
Butterfill, S. A., & Sinigaglia, C. (2014). Intention and motor representation in purposive action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88(1), 119–145.
Article
Google Scholar
Cannon, E. N., & Woodward, A. L. (2012). Infants generate goal-based action predictions. Developmental Science, 15(2), 292–298.
Article
Google Scholar
Cannon, E. N., Woodward, A. L., Gredebäck, G., von Hofsten, C., & Turek, C. (2012). Action production influences 12-month-old infants’ attention to others’ actions. Developmental Science, 15(1), 35–42.
Article
Google Scholar
Cohen, R. G., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2004). Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: Generation and recall of motor plans. Experimental Brain Research, 157(4), 486–495.
Article
Google Scholar
Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Cardellicchio, P., & Sinigaglia, C. (2014). How your hand drives my eyes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(5), 705–711.
Article
Google Scholar
Csibra, G. (2003). Teleological and referential understanding of action in infancy. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 447–458.
Article
Google Scholar
Csibra, G. (2008). Goal attribution to inanimate agents by 6.5-month-old infants. Cognition, 107(2), 705–717.
Article
Google Scholar
Csibra, G., Bı́ró, S., Koós, O., & Gergely, G. (2003). One-year-old infants use teleological representations of actions productively. Cognitive Science, 27(1), 111–133.
Article
Google Scholar
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (1998). The teleological origins of mentalistic action explanations: A developmental hypothesis. Developmental Science, 1(2), 255–259.
Article
Google Scholar
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2007). Obsessed with goals’: Functions and mechanisms of teleological interpretation of actions in humans. Acta Psychologica, 124(1), 60–78.
Article
Google Scholar
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2013). Teleological understanding of actions. In M. R. Banaji & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Navigating the social world: What infants, children, and other species can teach us (pp. 37–43). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Daum, M. M., Attig, M., Gunawan, R., Prinz, W., & Gredeback, G. (2012). Actions seen through babies’ eyes: A dissociation between looking time and predictive gaze. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(September), 370.
Google Scholar
Elsner, C., D’Ausilio, A., Gredebäck, G., Falck-Ytter, T., & Fadiga, L. (2013). The motor cortex is causally related to predictive eye movements during action observation. Neuropsychologia, 51(3), 488–492.
Article
Google Scholar
Falck-Ytter, T., Gredeback, G., & von Hofsten, C. (2006). Infants predict other people’s action goals. Nature Neuroscience, 9(7), 878–879.
Article
Google Scholar
Flanagan, J. R., & Johansson, R. S. (2003). Action plans used in action observation. Nature, 424(6950), 769–771.
Article
Google Scholar
Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(9), 396–403.
Article
Google Scholar
Gallese, V., & Sinigaglia, C. (2011). What is so special about embodied simulation? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 512–519.
Article
Google Scholar
Gao, T., Newman, G. E., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). The psychophysics of chasing: A case study in the perception of animacy. Cognitive Psychology, 59(2), 154–179.
Article
Google Scholar
Gazzola, V., Rizzolatti, G., Wicker, B., & Keysers, C. (2007a). The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions. NeuroImage, 35(4), 1674–1684.
Article
Google Scholar
Gazzola, V., van der Worp, H., Mulder, T., Wicker, B., Rizzolatti, G., & Keysers, C. (2007b). Aplasics born without hands mirror the goal of hand actions with their feet. Current Biology, 17(14), 1235–1240.
Article
Google Scholar
Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (2003). Teleological reasoning in infancy: The naive theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 287–292.
Article
Google Scholar
Gergely, G., Nadasky, Z., Csibra, G., & Biro, S. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56, 165–193.
Article
Google Scholar
Gerson, S. A., & Woodward, A. L. (2014). Learning from their own actions: The unique effect of producing actions on infants’ action understanding. Child Development, 85(1), 264–277.
Article
Google Scholar
Grafton, S. T., & Hamilton, A Fd C. (2007). Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. Human Movement Science, 26(4), 590–616.
Article
Google Scholar
Gredebäck, G., & Falck-Ytter, T. (2015). Eye movements during action observation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(5), 591–598.
Article
Google Scholar
Gredebäck, G., & Melinder, A. (2010). Infants’ understanding of everyday social interactions: A dual process account. Cognition, 114(2), 197–206.
Article
Google Scholar
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behaviour. American Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 243–259.
Article
Google Scholar
Hernik, M., Fearon, P., & Csibra, G. (2014). Action anticipation in human infants reveals assumptions about anteroposterior body-structure and action. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1781), 20133205.
Article
Google Scholar
Hernik, M., & Southgate, V. (2012). Nine-months-old infants do not need to know what the agent prefers in order to reason about its goals: On the role of preference and persistence in infants’ goal-attribution. Developmental Science, 15(5), 714–722.
Article
Google Scholar
Hunnius, S., & Bekkering, H. (2014). What are you doing? How active and observational experience shape infants’ action understanding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369(1644), 20130490.
Article
Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (2006). Motor cognition: What actions tell the self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Kanakogi, Y., & Itakura, S. (2011). Developmental correspondence between action prediction and motor ability in early infancy. Nature Communications, 2(June), 341.
Article
Google Scholar
Kawato, M. (1999). Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9(6), 718–727.
Article
Google Scholar
Luo, Y. (2011). Three-month-old infants attribute goals to a non-human agent. Developmental Science, 14(2), 453–460.
Article
Google Scholar
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Google Scholar
Needham, A., Barrett, T., & Peterman, K. (2002). A pick-me-up for infants’ exploratory skills: Early simulated experiences reaching for objects using ‘sticky mittens’ enhances young infants’ object exploration skills. Infant Behavior and Development, 25(3), 279–295.
Article
Google Scholar
Needham, A. W., Wiesen, S. E., Hejazi, J. N., Libertus, K., & Christopher, C. (2017). Characteristics of brief sticky mittens training that lead to increases in object exploration. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 164(December), 209–224.
Article
Google Scholar
Pazzaglia, M., Pizzamiglio, L., Pes, E., & Aglioti, S. M. (2008). The sound of actions in apraxia. Current Biology, 18(22), 1766–1772.
Article
Google Scholar
Pomiechowska, B., & Csibra, G. (2017). Motor activation during action perception depends on action interpretation. Neuropsychologia, 105, 84–91.
Article
Google Scholar
Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In Odmar Neumann & Wolfgang Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action (pp. 167–201). Berlin: Springer.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 2(9), 661–670.
Article
Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the brain: How our minds share actions, emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2010). The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 11(4), 264–274.
Article
Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2016). The mirror mechanism: A basic principle of brain function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(12), 757.
Article
Google Scholar
Rochat, P., Morgan, R., & Carpenter, M. (1997). Young infants’ sensitivity to movement information specifying social causality. Cognitive Development, 12(4), 537–561.
Article
Google Scholar
Rochat, P., Striano, T., & Morgan, R. (2004). Who Is doing what to whom? Young infants’ developing sense of social causality in animated displays. Perception, 33(3), 355–369.
Article
Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. A. (2010). Human motor control (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. A., Chapman, K. M., Weigelt, M., Weiss, D. J., & van der Wel, R. P. R. D. (2012). Cognition, action, and object manipulation. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 924–946.
Article
Google Scholar
Schlottmann, A., & Ray, E. (2010). Goal attribution to schematic animals: Do 6-month-olds perceive biological motion as animate? Developmental Science, 13(1), 1–10.
Article
Google Scholar
Scholl, B. J., & Gao, T. (2013). Perceiving animacy and intentionality: Visual processing or higher-level judgment. In M. D. Rutherford & V. A. Kuhlmeier (Eds.), Social perception: Detection and interpretation of animacy, agency, and intention (pp. 197–230). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet, P. D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(8), 299–309.
Article
Google Scholar
Sinigaglia, C., & Butterfill, S. A. (2016). Motor representation in goal ascription. In Yann Coello & Martin H. Fischer (Eds.), Foundations of embodied cognition 2: Conceptual and interactive embodiment (pp. 149–164). Hove: Psychology Press.
Google Scholar
Skerry, A. E., Carey, S. E., & Spelke, E. S. (2013). First-person action experience reveals sensitivity to action efficiency in prereaching infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(46), 18728–18733.
Article
Google Scholar
Sommerville, J. A., Hildebrand, E. A., & Crane, C. C. (2008). Experience matters: The impact of doing versus watching on infants’ subsequent perception of tool-use events. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1249–1256.
Article
Google Scholar
Sommerville, J. A., & Woodward, A. L. (2005). Pulling out the intentional structure of action: The relation between action processing and action production in infancy. Cognition, 95(1), 1–30.
Article
Google Scholar
Sommerville, J. A., Woodward, A. L., & Needham, A. (2005). Action experience alters 3-month-old infants’ perception of others’ actions. Cognition, 96(1), B1–B11.
Article
Google Scholar
Song, H.-J., Baillargeon, R., & Fisher, C. (2005). Can infants attribute to an agent a disposition to perform a particular action? Cognition, 98(2), B45–B55.
Article
Google Scholar
Southgate, V., Johnson, M. H., & Csibra, G. (2008). Infants attribute goals even to biomechanically impossible actions. Cognition, 107(3), 1059–1069.
Article
Google Scholar
Triberti, S., Repetto, C., Costantini, M., Riva, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2016). Press to grasp: How action dynamics shape object categorization. Experimental Brain Research, 234(3), 799–806.
Article
Google Scholar
van Buren, B., Uddenberg, S., & Scholl, B. J. (2016). The automaticity of perceiving animacy: Goal-directed motion in simple shapes influences visuomotor behavior even when task-irrelevant. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(3), 797–802.
Article
Google Scholar
Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 593–602.
Article
Google Scholar
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269(5232), 1880–1882.
Article
Google Scholar
Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C., & Kawato, M. (1998). Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(9), 338–347.
Article
Google Scholar
Woodward, A. L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reach. Cognition, 69, 1–34.
Article
Google Scholar
Woodward, A. L. (2009). Infants’ grasp of others’ intentions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 53–57.
Article
Google Scholar
Woodward, A. L., & Gerson, Sarah A. (2014). Mirroring and the development of action understanding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369(1644), 20130181.
Article
Google Scholar
Woodward, A. L., Sommerville, Jessica A., & Guajardo, Jose J. (2001). Making sense of human behavior: Action parsing and intentional inference. In Bertram F. Malle, Louis Moses, & Dare Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality (pp. 149–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar