Charting the landscape of interpretation, theory rivalry, and underdetermination in quantum mechanics
- 111 Downloads
When we speak about different interpretations of quantum mechanics it is suggested that there is one single quantum theory that can be interpreted in different ways. However, after an explicit characterization of what it is to interpret quantum mechanics, the right diagnosis is that we have a case of predictively equivalent rival theories. I extract some lessons regarding the resulting underdetermination of theory choice. Issues about theoretical identity, theoretical and methodological pluralism, and the prospects for a realist stance towards quantum theory can be properly addressed once we recognize that interpretations of quantum mechanics are rival theories.
KeywordsQuantum mechanics Empirical equivalence Underdetermination Pluralism Theory identity
I thank four anonymous referees for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this work. I thank Angelo Bassi, Max Maaneli Derakshani and Francesca Vidotto for bibliographic references. The first version of this article was written during my stay as a Visiting Fellow in the Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh. I thank its Director Edouard Machery and everybody in the Center for their hospitality, and James Fraser and everyone in the reading group for their helpful comments on the first draft. This work was financially supported by FONDECYT Grant 11170608.
- Albert, D. (1992). Quantum mechanics and experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Bohm, D., & Hiley, B. (1993). The undivided universe: An ontological interpretation of quantum theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bub, J. (1997). Interpreting the quantum world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bub, J., Clifton, R., & Monton, B. (1998). The Bare theory has no clothes. Quantum measurement: Beyond paradox (pp. 32–51). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Bueno, O. (2011). Structural empiricism, again. In A. Bokulich & P. Bokulich (Eds.), Scientific structuralism (pp. 81–104). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Busch, P., Grabowski, M., & Lahti, P. (1995). Operational quantum physics. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Daumer, M., Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., & Zanghì, N. (1997). Naive realism about operators. Erkenntnis, 45, 379–397.Google Scholar
- Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Münch-Berndl, K., & Zanghì, N. (1999). Hypersurface Bohm-Dirac Models. Physical Review A, 60, 2729.Google Scholar
- Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., & Zanghi, N. (1997). Bohmian mechanics and the meaning of the wave function. In R. Cohen, M. Horne, & J. Stachel (Eds.), Experimental metaphysics: Quantum mechanical studies for Abner Shimony (pp. 25–38). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
- Dürr, D., & Teufel, S. (2009). Bohmian mechanics: The physics and mathematics of quantum theory. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Einstein, A. (1954). What is the theory of relativity? Ideas and opinions (pp. 227–232). New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
- French, S., & Ladyman, J. (2011). In defence of ontic structural realism. In A. Bokulich & P. Bokulich (Eds.), Scientific structuralism (pp. 25–42). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Ghirardi, G. (2016). Collapse theories. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/qm-collapse.
- Glymour, C. (1970). Theoretical realism and theoretical equivalence. In R. Buck & R. Cohen (Eds.), Boston studies in philosophy of science VII (pp. 275–288). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
- Hartle, J. B. (1991). The quantum mechanics of cosmology. In S. Coleman, J. B. Hartle, T. Piran, & S. Weinberg (Eds.), Quantum cosmology and baby universes: Proceedings of 7th Jerusalem Winter School (pp. 67–158). Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
- Hempel, C. (1965). Aspects of Scientific explanation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Jammer, M. (1974). Philosophy of quantum mechanics: The interpretations of quantum mechanics in historical perspective. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Kitcher, P. (1989). Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world. In P. Kitcher & W. Salmon (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. XIII, pp. 410–503). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Leavens, C. (1996). The ‘tunneling time problem’ for electrons. In J. Cushing, A. Fine, & S. Goldstein (Eds.), Bohmian mechanics and quantum theory: An appraisal (pp. 11–130). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Lienert, M., Petrat, S., & Tumulka, R. (2017). Multi-time wave functions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 880, 012006.Google Scholar
- Maudlin, T. (2008). Non-local correlations in quantum theory: How the trick might be done. In W. L. Craig & Q. Smith (Eds.), Einstein, relativity, and absolute simultaneity (pp. 156–179). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Muller, F. A. (2015). Circumveiloped by Obscuritads: The nature of interpretation in quantum mechanics, hermeneutic circles and physical reality, with cameos of James Joyce and Jacques Derrida. In J.-Y. Béziau, D. Krause, & J. R. Becker Arenhart (Eds.), Conceptual clarifications. Tributes to Patrick Suppes (1922–2014) (pp. 107–136). College Publications.Google Scholar
- Peres, A. (1993). Quantum theory: Concepts and methods. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Psillos, S. (1999). Scientific realism: How science tracks truth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ruetsche, L. (2015). QM. In L. Sklar (Ed.), Physical theory: Method and interpretation (pp. 229–268). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Saatsi, J. (2017). Scientific realism meets metaphysics of quantum mechanics. In A. Cordero (Ed.), Philosophers think about quantum theory. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Salmon, W. (1989). Four decades of scientific explanation. In P. Kitcher & W. Salmon (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. XIII, pp. 3–219). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- von Neumann, J. (1955). Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Wallace, D. (2008). Philosophy of quantum mechanics. In D. Rickles (Ed.), The Ashgate companion to contemporary philosophy of physics (pp. 16–98). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Wallace, D. (2016). What is orthodox quantum mechanics? Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.05973 (forthcoming).
- Weatherall, J. O. (2018). Theoretical equivalence in physics. arXiv:1810.08192 (unpublished manuscript).