Skip to main content
Log in

Coherence of de Finetti coherence

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We prove that de Finetti coherence is preserved under taking products of coherent books on two sets of independent events. This establishes a desirable closure property of coherence: were it not the case it would raise a question mark over the utility of de Finetti’s notion of coherence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borkar, V. S., Konda, V. R., & Mitter, S. K. (2004). On de Finetti coherence and Kolmogorov probability. Statistics & Probability Letters, 66, 417–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B. (1993). Sul significato soggettivo della probabilitá. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 17 (1931) 298–329. Translated into English as “On the Subjective Meaning of Probability”. In P. Monari & D. Cocchi (Eds.), Probabilitá e Induzione (pp. 291–321). Clueb: Bologna.

  • de Finetti, B. (1980). La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Annales de l’Institut H. Poincaré, 7 (1937) 1–68. Translated into English by Henry E. Kyburg Jr., as “Foresight: Its Logical Laws, its Subjective Sources”. In H. E. Kyburg Jr. & H. E. Smokler (Eds.), Studies in subjective probability, New York: Second edition published by Krieger (pp. 53–118) Wiley: New York, 1964 .

  • de Finetti, B. (1974). Theory of probability (Vol. 1). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B. (2008). Philosophical lectures on probability. Collected, edited and annotated by A. Mora, With an Introductory Essay by M. C. Galavotti (Hykel Hosni Trans.). Synthese Library, vol. 340, Berlin:Springer.

  • Dickey, J. M., Eaton, M. L., & Sudderth, W. D. (2009). De Finetti Coherence and Logical Consistency. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 50, 133–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hailperin, T. (1986). Boole’s logic and probability: A critical exposition from the standpoint of contemporary algebra, logic and probability theory. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, A., & Tarski, A. (1948). Measures in Boolean algebras. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 64, 467–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J. L. (1959). Measures on boolean algebras. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 9.4, 1165–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny, J. G. (1955). Fair bets and inductive probabilities. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 20, 263–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolmogorov, A. N. (1995). Complete metric Boolean algebras. Philosophical Studies, 77, 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppelberg, S. (1989). General Theory of Boolean Algebras. In: Handbook of Boolean Algebras (Vol.1). Edited by J.D.Monk with the cooperation of R. Bonnet, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

  • Kroupa, T. (2006). Every state on a semisimple MV-algebra is integral. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157, 2771–2782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, R. S. (1955). On confirmation and rational betting. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 20, 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panti, G. (2009). Invariant measures in free MV-algebras. Communications in Algebra, 36, 2849–2861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. Truth and probability. In: Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays, (R. Braithwaite, ed.), pp. 156–198, Routledge and P. Kegan, London, 1931. Reprinted In: Studies in Subjective Probability, H. Kyburg et al. (eds.), 2nd edition, pp. 23–52, R.E. Krieger Publishing Co., 1980. Reprinted In F. P. Ramsey Philosophical Papers, D.H. Mellor (Ed.), Cambridge university Press, 1990.

  • Rota, G.-C. (2001). Twelve problems in probability no one likes to bring up, (The Fubini Lectures). In H. Crapo & D. Senato (Eds.), Algebraic combinatorics and computer science, a tribute to Gian-Carlo Rota (pp. 57–93). Milan: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sikorski, R. (1960). Boolean algebras. Second edition. Ergeb. der Math. und ihrer Grenzgeb., Vol 25, Springer, Berlin.

  • Tao, T. (2010). An epsilon of room I: Real analysis. Graduate studies in mathematics (Vol. 117). Providence RI: American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, T. (2011). An introduction to measure theory, graduate studies in mathematics (Vol. 126). Providence RI: American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Plato, J. (1994). Creating modern probability: Its mathematics, physics, and philosophy in historical perspective. Cambridge studies in probability, induction, and decision theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Two referees and an editor read earlier versions of this paper and gave many valuable suggestions for improvement, resulting in the present thoroughly revised version: suffice to say that the title has changed and two chapters have been added to the original version. The author is very grateful to them for their help. He also wishes to thank Alberto Gandolfi for many conversations on probabilistic coherence.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele Mundici.

Appendix: Background lemmas

Appendix: Background lemmas

In this section we collect all results needed for the proof of Theorem 2.1, together with detailed references where the interested reader can find a proof.

The following result has a central role in boolean algebra theory:

Lemma 2.1

(Stone representation theorem, (Koppelberg 1989, Chapter 3), (Sikorski 1960, §8)) For every boolean algebra D let \(D'\) be the topological space given by the prime (=maximal) ideals of D equipped with the following (hull kernel, or Zariski) topology: a basic clopen of \(D'\) is the set \(\{\mathfrak m\in D'\mid d\in \mathfrak m\}\) of all maximal ideals to which an element \(d\in D\) belongs, letting d range over all elements of D. An open set is an arbitrary union of these clopens. Then \(D'\) turns out to be a totally disconnected compact Hausdorff space, called the Stone space of D. Let \(\mathsf {CLOP}(D')\) denote the family of clopen subsets of \(D'\). Then D is isomorphic to the boolean algebra \( (\mathsf {CLOP}(D'),\emptyset , D',\cup ,\cap , \lnot ),\) where, for each \(X\in \mathsf {CLOP}(D'),\) \(\lnot X= D'\setminus X\) is the complement of X in \(D'\).

Throughout this paper the boolean algebras A and B are identified with their isomorphic copies \( (\mathsf {CLOP}(A'),\emptyset , A',\cup ,\cap , \lnot )\) and \((\mathsf {CLOP}(B'),\emptyset , B',\cup ,\cap , \lnot )\) given by Stone theorem.

Suppose now that \(A\cup B\) generates C. Then [(Koppelberg 1989, p. 161), (Sikorski 1960, p. 40)], A and B are independent subalgebras of C iff the free product \(A\oplus B\) (“boolean product” in (Sikorski 1960, p. 40) is isomorphic to C. The following lemma is a routine corollary of Stone duality:

Lemma 2.2

[(Koppelberg 1989, equation(1), p. 161], (Sikorski 1960, p. 41)) If A and B are independent subalgebras of C and \(A\cup B\) generates C then C is isomorphic to the boolean algebra \((\mathsf {CLOP}(A'\times B'), \emptyset , A'\times B',\cup ,\cap , \lnot )\), where \(A'\times B'\) is the cartesian product of the Stone spaces \(A'\) and \(B'\), with the product topology.

(Finitely additive, normalized) measures on a boolean algebra A have been defined in Subsect. 1.5.

Lemma 2.3

(De Finetti no Dutch Book theorem; de Finetti 1931, 1937, 1974; Dickey and Eaton 2009, Theorem 3.2; Kemeny 1955; Lehman 1955) Let A be a boolean algebra, \(A^*\) a finite subset of A, and \(\beta :A^*\rightarrow {{\mathrm{[0,1]}}}\) a map. Then \(\beta \) is a coherent book iff it can be extended to a measure on A.

We refer to Tao (2011) and Tao (2010) for measure spaces, probability measures and \(\sigma \)-finiteness of measures and/or measure spaces.

Lemma 2.4

(Weak form of Carathéodory extension theorem; Tao 2010, pp. 277–280) Let S be a totally disconnected compact Hausdorff space, i.e., a Stone space. Then every finitely additive \(\sigma \)-finite measure m on the clopen subsets of S uniquely extends to a countably additive measure on the Borel sets of S. (If \(m(S)=1\) then m is automatically \(\sigma \)-finite.)

Lemma 2.5

(Existence and uniqueness of product measure, Tao 2011, Proposition 1.7.11, p. 163) Suppose \((X,\mathcal B(X),\mu )\) and \((Y,\mathcal B(Y),\nu )\) are \(\sigma \) -finite measure spaces. Then there is a unique measure \(\xi \) on the product \(\sigma \)-algebra \(\mathcal B(X)\times \mathcal B(Y)\) satisfying \(\xi (E\times F)=\mu (E)\nu (F)\) for all \(E\in \mathcal B(X)\) and \(F\in \mathcal B(Y).\) \(\xi \) is called the product measure of \(\mu \) and \(\nu \).

It would be desirable to have a direct proof of Theorem 2.1 that does not make use of all the lemmas of this section.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mundici, D. Coherence of de Finetti coherence. Synthese 194, 4055–4063 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1126-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1126-9

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation