Skip to main content

Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation

Synthese volume 174, pages 99–149 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

The mass/count distinction attracts a lot of attention among cognitive scientists, possibly because it involves in fundamental ways the relation between language (i.e. grammar), thought (i.e. extralinguistic conceptual systems) and reality (i.e. the physical world). In the present paper, I explore the view that the mass/count distinction is a matter of vagueness. While every noun/concept may in a sense be vague, mass nouns/concepts are vague in a way that systematically impairs their use in counting. This idea has never been systematically pursued, to the best of my knowledge. I make it precise relying on supervaluations (more specifically, ‘data semantics’) to model it. I identify a number of universals pertaining to how the mass/count contrast is encoded in the languages of the world, along with some of the major dimensions along which languages may vary on this score. I argue that the vagueness based model developed here provides a useful perspective on both. The outcome (besides shedding light on semantic variation) seems to suggest that vagueness is not just an interface phenomenon that arises in the interaction of Universal Grammar (UG) with the Conceptual/Intentional System (to adopt Chomsky’s terminology), but it is actually part of the architecture of UG.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Barker C. (1992) Group terms in English: Representing groups as atoms. Journal of Semantics 9: 69–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barner D., Snedeker J. (2005) Quantity judgments and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition 97: 41–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borer H. (2005) Structuring sense. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bunt H. (1979) Ensembles and the formal semantic properties of mass terms. In: Pelletier F. J. (eds) Mass terms: Some philosophical problems. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G. (1997). Reference to kinds in English. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Published in 1980 by Garland, NY.

  • Cheng L., Sybesma R. (1998) Yi-wang Tang, yi-ge Tang: Classifiers and massifiers. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies XXVIII(3): 385–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G. (1984). Topics in the syntax and semantic of infinitives and gerunds. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Published in 1989 by Garland, NY.

  • Chierchia G. (1998a) Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter’. In: Rothstein S. (eds) Events and grammar. Kluwer, Dordrecth

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia G. (1998b) Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6: 339–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia G. (2004) Scalar implicature polarity phenomena and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In: Belletti A. (eds) Structures and beyond. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia G. (2005) Definites, locality, and intentional identity. In: Carlson G., Pelletier J. (eds) Reference and quantification. CSLI, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia G., Turner R. (1988) Semantics and property theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 261–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G., Fox, D., & Spector, B. (2008). The grammatical theory of scalar implicatures. In C. Maierborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (forthcoming).

  • Dayal V. (2004) Number marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(4): 393–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine K. (1975) Truth, vagueness and logic. Synthese 30: 265–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox C. (1998) Plurals and mass terms in property theory. In: Hamm F., Hinrichs E. (eds) Plurality and quantification. Kluwer, Dordrecth

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajewski, J. (2002). L-analyticity and natural language. Manuscript, University of Connecticut at Storrs.

  • Gallin D. (1975) Intensional and higher order logic. North Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillon B. (1992) Towards a common semantics for English count and mass nouns. Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 597–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, C. (2009). Mass, count and plurality in Innu-aimun. Paper presented at SULA V, Harvard/MIT, May 2009.

  • Grimshaw J. (2000) Extended projection and locality. In: Coopmans P., Everaert M., Grimshaw J. (eds) Lexical specification and insertion. J. Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M., & Spaulding, B. (2006). Wild rhesus monkeys generate causal inferences about possible and impossible physical transformations in the absence of experience. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 103, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Published in 1989 by Garland, NY.

  • Higginbotham J. (1994) Mass and count quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy 17: 447–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn L. (1989) A natural history of negation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. (2006). Analyticity, variation and change. In International conference of East Asian Linguistics, University of Toronto.

  • Ionin T., Matushansky O. (2006) The composition of complex cardinals. Journal of Semantics 23: 315–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamp H. (1975) Two theories about adjectives. In: Keenan E. (eds) Formal semantics of natural language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy C. (2007) Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky P. (1982) From cyclic phonolophy to lexical phonology. In: van der Hulst H., Smith N. (eds) The structure of phonological representation. Foris, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein E. (1980) A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer A. (1989) An investigation into the lumps of thought. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 607–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M. (2008). Masses and countables. Paper presented and the workshop “The Syntax and Semantics of Measurement”, University of Tromsø.

  • Kurafuji, T. (2003). Plural morphemes, definiteness and the notion of semantic parameter. In The proceedings of the third GLOW in Asia.

  • Landman F. (1989) Groups I. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 559–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landman F. (1991) Structures for semantics. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman F. (2004) Indefinites and the type of sets. Blackwell, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lasersohn P. (1999) Pragmatic halos. Language 75: 522–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson S. (2000) Presumptive meaning. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y.-H. A. (1999) Plurality in a classifier language. Journal of East Asian Language 8: 75–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, G. (1983). The logical analysis of plural and mass terms: A lattice theoretic approach. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, use and interpretation of language (pp. 302–323). Berlin: de Gruyer.

  • Lonning J.-T. (1987) Mass terms and quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy 10: 1–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longobardi G. (1994) Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 609–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, E. (2009). On the count/mass distinction in Ojibwe. Paper presented at the workshop on parts and quantities, University of British Columbia, November 2007.

  • McGee V., McLaughlin B. (1998) Vagueness by Timothy Williamson. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moro A. (2008) The boundaries of Babel. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier J., Schubert L. (1989) Mass expressions. In: Gabbay D., Guenthner F. (eds) Handbook of philsophical logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkal M. (1989) Imprecise concepts and quantification. In: Bartsch R., van Benthem J., Emde Boas P. (eds) Semantics and contextual expressions. Foris, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine W. (1960) Word and object. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine W. (1969) Ontological relativity and other essays. Columbia University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, S. (2008). Counting and the mass/count distinction, ms. Bar Ilan University, Tel Aviv.

  • Sauerland, U. (2003). A new semantics for number. In R. Young & Y. Zhou (Eds.), Proceedings of SALT 13. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, Cornell University

  • Schwarzschild R. (1996) Pluralities. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (2007). Mass nouns and stubbornly distributive predicates. Paper presented at the Harvard Colloquium Series, September 2007, STUBs/ Pluralities

  • Soja N., Carey S., Spelke E. (1991) Ontological categories guide young children’s inductions of word meanings: Object terms and substance terms. Cognition 38: 179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector B. (2007) Aspects of the pragmatics of plural morphology: On higher-order implicatures. In: Sauerland U., Stateva P. (eds) Presuppositions and implicatures in compositional semantics. Palgrave-Macmillan, Hampshire, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Steriade D. (2008) A pseudo-cyclic effect in romanian morphophonology. In: Bachrach A., Nevins A. (eds) Inflectional identity. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoulas, G. (2006). Plurality of mass nouns and the grammar of number. Paper presented at the 29th glow meeting, Barcelona.

  • Van Fraassen B. (1971) Formal semantics and logic. McMillan, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Veltman, F. (1985). Logics for conditional. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

  • Wilhelm A. (2008) Bare Nouns in Dëne Sułine. Natural Language Semantics 16: 39–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson T. (1994) Vagueness. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamparelli, R. (2008). Bare predicate nominals in romance languages. In H. Høeg Müller & A. Klinge (Eds.), Essays on nominal determination. John Benjamins.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA

    Gennaro Chierchia

Authors
  1. Gennaro Chierchia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gennaro Chierchia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chierchia, G. Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese 174, 99–149 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9686-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9686-6

Keywords

  • Atomicity
  • Classifiers
  • Mass/count
  • Parameters
  • Singular/plural
  • Supervaluations